From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 21 07:42:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50AE2C351D for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 07:42:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacques+freebsd@foucry.net) Received: from mithril.localdomain (dontpanic.foucry.net [80.67.176.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495wWq39Jyz3wgM for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 07:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacques+freebsd@foucry.net) Received: from mithril.foucry.net (mithril.foucry.net [127.0.0.1]) by mithril.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id A082018C16 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:42:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:42:29 +0200 From: Jacques Foucry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Did I miss something? [inatalling terminator] Message-ID: <20200421074229.GF2970@mithril.foucry.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20200420191935.GA73334@mithril.foucry.net> <20200420205845.a04c1ee6be848c01444e2d51@sohara.org> <20200420201234.GC2970@mithril.foucry.net> <20200420212018.7adfeb3713b143b243d83090@sohara.org> <20200420203102.GD2970@mithril.foucry.net> <0fdbc6f7-926b-fc63-709d-4caa0bd693da@hedeland.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <0fdbc6f7-926b-fc63-709d-4caa0bd693da@hedeland.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 495wWq39Jyz3wgM X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=foucry.net (policy=none) X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.57 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[foucry.net : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.995,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[mithril.localdomain]; HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[mithril.localdomain]; IP_SCORE(-0.97)[ipnet: 80.67.160.0/19(-2.72), asn: 20766(-2.14), country: FR(0.00)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20766, ipnet:80.67.160.0/19, country:FR]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 07:42:32 -0000 Le mardi 21 avr. 2020 à 08:59:25 (+0200), Per Hedeland à écrit: > On 2020-04-20 22:31, Jacques Foucry wrote: > > Le lundi 20 avr. 2020 à 21:20:18 (+0100), Steve O'Hara-Smith à écrit: > >> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:12:34 +0200 > >> Jacques Foucry wrote: > >> > >>> Le lundi 20 avr. 2020 à 20:58:45 (+0100), Steve O'Hara-Smith à écrit: > >>>> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 21:19:35 +0200 > >>>> Jacques Foucry wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> pkg search terminator did not give me any awswer. > >>>>> > >>>>> So, what's wrong? What' your thought about it? > >>>> > >>>> These lines in the port Makefile seem to be the reason. > >>>> > >>>> DEPRECATED= Old, uses EOLed python27 > >>>> EXPIRATION_DATE= 2020-02-28 > >>> > >>> Hug& > >>> > >>> Don't find those lines on the Makefile in my port three: > >>> Instaed, concerning python, I have those lines: > >>> > >>> USES= gnome python:3.5+ shebangfix > >> > >> looks like my ports tree needs an update :) > > > > :-) > > > > I made an update just befor compiling. :-) > > > >> > >>> USE_GNOME= intltool pygobject3 vte3 > >>> USE_PYTHON= autoplist distutils > >>> > >>> And it compile perfectly on my system > >> > >> Quarterly packages perhaps ? > > > > No, I use lastest: > > The port was un-deprecated only the day before you posted your > message, see > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/x11/terminator/Makefile?r1=532123&r2=532122&pathrev=532123 > - I would guess there's some delay before such changes take effect for > the package bulding. Ok, thanks for take time to digginگ into svn. Take care (all of you) -- Jacques Foucry