Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 03 Apr 2015 17:05:32 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 199109] Regression seen with ncurses on 11-current
Message-ID:  <bug-199109-8-eDDE5DyDuG@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199109-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-199109-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199109

Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rafan@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #4 from Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #3)
These are in the header files.

I wonder if they should be defined as 1?  Because the linker is complaining
about a missing symbol, it suggests the accessors are functions and not macros.

What's the side effect if we make the library NCURSES_OPAQUE?  It sounds like
it doesn't change the ABI but will potentially break certain applications that
accesses the internals directly?

Adding rafan@ just in case.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199109-8-eDDE5DyDuG>