From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 12 17:43:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8280D37B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:43:56 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA92673; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 02:43:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Warner Losh Cc: Peter Wemm , Daniel Eischen , John Indra , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) References: <200102130120.f1D1KpU56194@mobile.wemm.org> <200102130131.f1D1VrW33790@harmony.village.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 13 Feb 2001 02:43:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "13 Feb 2001 02:42:15 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > When we back down to 5, we add magic to the Makefiles to move > libc.so.5?? to /usr/lib/compat - that way they're only used when > needed at runtime, not for linking new programs. Umm, never mind this gross hack; as Peter pointed out, it's not a problem. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message