From owner-freebsd-current Thu Nov 23 12:34:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A060237B4C5 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 12:34:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from newsguy.com (p35-dn02kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [211.0.245.100]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN/) with ESMTP id FAA27887; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 05:34:37 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3A1D7EEF.6A6063F5@newsguy.com> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 05:32:47 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR MIME-Version: 1.0 To: janb@cs.utep.edu Cc: David Greenman , Julian Elischer , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: slight improvement in locore.s? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG janb@cs.utep.edu wrote: > > It does not impair readability. As long as that is true, I believe its > prudent to save every byte possible... My two cents. It's an improvement in speed (unmeasurable, granted :) and size (a couple of bytes). It doesn't have any disadvantage. So, if someone is willing to commit it, there really shouldn't be any objection to it. As silly as the improvement it, contest it is even more silly. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@united.bsdconspiracy.net "All right, Lieutenant, let's see what you do know. Whatever it is, it's not enough, but at least you haven't done anything stupid yet." "I've hardly had time, sir." "There's a naive statement." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message