From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 20 19:18:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA05079 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 19:18:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Kitten.mcs.com (Kitten.mcs.com [192.160.127.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA05026 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 19:17:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from font@Mars.mcs.net) Received: from Mars.mcs.net (font@Mars.mcs.net [192.160.127.85]) by Kitten.mcs.com (8.8.7/8.8.2) with ESMTP id VAA18430 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 21:17:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (font@localhost) by Mars.mcs.net (8.8.7/8.8.2) with SMTP id VAA14643 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 21:17:57 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 21:17:57 -0600 (CST) From: Font To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: netatalk and ddp_route: still have no valid route Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I've just upgraded a machine from 2.2.2-R to 2.2-980119-SNAP, and have remade the kernel with the NETATALK option enabled. During bootup, after ifconfig'ing but before rc.atalk is run, I get the bold/bright error message ddp_route: still have no valid route twice. Where it shows up is not consistent other than as described above. After rc.atalk completes, accesses from Macintoshes works fine (haven't tried printing yet, but disk mounts are just fine). Since it works, I probably shouldn't be too worried, but in the odd case that I'm doing something odd that I shouldn't be, I thought I'd ask the list. Are there any gotchas of which I am unaware? A nearly identical configuration was fine under 2.2.2-R; I've upgraded this one to keep somewhat in line with the rest of my servers, running 2.2.5-R. A bug in my MUA causes news.announce.newusers font to be sent to beneficiaries and senders of UCE/SPAM. @ mcs.net Wishes are like dishes.