From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Dec 23 12:54:54 2000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 23 12:54:52 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from grizzly.fas.com (cc69528-a.mtpls1.sc.home.com [24.6.61.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1DC37B400 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 12:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by grizzly.fas.com ($Revision: 1.37.109.23 $/16.2) id AA103924888; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 15:54:48 -0500 Subject: Any reason NOT to upgrade perl on a STABLE machine? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (Free BSD Questions list) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 15:54:48 -0500 (EST) From: "Stan Brown" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20001223205451.9B1DC37B400@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there any reason that I should NOT upgrade to a later version of perl, than is bundled by default with STABLE? -- Stan Brown stanb@awod.com 843-745-3154 Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 2000 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message