From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 10 17:36:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81151772; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from mail.mahoroba.org (ent.mahoroba.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:8010::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1BFB1E; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuga.mahoroba.org (ume@yuga-m.mahoroba.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:8016:7258:12ff:fe22:d94b]) (user=ume mech=DIGEST-MD5 bits=0) by mail.mahoroba.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP/inet6 id r0AHaHYA086963 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:36:17 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:36:08 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: Ulrich =?ISO-2022-JP-2?B?U3AbJChEK1MbKEJybGVpbg==?= Subject: Re: sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1 In-Reply-To: <20130109192828.GM35868@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <20130109.073354.730245417155474512.hrs@allbsd.org> <50ED6D2A.5080908@boland.org> <20130109142111.GL35868@acme.spoerlein.net> <20130109.234210.397446040718957005.hrs@allbsd.org> <20130109192828.GM35868@acme.spoerlein.net> User-Agent: xcite1.60> Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-2022-JP-2?B?R29qGyQoRCtXGyhC?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/24.2 (i386-portbld-freebsd9.1) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE X-PGP-Key: http://www.mahoroba.org/~ume/publickey.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F00 0B9E 2164 70FC 6DC5 BF5F 04E9 F086 BF90 71FE MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP-2 X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mail.mahoroba.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:8010::1]); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:36:19 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at asuka.mahoroba.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on asuka.mahoroba.org Cc: michiel@boland.org, stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:36:37 -0000 Hi, >>>>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 20:28:28 +0100 >>>>> Ulrich Sp$(D+S(Brlein said: uqs> The source address problem I'm now talking about is happening on my uqs> router at home, which has a Sixxs tunnel and needs to use AICCU of all uqs> things to talk to the outside world, sixxs-aiccu will create the tun(4) uqs> interface and set it up like this: uqs> tun0: flags=8051 metric 0 mtu 1280 uqs> options=80000 uqs> inet6 fe80::230:5ff:fe77:e7a0%tun0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd uqs> inet6 fe80::2428:ff00:1b:2%tun0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd uqs> inet6 2a02:2528:ff00:1b::2 --> 2a02:2528:ff00:1b::1 prefixlen 128 uqs> nd6 options=21 uqs> Opened by PID 82756 uqs> and I'd like to have ipv6 connection originating from this host use uqs> 2a02:2528:ff0d::1%em0 instead of 2a02:2528:ff00:1b::2%tun0 as the uqs> outgoing address. That tun0 interface can come and go, btw, which uqs> complicates things. Is this possible? Or should I just switch to the one uqs> local DSL provide I have here that actually offers native IPv6 for home uqs> DSL users? It is impossible with RFC 6724 / 3484 as hrs@ said. So, I made modification. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.mahoroba.org/~ume/