From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jan 22 14:43:26 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFE637B401 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:43:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452A043F1E for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:43:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@freebsd.org) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0MMhJ6Z031535; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 23:43:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@freebsd.org) To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Garrett Wollman , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getsysfd() patch #1 (Re: Virtual memory question) From: phk@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:41:24 PST." <200301222241.h0MMfOhv016629@apollo.backplane.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 23:43:19 +0100 Message-ID: <31534.1043275399@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Could you please take this private, and post a summary when you have reached concensus ? Then the rest of us can judge your proposal before anybody spends time creating a patch. Thankyou -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message