From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 24 13:30:25 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E394037B401 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:30:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.rdslink.ro (mail.rdslink.ro [193.231.236.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE2DE43F93 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:30:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from enache@rdslink.ro) Received: (qmail 21240 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 21:31:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ratsnest.hole) (81.196.245.187) by mail.rdslink.ro with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 21:31:40 -0000 Received: from ratsnest.hole (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ratsnest.hole (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h2OLSaXl001006; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:28:36 +0200 Received: (from adi@localhost) by ratsnest.hole (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id h2OLSa0Y001004; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:28:36 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:28:35 +0200 From: Enache Adrian To: "M. Warner Losh" Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation busted Message-ID: <20030324212835.GA853@ratsnest.hole> References: <20030324.084055.02633450.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030324.084055.02633450.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.5 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:40:55AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > I had a working Linux world on my laptop. I upgraded my kernel and > acroread4 stopped working. Now all I get is: Is acroread4 multithreaded ? Because since about 2 months all multithreaded linux binaries have stopped working for me; I don't know if this because the new glibc 2.2.93 ( I upgraded at the same time to RH 8.0 ) or something in the linux emulation ( I couldn't spot any relevant change there). I didn't have yet the time to investigate, but: - I could reproduce it with small multithreaded test programs. - It seems that the 'thread model' (i.e. what parameters are passed to clone()) hasn't changed in glibc 2.3 Regards Adi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message