Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:33:47 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org> To: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports CHANGES UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.port.mk ports/accessibility/linux-atk Makefile pkg-plist ports/archivers/stuffit Makefile ports/astro/linux-setiathome Makefile ports/audio/baudline Makefile ports/audio/linux-arts ... Message-ID: <20050628103347.1bea84ea@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20050627201024.GA13404@soaustin.net> References: <200506172259.j5HMxTad068378@repoman.freebsd.org> <200506251924.24269.lofi@freebsd.org> <42BDF3D9.6000803@magnesium.net> <20050627131305.GA5802@FreeBSD.org> <1119898902.24833.90.camel@leguin> <20050627201024.GA13404@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:10:24 -0500
linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:01:42PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > * Do not put new ports in X11BASE if you can avoid it.
> > * Move leaf ports to LOCALBASE if you can.
>
> Can anyone think of a good reason (other than the hard work that
> will be involved) not to try to migrate towards this?
I can understand that large infrastructure ports like X.org and GNOME
should be moved last/at once, but why moving leaf ports only?
I suggest to move the discussion to ports@.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Secret hacker rule #11: hackers read manuals.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050628103347.1bea84ea>