Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 19:15:02 +0900 From: Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.ruby.mk, bsd.gnome.mk, ... etc. Message-ID: <20000910101506538.PLIM.882.t-mta4.odn.ne.jp@mta4.odn.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20000907134953790.EFSE.880.t-mta1.odn.ne.jp@mta1.odn.ne.jp> References: <200009050109.e8519VG20062@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp> <20000907134953790.EFSE.880.t-mta1.odn.ne.jp@mta1.odn.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: bsd.ruby.mk, bsd.gnome.mk, ... etc. Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 22:49:41 +0900 > > But according to scheme of inclusion bsd.*.mk files by > > category_name, it takes to rename whether elisp to emacs or > > bsd.emacs.mk to bsd.elisp.mk. > > # I think it better to the former. > > If we take bsd.<defined-category-name>.mk policy, > shall we rename category from "elisp" to "emacs"? If there is no objection about it, I will rewrite all ports which belong to a (virtual) "elisp" category. Can I do it? --- shige To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000910101506538.PLIM.882.t-mta4.odn.ne.jp>