Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Nov 2000 06:46:47 -0800
From:      Chip <chip@wiegand.org>
To:        cjclark@alum.mit.edu
Cc:        Justin Thomas <justin@jdthomas.net>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Port Forwarding
Message-ID:  <3A0FFED7.60AD7760@wiegand.org>
References:  <3A0F4B2E.ED0F8AE9@jdthomas.net> <3A0F5580.15136507@wiegand.org> <20001112210737.V75251@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <3A0F8305.98BEBEAE@wiegand.org> <20001112232808.W75251@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Crist J . Clark" wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 09:58:29PM -0800, Chip wrote:
> > "Crist J . Clark" wrote:
> > >
> > > [Broken line wraps from sender not repaired.]
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 06:44:16PM -0800, Chip wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > > > I do this on my home network, to forward incoming http requests
> > > > to my
> > > > web server. I changed the natd.conf to this -
> > > >
> > > > use_sockets yes
> > > > port 8668
> > > > alias xxx.xxx.xxx.xx           (enter your ipaddr provided by
> > > > your isp)
> > > > interface xxx                  (enter your nic with the above ip
> > > > addr)
> > >
> > > I am not sure why one would specify both the 'alias_address' and
> > > 'interface' options.
> >
> > Well, to be quite honest with you, I don't either. It's just the
> > way I
> > was instructed by someone on this list some months back to set it
> > up.
> > I don't recall who, and it probably doesn't matter. It works this
> > way,
> > whether it's right or not. So, if I don't need to specify both,
> > which
> > one can I get rid of?
> 
> It depends. If you have multiple addresses on the interface, use the
> 'alias_address' option to tell natd which to use. If the interface has
> an address that changes with time (e.g. DHCP), you really should go
> with the 'interface' (and 'dynamic' too). If you have one address and
> it is static... it's a toss up. I think the more traditional way to go
> is just specify the interface.
> 
> BTW, Mozilla is really mauling your line wrapping.
> --
> Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu

Thanks for the info. The line wrapping problem is on mine? I
don't let 
the mozilla settings be used, I always hit enter to end a line,
as here.
Maybe there is another problem related to this, or I should just
make
the lines shorter. I hit enter after the words 'let', 'here', and
'make'
on the first three lines, so now I can see what's going on too.
Maybe 
it could be that your mailer wraps the lines about 5 or 10
characters
shorter than I am writing? I can make them shorter, doesn't
matter
much to me, just whatever works best for everyone else.
I appreciate the help.

-- 
Chip W.	
www.wiegand.org
Alternative Operating Systems


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A0FFED7.60AD7760>