From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 23:51:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C456C16A47E for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D180043CA3 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:51:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1450216nfc for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:51:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=B5vNZc2LqMoOqpsiTrFwjIvVbASqiN9Wj323TDit3xHht9pGnoeG3mqeTaZji27MfEdfomMc3Jkxhhb0DUAHPrVijZHvlktQ5xM7VIre1UUxoyB4IWLyF1lujAzpabvS0pvAuQhWZepwAlNXW/jfmqSdVzKSUZCj6P44o5gX/vc= Received: by 10.82.118.2 with SMTP id q2mr317212buc.1166313063525; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:51:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.191.16 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:51:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:51:03 -0800 From: "Kip Macy" To: "Attilio Rao" In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10612161541t66d0044di70ff9df6444068e1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200612162117.kBGLHR1B088020@repoman.freebsd.org> <3bbf2fe10612161541t66d0044di70ff9df6444068e1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, ache@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_sleepqueue.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:51:07 -0000 it would have to be under ifdef INVARIANTS On 12/16/06, Attilio Rao wrote: > > 2006/12/17, Kip Macy : > > Trying to avoid the aesthetically displeasing nested brackets is why I > made > > the mistake in the first place. > > Why not put 'int i' at the top of the function? > In should be more style compliant in this way. > > Attilio > > > -- > Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein >