From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 13 15:55:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F4D16A4B3 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:55:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [208.142.252.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8090443F75 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:55:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9DMtUc58644; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:55:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:55:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Roberson To: Arjan van Leeuwen In-Reply-To: <200310140043.49108.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Message-ID: <20031013185357.A56213-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE status; interactivity fixed? nice uninvestigated, HTT broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:55:35 -0000 On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > On Monday 13 October 2003 21:27, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > > > On Sunday 12 October 2003 23:21, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors > > > > under some load. I was not able to reproduce this problem with kde > > > > running afterwards. > > > > > > Thanks for the fix! However, the problem is still here for me (using rev. > > > 1.58). I just noticed it when compiling Mozilla. I can also still see it > > > when logging out of GNOME. > > > > Is it somewhat better? I specifically fixed the problem for Giant but > > other locks could have the same issues. I suspect that they are far less > > frequently held without Giant, but I could be wrong. > > Now that I looked at it better, yes, it does indeed seem better :). It still > seems to happen at the same places, but the jerkiness is less... jerky. the > position of the mouse pointer is updated more often than used to be the case. Thanks. This feedback is very important for me to resolve this issues. I think I know how to solve the issue now, I'm going to make the required changes soon. I'll send a status update again when I do. Cheers, Jeff > > Arjan >