From owner-freebsd-arch  Thu Jun 20 16:31:45 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from ns2.gnf.org (ns2.gnf.org [63.196.132.68])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BB20B37B403; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gnf.org (smtp.gnf.org [172.25.11.11])
	by ns2.gnf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5KNI6O31508;
	Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gordon@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mail.gnf.org (Postfix, from userid 888)
	id 1FC6211E515; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.gnf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1EA4011A572; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gordon Tetlow <gordon@FreeBSD.org>
X-X-Sender: gordont@smtp.gnf.org
To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, <arch@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: MFC of src/etc/rc.subr
In-Reply-To: <3D1197E0.26BCCA08@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206201631040.28471-100000@smtp.gnf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Doug Barton wrote:

> Terry Lambert wrote:
> > 
> > Doug Barton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> > > > I'm going to MFC src/etc/rc.subr into -STABLE probably tomorrow unless
> > > > someone has some grevious reason that it shouldn't.
> > >
> > > Personally I think it's way too premature to consider this, before we
> > > actually have things working in -current.
> > 
> > Since it won't be turned on by default, this should be a
> > non-problem.  Even if it were turned on, it should *still*
> > not be a problem, until people provide ports rc scripts in
> > the new format.
> > 
> > I think things *are* working in -current.
> 
> My concern is that people will start writing scripts that use these
> interfaces, then we're going to change them. However, if no one else
> objects, I suppose it's ok....

Actually, I think this is a good reason. I'm going to think on it some 
more. I have some ideas I need to flesh out and probably talk with lukem 
about.

-gordon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message