From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Dec 23 16:16: 0 2000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 23 16:15:59 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1C037B400 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 16:15:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id eBO0Fvw01955; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 16:15:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 16:15:57 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Stan Brown Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: Any reason NOT to upgrade perl on a STABLE machine? Message-ID: <20001223161557.U19572@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20001223205451.9B1DC37B400@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001223205451.9B1DC37B400@hub.freebsd.org>; from stanb@awod.com on Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 03:54:48PM -0500 Sender: bright@fw.wintelcom.net Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Stan Brown [001223 13:00] wrote: > Is there any reason that I should NOT upgrade to a later version of perl, than is > bundled by default with STABLE? Is there any reason you need to? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message