Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 21:24:13 +0000 (GMT) From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: thorpej@nas.nasa.gov, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What is wrong with this snipet? Message-ID: <199709152124.VAA02342@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199709141527.KAA00185@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at "Sep 14, 97 10:27:52 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John S. Dyson wrote: > We are going to be supporting a super efficient threads scheme that uses > the RFMEM capability. Sample code to use RFMEM is available upon request. > It is already being used in commercial multi-threaded applications, but > isn't ready for inclusion in FreeBSD (yet), due to a lack of more general > userland support. RFMEM supports full address space sharing in FreeBSD, > and it is a bug otherwise (whomever implemented it first.) Excuse my ignorance, I'm a bit out of touch, but is your RFMEM work in the kernel ready to support a threaded libc? If so, that is good news! > > -- > John > dyson@freebsd.org > jdyson@nc.com Regards, -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@netbsd.org; jb@freebsd.org CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709152124.VAA02342>