Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:51:03 +0200 From: Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> To: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Jail <freebsd-jail@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: New jail(8) committed Message-ID: <4F9BD9A7.3070107@erdgeist.org> In-Reply-To: <20120428060830.GA47982@DataIX.net> References: <4F99AB0E.4090805@FreeBSD.org> <4F9B6E8F.8070708@erdgeist.org> <20120428060830.GA47982@DataIX.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28.04.12 08:08, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > Since when does a lack of a parser in "YOUR tool" become a problem for > FreeBSD ? just sayin! I mixed a reply to Bjoern A. Zeeb's question about ezjail supporting the config format in <C79A7703-7626-42B1-959D-055F16C071E9@lists.zabbadoz.net> into the remarks I had about the general design decisions. Of course, the FreeBSD project is free to deliver any infrastructural code it chooses. My objections to the jail.conf may be biased, but I still stand by them and am still curios. > 10.X is not due for a while anyway. Should give you time to adjust. No, ezjail is completely written in sh, so there is little chance to "adjust". Implementing a config file parser is out of the question. Regards, erdgeist
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F9BD9A7.3070107>