Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:31:19 -0600
From:      "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>
To:        Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: PLEASE REVIEW: MAINTAINER policy addendum to porters-handbook
Message-ID:  <20040108223119.GO48603@over-yonder.net>
In-Reply-To: <1073600861.752.65.camel@gyros>
References:  <1073599686.752.62.camel@gyros> <20040108221340.GY8322@submonkey.net> <1073600861.752.65.camel@gyros>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:27:41PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Joe Marcus Clarke, and lo! it spake thus:
> 
> > 
> > > +        <para>If the maintainer of a port does not respond to a an update
> > > +          request from a user after two weeks (excluding holidays), then
> > 
> > I wouldn't normally be picky, but this is a policy definition.
> 
> You're absolutely right.  Do you have a suggestion on how this can be
> clarified?  Thanks.

How about something like "after two weeks (taking common holidays into
account)"?


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd@over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/

"The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I
      haven't figured out how to light the middle yet"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040108223119.GO48603>