Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Jan 1998 21:17:09 +0300
From:      Dmitrij Tejblum <tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru>
To:        Андрей Чернов <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru
Subject:   Re: amanda port, empty PATCH_STRIP= lines causes trouble 
Message-ID:  <199801191817.VAA19292@yandex.hq.cti.ru>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jan 1998 21:10:09 %2B0300." <Pine.BSF.3.96.980119210426.20149A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:
> 
> > Indeed, in old patch context diff header (i.e. "***" and "---" lines)
> > takes precedence over an Index: line. But new patch simple *ignore*
> > Index: line, unless POSIXLY_CORRECT environment variable is set. 
> 
> The subject discussed is exactly that Index: and ***/--- lines order.
> If old one consider ***/--- first and new one simple ignore Index:, it
> means that _both_ treat CVS generated diffs equally, i.e. don't pay any
> attention on Index:

Nope. I just posted example of old behavior. Old patch looked at ***/--- 
lines, could not find file to patch, and *after it* looked at Index: line, 
and could find this file. New patch ignore Index: even after it couldn't find 
file in ***/--- lines. This is the difference.

Dima





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801191817.VAA19292>