Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:56:53 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve LinuxThreads compatibility in rfork() Message-ID: <20110712215653.GL43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107122336050.11812@sci.felk.cvut.cz> References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107111805350.7134@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20110711172408.GX43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107111944550.7134@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20110711180246.GA43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107121108300.10573@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20110712103526.GF43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107121622080.11177@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20110712204337.GJ43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <CAOfDtXNqwcguU1BwUHLb%2BjgP%2B56Cz7sFGEsb2GXSsxQX=OEz-Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107122336050.11812@sci.felk.cvut.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--t3wCcZxwnWQbJWrM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > >>I will bump revision for stable/8 when merging, but I do not see much > >>reason to bump on HEAD right now. >=20 > Many thanks. >=20 > >Uhm I think we can survive without a bump in HEAD. For now we will > >need to keep our backward-compatibility patch anyway, and when the > >bump happens on stable/8 our sysctl comparison will identify 900039 as > >new ABI. >=20 > We cannot survive without a bump in HEAD before 9.0 release, > but we do not need bump immediately. Right, the point is that you can just say 'do not use 9.0-current earlier then r223966', and check only for >=3D 8025XX, where XX is the bump at MFC. >=20 > So far the condition for new API will be >=20 > if ( (osreldate >=3D 900040) > || ((osreldate >=3D 803000) && (osreldate < 900000))) >=20 > Of course, when MFC will bump revision, the 803000 constant > will change (probably to 802509). >=20 > Petr --t3wCcZxwnWQbJWrM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk4cwyQACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4ijWwCg5tbkrkKTj6AWRwHoNUjA++Co TVoAoMEjk2Hk8pafGLB/aKKFJP6M0wM8 =bIEd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --t3wCcZxwnWQbJWrM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110712215653.GL43872>