From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 1 20:31:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82346106566C for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:31:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.eu [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9AD8FC1A for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-63-16.51-151.net24.it [151.51.16.63]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n21KUvnd046573 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:31:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n21KZMnS083978; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:35:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <49AAF0AC.6080704@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:31:40 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <49AAAA1C.4080804@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tandberg RDX QuikStor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:31:56 -0000 Wojciech Puchar ha scritto: >> Hello. >> Has anyone been using the above (either USB or SATA)? >> Do they work with FreeBSD? > > i don't see a reason it should not. Although they are HD, they are sold as tape replacement. I was told they are seen as tapes and last time I checked only SCSI tapes were supported by FreeBSD. The whole thing might however not hold and they could be seen for what they are: just hard disks. This is another good question... > anyway - it's cardridges are more expensive than ordinary hard disks - > doesn't make sense. On the cost you are right; they justify this with higher reliability. Whether this is true or not, I don't know. bye & Thanks av.