Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:15:27 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Interesting development discipline model - PostgreSQL Message-ID: <fodij0$eel$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig61BC6998166D2631200E4029 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've just read an interesting post about a new model accepted for=20 developing PostgreSQL, and I'm finding parallels in how their release=20 8.3 was delayed similar to our 7.0. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00193.php I also see some possible reasons why it couldn't work for FreeBSD: a=20 much larger group of developers, lots of 3rd party software integrated=20 into the base system, etc. but maybe it could be made to work at least=20 for ports? --------------enig61BC6998166D2631200E4029 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHqk2fldnAQVacBcgRAidLAKC2lViGdwnBAzv3CoAKbl02pMJcYQCfQSQ/ LezynLnPOBz8QOpq89NXvL8= =DPf2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig61BC6998166D2631200E4029--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fodij0$eel$1>