Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:13:24 +0000
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        Jason Helfman <jhelfman@e-e.com>
Cc:        doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ambiguities in the Porter's Handbook (was: PR's not being picked up)
Message-ID:  <20101128221324.GA2661@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101123200007.GA46521@eggman.experts-exchange.com>
References:  <AANLkTik7wfhm8hp-Kwfu8HerqYftiYXTCwT6Q83t7Hmv@mail.gmail.com> <201011211909.23708.beech@akherb.com> <20101122052649.GA61979@comcast.net> <4CEA0738.3060701@unfs.us> <20101122072257.GF48679@comcast.net> <20101122131905.318b590c@gumby.homeunix.com> <AANLkTi=Y3MTcyCxKtAkf9AnS-immBwDYAaxXBHerHPES@mail.gmail.com> <20101122192836.GC12467@core.byshenk.net> <20101122220802.GG48679@comcast.net> <20101123200007.GA46521@eggman.experts-exchange.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:00:08PM -0800, Jason Helfman wrote:
> Here is a patch to take care of removing of "updating".

I've committed a version of your two patches, plus some of my own changes,
to try to remove the ambiguities in the text about "new ports" vs. "updating
an existing port".  Several people have tripped over this in the past.

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101128221324.GA2661>