Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 23:10:53 +0200 From: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: kib@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT/CFR] machine independent sf_bufs Message-ID: <C82CA72C-B7D9-4FE5-8B79-AA4787650109@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20140729180043.GG89995@glebius.int.ru> References: <20140719062725.GB85917@FreeBSD.org> <20140729104156.GD89995@FreeBSD.org> <A40E0DEE-153A-4698-AFC9-657DD4C56E05@freebsd.org> <20140729180043.GG89995@glebius.int.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 Jul 2014, at 20:00, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > M> > Sorry for top quoting, this is to annoy you :) I got zero > M> > replies on the below email during a week. I'd really appreciate > M> > testing on different platforms. Any takers? > M> OK, it works on an Raspberry pi running r269231 with your patch. > M> The only suspicious thing I observed was that the number of > M> 'requests for I/O initiated by sendfile' in netstat -m doesn't > M> always increase. I would expect that. However, I'm not sure if > M> this is ARM related (I would not think so) or is related to your > M> patch at all. > > Thanks a lot, Michael! > > The observation on number of I/Os is absolutely okay, since VM > cashes pages. Ahh, OK, makes sense. I was transmitting the same file several times... Best regards Michael > > > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C82CA72C-B7D9-4FE5-8B79-AA4787650109>