From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct 19 20:38:45 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: openoffice@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6291D1065670;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:38:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.129])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2400C8FC20;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:38:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it)
Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275)
	id 99B2F730A8; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:42:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:42:50 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20081019204250.GA71544@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
References: <20081019145234.GA67034@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
	<48FB9617.4070004@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <48FB9617.4070004@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, openoffice@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: unreasonable amount of memory used in openoffice build
X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD <freebsd-openoffice.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:38:45 -0000

On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 01:18:31PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> 
> > I would suggest to apply the fix unconditionally
> 
> Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see the part where you said, "I tested
> this fix and it worked for me."

"i tested this fix and it worked for me".

:)

but you are right, i should have said it.
I started the build of openoffice yesterday afternoon, without the patch,
and the build died twice on my laptop (512MB ram + 1GB swap)
after spending hours with the compiler looping around 'swread'.

When I applied the patch after lunch today, the build of the offending
file went smootly as the rest of the components, and in some 30min
since i restarted the build i managed to complete and install
openoffice 3.0.

	cheers
	luigi