Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 May 1995 02:41:27 +0900
From:      hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp (HOSOKAWA Tatsumi)
To:        phk@ref.tfs.com
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp
Subject:   Re: Bug of if_ze is serious! (Re: Help! if_ze bug?)
Message-ID:  <199505071741.CAA03062@remington.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 7 May 1995 09:08:54 -0700 (PDT). <199505071608.JAA10106@ref.tfs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199505071608.JAA10106@ref.tfs.com>
phk@ref.tfs.com writes:

>> I'm running just fine...

My card comes to work fine now.  But I can't explain why it works.

When I configured the ze with

  device ze0 at isa? port 0x320 net irq 5 iomem 0xd0000 flags 0x10 
	vector zeintr

the sending packet corrupts, but configured it

  device ze0 at isa? port 0x320 net irq 5 iomem 0xd4000 flags 0x10 
	vector zeintr

it works fine...  Hmm....

The former ioaddr is default value.  Why it does not work on the
former configuration?

--
	HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi              E-mail: hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp
	  WWW homepage: http://www.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp/person/hosokawa.html
	Department of Computer Science, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199505071741.CAA03062>