Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:52:05 -0500 From: Jerry <freebsd.user@seibercom.net> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: putting "/tmp" to memory Message-ID: <20110124075205.4632d037@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20110124121821.107c2061@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <12db3210cd2.-2509072410058136592.-3952788888916668261@zoho.com> <20110124121821.107c2061@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:18:21 +0000 RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> articulated: > I have > > tmpfs /tmp tmpfs rw,size=4280000000 > > I would suggest you don't use tmpmfs="YES" in rc.conf unless you are > being very conservative with a production server. tmpfs is nominally > experimental, but it seems to be very stable, and it's much more > memory efficient than md devices. On a FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE, I have the following: cat /etc/fstab | grep -i "tmpfs" tmpfs /tmp tmpfs rw,mode=01777 0 0 It works very well and I have not noticed any problems whatsoever. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Critics are like eunuchs in a harem: they know how it is done, they have seen it done every day, but they are unable to do it themselves. Brendan Behan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110124075205.4632d037>