Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Mar 2003 16:06:43 +0300
From:      "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil login.conf.5
Message-ID:  <20030303130643.GA25214@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20030303122609.GA9305@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
References:  <200303030509.h2359Ofb036507@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030303095422.GA20923@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303101518.GA8214@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030303103819.GA22044@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303115011.GA8705@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030303120707.GA24280@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303122609.GA9305@HAL9000.homeunix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 04:26:09 -0800, David Schultz wrote:

> Look at usr.bin/passwd/Makefile,v 1.45 and the subsequent commit
> that removed usr.bin/passwd/local_passwd.c.

It is removing from the utility, not from the library. All it means that
this utility not relay on this library feature anymore. It not means that
this future should be removed from the library too, because _other_ 
(f.e. non-base) utilities may relay on that feature.

> Aah, this is a separate issue.  The other items I removed are not
> implemented, and they never have been implemented since the
> creation of the login.conf manpage six years ago.  A little while
> ago, I was thinking about writing a daemon to enforce some
> accounting limits.  If I ever get around to writing one and manage
> to get it integrated into the base system, I will be sure to
> document it in the appropriate place.
> 
> FWIW, ports/sysutils/blimitd adds support for one of these
> options, but I think the general consensus is that system manpages
> should not document third-party utilities.

We need to clarify what "implemented" term means relating to that items
(including minpassword*). For them LOGIN_CAP library are merely
placeholder, like termcap database, i.e. they not means to be implemeted
somehow in the library code, but utilities get them to obtain their values
and set limits by itself. Like in termcap, their commonly used names are 
documented in single centralized place. Other way you try to implement 
will cause each utility will invent its own name, and all of them, 
duplicating and probably conflicting with each other, will pollute 
/etc/login.conf

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-src" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030303130643.GA25214>