Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Aug 2013 00:38:48 -0700
From:      Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
To:        Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Stable" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Thomas Zenker <thz@zenker.tk>
Subject:   Re: FBSD 9.2 RC crashes running as virtualbox host
Message-ID:  <CAN6yY1tb-KEXcyvdnJ%2B0i6nMxLMxK7-T=40uPJN4wbB53Z3enw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1ud324V5Egptqnt9njsn5BH9qZns4=THJKhCoH9nCy5VA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <520E2DDD.6050900@zenker.tk> <520E2FC8.7010305@zenker.tk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308161458420.65329@wonkity.com> <CAN6yY1uv7Nvxv2dO77vWvm%2BcTxvNwOinn5vZVDvfNbP_c%2BLwFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1ud324V5Egptqnt9njsn5BH9qZns4=THJKhCoH9nCy5VA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Thomas Zenker wrote:
>>>
>>>  On 08/16/13 15:41, Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 2013/8/16 Thomas Zenker <thz@zenker.tk>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> after updating my freebsd amd64 box from 9.1 (r250841) to 9.2-RC
>>>>>> (r254276) virtualbox crashes the machine. Seconds after starting VBOX
>>>>>>
>>>>> After starting VBOX gui or guest machine? If first, try to rebuild
>>>>> userland portion of vbox too.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         After starting a virtual guest machine in the GUI or directly
>>>> from cli
>>>> leads to the crash. The userland has been rebuild w/ 9.2 also. The same
>>>> binaries of the userland portion built with 9.2 work w/o problems in
>>>> 9.1.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Updated to 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r254408 amd64 today, rebuilt and reloaded
>>> the VirtualBox kernel module, and just started a couple of guests from the
>>> GUI with no problems.
>>>
>>
>> Updated to r254416 today.Two crashes when I tried starting VirtualBox
>> 4.16_2. I have both dumps and they ere very different. The first was a
>> "spin lock held too long" and the second was a general protection fault.
>> Both occurred when I attempted to start a saved Windows 7 VM.
>>
>> FreeBSD rogue.local 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r254416M:
>> Fri Aug 16 11:27:20 PDT 2013     root@rogue.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>> amd64
>>
>> #0  doadump (textdump=<value optimized out>) at pcpu.h:234
>> 234     pcpu.h: No such file or directory.
>>         in pcpu.h
>> (kgdb) #0  doadump (textdump=<value optimized out>) at pcpu.h:234
>> #1  0xffffffff80915c66 in kern_reboot (howto=260)
>>     at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:449
>> #2  0xffffffff80916167 in panic (fmt=0x1 <Address 0x1 out of bounds>)
>>     at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:637
>> #3  0xffffffff80cfae80 in trap_fatal (frame=0x9, eva=<value optimized
>> out>)
>>     at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:879
>> #4  0xffffffff80cfb691 in trap (frame=0xffffff8124900830)
>>     at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:605
>> #5  0xffffffff80ce4ac3 in calltrap ()
>>     at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:232
>> #6  0xffffffff80b86015 in vm_map_entry_splay (addr=984915968,
>>     root=0xfffffe002c9af200) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:832
>> #7  0xffffffff80b870f7 in vm_map_lookup_entry (map=0xfffffe007535b640,
>>     address=984915968, entry=0xffffff8124900970)
>>     at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:1080
>> #8  0xffffffff80b8a5cc in vm_map_madvise (map=0xfffffe007535b640,
>>    start=984915968, end=985440256, behav=5) at
>> /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:2050
>> #9  0xffffffff80b8d9e3 in sys_madvise (td=0xfffffe000549e920,
>>     uap=<value optimized out>) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_mmap.c:760
>> #10 0xffffffff80cfa62a in amd64_syscall (td=0xfffffe000549e920, traced=0)
>>     at subr_syscall.c:135
>> #11 0xffffffff80ce4da7 in Xfast_syscall ()
>>     at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:391
>> #12 0x000000002ce13dcc in ?? ()
>> Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>>
>>  I can make the cores and text dumps available. kmod was rebuilt after
>> the upgrade.
>>
>
> Just confirmed that 254050 works fine. Trying 354162 and will continue
> binary hunt till I find it.
>
> I am now up to 254270, at the point of the original failure report. I now
suspect I may have botched the kmod re-install on my original failure. I am
calling it quits of the night now, but will finish tests tomorrow morning.
The updates are pretty few and far between between 270 and the present.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1tb-KEXcyvdnJ%2B0i6nMxLMxK7-T=40uPJN4wbB53Z3enw>