From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 19 20:02:28 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0E3DD5D;
 Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:02:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com (mail-qc0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B82A13A5;
 Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:02:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id e16so1415582qcx.13
 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:02:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=qJMm4nownejKCUhRZ8EPTQ5pfhPt6bh+h2BiexpNTxg=;
 b=FyQtD0V4vV194zQN54pcVE4MmXMWSjyLfyy3z+zSqZK82uMjFcVcLGJnkMTDvN/VGY
 wzUtorzIK8mS0A1SulrQ0W5Nd/i8FUPkiLeda0v57s803blfh1lDhvfINcuv6Hr9dLn+
 00maD2lI+ntzm73Ser5X7evvZ5m3BTyN5b1T+TO/d1cIqmQ4CkK2EeWonHwN6lH4RTTJ
 QrdgAnRC6MJonByUEEkim4GSIaDeike1EJhxrZSDf2UsPMQAYNkDyEsb87OEFf4TWgNp
 59gYyZSyRjvBdxugm+fDAh4afHSZgxKCO5oAJTzzWqASL+DCtoaIInkVC8C+06N2ogia
 3ZJQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.24.4 with SMTP id t4mr6601693qcb.13.1387483347405; Thu,
 19 Dec 2013 12:02:27 -0800 (PST)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.53.200 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:02:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <FB1A916C-7ABA-4FFD-A79A-CF757E83F6E8@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <1387204500.12061.60192349.19EAE1B4@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <CAJ-VmonGE2=vmFOnCtLVLyNp0=F+NUd6OdU6=rROH_PWkyXSDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <FB1A916C-7ABA-4FFD-A79A-CF757E83F6E8@lurchi.franken.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:02:27 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: iITaZI1yTLhSSSA2RjkuQshU2ig
Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=D+Tq4SNJsEK5a4Aw9as34m31hutU+wQ1GqqaD2a3zVg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 10.0-RC1: bad mbuf leak?
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
 FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>,
 Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:02:28 -0000

On 19 December 2013 01:09, Michael Tuexen
<Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> Hm, try reverting just the em code to that from a 10.0-BETA? Just in
>> case something changed there?
> I saw a similar behaviour without the patches we are discussing (regarding
> ignoring the error).

Hm. Why was that?


-a