From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 03:32:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DCF106566B; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:32:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swell.k@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f170.google.com (mail-bw0-f170.google.com [209.85.218.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62858FC19; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:32:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swell.k@gmail.com) Received: by bwz18 with SMTP id 18so7022403bwz.19 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:32:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=lxfq88k7P+S5RI+rBjAFZYfRNy2OQ+EQAG/BlQMuW10=; b=Z40U9uktGWn07moDtwDBMYiYdAsfdI90H/6lRVwxIOSR3OLEx0EMvIAmgmzbVhJnhZ IbwcyPCT16fMX0sMEqhid99aEbpVwlrmsxo7NtZGffxbKMr4D2TMeqgKG2d3dg2KmCW2 RtYq1rja0nZPQ61VOPBJU3tyECsbLaXzFbm7M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=PWs7YfYsGtzkGNru5vV1f1PhNlPV0wiaOyqz6J/hHEzmYcYeRUTvWMhcitts0ymcqV gfu5YTjEbAgQQwkC2GordlVFKIy+/eNJVdsFu8NoTs4M4F0LPhGEYixVc/cQbqkldNFO tmKk/DECPlxbTKVVVbkxF7egu8x0LD5whp9Gs= Received: by 10.223.122.70 with SMTP id k6mr6269094far.26.1235446321557; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:32:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (78-106-133-55.broadband.corbina.ru [78.106.133.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 32sm17710485ugf.19.2009.02.23.19.31.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:32:00 -0800 (PST) From: Anonymous To: Robert Noland References: <200902240100.n1O10L0h095606@freefall.freebsd.org> <1235439881.1273.1.camel@widget.2hip.net> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:31:42 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1235439881.1273.1.camel@widget.2hip.net> (Robert Noland's message of "Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:44:41 -0600") Message-ID: <86iqn0ldcx.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org, edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/132035: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COMMENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:32:04 -0000 Robert Noland writes: > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 01:00 +0000, edwin@FreeBSD.org wrote: >> Synopsis: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COMMENT >> >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-x11 >> Responsible-Changed-By: edwin >> Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 24 01:00:20 UTC 2009 >> Responsible-Changed-Why: >> Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) > > Why do you want a slave port? That is just going to complicate things. Things are already complicated enough that distfile for libdrm-2.4.5 doesn't include libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_private.h As airlied explained on #dri-devel I guess it was itentional to force users to only use version from git. > I don't see any reason not to install the various libdrm interfaces > right now. As I understand nouveau interface is not stable. It may go away to a separate branch one day. If that happens I would not need to touch libdrm port, only convert libdrm-nouveau from slave port to a normal one with snapshot as distfile and switch xf86-video-nouveau to statically link with libdrm_nouveau.a. > > robert.