Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:01:39 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6722@twc.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version Message-ID: <EE.2B.03057.CB7C2595@dnvrco-omsmta02> References: <CAO%2BPfDeFz1JeSwU3f21Waz3nT2LTSDAvD%2B8MSPRCzgM_0pKGnA@mail.gmail.com> <20170622121856.haikphjpvr6ofxn3@ivaldir.net> <dahnkctsm1elbaqlarl8b9euouaplqk2tv@4ax.com> <20170622141644.yadxdubynuhzygcy@ivaldir.net> <4jrnkcpurfmojfdnglqg5f97sohcuv56sv@4ax.com> <20170622211126.GA6878@lonesome.com> <n8eokc5fafda8gedtvbhh7i0qdk83gur5q@4ax.com> <594C4663.5080209@quip.cz> <09384577-ed7e-d142-43f3-0a08f5d21056@freebsd.org> <5eabe1d2-85a3-f7eb-a1ab-dc5552eb70fe@gjunka.com> <fa33d0e8-67cb-ab06-9a58-26dafe250f6c@freebsd.org> <6d35f70b-17f2-d864-68ed-a3637cdc9fbf@gjunka.com> <63e5c4e30a60d51c5a068177b9483206@acheronmedia.hr> <ED.02.03935.A361E495@dnvrco-omsmta01> <8948545b-5269-8a0e-3f92-9dfd02f227c1@gjunka.com> <B7.46.01815.DD65F495@dnvrco-omsmta03> <310d8cf4-3549-aca7-5666-b3496707917e@heuristicsystems.com.au> <61.E4.01815.93B02595@dnvrco-omsmta03> <20170627175635.GB29356@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
from Mark Linimon: > Remember that NetBSD runs on dozens of targets*, of which only two support > Ada AFAIK. > mcl > * http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-7.1/ I follow http://releng.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/builds.cgi which shows 72 targets for HEAD, 67 targets for netbsd-7 and netbsd-8, 60 targets for netbsd-6. Ada, developed by the US Department of Defense, was not originally for amd64 and i386. A large part of the problem is that building Ada requires a preexisting GNAT. Full GCC suite includes Ada, and is capable of cross-compilation, raising the possibility of building for other targets. I can not say with authority which targets would succeed. Dragonlace.net shows a port for FreeBSD aarch64. Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EE.2B.03057.CB7C2595>