Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 19:41:34 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/portaudit-db/database portaudit.txt portaudit.xlist portaudit.xml Message-ID: <59A4C7E0-EEE2-11D8-87C4-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040815162939.GB3559@lum.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > The commit message seems to be incomplete. The 670% increase in > portaudit.xml seems to be largely a number of entries that are also in > ports/security/vuxml/vuln.xml, although the text and references seem to > be rewritten in most (all?) cases and different UUIDs have been > assigned. Yup, they use the UUIDs they had assigned in portaudit, before they have been re-added with different UUIDs to vuxml. > I'm not sure what portaudit.xml is for, but it seems a bit confusing to > have some issues described differently in two different locations. > Maybe > you could clue me in as to what is going on? Seems like we need to > normalize this data. Those entries are tested and work with portaudit. It seems like vuxml has different requirements. -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59A4C7E0-EEE2-11D8-87C4-00039312D914>