Date: Fri, 21 Jul 1995 12:46:59 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New options for lastcomm(1) Message-ID: <199507211047.MAA21429@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199507210926.CAA11990@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jul 21, 95 02:26:15 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > The additions would make sense for me. > > Find someone running accounting to review your ``cleanedup'' diff > and I am all for addeded functionality to lastcomm as a 2 mintue > read of the current lastcomm man pages shows it to be seriously > lacking in functionality of just what data it can produce :-(. So who is running accounting? (Or can someone explain me in a nutshell what i'd have to setup? I'd try it myself, even though i cannot bill someone, it's at least interesting. ;-) I agree that the current lastcomm(1) doesn't seem to suffer from featuremania. Comparing to a SysV acctcom(1), even Wolfram's proposal ain't too much. But a good starting point to the very least. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507211047.MAA21429>