Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:57:17 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: sclark46@earthlink.net, freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Subject: Re: 6.x acpi powerbutton Message-ID: <49EDFAED.4030606@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <49E8E6E3.40304@root.org> References: <49DE1F8B.2080400@earthlink.net> <49DE2E6D.5050001@icyb.net.ua> <49DE596E.2050406@earthlink.net> <49DEFF53.1040306@icyb.net.ua> <49DF7A1C.90009@root.org> <20090418043432.O34434@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <49E8D824.1000001@root.org> <20090417200726.GG3014@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <49E8E6E3.40304@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 17/04/2009 23:30 Nate Lawson said the following:
> Sure. Perhaps Andriy will pick up this task after reworking the suspend
> path code for S5? It seems related.
Oh I think that this would be a much easier and independent task.
Right now I have the following in my local tree, but I think that it might be
better to limit the message to S5 state only, so that people with laptops do not
complain about extra spam.
diff --git a/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c b/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c
index 8a592d2..f3e0c1f 100644
--- a/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c
+++ b/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c
@@ -2169,6 +2169,8 @@ acpi_ReqSleepState(struct acpi_softc *sc, int state)
if (state < ACPI_STATE_S1 || state > ACPI_STATE_S5)
return (EINVAL);
+ printf("acpi: request to enter S%d sleep state\n", state);
+
/* S5 (soft-off) should be entered directly with no waiting. */
if (state == ACPI_STATE_S5) {
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_EnterSleepState(sc, state)))
--
Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49EDFAED.4030606>