Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:26:57 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        python@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 231392] print/py-psautohint: Update to 1.9.1
Message-ID:  <bug-231392-21822-G0gmSMCalZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-231392-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-231392-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D231392

--- Comment #11 from Ting-Wei Lan <lantw44@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Steve Wills from comment #8)
I don't like the way of introducing a slave port conflicting with the master
port. I know we can modify all ports depending on py-fonttools to use
py-fonttools-lxml-ufo instead, but the problem will occur again once there =
is a
person who adds a new port depending on py-fonttools. Besides, switching all
ports to use py-fonttools-lxml-ufo defeats the idea of avoiding unnecessary
dependencies, which is the reason why the maintainer of fonttools doesn't w=
ant
to enable all options by default. Not all ports currently using fonttools
require both lxml and ufo features, and we will have to move all ports to
another slave port if there is a port requiring an optional feature which i=
sn't
enabled in the current slave port.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-231392-21822-G0gmSMCalZ>