Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:14:07 +0000
From:      Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>
To:        Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc:        stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ?
Message-ID:  <6.0.1.1.2.20040226204904.03d1acf8@gid.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.0.20040226145453.06e6ae30@209.112.4.2>
References:  <6.0.3.0.0.20040226131930.10513908@209.112.4.2> <6.0.1.1.2.20040226192403.03dddb28@gid.co.uk> <6.0.3.0.0.20040226145453.06e6ae30@209.112.4.2>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 19:57 26/2/04, Mike Tancsa wrote:

>At 02:26 PM 26/02/2004, Bob Bishop wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>At 18:25 26/2/04, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>>>
>>>em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid [etc]
>>
>>FWIW I get something very similar under 5.2.1-RC2 on my shiny new 
>>ThinkPad T41, so it's likely just not recognised.
>
>Actually, I worked around the problem by swapping its location with an fxp 
>next to it.  For some reason the em does not seem to like sharing its 
>interrupt with agp0 ? The fxp seems happy enough to do it however.

Oh great. All the PCI devices on my TP are sharing int 11, but it all works 
fine under WinXP. Maybe I should try without ACPI...

--
Bob Bishop		    +44 (0)118 977 4017
rb@gid.co.uk		fax +44 (0)118 989 4254



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.1.1.2.20040226204904.03d1acf8>