Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Nov 2013 22:57:09 +1000
From:      Da Rock <freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What is the "thinnest" display manager available?
Message-ID:  <52973DA5.1070700@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <l731r4$va4$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <mailman.1623.1385415415.1391.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> < 20131126073256.GC788@lena.kiev> <52946150.2060505@rawbw.com> < 20131126095907.05990916.freebsd@edvax.de> <l731r4$va4$1@ger.gmane.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 11/27/13 06:55, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:59:07 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
>
>> Source: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/x-xdm.html
>>
>> Allow me to ask the following question:
>>
>> Is xdm (and as far as I know, also wdm) still an exception from the
>> "rc.conf rule", or how is it supposed to be started on "more modern"
>> versions?
> I'd be interested in the answer to that too, as I use XDM on ttyv8 per
> the handbook, and it has been faultless for me.
I still use ttys like Polytropon, but I believe recommended practice is 
to use an rc.d system - just nobody has/could be bothered actually 
writing one :D

Maybe I'll (or someone else) get a round tuit one day, but I wouldn't 
hold your breath: it's been on the books for near a decade :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52973DA5.1070700>