From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 05:10:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061FC16A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:10:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02D543D48 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:10:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C403964BA06; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 02:10:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46847-08; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:10:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-224-176-51.eastlink.ca [24.224.176.51]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF41B64B9AE; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 02:10:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 517A13418D; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 02:10:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBB733E4A; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 02:10:02 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 02:10:02 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: "Patrick M. Hausen" In-Reply-To: <200506180943.j5I9hcOF019234@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Message-ID: <20050619020755.R90456@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200506180943.j5I9hcOF019234@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is considered "the best supported" RAID controller for 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:10:05 -0000 On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hello! > >> The subject says it all ... I'm looking a new server, and right now have >> built it around the SRCZCRX PCI-X 128MB, since I've had good luck with the >> Intel RAID controllers with 4.x, and I *really* like the storcon CLI >> utility ... but, with the move to 5.x, I'm wondering if there is something >> else I should be looking at, or is this still a good card to go with? > > IMHO it's the entire product line of ICP Vortex, now owned > by Adaptec. These cards really rock. Battery backed up cache, > RAID 1+0, driver maintained my company's engineers, yet in > the stock FreeBSD kernel, curses based management utility > to repair arrays without reboot, unattended rebuild if > you exchange a broken disk with a brand new one, same > interface to the host for _all_ products including SATA, ... 'k, its the above that I've grown to love with the Intel cards ... do you have a URL for these? Checking Adaptec's site, they don't seem to explicitly list the ICP Vortex stuff ... Also, is there a particular card that I should avoid, in their line up, or are they all good? I'm looking to put this into an Intel SR1400 Server Platform ... the motherboard has onboard U320 SCSI, so I was figuring to go the 0 Channel route ... and the SR1400 is 3x drive bays, so would be going RAID5 for this ... thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 07:32:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F53F16A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 07:32:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA84143D48 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 07:32:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5J7W4Cp081604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:32:05 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5J7W41W011866 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:32:04 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5J7W4wa011865 for stable@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:32:04 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:32:03 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: stable@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050619073203.GA11823@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff on relay.bestcom.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: named coredumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 07:32:08 -0000 Dear colleagues, today I've got problem with named exiting on signal 11. Yes, I've searched archives and found that POKED TIMER is a problem in our threads. Has anyone faced this problem and workarounded it? Or may be even fixed it? Is there anywhere detailed description of the problem? Jun 19 06:00:58 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** Jun 19 06:28:40 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** Jun 19 06:49:54 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** Jun 19 07:18:19 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** Jun 19 07:18:38 ns kernel: pid 44534 (named), uid 53: exited on signal 11 -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 08:29:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0130A16A41C; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:29:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AEB43D49; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:29:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5J8TjuH082056 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:29:46 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5J8Tjj8012133 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:29:45 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5J8TinT012132; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:29:44 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:29:44 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Jose M Rodriguez Message-ID: <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Gleb Smirnoff , Jose M Rodriguez , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Michal Vanco , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org References: <51688.147.175.8.5.1119105461.squirrel@webmail.satronet.sk> <42B46C9B.7000206@mac.com> <200506190004.48066.vanco@satro.sk> <200506182214.33279.josemi@redesjm.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506182214.33279.josemi@redesjm.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff on relay.bestcom.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Michal Vanco Subject: Re: Routes not deleted after link down X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:29:53 -0000 On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: J> Second, you may need a route daemon for this. ospf is a well known J> canditate where convergence in case of lost link is a must. While an OSPF daemon may stop advertising the affected route to its neighbors, the kernel will still have the route installed and thus the box won't be able to contact other hosts on the connected net, while they are reachable via alternate pass. I've checked that Cisco routers remove route from FIB when interface link goes down. I haven't checked Junipers yet. >From my viewpoint, removing route (or marking it unusable) is a correct behavior for router. Not sure it is correct for desktop. My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is. What is opinion of other networkers? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 08:48:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9742116A41C; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:48:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vanco@satro.sk) Received: from mail.satronet.sk (mail.satronet.sk [217.144.16.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B77B43D49; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:48:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vanco@satro.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.satronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3D21605A185; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:48:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.satronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18564-03-2; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:48:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.14.183] (strojar.garda.sk [147.175.8.5]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.satronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9002116051D5D; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:48:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Michal Vanco Organization: Satro s.r.o. To: Gleb Smirnoff Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:48:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <51688.147.175.8.5.1119105461.squirrel@webmail.satronet.sk> <200506182214.33279.josemi@redesjm.local> <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart93270823.9id32FKxkg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506191048.49883.vanco@satro.sk> X-Virus-Scanned: by ANTIvirus at satronet.sk Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Jose M Rodriguez Subject: Re: Routes not deleted after link down X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:48:57 -0000 --nextPart93270823.9id32FKxkg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 19 June 2005 10:29, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > J> Second, you may need a route daemon for this. ospf is a well known > J> canditate where convergence in case of lost link is a must. > > While an OSPF daemon may stop advertising the affected route to its > neighbors, the kernel will still have the route installed and thus > the box won't be able to contact other hosts on the connected net, > while they are reachable via alternate pass. Routing protocol should be responsible for removing affected routes from FI= B.=20 =46or example quagga should remove all routes learned via particular ospf=20 neighbour when that neighbour is not reachable anymore due to link goes dow= n.=20 But in case when no daemons are used (`static' and `connected' are also=20 `routing protocols'), kernel should be responsible for doing that. > > I've checked that Cisco routers remove route from FIB when interface > link goes down. I haven't checked Junipers yet. Junipers do the same. It is the only feasible behaviour for router. > > From my viewpoint, removing route (or marking it unusable) is a correct > behavior for router. Not sure it is correct for desktop. > Sure. > My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it > switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is. > Agree. --nextPart93270823.9id32FKxkg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCtTFx2/VqJwUsLAMRAuBlAKChluaPjo3qwcqw9oNQ2Z4m2v4cQgCgjUQH 1Jmp7EE0WxJBY9RJjsyqk8M= =Vm+C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart93270823.9id32FKxkg-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 11:16:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E66C16A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:16:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from creep@daedalus.desk.pl) Received: from daedalus.desk.pl (daedalus.desk.pl [62.233.238.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC82643D1D for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:16:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from creep@daedalus.desk.pl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daedalus.desk.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7058D366644; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:09:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daedalus.desk.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daedalus [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32678-10; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:09:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by daedalus.desk.pl (Postfix, from userid 1023) id 2205E36650A; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:09:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:09:02 +0200 From: Marcin Koziej To: Tom Pepper ;, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050619110902.GA705@daedalus.desk.pl> References: <20050618234921.GA1740@daedalus.desk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Antivirus: Skaner Antywirusowy DESK.pl Cc: Subject: Re: re0 "no carrier" problem - Patches found in archives didn't work. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:16:03 -0000 [04:12 19-06-2005] Tom Pepper > this may seem obvious, but do you still have the same issue if you > statically define the mediatype to a fixed link speed and duplex? > lots of interfaces have problems negotiating autoselect with > switches, as protocols vary widely. the blinking is indicative of > autoselect setup woes... This wasn't obvious for me! Thanks for the answer! When I set the media by hand it showed 'active', but no data could be transmitted (yellow link diode on switch, not blinking). I then pulled the switch with my home lan from the wall and plugged my re0 instead - It worked! So this seems to be the %$R#(@%*$ switch issue. The funny thing is, that with media set manually (or sometimes with autoselect) everything works fine with this switch (i have used it all day yesterday till evening without problem). Now, when i wait some time with media manually set, it starts transmitting data and everything works fine. Why does it happen? Why is it so unpredictible? Can it be fixed in software, or should i throw the switch out the window and by a new one? Thanks and best regards, m. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 11:22:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D8A16A41C; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:22:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from 62-15-207-214.inversas.jazztel.es (62-15-207-214.inversas.jazztel.es [62.15.207.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3B543D1F; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:22:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) by 62-15-207-214.inversas.jazztel.es (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5JBM8JC041447; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:22:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by redesjm.local (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j5JBM8Zi000862; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:22:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: Michal Vanco Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:22:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <51688.147.175.8.5.1119105461.squirrel@webmail.satronet.sk> <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> <200506191048.49883.vanco@satro.sk> In-Reply-To: <200506191048.49883.vanco@satro.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-13" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506191322.08287.josemi@redesjm.local> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.30.0.15; VDF: 6.30.0.207; host: antares.redesjm.local) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Jose M Rodriguez Subject: Re: Routes not deleted after link down X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:22:13 -0000 El Domingo, 19 de Junio de 2005 10:48, Michal Vanco escribi=F3: > On Sunday 19 June 2005 10:29, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > > J> Second, you may need a route daemon for this. ospf is a well > > known J> canditate where convergence in case of lost link is a > > must. > > > > While an OSPF daemon may stop advertising the affected route to its > > neighbors, the kernel will still have the route installed and thus > > the box won't be able to contact other hosts on the connected net, > > while they are reachable via alternate pass. > > Routing protocol should be responsible for removing affected routes > from FIB. For example quagga should remove all routes learned via > particular ospf neighbour when that neighbour is not reachable > anymore due to link goes down. But in case when no daemons are used > (`static' and `connected' are also `routing protocols'), kernel > should be responsible for doing that. > > > I've checked that Cisco routers remove route from FIB when > > interface link goes down. I haven't checked Junipers yet. > > Junipers do the same. It is the only feasible behaviour for router. > > > From my viewpoint, removing route (or marking it unusable) is a > > correct behavior for router. Not sure it is correct for desktop. > > Sure. > > > My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it > > switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is. > I'm not sure of this. I also think that a devd or monitor daemon will=20 be enough and easy to implement. I think NetBSD have allready some kinda of net monitor daemon for pppoe=20 support (via sppp). Not sure if route support is included. But seems easy and clean that a kernel based solution. =2D- josemi > Agree. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 15:52:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7615116A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:52:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3786F43D1D for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:52:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from ranger.anduin.net ([81.0.162.52] helo=[192.168.1.110]) by anduin.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dk265-0002Ej-I1 for stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:52:33 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <8149D7F8-3FA2-48F5-BF03-9AF813448BF0@anduin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: stable@freebsd.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:52:02 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Cc: Subject: NFS-related hang in 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:52:35 -0000 Hi, when doing large file transfers (backing up jails using tar+gzip to a neighboring server), NFS has a tendency to lock up on me. This usually happens after quite a while - like a few hours or so. Also, before the hang, performance is generally bad. KDB trace: db> trace Tracing pid 56 tid 100064 td 0xc1a18600 kdb_enter(c096bad3,4,480758,c08dcbf9,f5) at kdb_enter+0x30 siointr1(c1a8e000,c1a18600,c1a148d4,c1a12700,c1a12700) at siointr1+0xe7 siointr(c1a8e000,0,0,4,c1a18600) at siointr+0x78 intr_execute_handlers(c19bd090,d54807bc,d5480818,c08d05a3,34) at intr_execute_handlers+0x88 lapic_handle_intr(34) at lapic_handle_intr+0x3a Xapic_isr1() at Xapic_isr1+0x33 --- interrupt, eip = 0xc06b8490, esp = 0xd5480800, ebp = 0xd5480818 --- _mtx_lock_sleep(c0a1cd2c,c1a18600,0,0,0) at _mtx_lock_sleep+0xb0 udp_input(c2d40000,14,c1a99000,1,0) at udp_input+0x257 ip_input(c2d40000,0,0,0,0) at ip_input+0x590 transmit_event(c1c64100,20940000,0,c1d58a80,7f4220) at transmit_event +0x107 ready_event_wfq(c1c64100,20940000,0,c1d58a80,c06d860a) at ready_event_wfq+0x511 dummynet_io(c2bd2e00,64,1,d54809c8,c2bd2e00) at dummynet_io+0x519 ipfw_check_out(0,d5480a24,c1a99000,2,c1d1821c) at ipfw_check_out+0xf1 pfil_run_hooks(c0a1c160,d5480a9c,c1a99000,2,c1d1821c) at pfil_run_hooks+0x138 ip_output(c2bd2e00,0,0,0,0) at ip_output+0x593 udp_output(c1d1821c,c2bd2e00,0,0,c1a18600) at udp_output+0x597 udp_send(c2242654,0,c1e12100,0,0) at udp_send+0x30 sosend(c2242654,0,0,c1e12100,0) at sosend+0x6f1 nfs_send(c2242654,c1d57860,c1e12100,c2313900,1c) at nfs_send+0xc9 nfs_request(c22cf108,c1e12a00,7,0,c20bb300) at nfs_request+0x342 nfs_writerpc(c22cf108,d5480ca4,c20bb300,d5480c94,d5480c98) at nfs_writerpc+0x2a0 nfs_doio(cbf75e08,c20bb300,0,c094f9b4,0) at nfs_doio+0x508 nfssvc_iod(c0a21828,d5480d38,0,0,0) at nfssvc_iod+0x1db fork_exit(c07c5150,c0a21828,d5480d38) at fork_exit+0x80 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 --- trap 0x1, eip = 0, esp = 0xd5480d6c, ebp = 0 --- I cannot seem to kill process 56 (nfsiod), so I have to reset the box. Anyone got a clue? What can I do to ease debugging here? Next time it happens I can probably make a dump, at least I will have a debug kernel running then. /Eirik From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 16:01:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73E616A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:01:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wilbury@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1A343D48 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:01:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wilbury@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so380284wri for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 09:01:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=U98y+POE1pX0ZOS20WlQrrZwxsW57mwzKlMS1JbP6V2Zjux9cMds8sUrUY6h/cI0GQOgr3i180UNFLjXNlwY68MdizOKRQKgGjeiV7T/t/UczlNuRUC+JjYDQ+oXZkGKASJBvGuLDprbXGnWLcncfBT9KH3LalzmYAaWA9k86NE= Received: by 10.54.29.61 with SMTP id c61mr2061323wrc; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 09:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.11.46 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 09:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:01:05 +0200 From: Juraj Lutter To: Rong-En Fan In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0506140535428f4914@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6eb82e0506140535428f4914@mail.gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-p16/i386 unknown reason console hang X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juraj Lutter List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:01:07 -0000 On 6/14/05, Rong-En Fan wrote: > Hello all, >=20 > Recently, one of our 5.3-p16/i386 machine got frequenctly hang. Details, >=20 > 1. I can switch vty, but can't login (after typing username, got hang) > 2. can response to ping, but not other tcp/udp services > 3. can break into ddb I'm getting exactly the same behaviour on 4.11-STABLE/i386. After typing the username on console machine hangs. It works like a charm with previous kernel (4.8-STABLE). Upgrade was done today via usual way (build world/kernel, install world/kernel, mergemaster, reboot with /usr/local/etc/rc.d empty to ensure only base services to run). otis --=20 Sincerely yours, Juraj Lutter From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 16:33:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F54D16A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:33:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vinny@tellurian.com) Received: from mail1.tellurian.net (mail1.tellurian.net [216.182.1.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C347E43D4C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:33:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vinny@tellurian.com) Received: from leviathon.tellurian.com (leviathon.tellurian.net [216.182.41.250]) by mail1.tellurian.net ([216.182.1.23] Tellurian Networks Mail Server version 3.0d-2) with ESMTP id 234864098 for multiple; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:33:31 -0400 Message-Id: <6.2.3.3.2.20050619123234.04e2b850@pop3.tellurian.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.3 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:33:59 -0400 To: Marcin Koziej From: Vinny Abello In-Reply-To: <20050619110902.GA705@daedalus.desk.pl> References: <20050618234921.GA1740@daedalus.desk.pl> <20050619110902.GA705@daedalus.desk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Authenticated-User: vinny@tellurian.com X-Ultimate-Internet-Connection: Tellurian Networks Cc: , Tom Pepper , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: re0 "no carrier" problem - Patches found in archives didn't work. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:33:33 -0000 At 07:09 AM 6/19/2005, Marcin Koziej wrote: >[04:12 19-06-2005] Tom Pepper > > this may seem obvious, but do you still have the same issue if you > > statically define the mediatype to a fixed link speed and duplex? > > lots of interfaces have problems negotiating autoselect with > > switches, as protocols vary widely. the blinking is indicative of > > autoselect setup woes... > >This wasn't obvious for me! Thanks for the answer! > >When I set the media by hand it showed 'active', but no data could >be transmitted >(yellow link diode on switch, not blinking). I then pulled the >switch with my home >lan from the wall and plugged my re0 instead - It worked! > >So this seems to be the %$R#(@%*$ switch issue. The funny thing is, >that with media >set manually (or sometimes with autoselect) everything works fine >with this switch >(i have used it all day yesterday till evening without problem). >Now, when i wait >some time with media manually set, it starts transmitting data and >everything works fine. >Why does it happen? Why is it so unpredictible? Can it be fixed in software, >or should i throw the switch out the window and by a new one? I may be replying to the wrong thread, but if I remember a previous post, this is for a realtek gig-e card going to a gig-e switch... Just another obvious point but you are using either Cat-5e or Cat-6 cables, right? Just thought I'd offer another obvious suggestion. :) Vinny Abello Network Engineer Server Management vinny@tellurian.com (973)300-9211 x 125 (973)940-6125 (Direct) PGP Key Fingerprint: 3BC5 9A48 FC78 03D3 82E0 E935 5325 FBCB 0100 977A Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection http://www.tellurian.com (888)TELLURIAN "Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear" -- Mark Twain From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 16:53:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5937616A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:53:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from smtp.thilelli.net (smtp.thilelli.net [213.41.129.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DB743D1D for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:52:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEDD7305B; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:52:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bento.thilelli.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bento.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05615-02; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:52:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.thilelli.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FDC7303E; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:52:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.20 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jgabel) by webmail.thilelli.net with HTTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:52:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <62860.192.168.1.20.1119199973.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> In-Reply-To: <20050619110902.GA705@daedalus.desk.pl> References: <20050618234921.GA1740@daedalus.desk.pl> <20050619110902.GA705@daedalus.desk.pl> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:52:53 +0200 (CEST) From: "Julien Gabel" To: "Marcin Koziej" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at thilelli.net Cc: Tom Pepper , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: re0 "no carrier" problem - Patches found in archives didn't work. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jpeg@thilelli.net List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:53:00 -0000 >> this may seem obvious, but do you still have the same issue if you >> statically define the mediatype to a fixed link speed and duplex? >> lots of interfaces have problems negotiating autoselect with >> switches, as protocols vary widely. the blinking is indicative of >> autoselect setup woes... > When I set the media by hand it showed 'active', but no data could be > transmitted (yellow link diode on switch, not blinking). I then pulled > the switch with my home lan from the wall and plugged my re0 instead - > It worked! > > So this seems to be the %$R#(@%*$ switch issue. The funny thing is, that > with media set manually (or sometimes with autoselect) everything works > fine with this switch (i have used it all day yesterday till evening > without problem). Now, when i wait some time with media manually set, it > starts transmitting data and everything works fine. > Why does it happen? Why is it so unpredictible? Can it be fixed in > software, or should i throw the switch out the window and by a new one? Not sure if it is solely "switch related". I encountered the very same problem for months now using different links ans switches. Moreover, it seems to be FreeBSD specific since the same machine works better with others OSes. See PR kern/80005 for a more long description on a very similar problem. -- -jpeg. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 17:46:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FCD16A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:46:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.156.12.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EB043D49 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:46:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4373E46BA3; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:46:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:49:10 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Philippe PEGON In-Reply-To: <42B40173.6070600@crc.u-strasbg.fr> Message-ID: <20050619184650.T6413@fledge.watson.org> References: <20050617150950.F1236@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> <20050617235352.GA80058@xor.obsecurity.org> <42B40173.6070600@crc.u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Mitch Parks , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 5.4-p1 crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:46:31 -0000 On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Philippe PEGON wrote: >> Unfortunately this is a known bug in FreeBSD; check the archives for >> more discussion. Doug White tried to look at fixing it before >> 5.4-RELEASE but I think he gave up. > > do you know if someone works on it ? I sent two mail in freebsd-stable > about it without solution and this bug is really annoying : > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-stable/2005-June/015952.html > > and > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-stable/2005-June/015864.html > > there is a PR for it : kern/74319 This sounds very similar to a serial console related tty bug I was experiencing on -STABLE a few months ago, and that is believed may have been worked around in 5.4 tweaks before release. In particular, that there are reference counting related bugs in the 5.x tty code that are fixed by a partial rewrite of the tty code in 6.x, but that are too large and disruptive to merge to RELENG_5. If the problem is persisting, it may be worth trying to merge anyway, but it is a pretty big change and would break device driver binary compatibility, etc. What we might want to do here is wait until 6.x has settled out a bit more, then consider merging it to 5.x once 6.x has gotten burned in with similar workloads and continued to not illustrate the 5.x tty reference bugs. Robert N M Watson From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 18:06:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A6716A42F; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:06:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.156.12.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1371A43E84; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:03:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BEC46BD1; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:03:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:06:35 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= In-Reply-To: <8149D7F8-3FA2-48F5-BF03-9AF813448BF0@anduin.net> Message-ID: <20050619185338.J6413@fledge.watson.org> References: <8149D7F8-3FA2-48F5-BF03-9AF813448BF0@anduin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1985640926-1119204395=:6413" Cc: stable@freebsd.org, mlaier@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NFS-related hang in 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:06:07 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1985640926-1119204395=:6413 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Eirik =D8verby wrote: > when doing large file transfers (backing up jails using tar+gzip to a=20 > neighboring server), NFS has a tendency to lock up on me. This usually=20 > happens after quite a while - like a few hours or so. Also, before the=20 > hang, performance is generally bad. Hmm. Looks like a bug in dummynet. ipfw should not be directly=20 re-injecting UDP traffic back into the input path from an outbound path,=20 or it risks re-entering, generating lock order problems, etc. It should be= =20 getting dropped into the netisr queue to be processed from the netisr=20 context. Is it possible to configure dummynet out of your configuration, and see if= =20 the problem goes away? Robert N M Watson > > KDB trace: > > db> trace > Tracing pid 56 tid 100064 td 0xc1a18600 > kdb_enter(c096bad3,4,480758,c08dcbf9,f5) at kdb_enter+0x30 > siointr1(c1a8e000,c1a18600,c1a148d4,c1a12700,c1a12700) at siointr1+0xe7 > siointr(c1a8e000,0,0,4,c1a18600) at siointr+0x78 > intr_execute_handlers(c19bd090,d54807bc,d5480818,c08d05a3,34) at=20 > intr_execute_handlers+0x88 > lapic_handle_intr(34) at lapic_handle_intr+0x3a > Xapic_isr1() at Xapic_isr1+0x33 > --- interrupt, eip =3D 0xc06b8490, esp =3D 0xd5480800, ebp =3D 0xd5480818= --- > _mtx_lock_sleep(c0a1cd2c,c1a18600,0,0,0) at _mtx_lock_sleep+0xb0 > udp_input(c2d40000,14,c1a99000,1,0) at udp_input+0x257 > ip_input(c2d40000,0,0,0,0) at ip_input+0x590 > transmit_event(c1c64100,20940000,0,c1d58a80,7f4220) at transmit_event+0x1= 07 > ready_event_wfq(c1c64100,20940000,0,c1d58a80,c06d860a) at=20 > ready_event_wfq+0x511 > dummynet_io(c2bd2e00,64,1,d54809c8,c2bd2e00) at dummynet_io+0x519 > ipfw_check_out(0,d5480a24,c1a99000,2,c1d1821c) at ipfw_check_out+0xf1 > pfil_run_hooks(c0a1c160,d5480a9c,c1a99000,2,c1d1821c) at pfil_run_hooks+0= x138 > ip_output(c2bd2e00,0,0,0,0) at ip_output+0x593 > udp_output(c1d1821c,c2bd2e00,0,0,c1a18600) at udp_output+0x597 > udp_send(c2242654,0,c1e12100,0,0) at udp_send+0x30 > sosend(c2242654,0,0,c1e12100,0) at sosend+0x6f1 > nfs_send(c2242654,c1d57860,c1e12100,c2313900,1c) at nfs_send+0xc9 > nfs_request(c22cf108,c1e12a00,7,0,c20bb300) at nfs_request+0x342 > nfs_writerpc(c22cf108,d5480ca4,c20bb300,d5480c94,d5480c98) at=20 > nfs_writerpc+0x2a0 > nfs_doio(cbf75e08,c20bb300,0,c094f9b4,0) at nfs_doio+0x508 > nfssvc_iod(c0a21828,d5480d38,0,0,0) at nfssvc_iod+0x1db > fork_exit(c07c5150,c0a21828,d5480d38) at fork_exit+0x80 > fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 > --- trap 0x1, eip =3D 0, esp =3D 0xd5480d6c, ebp =3D 0 --- > > I cannot seem to kill process 56 (nfsiod), so I have to reset the box. > > Anyone got a clue? What can I do to ease debugging here? Next time it hap= pens=20 > I can probably make a dump, at least I will have a debug kernel running t= hen. > > /Eirik > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --0-1985640926-1119204395=:6413-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 18:37:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA6516A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:37:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from creep@daedalus.desk.pl) Received: from daedalus.desk.pl (daedalus.desk.pl [62.233.238.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D8F43D4C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:37:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from creep@daedalus.desk.pl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daedalus.desk.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B59936687D for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:30:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daedalus.desk.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daedalus [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10504-10 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:30:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by daedalus.desk.pl (Postfix, from userid 1023) id 5910B3666AF; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:30:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:30:18 +0200 From: Marcin Koziej To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050619183018.GA10873@daedalus.desk.pl> References: <20050618234921.GA1740@daedalus.desk.pl> <20050619110902.GA705@daedalus.desk.pl> <6.2.3.3.2.20050619123234.04e2b850@pop3.tellurian.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.3.2.20050619123234.04e2b850@pop3.tellurian.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Antivirus: Skaner Antywirusowy DESK.pl Subject: Re: re0 "no carrier" problem - Patches found in archives didn't work. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:37:21 -0000 > I may be replying to the wrong thread, but if I remember a previous > post, this is for a realtek gig-e card going to a gig-e switch... > Just another obvious point but you are using either Cat-5e or Cat-6 > cables, right? Just thought I'd offer another obvious suggestion. :) I just want my 10baseT/UTP :P !!! the card can do that. The rest seems too because sometimes everything works just fine :) The "sometimes" is the problem. m. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 18:40:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7394616A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:40:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from creep@daedalus.desk.pl) Received: from daedalus.desk.pl (daedalus.desk.pl [62.233.238.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B82643D48 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:40:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from creep@daedalus.desk.pl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daedalus.desk.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4622366652 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:33:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daedalus.desk.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daedalus [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13599-03 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:33:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by daedalus.desk.pl (Postfix, from userid 1023) id 3EFFE36663A; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:33:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:33:41 +0200 From: Marcin Koziej To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050619183341.GB10873@daedalus.desk.pl> References: <20050618234921.GA1740@daedalus.desk.pl> <20050619110902.GA705@daedalus.desk.pl> <62860.192.168.1.20.1119199973.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <62860.192.168.1.20.1119199973.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Antivirus: Skaner Antywirusowy DESK.pl Subject: Re: re0 "no carrier" problem - Patches found in archives didn't work. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:40:42 -0000 > Not sure if it is solely "switch related". I encountered the very same > problem for months now using different links ans switches. Moreover, it > seems to be FreeBSD specific since the same machine works better with > others OSes. > > See PR kern/80005 for a more long description on a very similar problem. I've seen this, but it didn't help a lot. I'll try to investigate on this, but I have a question - how? Should i just insert loads o printf's here and there to see what functions are called when the link fails? (Brings back memories... ;>) It would be cool having dtrace ported.... -- m. Brain power of a glass of water. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 19:22:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063A616A41F for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:22:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from lakermmtao09.cox.net (lakermmtao09.cox.net [68.230.240.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8BF43D1F for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:22:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from dolphin.local.net ([68.11.70.216]) by lakermmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050619192201.DWIH6804.lakermmtao09.cox.net@dolphin.local.net>; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:22:01 -0400 Received: from dolphin.local.net (conrads@localhost.local.net [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.local.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5JJM2ZR038048; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:22:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:22:01 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: "GMane" Message-ID: <20050619142201.2b50119a@dolphin.local.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.11 (GTK+ 2.6.8; amd64-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rebooting problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:22:05 -0000 On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:19:41 +0200 "GMane" wrote: > Hi Cian, > > "Cian Hughes" wrote in message > news:D3A42022-823A-47DB-9EA3-2FC4B49067FA@cian.ws... > > Do you also have a hanging problem if you shutdown with `shutdown - > > p now`? > > No, the problem it's only with the reboot command. > > > Are you using ACPI? > > Have you ensured you are using the latest BIOS for you system? > > I turned off the ACPI from the BIOS. (but from the dmesg it seems > on) You need to add a line to /boot/device.hints to disable acpi: hint.acpi.0.disabled="1" FWIW, I've been seeing the same problem on both my 32-bit Athlon box and on my Athlon 64, both running 5.4-STABLE. One thing I've discovered is that the machine will reboot properly if booted in single-user mode. It appears to be only a problem when shutting down from multi-user mode. The shutdown process gets as far as outputting the "Uptime:" line, and then just hangs. -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 19:53:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F13E16A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:53:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52EA43D58 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:53:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from pumice6.sentex.ca (pumice6.sentex.ca [64.7.153.21]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5JJr5SZ010358 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:53:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by pumice6.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5JJrTE9013595; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:53:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5JJrLPF093760 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:53:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20050619155139.044eb358@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:53:59 -0400 To: Marcin Koziej , Tom Pepper ;, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20050619110902.GA705@daedalus.desk.pl> References: <20050618234921.GA1740@daedalus.desk.pl> <20050619110902.GA705@daedalus.desk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.18 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.21 Cc: Subject: Re: re0 "no carrier" problem - Patches found in archives didn't work. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:53:32 -0000 At 07:09 AM 19/06/2005, Marcin Koziej wrote: >When I set the media by hand it showed 'active', but no data could be >transmitted >(yellow link diode on switch, not blinking). I then pulled the switch with >my home >lan from the wall and plugged my re0 instead - It worked! > >So this seems to be the %$R#(@%*$ switch issue. The funny thing is, that >with media >set manually (or sometimes with autoselect) everything works fine with >this switch >(i have used it all day yesterday till evening without problem). Now, when i Both sides have to agree to the setting. ie if the switch is set to autoneg, your network card must also be set to autoneg and vice versa. Unless its a managed switch, leave the NIC as autonegotiate. If its still failing, I suspect its something with the re driver. Its possible the NIC and switch dont like each other (it has happened in the past with certain vendors) but this is pretty rare these days. ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 19:55:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEF016A41C; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:55:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@wm-access.no) Received: from lakepoint.domeneshop.no (lakepoint.domeneshop.no [194.63.248.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E021243D1F; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:55:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@wm-access.no) Received: from [192.168.4.8] (host-81-191-4-179.bluecom.no [81.191.4.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by lakepoint.domeneshop.no (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5JJsxTP027768; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:55:00 +0200 Message-ID: <42B5CD89.6070509@wm-access.no> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:54:49 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <51688.147.175.8.5.1119105461.squirrel@webmail.satronet.sk> <42B46C9B.7000206@mac.com> <200506190004.48066.vanco@satro.sk> <200506182214.33279.josemi@redesjm.local> <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: id=AE7F1636 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Michal Vanco Subject: Re: Routes not deleted after link down X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:55:02 -0000 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it > switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is. > > What is opinion of other networkers? > How about also adding a sysctl for setting a delay time between event and disabling of the route? Then even people with roaming wlan cards can benefit. Also it is in my opinion that the route be disabled (moved to a passive route table maybe?) and not deleted. At my old job i came across situations where the lack of this feature caused headaches and once or twice the loss of a customer. -- Sten Daniel Sørsdal From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 20:33:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770F016A41C; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:33:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EF943D1F; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:33:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from pumice3.sentex.ca (pumice3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.26]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5JKXRKQ011291; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:33:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by pumice3.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5JKXqcm057171; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:33:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5JKXjBf093838 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:33:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20050619161035.03720998@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:34:23 -0400 To: Gleb Smirnoff From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> References: <51688.147.175.8.5.1119105461.squirrel@webmail.satronet.sk> <42B46C9B.7000206@mac.com> <200506190004.48066.vanco@satro.sk> <200506182214.33279.josemi@redesjm.local> <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.18 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.26 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routes not deleted after link down X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:33:53 -0000 At 04:29 AM 19/06/2005, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: >On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: >J> Second, you may need a route daemon for this. ospf is a well known >J> canditate where convergence in case of lost link is a must. > >I've checked that Cisco routers remove route from FIB when interface >link goes down. I haven't checked Junipers yet. > > >From my viewpoint, removing route (or marking it unusable) is a correct >behavior for router. Not sure it is correct for desktop. > >My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it >switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is. I like this idea as well, but you need to control how the routes would come back after the interface comes back up ? This seems more of the province of a routing daemon like quagga as opposed to a kernel feature no ? ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 20:52:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09D416A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:52:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C3C843D53 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:52:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2005 20:52:55 -0000 Received: from p5090D5A6.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO klotz.local) [80.144.213.166] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 19 Jun 2005 22:52:55 +0200 X-Authenticated: #989277 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klotz.local (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5JKpsIF001213; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:51:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Message-ID: <42B5DAEA.4040908@nurfuerspam.de> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:51:54 +0200 From: Martin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050403) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: twesky References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:52:57 -0000 twesky wrote: > I am having ATA_DMA errors on 5.4R and 5 STABLE up to June 16 (haven't > done a cvsup again). It doesn't happen on 5.3R or lower. I have got same problem. I tried yesterday's kernel and I got lots of ATA DMA errors. A question: do you have a VIA IDE controller like mine? atapci0: port 0xfc00-0xfc0f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 17.1 on pci0 atapci0@pci0:17:1: class=0x01018a card=0x05711849 chip=0x05711106 rev=0x06 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'VIA Technologies Inc' device = 'VT82xxxx EIDE Controller (All VIA Chipsets)' class = mass storage subclass = ATA Today, I noticed, the short experiment with the latest -STABLE destroyed a part of my /usr partition. It looked like this (with May 9th kernel today): kernel: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count kernel: bad block 50333952, ino 1743780 kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block kernel: bad block 3221252091, ino 1743780 klotz kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block kernel: bad block 144119931884736777, ino 1743780 kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block kernel: bad block 72340173158093844, ino 1743780 kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block kernel: bad block 1104111992832, ino 1743780 kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block kernel: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count kernel: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count kernel: bad block 1865342872522620032, ino 1743783 While shutting down I got this: Jun 19 22:04:21 klotz kernel: /usr: unmount pending error: blocks -3561100369582 68157 files 0 I restored the fs in single-user mode. And now it runs fine with the kernel (May 9th). See also my earlier post. Martin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 21:06:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193E316A41C; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:06:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Philippe.Pegon@crc.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE4843D1F; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:06:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Philippe.Pegon@crc.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from sokaris.u-strasbg.fr (sokaris.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::101]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.13.1/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id j5JL6GQs063385 ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:06:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (crc.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:1001::1]) by sokaris.u-strasbg.fr (8.12.9/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id j5JL6Ett064458 ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:06:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42B5DFAE.4070000@crc.u-strasbg.fr> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:12:14 +0200 From: Philippe PEGON User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Watson References: <20050617150950.F1236@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> <20050617235352.GA80058@xor.obsecurity.org> <42B40173.6070600@crc.u-strasbg.fr> <20050619184650.T6413@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20050619184650.T6413@fledge.watson.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::156]); Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:06:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophos at u-strasbg.fr Cc: Mitch Parks , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 5.4-p1 crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:06:21 -0000 Robert Watson a écrit : > This sounds very similar to a serial console related tty bug I was > experiencing on -STABLE a few months ago, and that is believed may have > been worked around in 5.4 tweaks before release. In particular, that > there are reference counting related bugs in the 5.x tty code that are > fixed by a partial rewrite of the tty code in 6.x, but that are too > large and disruptive to merge to RELENG_5. If the problem is > persisting, it may be worth trying to merge anyway, but it is a pretty > big change and would break device driver binary compatibility, etc. > What we might want to do here is wait until 6.x has settled out a bit > more, then consider merging it to 5.x once 6.x has gotten burned in with > similar workloads and continued to not illustrate the 5.x tty reference > bugs. Thanks for your answer. Like I said on anothers posts, we have a FreeBSD 5.4-p1 which connects every fifteen minutes with an expect program to a lot of network devices for retrieving some informations, it seems that it is the culprit, the server crashed almost everyday. We reduced the frequency to one per hour and that attenuates the problem. This panic is easy to reproduce with this simple expect program (see below) by running it 6 times simultaneously and waiting a few hours, I tested it on a HP DL360 with 2 cpu. If that can help, I can test this on current next week. #! /usr/local/bin/expect set timeout 60 set host [lindex $argv 0] set pass "PASSWORD" spawn ssh user@another-server expect { "continue*(yes/no)" { send "yes\r" ; exp_continue } "assword:" { send "$pass\r" } } expect "*# " { send "ls\r" } expect "*#" { send "exit\r" } puts "Done." > > Robert N M Watson -- Philippe PEGON From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 22:20:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A21816A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:20:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@hosting50.cz) Received: from shinzon.blueboard.cz (shinzon.blueboard.cz [217.11.249.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E23E43D48 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:20:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@hosting50.cz) Received: (qmail 16457 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jun 2005 22:10:35 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 16449, pid: 16453, t: 3.4153s scanners: clamav: 0.85.1/m:32/d:927 spam: 3.0.4 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (tomas@blueboard.cz@217.11.239.236) by shinzon.blueboard.cz with SMTP; 19 Jun 2005 22:10:32 -0000 Message-ID: <42B5ED53.3010805@hosting50.cz> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:10:27 +0200 From: Tomas Randa User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: cs, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0524-6, 18.06.2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on shinzon.blueboard.cz X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=3.0.4 Subject: SCSI troubles X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:20:58 -0000 Hi, I Am running 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sun May 8 18:23:40 CEST 2005 with Adaptec 29320 or 2930U2 controller and with heavy load on SCSI I have the following problems ending with system freeze. Have anybody some opinion where could be problem? Thanks a lot Tomas Randa da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled kernel: ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 0 (cmdcmplt) kernel: QOUTPOS = 252 kernel: ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 0 (cmdcmplt) kernel: QOUTPOS = 253 kernel: ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 0 (cmdcmplt) kernel: QOUTPOS = 254 kernel: ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 0 (cmdcmplt) kernel: QOUTPOS = 255 kernel: ahc0: Recovery Initiated kernel: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dump Card State Begins <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< kernel: ahc0: Dumping Card State while idle, at SEQADDR 0x8 kernel: Card was paused kernel: ACCUM = 0x0, SINDEX = 0x7, DINDEX = 0xe4, ARG_2 = 0x0 kernel: HCNT = 0x0 SCBPTR = 0xa kernel: SCSISIGI[0x0] ERROR[0x0] SCSIBUSL[0x0] LASTPHASE[0x1]:(P_BUSFREE) kernel: SCSISEQ[0x12]:(ENAUTOATNP|ENRSELI) SBLKCTL[0xa]:(SELWIDE|SELBUSB) kernel: SCSIRATE[0x0] SEQCTL[0x10]:(FASTMODE) SEQ_FLAGS[0xc0]:(NO_CDB_SENT|NOT_IDENTIFIED kernel: SSTAT0[0x0] SSTAT1[0xa]:(PHASECHG|BUSFREE) SSTAT2[0x0] kernel: SSTAT3[0x0] SIMODE0[0x8]:(ENSWRAP) SIMODE1[0xa4]:(ENSCSIPERR|ENSCSIRST|ENSELTIMO) kernel: SXFRCTL0[0x80]:(DFON) DFCNTRL[0x0] DFSTATUS[0x89]:(FIFOEMP|HDONE|PRELOAD_AVAIL) kernel: STACK: 0x0 0x167 0x10d 0x3 kernel: SCB count = 70 kernel: Kernel NEXTQSCB = 43 kernel: Card NEXTQSCB = 43 kernel: QINFIFO entries: kernel: Waiting Queue entries: kernel: Disconnected Queue entries: kernel: QOUTFIFO entries: kernel: Sequencer Free SCB List: 10 0 20 23 12 15 19 29 18 28 26 7 5 27 9 17 30 1 2 16 4 kernel: Sequencer SCB Info: kernel: 0 SCB_CONTROL[0xe0]:(TAG_ENB|DISCENB|TARGET_SCB) SCB_SCSIID[0x7] kernel: SCB_LUN[0x0] SCB_TAG[0xff] kernel: 1 SCB_CONTROL[0xe0]:(TAG_ENB|DISCENB|TARGET_SCB) SCB_SCSIID[0x7] kernel: SCB_LUN[0x0] SCB_TAG[0xff] kernel: 2 SCB_CONTROL[0xe0]:(TAG_ENB|DISCENB|TARGET_SCB) SCB_SCSIID[0x7] kernel: SCB_LUN[0x0] SCB_TAG[0xff] From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 23:12:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF3216A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:12:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6BB43D1D for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:12:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CA92E72DD4; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:12:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C515E72DCB; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:12:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:12:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Mitch Parks In-Reply-To: <20050617150950.F1236@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> Message-ID: <20050619161113.V83634@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20050617150950.F1236@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4-p1 crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:12:03 -0000 On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Mitch Parks wrote: > Below are details regarding another crash on a Dell 2600 SMP (HTT and USB > disabled). It has been 9 days since the last crash. I didn't have the serial > console in place for this last crash, but it is now. As noted, the ttwakeup() panic is a known bug. The best thing we have for a fix is this patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tty.t_pgrp.diff Please give it a try and report back if you have any more panics (or don't :-) ). -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 23:14:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3871416A41C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:14:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2645A43D48 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:14:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F1DA72DD4; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0999072DCB; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:14:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Baldur Gislason In-Reply-To: <20050618012856.GB51304@gremlin.foo.is> Message-ID: <20050619161223.V83634@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20050618012856.GB51304@gremlin.foo.is> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird fdisk behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:14:27 -0000 On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Baldur Gislason wrote: > I am trying to add another partition to my root drive, it has a few gigabytes of unpartitioned space. > Whenever I try to run fdisk -u it says cannot open disk /dev/ad0: No such file or directory > ad0 does exist, why does fdisk say otherwise? fdisk can display the partition table but it can't alter it. > securelevel is -1 and this is FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE from the beginning of May this year. Be aware that fdisk will fake up a partition table if the volume has no table. Look for a message like: warning: invalid partition table found If you see that then there is no FDISK partition table. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 00:01:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1A316A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:01:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pmurray@nevada.net.nz) Received: from bellagio.open2view.com (bellagio.open2view.com [203.97.20.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6844143D53 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:01:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pmurray@nevada.net.nz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bellagio.open2view.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88645B909; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:02:10 +1200 (NZST) Received: from bellagio.open2view.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bellagio.open2view.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28320-08; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:02:09 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [10.58.3.145] (222-153-224-129.jetstream.xtra.co.nz [222.153.224.129]) by bellagio.open2view.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352105B8F5; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:02:09 +1200 (NZST) In-Reply-To: <20050618012856.GB51304@gremlin.foo.is> References: <20050618012856.GB51304@gremlin.foo.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Philip Murray Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:01:34 +1200 To: Baldur Gislason X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at open2view.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird fdisk behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:01:39 -0000 Hi, On 18/06/2005, at 1:28 PM, Baldur Gislason wrote: > I am trying to add another partition to my root drive, it has a few > gigabytes of unpartitioned space. > Whenever I try to run fdisk -u it says cannot open disk /dev/ad0: > No such file or directory > ad0 does exist, why does fdisk say otherwise? fdisk can display the > partition table but it can't alter it. > securelevel is -1 and this is FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE from the beginning > of May this year. > Try setting sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16 before running fdisk. This stops GEOM protecting the drive/partition and allows fdisk to open it. I think fdisk and bsdlabel have been taught about GEOM in 6-current, but I very might well be wrong. Cheers Phil Murray From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 00:12:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CFD16A41C; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:12:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF01043D48; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:12:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from ranger.anduin.net ([81.0.162.52] helo=[192.168.1.110]) by anduin.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dk9tt-0004tG-AF; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:12:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20050619185338.J6413@fledge.watson.org> References: <8149D7F8-3FA2-48F5-BF03-9AF813448BF0@anduin.net> <20050619185338.J6413@fledge.watson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:11:57 +0200 To: Robert Watson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, mlaier@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NFS-related hang in 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:12:31 -0000 On 19. jun. 2005, at 20.06, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Eirik =D8verby wrote: > > >> when doing large file transfers (backing up jails using tar+gzip =20 >> to a neighboring server), NFS has a tendency to lock up on me. =20 >> This usually happens after quite a while - like a few hours or so. =20= >> Also, before the hang, performance is generally bad. >> > > Hmm. Looks like a bug in dummynet. ipfw should not be directly re-=20= > injecting UDP traffic back into the input path from an outbound =20 > path, or it risks re-entering, generating lock order problems, etc. =20= > It should be getting dropped into the netisr queue to be processed =20 > from the netisr context. This problem would exist across all 5.4 installations, both i386 and =20 amd64? Would it depend on heavy load, or could it theoretically =20 happen at any time when there's traffic? All three of my fbsd5 =20 servers (dual opteron, dual p3-1ghz, dual p3-700mhz) are experiencing =20= random hangs with ~a few weeks between, impression is that if running =20= single-cpu mode they are all stable. All using dummynet in a =20 comparable manner. Ideas? > Is it possible to configure dummynet out of your configuration, and =20= > see if the problem goes away? I'm running a test right now, will let you know in the morning. > > Robert N M Watson > > >> >> KDB trace: >> >> db> trace >> Tracing pid 56 tid 100064 td 0xc1a18600 >> kdb_enter(c096bad3,4,480758,c08dcbf9,f5) at kdb_enter+0x30 >> siointr1(c1a8e000,c1a18600,c1a148d4,c1a12700,c1a12700) at siointr1=20 >> +0xe7 >> siointr(c1a8e000,0,0,4,c1a18600) at siointr+0x78 >> intr_execute_handlers(c19bd090,d54807bc,d5480818,c08d05a3,34) at =20 >> intr_execute_handlers+0x88 >> lapic_handle_intr(34) at lapic_handle_intr+0x3a >> Xapic_isr1() at Xapic_isr1+0x33 >> --- interrupt, eip =3D 0xc06b8490, esp =3D 0xd5480800, ebp =3D =20 >> 0xd5480818 --- >> _mtx_lock_sleep(c0a1cd2c,c1a18600,0,0,0) at _mtx_lock_sleep+0xb0 >> udp_input(c2d40000,14,c1a99000,1,0) at udp_input+0x257 >> ip_input(c2d40000,0,0,0,0) at ip_input+0x590 >> transmit_event(c1c64100,20940000,0,c1d58a80,7f4220) at =20 >> transmit_event+0x107 >> ready_event_wfq(c1c64100,20940000,0,c1d58a80,c06d860a) at =20 >> ready_event_wfq+0x511 >> dummynet_io(c2bd2e00,64,1,d54809c8,c2bd2e00) at dummynet_io+0x519 >> ipfw_check_out(0,d5480a24,c1a99000,2,c1d1821c) at ipfw_check_out+0xf1 >> pfil_run_hooks(c0a1c160,d5480a9c,c1a99000,2,c1d1821c) at =20 >> pfil_run_hooks+0x138 >> ip_output(c2bd2e00,0,0,0,0) at ip_output+0x593 >> udp_output(c1d1821c,c2bd2e00,0,0,c1a18600) at udp_output+0x597 >> udp_send(c2242654,0,c1e12100,0,0) at udp_send+0x30 >> sosend(c2242654,0,0,c1e12100,0) at sosend+0x6f1 >> nfs_send(c2242654,c1d57860,c1e12100,c2313900,1c) at nfs_send+0xc9 >> nfs_request(c22cf108,c1e12a00,7,0,c20bb300) at nfs_request+0x342 >> nfs_writerpc(c22cf108,d5480ca4,c20bb300,d5480c94,d5480c98) at =20 >> nfs_writerpc+0x2a0 >> nfs_doio(cbf75e08,c20bb300,0,c094f9b4,0) at nfs_doio+0x508 >> nfssvc_iod(c0a21828,d5480d38,0,0,0) at nfssvc_iod+0x1db >> fork_exit(c07c5150,c0a21828,d5480d38) at fork_exit+0x80 >> fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 >> --- trap 0x1, eip =3D 0, esp =3D 0xd5480d6c, ebp =3D 0 --- >> >> I cannot seem to kill process 56 (nfsiod), so I have to reset the =20 >> box. >> >> Anyone got a clue? What can I do to ease debugging here? Next time =20= >> it happens I can probably make a dump, at least I will have a =20 >> debug kernel running then. >> >> /Eirik >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-=20 >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 01:04:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C99016A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 01:04:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from twesky@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F2A43D48 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 01:04:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from twesky@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so385632wri for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:04:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZwlhISYxY+JlTxAfWp7E5qAUVE4toqkOTAdt/gZtfRyulnZ0Jb/LEK9e5pyW5OX7mzjvqWy7Z6vMLN5kk/9+GTnTnqiCDMR1pApx/CHVJH/LsNe6caW/YJ8e2H+9WlvSvcy2hoQDhunaoQe/eiTjnNi7nQuE29yD0onNsyWUONU= Received: by 10.54.54.51 with SMTP id c51mr2215999wra; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:04:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.45.71 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:04:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8d02aed005061918049c8fd8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:04:11 -0500 From: twesky To: Martin In-Reply-To: <42B5DAEA.4040908@nurfuerspam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> <42B5DAEA.4040908@nurfuerspam.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: twesky List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 01:04:12 -0000 Here is my controller: atapci0: port 0x1860-0x186f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 The last known good stable version for me was aprox April 25, my next cvsup was May 17, but I have problems with 5.4 Release so I assume (probably incorrectly) that something changed between April 25 and 5.4R. I don't exactly recall my shutdown errors, but I did have to restore my file systems to get my laptop back to a functioning state. On 6/19/05, Martin wrote: > twesky wrote: > > I am having ATA_DMA errors on 5.4R and 5 STABLE up to June 16 (haven't > > done a cvsup again). It doesn't happen on 5.3R or lower. >=20 > I have got same problem. I tried yesterday's kernel and I got lots of > ATA DMA errors. A question: do you have a VIA IDE controller like mine? >=20 > atapci0: port > 0xfc00-0xfc0f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 17.1 on pci0 >=20 > atapci0@pci0:17:1: class=3D0x01018a card=3D0x05711849 chip=3D0x05711= 106 > rev=3D0x06 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT82xxxx EIDE Controller (All VIA Chipsets)' > class =3D mass storage > subclass =3D ATA >=20 > Today, I noticed, the short experiment with the latest -STABLE destroyed > a part of my /usr partition. It looked like this (with May 9th kernel > today): >=20 > kernel: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count > kernel: bad block 50333952, ino 1743780 > kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block > kernel: bad block 3221252091, ino 1743780 > klotz kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block > kernel: bad block 144119931884736777, ino 1743780 > kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block > kernel: bad block 72340173158093844, ino 1743780 > kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block > kernel: bad block 1104111992832, ino 1743780 > kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block > kernel: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count > kernel: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count > kernel: bad block 1865342872522620032, ino 1743783 >=20 > While shutting down I got this: >=20 > Jun 19 22:04:21 klotz kernel: /usr: unmount pending error: blocks > -3561100369582 68157 files 0 >=20 > I restored the fs in single-user mode. And now it runs fine with > the kernel (May 9th). >=20 > See also my earlier post. >=20 > Martin > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 01:25:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5E416A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 01:25:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mitch@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu) Received: from kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu (kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu [129.101.191.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6549343D48 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 01:25:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mitch@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu) Received: (qmail 2179 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Jun 2005 01:24:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jun 2005 01:24:59 -0000 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:24:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Mitch Parks To: Doug White In-Reply-To: <20050619161113.V83634@carver.gumbysoft.com> Message-ID: <20050619180740.H750@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> References: <20050617150950.F1236@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> <20050619161113.V83634@carver.gumbysoft.com> X-Radio: KUOI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4-p1 crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 01:25:00 -0000 On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Doug White wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Mitch Parks wrote: >> Below are details regarding another crash on a Dell 2600 SMP (HTT and USB >> disabled). It has been 9 days since the last crash. I didn't have the serial >> console in place for this last crash, but it is now. > > As noted, the ttwakeup() panic is a known bug. The best thing we have for > a fix is this patch: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tty.t_pgrp.diff > > Please give it a try and report back if you have any more panics (or > don't :-) ). Thanks! This patch appears to be for 5.3, but I manually applied the chunk of the patch that didn't apply cleanly and the countdown is on. I'll report back in 10 days unless something bad happens before then. Below is the patch chunk #10 that I actually applied rather than the one given. If I've done something bad here by removing the PGRP_LOCK please let me know. .... Hunk #6 succeeded at 1154 (offset -51 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 1215 (offset -6 lines). Hunk #8 succeeded at 1203 (offset -51 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 1946 (offset -5 lines). Hunk #10 failed at 2562. Hunk #11 succeeded at 2847 (offset -212 lines). 1 out of 11 hunks failed--saving rejects to tty.c.rej @@ -2495,19 +2511,21 @@ * On return following a ttyprintf(), we set tp->t_rocount to 0 so * that pending input will be retyped on BS. */ + sx_slock(&proctree_lock); if (tp->t_session == NULL) { + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); ttyprintf(tp, "not a controlling terminal\n"); tp->t_rocount = 0; return; } if (tp->t_pgrp == NULL) { + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); ttyprintf(tp, "no foreground process group\n"); tp->t_rocount = 0; return; } - PGRP_LOCK(tp->t_pgrp); - if ((p = LIST_FIRST(&tp->t_pgrp->pg_members)) == 0) { - PGRP_UNLOCK(tp->t_pgrp); + if ((p = LIST_FIRST(&tp->t_pgrp->pg_members)) == NULL) { + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); ttyprintf(tp, "empty foreground process group\n"); tp->t_rocount = 0; return; Or the complete patch: http://kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu/~mitch/crash/tty_5.4.patch Mitch Parks mitch@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 01:47:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFF316A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 01:47:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from evantd@washington.edu) Received: from innosense.washington.edu (c-24-19-1-105.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [24.19.1.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A539943D49 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 01:47:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from evantd@washington.edu) Received: by innosense.washington.edu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2DD86BCD9; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:46:17 -0700 From: Evan Dower To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050620014617.GA54283@innosense.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: ndis no longer detects netgear wg311v2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 01:47:08 -0000 I recently moved, and for some reason my computer started crashing when I tried to make it associate with my new wireless network. (It worked fine on the old wireless network.) I figured the first thing I should do to fix the problem is update my sources, since it may have already been fixed. Unfortunately the updated sources don't recognize my wireless card at all. Before the update (hand-transcribed): # uname -a FreeBSD lojak.washington.edu 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Apr 2 11:50:53 PST 2005 root@lojak.washington.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM i386 # kldload FwRad16.bin.ko # kldload ndis # kldload if_ndis ndis0: mem 0xfb020000-0xfb03ffff,0xfb040000-0xfb041fff irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci2 ndis0: NDIS API version: 5.1 ndis0: Ethernet address: 00:09:5b:ba:da:ef ndis0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps ndis0: 11g rates: 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps # ifconfig ndis0 ndis0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 ether 00:09:5b:da:ef media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier ssid "" channel -1 authmode OPEN powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100 rtsthreshold 2312 protmode CTS wepmode OFF weptxkey 1 # wicontrol ndis0 -l 0 stations: # ifconfig ndis0 ssid "The Penthouse" channel 11 up ndis0: link up # dhclient ndis0 ndis0: link up <<< I can't see the whole panic screen, but here's the bottom: >>> panic: page fault cpuid = 0 boot() called on cpu#0 Uptime: 11m20s Dumping 1023 MB Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1; apic id = 01 fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor read, page not present intruction pointer = 0x8:0x0 stack pointer = 0x10:0xe4e1fcec frame pointer = 0x10:0xe4e1fd0c code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 5 (thread taskq) trap number = 12 I can work on getting the crash dump if that's useful, but the behavior seems to have changed in the last couple of months. Now I get: # uname -a FreeBSD lojak.washington.edu 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sat Jun 14:20:40 PDT 2005 root@lojak.washington.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM i386 # kldload FwRad16.bin.ko # kldload ndis warning: KLD '/boot/kernel/if_ndis.ko' is newer than the linker.hints file # kldload if_ndis kldload: can't load if_ndis: File exists # kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 10 0xc0400000 4a42f0 kernel 2 14 0xc08a5000 56270 acpi.ko 3 1 0xc2e83000 14000 FwRad16.bin.ko 4 1 0xc2e97000 9000 if_ndis.ko 5 1 0xc2ea0000 12000 ndis.ko 6 1 0xc2ec5000 b000 pccard.ko # ifconfig ndis0 ifconfig: interface ndis0 does not exist # kldunload if_ndis # kldload if_ndis # ifconfig ndis0 ifconfig: interface ndis0 does not exist I haven't seen anything in UPDATING that accounts for this. Does anyone have any idea of where to look for clues? Thanks very much, -- Evan Dower Software Development Engineer Amazon.com, Inc. Public key: http://students.washington.edu/evantd/pgp-pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = D321 FA24 4BDA F82D 53A9 5B27 7D15 5A4F 033F 887D From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 02:07:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D08516A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:07:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brucegb@realtime.net) Received: from ruth.realtime.net (ruth.realtime.net [205.238.132.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D2543D1F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:07:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brucegb@realtime.net) Received: from tigerfish2.my.domain (unverified [70.113.33.56]) by realtime.net (Realtime Communications Advanced E-Mail Services V9.2) with ESMTP id 86724110 for multiple; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:07:42 -0500 Received: from tigerfish2.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tigerfish2.my.domain (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5K27fMm031388; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:07:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brucegb@tigerfish2.my.domain) Received: (from brucegb@localhost) by tigerfish2.my.domain (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j5K27fwA031387; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:07:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brucegb) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:07:41 -0500 From: Bruce Burden To: Tomas Randa Message-ID: <20050620020741.GM20906@tigerfish2.my.domain> References: <42B5ED53.3010805@hosting50.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42B5ED53.3010805@hosting50.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI troubles X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:07:46 -0000 On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:10:27AM +0200, Tomas Randa wrote: > > I Am running 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sun May 8 18:23:40 CEST > 2005 with Adaptec 29320 or 2930U2 controller and with heavy load on SCSI > I have the following problems ending with system freeze. Have anybody > some opinion where could be problem? > > kernel: ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 0 (cmdcmplt) > kernel: QOUTPOS = 252 > Why are you using ahc() rather than ahd()? Have you tried the ahd() driver previously? What do you consider "heavy load"? I have nad no problems with the ahd() and a 29320. Bruce -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "I like bad!" Bruce Burden Austin, TX. - Thuganlitha The Power and the Prophet Robert Don Hughes From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 05:59:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4102E16A41F; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:59:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from silver.he.iki.fi (helenius.fi [193.64.42.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCB043D4C; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:58:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from [193.64.42.172] (hac.vuokselantie10.fi [193.64.42.172]) by silver.he.iki.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765F4BB42; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:58:55 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <42B65B5A.40005@he.iki.fi> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:59:54 +0300 From: Petri Helenius User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa References: <51688.147.175.8.5.1119105461.squirrel@webmail.satronet.sk> <42B46C9B.7000206@mac.com> <200506190004.48066.vanco@satro.sk> <200506182214.33279.josemi@redesjm.local> <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> <6.2.1.2.0.20050619161035.03720998@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050619161035.03720998@64.7.153.2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routes not deleted after link down X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:59:00 -0000 Mike Tancsa wrote: > > I like this idea as well, but you need to control how the routes would > come back after the interface comes back up ? This seems more of the > province of a routing daemon like quagga as opposed to a kernel > feature no ? The connected interface should try to transmit packets according to it's netmask when the interface is operational. So it should come back up "immediately". (at least when the mentioned sysctl is enabled) Pete From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 07:13:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED1D16A41C; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:13:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vanco@satro.sk) Received: from mail.satronet.sk (mail.satronet.sk [217.144.16.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4175B43D58; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:13:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vanco@satro.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.satronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80ADA1605A151; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:13:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.satronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31436-02-21; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:13:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [147.175.51.163] (unknown [147.175.51.163]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.satronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF091605665F; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:13:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Michal Vanco Organization: Satro s.r.o. To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:13:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <51688.147.175.8.5.1119105461.squirrel@webmail.satronet.sk> <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> <42B5CD89.6070509@wm-access.no> In-Reply-To: <42B5CD89.6070509@wm-access.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3864263.Jzx53G1yHf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506201113.34307.vanco@satro.sk> X-Virus-Scanned: by ANTIvirus at satronet.sk Cc: Gleb Smirnoff , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Sten Daniel =?iso-8859-1?q?S=F8rsdal?= Subject: Re: Routes not deleted after link down X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:13:41 -0000 --nextPart3864263.Jzx53G1yHf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 19 June 2005 21:54, Sten Daniel S=F8rsdal wrote: > Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it > > switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is. > > > > What is opinion of other networkers? > > How about also adding a sysctl for setting a delay time between event > and disabling of the route? Then even people with roaming wlan cards can > benefit. > Also it is in my opinion that the route be disabled (moved to a passive > route table maybe?) and not deleted. This is what I meant initially. Marking route passive is better than just=20 deleting it and it'll be also faster to recall the route back in case of li= nk=20 up. --nextPart3864263.Jzx53G1yHf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCtoi+2/VqJwUsLAMRAkV7AJ9k4+qUBriivsLdaNcjSo3RHtA3LQCgmgEG hm+IhTO2UeeDrVeR6401neE= =s+kG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3864263.Jzx53G1yHf-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 07:29:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD33A16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:29:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from decibel@decibel.org) Received: from flake.decibel.org (flake.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AAF743D48 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:29:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from decibel@decibel.org) Received: by flake.decibel.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 066AF15230; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:29:46 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:29:46 -0500 From: "Jim C. Nasby" To: Greg Barniskis Message-ID: <20050620072946.GL5113@decibel.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jim C. Nasby" , Greg Barniskis , "J. T. Farmer" , uzi@bmby.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050617103807.058c6fa8@mail.distrust.net> <005c01c57354$3e877900$fe00a8c0@uzi> <42B2E9B5.7090803@goldsword.com> <42B2EC91.8070800@scls.lib.wi.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42B2EC91.8070800@scls.lib.wi.us> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE i386 X-Distributed: Join the Effort! http://www.distributed.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: uzi@bmby.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:29:51 -0000 On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:30:25AM -0500, Greg Barniskis wrote: > I think he meant comparing 36,000 on CentOS (async) to 24,000 on > CURRENT (sync). I wondered that myself, and having searched out the > answer I find that it is declared in > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-disk.html > > that async provides fast writes at the cost of "no guarantee at all > for a consistent state of the filesystem". So, you choose: fast but > not so reliable writes, or slower writes with fast, reliable > disaster recovery. > > Thanks to the FreeBSD team for choosing the sensible default, even > if it results in the occasional "Linux is faster!" debate. Dang > smirky penguins... you're flightless I tell ya, flightless. =) Note that it's very easy to accidentally configure MySQL in such a manner that you don't have any data integrity anyway. For example, if you fat-finger 'innodb' as 'innodd' or something MySQL siletly creates a MyISAM table for you. So if you care about data integrity, you should probably look beyond MySQL in the first place. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 08:35:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2879A16A41C; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:35:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.156.12.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA29443D4C; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:35:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C17246BA3; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 04:35:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:38:27 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050620092829.E19830@fledge.watson.org> References: <8149D7F8-3FA2-48F5-BF03-9AF813448BF0@anduin.net> <20050619185338.J6413@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-980453451-1119256707=:19830" Cc: stable@freebsd.org, mlaier@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NFS-related hang in 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:35:43 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-980453451-1119256707=:19830 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Eirik =D8verby wrote: >> Hmm. Looks like a bug in dummynet. ipfw should not be directly re-=20 >> injecting UDP traffic back into the input path from an outbound path,=20 >> or it risks re-entering, generating lock order problems, etc. It should= =20 >> be getting dropped into the netisr queue to be processed from the=20 >> netisr context. > > This problem would exist across all 5.4 installations, both i386 and=20 > amd64? Would it depend on heavy load, or could it theoretically happen=20 > at any time when there's traffic? All three of my fbsd5 servers (dual=20 > opteron, dual p3-1ghz, dual p3-700mhz) are experiencing random hangs=20 > with ~a few weeks between, impression is that if running single-cpu mode= =20 > they are all stable. All using dummynet in a comparable manner. Ideas? Yes. Basically, the network stack avoids recursion in processing for=20 "complicated" packets by deferring processing an offending packet to a=20 thread called the 'netisr'. Whenever the stack reaches a possible=20 recursion point on a packet, it's supposed to queue the packet for=20 processing 'later' in a per-protocol queue, unwind, and then when the=20 netisr runs, pick up and continue processing. In the stack trace you=20 provide, dummynet appears to immediately immediately invoke the in-bound=20 network path from the out-bound network path, walking back into the=20 network stack from the outbound path. This is generally forbidden, for a= =20 variety of reasons: - We do allow the in-bound path to call the out-bound path, so that protocols like TCP, and services like NFS can turn around packets without a context switch. If further recursion is permitted, the stack may overflow. - Both paths may hold network stack locks over calls in either direction -- specifically, we allow protocol locks to be held over calls into the socket layer, as the protocol layer drives operation; if a recursive call is made, deadlocks can occur due to violating the lock order. This is what is happening in your case. Pretty much all network code is entirely architecture-independent, so bugs= =20 typically span architectures, although race conditions can sometimes be=20 hard to reproduce if they require precise timing and multiple processors. >> Is it possible to configure dummynet out of your configuration, and see= =20 >> if the problem goes away? > > I'm running a test right now, will let you know in the morning. Thanks. Robert N M Watson --0-980453451-1119256707=:19830-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 10:09:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA92616A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:09:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Received: from schubert.byrnehq.com (dsl-33-12.dsl.netsource.ie [213.79.33.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1A143D53 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:09:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Received: from localhost (mauer.directski.com. [212.147.140.194]) by schubert.byrnehq.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5KB9gTD011054 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:09:42 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:09:53 +0100 From: Tony Byrne Organization: ByrneHQ X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <67335859.20050620110953@byrnehq.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <8d02aed005061918049c8fd8@mail.gmail.com> References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> <42B5DAEA.4040908@nurfuerspam.de> <8d02aed005061918049c8fd8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ByrneHQ-SA-Hits: 1.455 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 192.168.10.254 Subject: Re[2]: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tony Byrne List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:09:48 -0000 Hello twesky, t> atapci0: port t> 0x1860-0x186f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on t> pci0 t> ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 t> ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 t> The last known good stable version for me was aprox April 25, my next t> cvsup was May 17, but I have problems with 5.4 Release so I assume t> (probably incorrectly) that something changed between April 25 and t> 5.4R. t> I don't exactly recall my shutdown errors, but I did have to restore t> my file systems to get my laptop back to a functioning state. We've been seeing the same problem in a server equipped with an Intel ICH5 controller and SATA Hard Disk. The problems seemed to start after an update in mid-May. We noticed that processes such as our imap server would stall for a few seconds and the console would indicate either a READ_DMA or WRITE_DMA timeout. On two occasions the the disk became detached requiring a reboot. The frequency of these timeouts were such that we couldn't do any work with the server. We didn't have this problem prior to the update. We are tracking RELENG_5, but have now reverted to a May 9th kernel, which doesn't seem to be quite so fussy and has reduced the problem to a handful of timeouts every day. What's bugging me is that this list has been very quiet about this problem. The Intel ICH* controllers must be common in the field and I'm surprised that this problem has gone unnoticed. Of course, there can be hardware reasons for timeouts such as a dying disk or cable, but I think we've eliminated these in our case. The disk works fine when transferred to another machine and the SATA cable works fine when used with another disk (albeit one of smaller capacity) in the server. So we've come to the conclusion that it's the combination of controller, disk and FreeBSD version that holds the key to this. Jun 20 10:20:04 roo kernel: atapci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.2 on pci0 Jun 20 10:20:04 roo kernel: ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 Jun 20 10:20:04 roo kernel: ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 ... Jun 20 10:20:04 roo kernel: ad0: 190782MB [387621/16/63] at ata0-master SATA150 Jun 20 10:20:04 roo kernel: acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 ... Regards, Tony. -- Tony Byrne From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 10:42:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF0E16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:42:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@hosting50.cz) Received: from tygr.czu.cz (tygr.czu.cz [193.84.32.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C596D43D53 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:42:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@hosting50.cz) Received: from AF.CZU.CZ (af.czu.cz [193.84.40.5]) by tygr.czu.cz (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5KAfln07457; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:41:47 +0200 Received: from AGRO60/SpoolDir by AF.CZU.CZ (Mercury 1.21); 20 Jun 105 12:41:48 MET Received: from SpoolDir by AGRO60 (Mercury 1.48); 20 Jun 05 12:41:41 MET Received: from [193.84.40.30] (193.84.40.30) by AF.CZU.CZ (Mercury 1.48) with ESMTP; 20 Jun 05 12:41:40 MET Message-ID: <42B6B9A5.7030709@hosting50.cz> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:42:13 +0000 From: Tomas Randa User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050328) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Burden References: <42B5ED53.3010805@hosting50.cz> <20050620020741.GM20906@tigerfish2.my.domain> In-Reply-To: <20050620020741.GM20906@tigerfish2.my.domain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Tygr-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Tygr-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Tygr-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0, required 5, autolearn=disabled) X-Tygr-MailScanner-From: lists@hosting50.cz Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI troubles X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:42:14 -0000 Hi, I tried ahc controller, but with ahd (29320 controller) the situation is identical :( I have a database server data and system on this hard drive. And for example when I start cvsup or copy big files, this errors starts. Somewhere on google, I read that problems might be when Tagged Queing is enabled, do you think it is possible? Thanks Tomas Randa Bruce Burden wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:10:27AM +0200, Tomas Randa wrote: > >>I Am running 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sun May 8 18:23:40 CEST >>2005 with Adaptec 29320 or 2930U2 controller and with heavy load on SCSI >>I have the following problems ending with system freeze. Have anybody >>some opinion where could be problem? >> >>kernel: ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 0 (cmdcmplt) >>kernel: QOUTPOS = 252 >> > > Why are you using ahc() rather than ahd()? Have you tried > the ahd() driver previously? > > What do you consider "heavy load"? I have nad no problems > with the ahd() and a 29320. > > Bruce From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 10:45:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46EB16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:45:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.schuh@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6066F43D48 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:45:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.schuh@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g2so29409nfe for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:45:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=oWeOQ3KyHySfs2epG5US+S0Rdu/01Za0ZaPeUEUOtWFUOP79IvWmRbmshw9uHT9f/XjVukcjuVGRa2i+AzIYeZRxO7RrddLyGjumoq7M9VwrIgD3V8zHAeveRB7IVfKIxxeiU36dieoId8HMMpU8FazPhmmB22HlxymS1QLOgZI= Received: by 10.48.144.12 with SMTP id r12mr79059nfd; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:45:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.244.20 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:45:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1dbad315050620034565892ee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:45:10 +0200 From: Michael Schuh To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Schuh List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:45:11 -0000 Hello, i follows up these thread and i think you all digging on the false possible error location...... I have made many performance tests with RELENG_4 related to RELENG_5 and DragonFly and Gentoo. My results was that RELENG_5 is half as RELENG_4 fast by disk-access (ata-related). I have seen that RELENG_5 with GENERIC Kernel and only modified option HZ= =3D2000. the spread begind with Gentoo (mentoided from me as the slowest, but errare humanum est) Gentoo : 100% time consumption RELENG_4: 67% time consumtion DrangonFly Rel1.2 69-72% time consumption (i think preemtion) RELENG_5 134% time consumtion these tests are made on physically the same Hardware (real, not equal system, same system, same disk, same RAM) with the command: # cd /; /usr/bin/time dd if=3D/dev/zero bs=3D1024 count=3D1024k of=3Dzerofi= le; rm zerofile the tests are made more then 3 times/period/system. I have made the tests to the beginning of stable-5, and by the release 5.4. after the Release from DragonFly. By the first time i have made a mailing on stable, and i become the answer thath these issues become fixed on RELENG_6..... so i think you have to wait on the developers.... :-(( best regards Michael From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 10:48:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1705816A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:48:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (gid.co.uk [194.32.164.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1EB43D1F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:48:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: (from rb@localhost) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.11.7/8.11.6) id j5KAmke09974; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:48:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20050620114339.04461da8@gid.co.uk> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:48:38 +0100 To: Tony Byrne , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Bob Bishop In-Reply-To: <67335859.20050620110953@byrnehq.com> References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> <42B5DAEA.4040908@nurfuerspam.de> <8d02aed005061918049c8fd8@mail.gmail.com> <67335859.20050620110953@byrnehq.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re[2]: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:48:49 -0000 At 11:09 20/06/2005, Tony Byrne wrote: >[...] > Of course, there >can be hardware reasons for timeouts such as a dying disk or cable, >but I think we've eliminated these in our case. [etc] Don't ignore the possibility of failing controller hardware. We had comparable mysterious problems on a client system, causing a lot of head-scratching. Eventually the failure went hard and we had to replace the motherboard. -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 940 1243 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 940 1295 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 11:12:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5DF16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:12:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Received: from schubert.byrnehq.com (dsl-33-12.dsl.netsource.ie [213.79.33.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BCC43D58 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:12:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Received: from localhost (mauer.directski.com. [212.147.140.194]) by schubert.byrnehq.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5KCBtEk011189; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:11:56 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:12:06 +0100 From: Tony Byrne Organization: ByrneHQ X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1985138264.20050620121206@byrnehq.com> To: Bob Bishop In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050620114339.04461da8@gid.co.uk> References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> <42B5DAEA.4040908@nurfuerspam.de> <8d02aed005061918049c8fd8@mail.gmail.com> <67335859.20050620110953@byrnehq.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20050620114339.04461da8@gid.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ByrneHQ-SA-Hits: 1.455 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 192.168.10.254 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Tony Byrne Subject: Re[3]: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tony Byrne List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:12:02 -0000 Hello Bob, >>can be hardware reasons for timeouts such as a dying disk or cable, >>but I think we've eliminated these in our case. [etc] BB> Don't ignore the possibility of failing controller hardware. We had BB> comparable mysterious problems on a client system, causing a lot of BB> head-scratching. Eventually the failure went hard and we had to replace the BB> motherboard. I hear ya! However, moving back to an older kernel changes the severity of the problem from a timeout every 2 to three minutes during heavy activity to about 4 or 5 in a 24 hour period. That doesn't sound like hardware to me. Regards, Tony. -- Tony Byrne From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 11:14:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76E916A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:14:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-5.paradise.net.nz (bm-5a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.58.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B07943D1F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:14:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (smtp-1a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.32.194]) by linda-5.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IID00842R8SFX@linda-5.paradise.net.nz> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:14:52 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-45-99.paradise.net.nz [218.101.45.99]) by smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CFE82912; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:14:51 +1200 (NZST) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:14:48 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <1dbad315050620034565892ee@mail.gmail.com> To: Michael Schuh Message-id: <42B6A528.2000204@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050511) References: <1dbad315050620034565892ee@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:14:57 -0000 Michael Schuh wrote: > > > My results was that RELENG_5 is half as RELENG_4 fast by disk-access > (ata-related). > > I have seen that RELENG_5 with GENERIC Kernel and only modified option HZ=2000. > > the spread begind with Gentoo (mentoided from me as the slowest, but > errare humanum est) > > Gentoo : 100% time consumption > RELENG_4: 67% time consumtion > DrangonFly Rel1.2 69-72% time consumption (i think preemtion) > RELENG_5 134% time consumtion > > these tests are made on physically the same Hardware (real, not equal > system, same system, same disk, same RAM) with the command: > > # cd /; /usr/bin/time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024 count=1024k of=zerofile; > > You have shown that sequential IO is slower in RELENG_5 (I think others have observed this also - check out Google)...However, random IO is often more important for databases, and RELENG_5 can be faster than RELENG_4 (try out iozone, it makes testing this easy). Also note that if your operating systems are installed in different parts of the same disk, then this will effect your results too - as some parts are faster than others. With respect to Mysql performance, I would suspect threading or threading/kernel interaction as the culprit. (That reminds me, I don't recall seeing the original poster re-doing the tests with 6.0-CURRENT - that would be interesting). cheers Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 11:38:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93ED316A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:38:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmartin37@speakeasy.net) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6FA43D55 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:38:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmartin37@speakeasy.net) Received: (qmail 17981 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2005 11:38:08 -0000 Received: from adsl-211-141-154.asm.bellsouth.net (HELO [192.168.2.101]) (moonlightcheese@[68.211.141.154]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 Jun 2005 11:38:08 -0000 Message-ID: <42B6AA9C.1020101@speakeasy.net> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:38:04 -0400 From: JM User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.3 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Byrne References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> <42B5DAEA.4040908@nurfuerspam.de> <8d02aed005061918049c8fd8@mail.gmail.com> <67335859.20050620110953@byrnehq.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20050620114339.04461da8@gid.co.uk> <1985138264.20050620121206@byrnehq.com> In-Reply-To: <1985138264.20050620121206@byrnehq.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:38:08 -0000 Tony Byrne wrote: >Hello Bob, > > > > >>>can be hardware reasons for timeouts such as a dying disk or cable, >>>but I think we've eliminated these in our case. [etc] >>> >>> > >BB> Don't ignore the possibility of failing controller hardware. We had >BB> comparable mysterious problems on a client system, causing a lot of >BB> head-scratching. Eventually the failure went hard and we had to replace the >BB> motherboard. > >I hear ya! However, moving back to an older kernel changes the >severity of the problem from a timeout every 2 to three minutes during >heavy activity to about 4 or 5 in a 24 hour period. That doesn't >sound like hardware to me. > >Regards, > >Tony. > > > i have these same errors on my VIA 823x series chipset. however, the problem is only with the secondary device (acd0 in this case), and might be stemming from some other problem. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 11:48:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E6B16A41F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:48:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.schuh@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F167243D4C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:48:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.schuh@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g2so31942nfe for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 04:48:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=U7ILXQT4gAC7VXhL2flRMkulKvBonY74mEUZQMCaXJgyQNOWUmKka/T9RNPt8AosKddfCfvJH1vuqQ7rs8KYOwRN9eJROauUeh36tSYoPUPqyaB6Xu7Vbvc4h3WiBGD4vnVUK914r2uvG2+JYBFuFtJg5lRt8ZGF/bcWFQDPckQ= Received: by 10.48.249.6 with SMTP id w6mr81006nfh; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 04:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.244.20 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 04:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1dbad315050620044862e8a7f6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:48:57 +0200 From: Michael Schuh To: Mark Kirkwood In-Reply-To: <42B6A528.2000204@paradise.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1dbad315050620034565892ee@mail.gmail.com> <42B6A528.2000204@paradise.net.nz> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Schuh List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:48:59 -0000 Hello, yes random IO is more targetted to Databases. noop, i have the installation always made in the same way, and i have respe= cted the different diskperformace in different disk-parts..... this was the reason for #cd /;=20 at the beginning of my tests. In the first test i have me shooting self in my foot and i bites me in my ass :-))) =20 my suggestion going more in the direction...first solve all disk(ata) relat= ed performace issues, then test the mysql-performaces issues again to secure that you are not lying on an mixing of many problems.... :-) I think this was better then seek around corners that are not so relevant..= . or the result is not so dramatically.... greetings Michael 2005/6/20, Mark Kirkwood : > Michael Schuh wrote: > > > > > > My results was that RELENG_5 is half as RELENG_4 fast by disk-access > > (ata-related). > > > > I have seen that RELENG_5 with GENERIC Kernel and only modified option = HZ=3D2000. > > > > the spread begind with Gentoo (mentoided from me as the slowest, but > > errare humanum est) > > > > Gentoo : 100% time consumption > > RELENG_4: 67% time consumtion > > DrangonFly Rel1.2 69-72% time consumption (i think preemtion) > > RELENG_5 134% time consumtion > > > > these tests are made on physically the same Hardware (real, not equal > > system, same system, same disk, same RAM) with the command: > > > > # cd /; /usr/bin/time dd if=3D/dev/zero bs=3D1024 count=3D1024k of=3Dze= rofile; > > > > >=20 > You have shown that sequential IO is slower in RELENG_5 (I think others > have observed this also - check out Google)...However, random IO is > often more important for databases, and RELENG_5 can be faster than > RELENG_4 (try out iozone, it makes testing this easy). >=20 > Also note that if your operating systems are installed in different > parts of the same disk, then this will effect your results too - as some > parts are faster than others. >=20 > With respect to Mysql performance, I would suspect threading or > threading/kernel interaction as the culprit. (That reminds me, I don't > recall seeing the original poster re-doing the tests with 6.0-CURRENT - > that would be interesting). >=20 > cheers >=20 > Mark >=20 > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 12:02:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B36916A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:02:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (gid.co.uk [194.32.164.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4970D43D1F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:02:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: (from rb@localhost) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.11.7/8.11.6) id j5KC2K110612; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:02:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20050620123319.0477e928@gid.co.uk> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:02:11 +0100 To: Tony Byrne From: Bob Bishop In-Reply-To: <1985138264.20050620121206@byrnehq.com> References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> <42B5DAEA.4040908@nurfuerspam.de> <8d02aed005061918049c8fd8@mail.gmail.com> <67335859.20050620110953@byrnehq.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20050620114339.04461da8@gid.co.uk> <1985138264.20050620121206@byrnehq.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Tony Byrne Subject: Re[3]: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:02:36 -0000 At 12:12 20/06/2005, Tony Byrne wrote: >Hello Bob, > > > >>can be hardware reasons for timeouts such as a dying disk or cable, > >>but I think we've eliminated these in our case. [etc] > >BB> Don't ignore the possibility of failing controller hardware. We had >BB> comparable mysterious problems on a client system, causing a lot of >BB> head-scratching. Eventually the failure went hard and we had to >replace the >BB> motherboard. > >I hear ya! However, moving back to an older kernel changes the >severity of the problem from a timeout every 2 to three minutes during >heavy activity to about 4 or 5 in a 24 hour period. That doesn't >sound like hardware to me. It didn't to me either. Note the use of 'mysterious' :-) I'd eliminated drives and cables, and then did it all over again when the failure went hard, leaving the controller (or something else on the mobo). With a new mobo all the annoying timeouts which I'd put down to driver misbehaviour just went away. -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 940 1243 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 940 1295 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 15:56:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDDE16A41C; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:56:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.156.12.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7AB43D1F; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:56:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915D246B20; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:56:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:59:30 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: David Sze In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.2.20050617091736.05949298@mail.distrust.net> Message-ID: <20050619165349.U6413@fledge.watson.org> References: <746fd037f6ca8131a8fb8938f1e346e9@lonres.com> <20050610170537.GA67849@bibipentium.lonres.com> <20050611085604.J75625@fledge.watson.org> <20050616161506.GB28794@bibipentium.lonres.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050617091736.05949298@mail.distrust.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:09:14 +0000 Cc: Steve Roome , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, steve@pepcross.com, Guy Helmer , Kris Kennaway , Greg 'groggy' Lehey , performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:56:52 -0000 On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, David Sze wrote: > FreeBSD/amd64 5.4-RELEASE (libpthread, system and process scope) > FreeBSD/amd64 6.0-CURRENT (libpthread, libthr, system and process > scope) > CentOS/amd64 4.0 (i.e. RHEL4.0) > > I couldn't get libthr to work on FreeBSD/amd64 5.4-RELEASE, mysqld would > immediately coredump and the stacktrace looked like it was corrupted > (i.e. hundreds of stack frames, all of which were ???). The libthr in 5.x is basically an early prototype compared to the more mature work on 6.x, so this result is not all that surprising. David Xu has put a very large amount of work into the libthr on 6.x with some very good results. > It turns out that the problem was the same thing everyone usually points > the finger at, but no one actually mentioned this time: Linux mounts > its partitions async by default. I don't have the exact numbers in > front of me right now, but these were the ballpark figures (I'm not > going to separate out results for all of the different threading > libraries for FreeBSD because the deltas weren't huge): This is actually an interesting observation -- on 6.x using P4 Xeon hardware, I've seen a substantial performance improvement from running with libthr with MySQL. Sometimes as much as 30% - 50%. However, amd64 is quite a different beast. BTW, could you run 'file' on the Linux and FreeBSD MySQL binaries and confirm that they're both either 32-bit i386 binaries, or 64-bit amd64 binaries? > That last CentOS number is not a typo, it was an order of magnitude > slower. I didn't try other file systems on CentOS, just the default > ext3. It's possible that reiserfs or xfs might not be as affected by > switching from async to sync. > > So my production server is now happily running mysql 4.1 on 6.0-CURRENT > :). I was interested to observe, in some benchmarking a few months ago, that 4.0 MySQL performance on FreeBSD 6.x is a *lot* faster than 4.1 MySQL performance. I don't track MySQL feature development, but I couldn't help but wonder if either there had been substantial reliability changes that impacted file system semantics (which might be indicated by sync/async issues), or whether there had been a lot of performance optimization work for Linux that had swung its use of IPC/etc primitives towards ones that work better on Linux than FreeBSD? BTW, could you confirm that on 6.x, you're setting /etc/malloc.conf so that it's not scrubbing memory on free()? In particular: ln -s jz /etc/malloc.conf as root. Most 6.x debugging features are set as part of the kernel configuration, and your performance results suggest that you've caught them all already, I think, but this one is user space. Also, make sure you are compiling without INVARIANT_SUPPORT -- for packet send tests, I find that even without INVARIANTS, I see a 4% hit for having INVARIANT_SUPPORT in the kernel. Robert N M Watson From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 12:12:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE0016A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:12:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655D943D49 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:12:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from eirik.unicore.no ([213.225.74.166] helo=[10.0.16.10]) by anduin.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DkL8n-000C9C-3n for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:12:37 +0200 Resent-Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:12:02 +0200 Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Resent-To: stable@freebsd.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= Resent-From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:53:19 +0200 To: Robert Watson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Cc: Subject: Re: NFS-related hang in 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:12:38 -0000 On 20. jun. 2005, at 10.38, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Eirik =D8verby wrote: > > > >>> Hmm. Looks like a bug in dummynet. ipfw should not be directly =20 >>> re- injecting UDP traffic back into the input path from an =20 >>> outbound path, or it risks re-entering, generating lock order =20 >>> problems, etc. It should be getting dropped into the netisr queue =20= >>> to be processed from the netisr context. >>> >>> >> >> This problem would exist across all 5.4 installations, both i386 =20 >> and amd64? Would it depend on heavy load, or could it =20 >> theoretically happen at any time when there's traffic? All three =20 >> of my fbsd5 servers (dual opteron, dual p3-1ghz, dual p3-700mhz) =20 >> are experiencing random hangs with ~a few weeks between, =20 >> impression is that if running single-cpu mode they are all stable. =20= >> All using dummynet in a comparable manner. Ideas? >> >> > > Yes. Basically, the network stack avoids recursion in processing =20 > for "complicated" packets by deferring processing an offending =20 > packet to a thread called the 'netisr'. Whenever the stack reaches =20= > a possible recursion point on a packet, it's supposed to queue the =20 > packet for processing 'later' in a per-protocol queue, unwind, and =20 > then when the netisr runs, pick up and continue processing. In the =20= > stack trace you provide, dummynet appears to immediately =20 > immediately invoke the in-bound network path from the out-bound =20 > network path, walking back into the network stack from the outbound =20= > path. This is generally forbidden, for a variety of reasons: > > - We do allow the in-bound path to call the out-bound path, so that > protocols like TCP, and services like NFS can turn around packets > without a context switch. If further recursion is permitted, the =20= > stack > may overflow. > > - Both paths may hold network stack locks over calls in either =20 > direction > -- specifically, we allow protocol locks to be held over calls =20 > into the > socket layer, as the protocol layer drives operation; if a recursive > call is made, deadlocks can occur due to violating the lock =20 > order. This > is what is happening in your case. > > Pretty much all network code is entirely architecture-independent, =20 > so bugs typically span architectures, although race conditions can =20 > sometimes be hard to reproduce if they require precise timing and =20 > multiple processors. > So I'm lucky to have seen this one... Great ;) >>> Is it possible to configure dummynet out of your configuration, =20 >>> and see if the problem goes away? >>> >>> >> >> I'm running a test right now, will let you know in the morning. >> >> > > Thanks. > I know enough not to call this a "confirmation", but disabling =20 dummynet did indeed allow me to finish the backup. I never made it =20 past 15GBs before, now the full 19GB tar.gz file is done, and the =20 boxes are both still running. The funny thing is - I only disabled =20 dummynet on one of the boxes now - the source of the backup, the box =20 that pushes data. The other box has pretty much 100% the same setup, =20 and is also i386. But as traffic shaping can only happen on outgoing =20 packets, I suppose that makes sense. I can try re-running the test again if you wish, in order to gain =20 more statistics. It's just too bad it takes a while ;) /Eirik > > Robert N M Watson > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 12:19:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BBF16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:19:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Received: from schubert.byrnehq.com (dsl-33-12.dsl.netsource.ie [213.79.33.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AEC43D55 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:19:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Received: from localhost (mauer.directski.com. [212.147.140.194]) by schubert.byrnehq.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5KDJ4Pb011369; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:19:32 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:19:14 +0100 From: Tony Byrne Organization: ByrneHQ X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <255741629.20050620131914@byrnehq.com> To: Bob Bishop In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050620123319.0477e928@gid.co.uk> References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> <42B5DAEA.4040908@nurfuerspam.de> <8d02aed005061918049c8fd8@mail.gmail.com> <67335859.20050620110953@byrnehq.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20050620114339.04461da8@gid.co.uk> <1985138264.20050620121206@byrnehq.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20050620123319.0477e928@gid.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ByrneHQ-SA-Hits: 1.455 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 192.168.10.254 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Tony Byrne Subject: Re[4]: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tony Byrne List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:19:35 -0000 Hello Bob, BB> It didn't to me either. Note the use of 'mysterious' :-) BB> I'd eliminated drives and cables, and then did it all over again when the BB> failure went hard, leaving the controller (or something else on the mobo). BB> With a new mobo all the annoying timeouts which I'd put down to driver BB> misbehaviour just went away. Did you replace the motherboard with one of the same brand and model? Regards, Tony. -- Tony Byrne From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 12:33:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3546116A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:33:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (gid.co.uk [194.32.164.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF3443D1D for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:33:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: (from rb@localhost) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.11.7/8.11.6) id j5KCXbU10838; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:33:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20050620133252.044d0d68@gid.co.uk> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:33:29 +0100 To: Tony Byrne From: Bob Bishop In-Reply-To: <255741629.20050620131914@byrnehq.com> References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> <42B5DAEA.4040908@nurfuerspam.de> <8d02aed005061918049c8fd8@mail.gmail.com> <67335859.20050620110953@byrnehq.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20050620114339.04461da8@gid.co.uk> <1985138264.20050620121206@byrnehq.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20050620123319.0477e928@gid.co.uk> <255741629.20050620131914@byrnehq.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Tony Byrne Subject: Re[4]: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:33:49 -0000 At 13:19 20/06/2005, Tony Byrne wrote: >Hello Bob, > >BB> It didn't to me either. Note the use of 'mysterious' :-) >BB> I'd eliminated drives and cables, and then did it all over again when the >BB> failure went hard, leaving the controller (or something else on the mobo). >BB> With a new mobo all the annoying timeouts which I'd put down to driver >BB> misbehaviour just went away. > >Did you replace the motherboard with one of the same brand and model? No, but as it happened they both have the same SATA controller chip. -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 940 1243 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 940 1295 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 14:46:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A29D16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:46:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay@codegurus.org) Received: from pih-relay04.plus.net (pih-relay04.plus.net [212.159.14.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2934443D4C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:46:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay@codegurus.org) Received: from jayton.plus.com ([84.92.156.191] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by pih-relay04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1DkNXX-0004Fu-Ih for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:46:19 +0100 Message-ID: <42B6D6BC.4000208@codegurus.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:46:20 +0100 From: Jayton Garnett User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20050620120030.6818B16A420@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050620120030.6818B16A420@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) (JM) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jay@codegurus.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:46:21 -0000 I had a similar problem and i changed system cases where i was getting a ICRC error and FreeBSD refused to load or even mount the root fs, it was also giving errors with something to do with the ATA something or other, it turned out to be the cable i used after rebuilding the system in the new case, i used a normal EIDE cable instead of a ATA cable :-/ hope that helps(probably not) Jay > >Tony Byrne wrote: > > > >>Hello Bob, >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>can be hardware reasons for timeouts such as a dying disk or cable, >>>>but I think we've eliminated these in our case. [etc] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>BB> Don't ignore the possibility of failing controller hardware. We had >>BB> comparable mysterious problems on a client system, causing a lot of >>BB> head-scratching. Eventually the failure went hard and we had to replace the >>BB> motherboard. >> >>I hear ya! However, moving back to an older kernel changes the >>severity of the problem from a timeout every 2 to three minutes during >>heavy activity to about 4 or 5 in a 24 hour period. That doesn't >>sound like hardware to me. >> >>Regards, >> >>Tony. >> >> >> >> >> >i have these same errors on my VIA 823x series chipset. however, the >problem is only with the secondary device (acd0 in this case), and might >be stemming from some other problem. > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 15:03:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23F616A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:03:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.com (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB9F43D58 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:03:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from sysadm.stc ([192.168.2.26]) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1DkNoJ-0002KJ-GZ for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:03:39 +0400 Message-ID: <42B6DABB.40306@speechpro.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:03:23 +0400 From: Igor Robul User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050518) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20050618051752.GA519@faust.net> In-Reply-To: <20050618051752.GA519@faust.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: kernel panic with cdrecord X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:03:41 -0000 Zoran Kolic wrote: >Dear all! >After moving to amd64 system (64-bit), >I have problem writing cd with cdrecord. >Release 5.4 >Nec 3520a (dvd writer) > > If you wish to write DVDs, then you can try /usr/ports/sysutils/dvd+rw-tools If you just wish write CD-R/RW then you can try burncd (8) which is in base system. I could not tell, if this will help you with AMD64. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 15:09:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1032416A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:09:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.fluidhosting.com (mail1.fluidhosting.com [66.150.201.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DA8F43D48 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:09:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 57632 invoked by uid 399); 20 Jun 2005 15:09:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.15.101?) (dougb@dougbarton.net@67.20.70.103) by mail1.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2005 15:09:02 -0000 Message-ID: <42B6DC0B.2010303@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:08:59 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050326) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <20050619073203.GA11823@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050619073203.GA11823@cell.sick.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: named coredumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:09:04 -0000 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > today I've got problem with named exiting on signal 11. Yes, I've searched > archives and found that POKED TIMER is a problem in our threads. > > Has anyone faced this problem and workarounded it? Or may be even fixed it? > Is there anywhere detailed description of the problem? > > Jun 19 06:00:58 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** > Jun 19 06:28:40 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** > Jun 19 06:49:54 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** > Jun 19 07:18:19 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** > Jun 19 07:18:38 ns kernel: pid 44534 (named), uid 53: exited on signal 11 > You haven't stated what version of FreeBSD or named you are using. If you're using FreeBSD old enough so that your named is 9.3.0, then you should upgrade to 5-stable, which will as a by product upgrade named to 9.3.1 which has a lot of the threading issues solved. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 15:16:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D605F16A41F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:16:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@as9105.com) Received: from sickle.as9105.com (sickle.as9105.com [212.139.129.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F90043D53 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:16:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@as9105.com) Received: (qmail 46107 invoked by uid 30010); 20 Jun 2005 15:16:25 -0000 Received: from freebsd@as9105.com by sickle.as9105.com by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.75.1. spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(212.74.112.53):. Processed in 1.389997 secs); 20 Jun 2005 15:16:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO d2) (postmaster@as9105.com@212.74.112.53) by sickle.as9105.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2005 15:16:24 -0000 From: "Danny Cooper" To: "'Doug Barton'" , "'Gleb Smirnoff'" Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:16:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <42B6DC0B.2010303@FreeBSD.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcV1qiGwGrxtKgN0SZSq2f+1ohlPogAACWig X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <111928058467246101@sickle.as9105.com> Message-Id: <20050620151628.0F90043D53@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: named coredumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:16:30 -0000 I am receiving the same problems with FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (amd64) bind-9.3.1 DELL PE2850 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz 4 GB RAM named.log.0:19-Jun-2005 11:46:15.945 *** POKED TIMER *** named.log.0:19-Jun-2005 18:34:17.314 *** POKED TIMER *** named.log.0:20-Jun-2005 02:40:46.193 *** POKED TIMER *** Depending on the load the of the server it can happen every hour. In some case's named starts to Max out one CPU and refused to resolve DNS until named is killed and restarted. Danny Cooper -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Doug Barton Sent: 20 June 2005 16:09 To: Gleb Smirnoff Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: named coredumping Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > today I've got problem with named exiting on signal 11. Yes, I've searched > archives and found that POKED TIMER is a problem in our threads. > > Has anyone faced this problem and workarounded it? Or may be even fixed it? > Is there anywhere detailed description of the problem? > > Jun 19 06:00:58 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** > Jun 19 06:28:40 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** > Jun 19 06:49:54 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** > Jun 19 07:18:19 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** > Jun 19 07:18:38 ns kernel: pid 44534 (named), uid 53: exited on signal 11 > You haven't stated what version of FreeBSD or named you are using. If you're using FreeBSD old enough so that your named is 9.3.0, then you should upgrade to 5-stable, which will as a by product upgrade named to 9.3.1 which has a lot of the threading issues solved. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 15:19:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E70816A429; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:19:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B9543D1F; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:18:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0FE1F030; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:18:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 4A4016126; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:18:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:18:54 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Eirik =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8verby?= Message-ID: <20050620151854.GA41619@stack.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: NFS-related hang in 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:19:00 -0000 --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Eirik verby wrote: > I know enough not to call this a "confirmation", but disabling =20 > dummynet did indeed allow me to finish the backup. I never made it =20 > past 15GBs before, now the full 19GB tar.gz file is done, and the =20 > boxes are both still running. The funny thing is - I only disabled =20 > dummynet on one of the boxes now - the source of the backup, the box =20 > that pushes data. The other box has pretty much 100% the same setup, =20 > and is also i386. But as traffic shaping can only happen on outgoing =20 > packets, I suppose that makes sense. Hmm, does that solve kern/79208 for you as well by any chance ? Marc --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCtt5eezjnobFOgrERAsXHAJ9pk5mS42whT7zVcNDfmrI6AnWncACfcKHv jfOmVW0LKbz9WW1b/2qh0f4= =sXsW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 16:05:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08D416A431 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:05:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Received: from schubert.byrnehq.com (dsl-33-12.dsl.netsource.ie [213.79.33.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1581D43D1D for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:05:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Received: from localhost (mauer.directski.com. [212.147.140.194]) by schubert.byrnehq.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5KH5ZDD013055; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:05:37 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:05:48 +0100 From: Tony Byrne Organization: ByrneHQ X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1351187492.20050620170548@byrnehq.com> To: Jayton Garnett In-Reply-To: <42B6D6BC.4000208@codegurus.org> References: <20050620120030.6818B16A420@hub.freebsd.org> <42B6D6BC.4000208@codegurus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ByrneHQ-SA-Hits: 1.455 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 192.168.10.254 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) (JM) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tony Byrne List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:05:44 -0000 Hello Jayton, Monday, June 20, 2005, 3:46:20 PM, you wrote: JG> I had a similar problem and i changed system cases where i was getting a JG> ICRC error and FreeBSD refused to load or even mount the root fs, it was JG> also giving errors with something to do with the ATA something or other, JG> it turned out to be the cable i used after rebuilding the system in the JG> new case, i used a normal EIDE cable instead of a ATA cable :-/ In our case it's a SATA drive. Regards, Tony. -- Tony Byrne From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 16:30:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16A516A41C; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:30:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A290643D58; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:30:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from ranger.anduin.net ([81.0.162.52] helo=[192.168.1.110]) by anduin.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DkP9x-000DnP-BD; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:30:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20050620151854.GA41619@stack.nl> References: <20050620151854.GA41619@stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:29:31 +0200 To: Marc Olzheim X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: NFS-related hang in 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:30:07 -0000 On 20. jun. 2005, at 17.18, Marc Olzheim wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Eirik verby wrote: > >> I know enough not to call this a "confirmation", but disabling >> dummynet did indeed allow me to finish the backup. I never made it >> past 15GBs before, now the full 19GB tar.gz file is done, and the >> boxes are both still running. The funny thing is - I only disabled >> dummynet on one of the boxes now - the source of the backup, the box >> that pushes data. The other box has pretty much 100% the same setup, >> and is also i386. But as traffic shaping can only happen on outgoing >> packets, I suppose that makes sense. >> > > Hmm, does that solve kern/79208 for you as well by any chance ? Seems not. Now, how do I get my box back to life? ;) /Eirik > > Marc > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 16:30:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BA016A449 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:30:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmartin37@speakeasy.net) Received: from mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF3743D1F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:30:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmartin37@speakeasy.net) Received: (qmail 16564 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2005 16:30:11 -0000 Received: from adsl-211-141-154.asm.bellsouth.net (HELO [192.168.2.101]) (moonlightcheese@[68.211.141.154]) (envelope-sender ) by mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 Jun 2005 16:30:11 -0000 Message-ID: <42B6EF10.6090104@speakeasy.net> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:30:08 -0400 From: JM User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.3 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jay@codegurus.org References: <20050620120030.6818B16A420@hub.freebsd.org> <42B6D6BC.4000208@codegurus.org> In-Reply-To: <42B6D6BC.4000208@codegurus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) (JM) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:30:12 -0000 Jayton Garnett wrote: > I had a similar problem and i changed system cases where i was getting > a ICRC error and FreeBSD refused to load or even mount the root fs, it > was also giving errors with something to do with the ATA something or > other, it turned out to be the cable i used after rebuilding the > system in the new case, i used a normal EIDE cable instead of a ATA > cable :-/ > > hope that helps(probably not) actually, that makes a lot of sense. my computer running FreeBSD is actually just an Eden 5000 V-series. the cable is trimmed to fit the 2.5" hard drive in the tiny case and i'm sure this is having something to do with the timeouts... however the harddrive is recognized as UDMA33 but the cdrom still times out. thanks for the input. note: this setup works fine in windows... maybe someone should take a look at this issue? i'm running the old 5.3-RELEASE (too lazy to update) with a VIA VT8231 SouthBridge (82xxxx ata controller). > > Jay > >> >> Tony Byrne wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hello Bob, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> can be hardware reasons for timeouts such as a dying disk or cable, >>>>> but I think we've eliminated these in our case. [etc] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> BB> Don't ignore the possibility of failing controller hardware. We had >>> BB> comparable mysterious problems on a client system, causing a lot of >>> BB> head-scratching. Eventually the failure went hard and we had to >>> replace the >>> BB> motherboard. >>> >>> I hear ya! However, moving back to an older kernel changes the >>> severity of the problem from a timeout every 2 to three minutes during >>> heavy activity to about 4 or 5 in a 24 hour period. That doesn't >>> sound like hardware to me. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Tony. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> i have these same errors on my VIA 823x series chipset. however, the >> problem is only with the secondary device (acd0 in this case), and >> might be stemming from some other problem. >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 16:41:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE59C16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:41:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (mail-in-01.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7618F43D1F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:41:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.16]) by mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CCD12F61; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:41:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (mail-in-03.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.43]) by mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A936210D48E; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:41:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dsl-213-023-192-129.arcor-ip.net [213.23.192.129]) by mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F3240CE8; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:41:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5KGf2U8067111 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:41:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:40:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <746fd037f6ca8131a8fb8938f1e346e9@lonres.com> <20050611085604.J75625@fledge.watson.org> <42AAFDB2.4010604@vigrid.com> In-Reply-To: <42AAFDB2.4010604@vigrid.com> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: Subject: kpdf crashes with LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE set (Was: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:41:09 -0000 --nextPart3206663.OdMFPeoQHs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday, 11. June 2005 17:05, Daniel Eischen wrote: > You can set the environment variable LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE to force > libpthread to use system scope. I've played around with that variable (set it in .xsession) and found that= =20 kpdf (from graphics/kdegraphics3) will reproducably crash if it is set.=20 Unsetting it in a shell running on top of a KDE started with=20 mentioned .xsession and launching kpdf from there will remedy the problem. The backtrace I get is probably useless, let me know if (and how) I should= =20 recompile libpthread or other system libraries with debug symbols ... This is on 5.4-STABLE, two-three weeks old. Cheers, =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart3206663.OdMFPeoQHs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCtvGcXhc68WspdLARAhvqAJ0Uk3Dl2sTXP278aVmqH1lUbqhTVgCfeqXt XqWTKIb1KUKF7OKUnRxvqWo= =tzU/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3206663.OdMFPeoQHs-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 16:54:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1E616A41C; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:54:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F71C43D1D; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:54:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id j5KGrxsH001115; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:53:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:53:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Michael Nottebrock In-Reply-To: <200506201841.00470.lofi@freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kpdf crashes with LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE set (Was: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:54:00 -0000 On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Saturday, 11. June 2005 17:05, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > You can set the environment variable LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE to force > > libpthread to use system scope. > > I've played around with that variable (set it in .xsession) and found that > kpdf (from graphics/kdegraphics3) will reproducably crash if it is set. > Unsetting it in a shell running on top of a KDE started with > mentioned .xsession and launching kpdf from there will remedy the problem. > > The backtrace I get is probably useless, let me know if (and how) I should > recompile libpthread or other system libraries with debug symbols ... > > This is on 5.4-STABLE, two-three weeks old. Works here on a month or two old -current. I'm using /usr/local/ant/docs/appendix_e.pdf as a test (it's 60 pages or so). -- DE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 17:13:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADB016A436; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:13:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B748343D1F; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:13:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.16]) by mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D60E321CF; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:13:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.45]) by mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D99110D4D9; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:13:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dsl-213-023-192-129.arcor-ip.net [213.23.192.129]) by mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC8A321CF; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:13:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5KHDPcf069255 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:13:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) From: Michael Nottebrock To: Daniel Eischen Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:13:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kpdf crashes with LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE set (Was: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:13:30 -0000 --nextPart65889832.H5yI9MeFv9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday, 20. June 2005 18:53, Daniel Eischen wrote: > Works here on a month or two old -current. I'm using > /usr/local/ant/docs/appendix_e.pdf as a test (it's 60 pages or so). Crashes for me:=20 [lofi@kiste]:127:~ > env LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE=3D1 kpdf=20 'http://drtc.isibang.ac.in/%7Eprachi/apache-ant-1.5.4/docs/appendix_e.pdf' Bus error [lofi@kiste]:1:~ > kpdf=20 'http://drtc.isibang.ac.in/%7Eprachi/apache-ant-1.5.4/docs/appendix_e.pdf' [lofi@kiste]:0:~ > I don't have a -CURRENT machine to test. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart65889832.H5yI9MeFv9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCtvkzXhc68WspdLARAj+JAJ9ym/HdzVP6chUr53A4wsQ181ppFACfVLr6 zpG0QbU0NyT3uwsX0aM0hak= =4SzF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart65889832.H5yI9MeFv9-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 17:17:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AA416A41C; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:17:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D4A43D1D; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:17:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id j5KHHF8i025121; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:17:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:17:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Michael Nottebrock In-Reply-To: <200506201913.23547.lofi@freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kpdf crashes with LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE set (Was: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:17:16 -0000 On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Monday, 20. June 2005 18:53, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > Works here on a month or two old -current. I'm using > > /usr/local/ant/docs/appendix_e.pdf as a test (it's 60 pages or so). > > Crashes for me: > > [lofi@kiste]:127:~ > env LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE=1 kpdf > 'http://drtc.isibang.ac.in/%7Eprachi/apache-ant-1.5.4/docs/appendix_e.pdf' > Bus error > [lofi@kiste]:1:~ > kpdf > 'http://drtc.isibang.ac.in/%7Eprachi/apache-ant-1.5.4/docs/appendix_e.pdf' > [lofi@kiste]:0:~ > > > I don't have a -CURRENT machine to test. Try -stable. -- Dan Eischen From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 17:36:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4939516A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:36:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delphi123@zebra.net) Received: from smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B10543D49 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:36:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delphi123@zebra.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=zebra.net; b=VFzE2ZSyqI2MhiwbMJcAlDBAQIUyPGPaDyV1FfCDNH+N1hZ6MuCBGqtgeNipCf+j; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [67.100.142.151] (helo=dell1) by smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DkQC9-0003wQ-C8 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:36:25 -0400 Message-ID: <006601c575be$93ffd460$6401a8c0@dell1> From: "Benjamin Sher" To: Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:36:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-ELNK-Trace: bfb5dbe3ee73c5c689edb3c9282d24c54a0a1c3cc142586aaba10b60cf348c3fef2dd25d0f9c7bdb350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 67.100.142.151 Subject: After Install -- Where is FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:36:26 -0000 Dear friends: I just installed FreeBSD 5.4. I have two primary HD: the first disk holds WinXP, the second disk now has FreeBSD. Well, the good news is that my first install of FreeBSD went perfectly. I selected ALL for installation of ports and packages so it took a good hour to install everything from my two CD's. And some of the packages encountered an error and could not be installed (they told me to look in the debugger for details). Windows XP came through completely unscathed and in perfect working order on my first primary HD. All that's missing now is FreeBSD. After completing my install, I exited. FreeBSD exited normally, then rebooted. But no sign of FreeBSD. Instead, Windows came up. I do recall choosing to have a boot manager but never actually saw the screen and boot-up options. So, I went back into Free BSD by switching back to the CD in my Bios, but that's as far as I dare go on my own. What should I do? Am I missing something? Thank you all so much. Benjamin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 17:37:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9842316A41C; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:37:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5600943D55; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:37:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from turtle.stack.nl (turtle.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::132]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2761F0A7; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:37:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by turtle.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 65A5E1CE96; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:37:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:37:22 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Eirik =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8verby?= Message-ID: <20050620173722.GA1013@stack.nl> References: <20050620151854.GA41619@stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD turtle.stack.nl 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: Marc Olzheim , stable@freebsd.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: NFS-related hang in 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:37:24 -0000 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 06:29:31PM +0200, Eirik verby wrote: > >Hmm, does that solve kern/79208 for you as well by any chance ? >=20 > Seems not. >=20 > Now, how do I get my box back to life? ;) Hmm, Sorry 'bout that... :-/ Marc --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCtv7SezjnobFOgrERAt3iAJ9ST3JurmWfYdpT0NYO0cAsR6lXMQCdEmYm 4pozWThm1zUZZ6aGIkQqp4o= =y4KZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 17:39:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B132116A41C; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:39:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3B643D1D; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:39:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5KHddtZ012406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:39:39 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5KHdcew026810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:39:39 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5KHdc6X026809; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:39:38 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:39:38 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20050620173938.GA26753@cell.sick.ru> References: <20050619073203.GA11823@cell.sick.ru> <42B6DC0B.2010303@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42B6DC0B.2010303@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff on relay.bestcom.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: named coredumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:39:42 -0000 On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:08:59AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: D> Gleb Smirnoff wrote: D> > Dear colleagues, D> > D> >today I've got problem with named exiting on signal 11. Yes, I've searched D> >archives and found that POKED TIMER is a problem in our threads. D> > D> >Has anyone faced this problem and workarounded it? Or may be even fixed it? D> >Is there anywhere detailed description of the problem? D> > D> >Jun 19 06:00:58 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** D> >Jun 19 06:28:40 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** D> >Jun 19 06:49:54 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** D> >Jun 19 07:18:19 ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER *** D> >Jun 19 07:18:38 ns kernel: pid 44534 (named), uid 53: exited D> >on signal 11 D> > D> D> You haven't stated what version of FreeBSD or named you are using. If D> you're using FreeBSD old enough so that your named is 9.3.0, then you D> should upgrade to 5-stable, which will as a by product upgrade named to D> 9.3.1 which has a lot of the threading issues solved. That is 5.4-RELEASE, BIND 9.3.1 -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 17:49:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F392D16A423 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:49:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delphi123@zebra.net) Received: from smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C8043D4C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:49:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delphi123@zebra.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=zebra.net; b=q8+4fXw1K/wKGG4z3q/96XVfJr2/xcmYxHb9agQf/Nc3hzG/N6JpRCPeo6z71Cxk; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [67.100.142.151] (helo=dell1) by smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DkQOz-00072n-87; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:49:41 -0400 Message-ID: <008901c575c0$6e632890$6401a8c0@dell1> From: "Benjamin Sher" To: "Alex Zbyslaw" , References: <000801c575bb$bcb3a0b0$6401a8c0@dell1> <42B6FD0D.9070001@centtech.com> <42B6FFBF.9000605@dial.pipex.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:49:38 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-ELNK-Trace: bfb5dbe3ee73c5c689edb3c9282d24c54a0a1c3cc142586a5ce2bc21311418ed0805eac144dddfe2350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 67.100.142.151 Cc: Subject: Re: After Install -- Where is FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:49:43 -0000 Dear Alex and friends: Thanks a million. And what a relief! Benjamin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Zbyslaw" To: "Benjamin Sher" Cc: "FreeBSD-Questions Questions" Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 12:41 PM Subject: Re: After Install -- Where is FreeBSD? > Benjamin Sher wrote: > > >> Dear friends: > >> All that's missing now is FreeBSD. After completing my install, I > >> exited. FreeBSD exited normally, then rebooted. But no sign of > >> FreeBSD. Instead, Windows came up. I do recall choosing to have a > >> boot manager but never actually saw the screen and boot-up options. > >> So, I went back into Free BSD by switching back to the CD in my Bios, > >> but that's as far as I dare go on my own. What should I do? Am I > >> missing something? > > > I don't know why the boot manager isn't installed, but it's very easy to > install it again. Boot from the CD, select Post Installation Config, > then select the disk Label editor. Pick the first slice and make it > bootable (S) then W to write you changes and you are asked if you want > to install the boot manager. Say yes. > > Quit out and reboot, taking out the CD. While I'm getting things to > work I usually leave the floppy and CD as BIOS boot options before the > hard disk. Once I know it all works, I fix the BIOS to look for the > disk first. If you don't have a bootable CD or floppy in the drive, > then the system boots from disk. > > This is from memory, but I'm pretty sure it's correct. As long as you > do nothing other than making a slice bootable, then you should do no damage. > > --Alex > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.8/22 - Release Date: 6/17/2005 > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 17:50:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E6616A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:50:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E22BA43D49 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:50:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2005 17:50:47 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) [62.245.232.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 20 Jun 2005 19:50:47 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:50:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <006601c575be$93ffd460$6401a8c0@dell1> In-Reply-To: <006601c575be$93ffd460$6401a8c0@dell1> X-Birthday: Oct. 6th 1972 X-CelPhone: +49 (0) 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 (0) 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1305727.T84nu2dEER"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506201950.42964@harrymail> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Benjamin Sher Subject: Re: After Install -- Where is FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:50:50 -0000 --nextPart1305727.T84nu2dEER Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag, 20. Juni 2005 19:36 schrieb Benjamin Sher: > Dear friends: > > I just installed FreeBSD 5.4. I have two primary HD: the first disk > holds WinXP, the second disk now has FreeBSD. > > Well, the good news is that my first install of FreeBSD went perfectly. > I selected ALL for installation of ports and packages so it took a good > hour to install everything from my two CD's. And some of the packages > encountered an error and could not be installed (they told me to look in > the debugger for details). > > Windows XP came through completely unscathed and in perfect working > order on my first primary HD. > > All that's missing now is FreeBSD. After completing my install, I > exited. FreeBSD exited normally, then rebooted. But no sign of FreeBSD. > Instead, Windows came up. I do recall choosing to have a boot manager > but never actually saw the screen and boot-up options. So, I went back > into Free BSD by switching back to the CD in my Bios, but that's as far > as I dare go on my own. What should I do? Am I missing something? You can define the first boot disk in your BIOS (usually) but that's not=20 convenient. You need a bootmanager. WinXP has one, you can dump the loader from the BSD slice and copy it into= =20 a location where the XP loader can read it. Or you can use the FreeBSD BootEays manager, see boot0cfg. I recommend using GAG (http://gag.sourceforge.net/) but grub and similar=20 should also work. =2DHarry P.S.: There's freebsd-questions@ for that kind of questions ;) > > Thank you all so much. > > Benjamin > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart1305727.T84nu2dEER Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCtwHyBylq0S4AzzwRAj89AKCC3sXMbSkzscDgsdixs1qVoMr4BgCfVgZj tzaFqwmde/Wi2Lyj/O3DLt4= =emcD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1305727.T84nu2dEER-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 18:02:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFDE16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:02:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.fluidhosting.com (mail1.fluidhosting.com [66.150.201.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE79043D53 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:02:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 95289 invoked by uid 399); 20 Jun 2005 18:02:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.0.35.182?) (dougb@dougbarton.net@192.0.35.182) by mail1.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2005 18:02:58 -0000 Message-ID: <42B68641.3070603@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:02:57 +0200 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny Cooper References: <20050620151628.0F90043D53@mx1.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20050620151628.0F90043D53@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, 'Gleb Smirnoff' Subject: Re: named coredumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:02:59 -0000 Thanks for clarifying guys. Are either of you in a position to upgrade to -stable and see if the problem persists? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 18:12:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E46C16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:12:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Philippe.Pegon@crc.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C7D43D48 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:12:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Philippe.Pegon@crc.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from sokaris.u-strasbg.fr (sokaris.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::101]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.13.1/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id j5KICoq1008904 ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:12:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (crc.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:1001::1]) by sokaris.u-strasbg.fr (8.12.9/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id j5KICntt040185 ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:12:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42B7071F.30704@crc.u-strasbg.fr> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:12:47 +0200 From: Philippe PEGON User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050326) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mitch Parks References: <20050617150950.F1236@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> <20050619161113.V83634@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20050619180740.H750@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050619180740.H750@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::157]); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:12:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophos at u-strasbg.fr Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4-p1 crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:12:52 -0000 Mitch Parks wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Doug White wrote: > >> On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Mitch Parks wrote: >> >>> Below are details regarding another crash on a Dell 2600 SMP (HTT and >>> USB >>> disabled). It has been 9 days since the last crash. I didn't have the >>> serial >>> console in place for this last crash, but it is now. >> >> >> As noted, the ttwakeup() panic is a known bug. The best thing we have for >> a fix is this patch: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tty.t_pgrp.diff >> >> Please give it a try and report back if you have any more panics (or >> don't :-) ). > > > Thanks! This patch appears to be for 5.3, but I manually applied the > chunk of the patch that didn't apply cleanly and the countdown is on. > > I'll report back in 10 days unless something bad happens before then. > > Below is the patch chunk #10 that I actually applied rather than the one > given. If I've done something bad here by removing the PGRP_LOCK please > let me know. I'm not a kernel developper, but if you remove PGRP_LOCK(tp->t_pgrp); and the PGRP_UNLOCK(tp->t_pgrp) in the if condition (removed by the orginal patch) there is maybe another "PGRP_UNLOCK(tp->t_pgrp);" to remove if the if condition doesn't match, line 2528 in the original 5.4-p1 tty.c ? > > .... > Hunk #6 succeeded at 1154 (offset -51 lines). > Hunk #7 succeeded at 1215 (offset -6 lines). > Hunk #8 succeeded at 1203 (offset -51 lines). > Hunk #9 succeeded at 1946 (offset -5 lines). > Hunk #10 failed at 2562. > Hunk #11 succeeded at 2847 (offset -212 lines). > 1 out of 11 hunks failed--saving rejects to tty.c.rej > > > @@ -2495,19 +2511,21 @@ > * On return following a ttyprintf(), we set tp->t_rocount to 0 so > * that pending input will be retyped on BS. > */ > + sx_slock(&proctree_lock); > if (tp->t_session == NULL) { > + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); > ttyprintf(tp, "not a controlling terminal\n"); > tp->t_rocount = 0; > return; > } > if (tp->t_pgrp == NULL) { > + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); > ttyprintf(tp, "no foreground process group\n"); > tp->t_rocount = 0; > return; > } > - PGRP_LOCK(tp->t_pgrp); > - if ((p = LIST_FIRST(&tp->t_pgrp->pg_members)) == 0) { > - PGRP_UNLOCK(tp->t_pgrp); > + if ((p = LIST_FIRST(&tp->t_pgrp->pg_members)) == NULL) { > + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); > ttyprintf(tp, "empty foreground process group\n"); > tp->t_rocount = 0; > return; > > Or the complete patch: > http://kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu/~mitch/crash/tty_5.4.patch > > Mitch Parks > mitch@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Philippe PEGON From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 18:26:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCE216A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:26:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B956143D55 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:26:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 70so797087wra for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:26:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=odX3x86PYAcjlBD8V6a4CJIzpIzMUVBk1RC9vAWOpXWdb+5nUmmGTV7YJHa0SkkY6+xYZWhRJlbems/0FoMEMTpkjDIwfZNArp5AYORKCbwGB+VgN73RuJCKRFF+CtBTJ5g+lLGAFpLBvqM8bTXbuZLNjeR+RU6lSHY6E4GQj/g= Received: by 10.54.106.2 with SMTP id e2mr2828179wrc; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:26:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.7.20 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:26:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6eb82e05062011263389c3cb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:26:19 +0800 From: Rong-En Fan To: Juraj Lutter In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6eb82e0506140535428f4914@mail.gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-p16/i386 unknown reason console hang X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Rong-En Fan List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:26:21 -0000 On 6/20/05, Juraj Lutter wrote: > On 6/14/05, Rong-En Fan wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > Recently, one of our 5.3-p16/i386 machine got frequenctly hang. Details= , > > > > 1. I can switch vty, but can't login (after typing username, got hang) > > 2. can response to ping, but not other tcp/udp services > > 3. can break into ddb >=20 > I'm getting exactly the same behaviour on 4.11-STABLE/i386. After > typing the username on console machine hangs. It works like a charm > with previous kernel (4.8-STABLE). Upgrade was done today via usual > way (build world/kernel, install world/kernel, mergemaster, reboot > with /usr/local/etc/rc.d empty to ensure only base services to run). Hmm.. after switching from uw-imap to dovecot, this hang seems not exist anymore. I'm guessing that possible causes by different locking mechanism used by Postfix and uw-imap (flock and fnctl...). rafan. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 18:29:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5180F16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:29:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mitch@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu) Received: from kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu (kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu [129.101.191.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 221A943D58 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:29:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mitch@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu) Received: (qmail 3238 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Jun 2005 18:29:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jun 2005 18:29:23 -0000 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:29:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Mitch Parks To: Doug White In-Reply-To: <20050619180740.H750@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> Message-ID: <20050620110915.N1961@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> References: <20050617150950.F1236@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> <20050619161113.V83634@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20050619180740.H750@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> X-Radio: KUOI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4-p1 crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:29:24 -0000 On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Mitch Parks wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Doug White wrote: >> As noted, the ttwakeup() panic is a known bug. The best thing we have for >> a fix is this patch: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tty.t_pgrp.diff >> >> Please give it a try and report back if you have any more panics (or >> don't :-) ). > > I'll report back in 10 days unless something bad happens before then. *sigh* Ok, I'm back too soon. Suggestions? Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x4296bad0 fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc055740e stack pointer = 0x10:0xe8f6e9b8 frame pointer = 0x10:0xe8f6e9c0 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 34338 (sshd) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 boot() called on cpu#0 Uptime: 17h9m7s Dumping 2047 MB ... #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:159 159 __asm __volatile("movl %%fs:0,%0" : "=r" (td)); #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:159 #1 0xc05357d7 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:410 #2 0xc0535afd in panic (fmt=0xc068b12f "%s") at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:566 #3 0xc06633b4 in trap_fatal (frame=0xe8f6e978, eva=1117174480) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:817 #4 0xc06630f7 in trap_pfault (frame=0xe8f6e978, usermode=0, eva=1117174480) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:735 #5 0xc0662d51 in trap (frame= {tf_fs = -1068367848, tf_es = -386531312, tf_ds = 16777232, tf_edi = -9965 94328, tf_esi = 1117174476, tf_ebp = -386471488, tf_isp = -386471516, tf_ebx = - 1003267468, tf_edx = 1117174476, tf_ecx = -1066423096, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 1 2, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = -1068141554, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66054, tf_esp = -1003267584, tf_ss = -1003279104}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:425 #6 0xc06513ea in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:140 #7 0xc0520018 in fork1 (td=0xc4335a74, flags=89, pages=-386471452, procp=0xc056425d) at atomic.h:154 #8 0xc0557362 in selwakeuppri (sip=0xc4335a74, pri=89) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:1056 #9 0xc056425d in ttwakeup (tp=0x10206) at /usr/src/sys/kern/tty.c:2382 #10 0xc0562ee0 in ttymodem (tp=0xc4335a00, flag=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/tty.c:1639 #11 0xc0566beb in ptcopen (dev=0xc4332d00, flag=3, devtype=8192, td=0x0) at linedisc.h:136 #12 0xc04f9f66 in spec_open (ap=0xe8f6ea80) at /usr/src/sys/fs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:207 #13 0xc04f9cab in spec_vnoperate (ap=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/fs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:118 #14 0xc0594985 in vn_open_cred (ndp=0xe8f6ebe4, flagp=0xe8f6ece4, cmode=0, cred=0xc3853880, fdidx=0) at vnode_if.h:228 #15 0xc059456a in vn_open (ndp=0x0, flagp=0xe8f6ece4, cmode=0, fdidx=3) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c:91 #16 0xc058e417 in kern_open (td=0xc41f5d80, path=0x0, pathseg=UIO_USERSPACE, flags=3, mode=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:957 #17 0xc058e328 in open (td=0xc41f5d80, uap=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:926 #18 0xc06636ef in syscall (frame= {tf_fs = 47, tf_es = 47, tf_ds = 47, tf_edi = -1, tf_esi = 671951917, tf_e bp = -1077943096, tf_isp = -386470540, tf_ebx = 671959136, tf_edx = 671951944, t f_ecx = 674495244, tf_eax = 5, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 674002619, tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 658, tf_esp = -1077943188, tf_ss = 47}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1009 #19 0xc065143f in Xint0x80_syscall () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:201 #20 0x0000002f in ?? () #21 0x0000002f in ?? () #22 0x0000002f in ?? () #23 0xffffffff in ?? () #24 0x280d2c2d in ?? () #25 0xbfbfe4c8 in ?? () #26 0xe8f6ed74 in ?? () #27 0x280d4860 in ?? () #28 0x280d2c48 in ?? () #29 0x2833fb0c in ?? () #30 0x00000005 in ?? () #31 0x0000000c in ?? () #32 0x00000002 in ?? () #33 0x282c76bb in ?? () #34 0x0000001f in ?? () #35 0x00000292 in ?? () #36 0xbfbfe46c in ?? () #37 0x0000002f in ?? () #38 0x00000000 in ?? () #39 0x00000000 in ?? () #40 0x00000000 in ?? () #41 0x00000000 in ?? () #42 0x6701c000 in ?? () #43 0xc41fac5c in ?? () #44 0xc41f5d80 in ?? () #45 0xe8f6eb34 in ?? () #46 0xe8f6eb1c in ?? () #47 0xc347f600 in ?? () #48 0xc0545d9f in sched_switch (td=0x280d2c2d, newtd=0x280d4860, flags=Cannot access memory at address 0xbfbfe4d8 ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c:881 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 18:43:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D3016A41F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:43:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Philippe.Pegon@crc.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF2A43D49 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:43:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Philippe.Pegon@crc.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from sokaris.u-strasbg.fr (sokaris.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::101]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.13.1/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id j5KIhs2i011688 ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:43:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (crc.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:1001::1]) by sokaris.u-strasbg.fr (8.12.9/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id j5KIhmtt044856 ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:43:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42B70E62.3080801@crc.u-strasbg.fr> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:43:46 +0200 From: Philippe PEGON User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050326) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Philippe PEGON References: <20050617150950.F1236@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> <20050619161113.V83634@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20050619180740.H750@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> <42B7071F.30704@crc.u-strasbg.fr> In-Reply-To: <42B7071F.30704@crc.u-strasbg.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::156]); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:43:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophos at u-strasbg.fr Cc: Mitch Parks , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4-p1 crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:43:56 -0000 Philippe PEGON wrote: > Mitch Parks wrote: > >> On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Doug White wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Mitch Parks wrote: >>> >>>> Below are details regarding another crash on a Dell 2600 SMP (HTT >>>> and USB >>>> disabled). It has been 9 days since the last crash. I didn't have >>>> the serial >>>> console in place for this last crash, but it is now. >>> >>> >>> >>> As noted, the ttwakeup() panic is a known bug. The best thing we have >>> for >>> a fix is this patch: >>> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tty.t_pgrp.diff >>> >>> Please give it a try and report back if you have any more panics (or >>> don't :-) ). >> >> >> >> Thanks! This patch appears to be for 5.3, but I manually applied the >> chunk of the patch that didn't apply cleanly and the countdown is on. >> >> I'll report back in 10 days unless something bad happens before then. >> >> Below is the patch chunk #10 that I actually applied rather than the >> one given. If I've done something bad here by removing the PGRP_LOCK >> please let me know. > > > I'm not a kernel developper, but if you remove > > PGRP_LOCK(tp->t_pgrp); > > and the PGRP_UNLOCK(tp->t_pgrp) in the if condition (removed by the > orginal patch) > > there is maybe another "PGRP_UNLOCK(tp->t_pgrp);" to remove if the if > condition doesn't match, line 2528 in the original 5.4-p1 tty.c ? after having applied the patch (with your modification), there is no "sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock)" in the ttyinfo function if the three conditions failed. Maybe we have just to replace "PGRP_UNLOCK(tp->t_pgrp);" line 2528 by "sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock)" ? I think that we need the helps of a kernel developper. > >> >> .... >> Hunk #6 succeeded at 1154 (offset -51 lines). >> Hunk #7 succeeded at 1215 (offset -6 lines). >> Hunk #8 succeeded at 1203 (offset -51 lines). >> Hunk #9 succeeded at 1946 (offset -5 lines). >> Hunk #10 failed at 2562. >> Hunk #11 succeeded at 2847 (offset -212 lines). >> 1 out of 11 hunks failed--saving rejects to tty.c.rej >> >> >> @@ -2495,19 +2511,21 @@ >> * On return following a ttyprintf(), we set tp->t_rocount to >> 0 so >> * that pending input will be retyped on BS. >> */ >> + sx_slock(&proctree_lock); >> if (tp->t_session == NULL) { >> + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); >> ttyprintf(tp, "not a controlling terminal\n"); >> tp->t_rocount = 0; >> return; >> } >> if (tp->t_pgrp == NULL) { >> + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); >> ttyprintf(tp, "no foreground process group\n"); >> tp->t_rocount = 0; >> return; >> } >> - PGRP_LOCK(tp->t_pgrp); >> - if ((p = LIST_FIRST(&tp->t_pgrp->pg_members)) == 0) { >> - PGRP_UNLOCK(tp->t_pgrp); >> + if ((p = LIST_FIRST(&tp->t_pgrp->pg_members)) == NULL) { >> + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); >> ttyprintf(tp, "empty foreground process group\n"); >> tp->t_rocount = 0; >> return; >> >> Or the complete patch: >> http://kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu/~mitch/crash/tty_5.4.patch >> >> Mitch Parks >> mitch@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Philippe PEGON From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 19:01:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C84616A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:01:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from twesky@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6242A43D55 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:01:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from twesky@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so78171wri for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:01:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=LdqMbF1iBPSEeUzws4QHAzK2mdFjsaLoChheelt8+PQTJ90Eo0NnWW7chGF5aqT4GCWcoWCxO6+ahKzdZUj+IXjAJm/BOHa/16i5RzjQgA0Uh+vkgS/SrtBJoQk13RbKNafvIh72omizEocM9h03ktbhCmlLhsTrGByHqtTsd/I= Received: by 10.54.34.4 with SMTP id h4mr2679415wrh; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.45.71 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8d02aed005062012012e081fb5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:01:39 -0500 From: twesky To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) (JM) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: twesky List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:01:40 -0000 My laptop works fine with Fedora Core 4. I'm not sure it's a hardware issue, and I don't have an identical laptop to test. Do we know the last working stable version? ----------------------------------------- actually, that makes a lot of sense. my computer running FreeBSD is=20 actually just an Eden 5000 V-series. the cable is trimmed to fit the=20 2.5" hard drive in the tiny case and i'm sure this is having something=20 to do with the timeouts... however the harddrive is recognized as UDMA33=20 but the cdrom still times out. thanks for the input. note: this setup=20 works fine in windows... maybe someone should take a look at this=20 issue? i'm running the old 5.3-RELEASE (too lazy to update) with a VIA=20 VT8231 SouthBridge (82xxxx ata controller). From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 19:59:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8C916A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:59:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wilbury@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15C743D49 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:59:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wilbury@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so956071wra for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:59:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oNcju1cIuaJ2XOj+Kekb2fEuXWWqMUGzWc9Dbi/uwigZpVs+TjIG92qS+vZEgdc46yUJsz4Q8ayAmLwftaLZ1yXZl04lEhinOnxUQIbvcrWfWItrUjbqQCaRJsppsNtNU6H5jHL1BBv59GgmwQRh7M7rxbtgRsoEqjQp2Ivhtak= Received: by 10.54.29.61 with SMTP id c61mr2715954wrc; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:59:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.11.46 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:59:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:59:11 +0200 From: Juraj Lutter To: Rong-En Fan In-Reply-To: <6eb82e05062011263389c3cb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6eb82e0506140535428f4914@mail.gmail.com> <6eb82e05062011263389c3cb@mail.gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-p16/i386 unknown reason console hang X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juraj Lutter List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:59:13 -0000 On 6/20/05, Rong-En Fan wrote: > Hmm.. after switching from uw-imap to dovecot, this hang seems not exist > anymore. I'm guessing that possible causes by different locking mechanism > used by Postfix and uw-imap (flock and fnctl...). Weird. I run qmail/courier-imap (tried postfix/courier-imap) on that box. It behaves always the same. Btw. I've mentioned that this weird hang occurs even with BASE services (sshd, cron, syslog) running (as you might have noticed from "with /usr/local/etc/rc.d empty").. I'm quite stuck although I'm planning on hardware update very soon and move to 5.4-STABLE as well. Anyway, any hint will be very appreciated by me. Have a nice evening. otis --=20 Sincerely yours, Juraj Lutter From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 20:10:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB43616A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:10:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DC5C43D53 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:10:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2005 20:10:18 -0000 Received: from p5090F523.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO klotz.local) [80.144.245.35] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 20 Jun 2005 22:10:18 +0200 X-Authenticated: #989277 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klotz.local (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5KK9GDA001040; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:09:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Message-ID: <42B7226B.40503@nurfuerspam.de> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:09:15 +0200 From: Martin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050403) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: twesky References: <8d02aed005062012012e081fb5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8d02aed005062012012e081fb5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) (JM) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:10:20 -0000 twesky wrote: > My laptop works fine with Fedora Core 4. I'm not sure it's a hardware > issue, and I don't have an identical laptop to test. Do we know the > last working stable version? I just compiled the kernel from May 26th. Works fine. It looks like for me it's broken between May 26th and May 30th. I tried these kernels: 2005-06-16 broken 2005-05-31 broken 2005-05-30 (00:00:00) broken 2005-05-26 (00:00:00) ok 2005-05-22 ok 2005-05-15 ok 2005-05-09 ok The problem appears under heavy disk load. Martin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 20:13:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2070A16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:13:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Philippe.Pegon@crc.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC2143D49 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:13:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Philippe.Pegon@crc.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from sokaris.u-strasbg.fr (sokaris.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::101]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.13.1/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id j5KKDJjb019862 ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (crc.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:1001::1]) by sokaris.u-strasbg.fr (8.12.9/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id j5KKDItt057224 ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:13:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42B724C7.90606@crc.u-strasbg.fr> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:19:19 +0200 From: Philippe PEGON User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mitch Parks References: <20050617150950.F1236@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> <20050619161113.V83634@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20050619180740.H750@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> <20050620110915.N1961@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050620110915.N1961@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::156]); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophos at u-strasbg.fr Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4-p1 crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:13:21 -0000 Mitch Parks a écrit : > On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Mitch Parks wrote: > >> On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Doug White wrote: > > >>> As noted, the ttwakeup() panic is a known bug. The best thing we have >>> for >>> a fix is this patch: >>> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tty.t_pgrp.diff >>> >>> Please give it a try and report back if you have any more panics (or >>> don't :-) ). >> >> >> I'll report back in 10 days unless something bad happens before then. > > > *sigh* Ok, I'm back too soon. Suggestions? same thing for me > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > fault virtual address = 0x4296bad0 > fault code = supervisor write, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc055740e > stack pointer = 0x10:0xe8f6e9b8 > frame pointer = 0x10:0xe8f6e9c0 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 34338 (sshd) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 0 > boot() called on cpu#0 > Uptime: 17h9m7s > Dumping 2047 MB > ... > > #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:159 > 159 __asm __volatile("movl %%fs:0,%0" : "=r" (td)); > > #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:159 > #1 0xc05357d7 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:410 > #2 0xc0535afd in panic (fmt=0xc068b12f "%s") > at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:566 > #3 0xc06633b4 in trap_fatal (frame=0xe8f6e978, eva=1117174480) > at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:817 > #4 0xc06630f7 in trap_pfault (frame=0xe8f6e978, usermode=0, > eva=1117174480) > at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:735 > #5 0xc0662d51 in trap (frame= > {tf_fs = -1068367848, tf_es = -386531312, tf_ds = 16777232, tf_edi > = -9965 > 94328, tf_esi = 1117174476, tf_ebp = -386471488, tf_isp = -386471516, > tf_ebx = - > 1003267468, tf_edx = 1117174476, tf_ecx = -1066423096, tf_eax = 0, > tf_trapno = 1 > 2, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = -1068141554, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66054, > tf_esp = -1003267584, tf_ss = -1003279104}) at > /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:425 > #6 0xc06513ea in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:140 > #7 0xc0520018 in fork1 (td=0xc4335a74, flags=89, pages=-386471452, > procp=0xc056425d) at atomic.h:154 > #8 0xc0557362 in selwakeuppri (sip=0xc4335a74, pri=89) > at /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:1056 > #9 0xc056425d in ttwakeup (tp=0x10206) at /usr/src/sys/kern/tty.c:2382 > #10 0xc0562ee0 in ttymodem (tp=0xc4335a00, flag=0) > at /usr/src/sys/kern/tty.c:1639 > #11 0xc0566beb in ptcopen (dev=0xc4332d00, flag=3, devtype=8192, td=0x0) > at linedisc.h:136 > #12 0xc04f9f66 in spec_open (ap=0xe8f6ea80) > at /usr/src/sys/fs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:207 > #13 0xc04f9cab in spec_vnoperate (ap=0x0) > at /usr/src/sys/fs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:118 > #14 0xc0594985 in vn_open_cred (ndp=0xe8f6ebe4, flagp=0xe8f6ece4, cmode=0, > cred=0xc3853880, fdidx=0) at vnode_if.h:228 > #15 0xc059456a in vn_open (ndp=0x0, flagp=0xe8f6ece4, cmode=0, fdidx=3) > at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c:91 > #16 0xc058e417 in kern_open (td=0xc41f5d80, path=0x0, > pathseg=UIO_USERSPACE, > flags=3, mode=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:957 > #17 0xc058e328 in open (td=0xc41f5d80, uap=0x0) > at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:926 > #18 0xc06636ef in syscall (frame= > {tf_fs = 47, tf_es = 47, tf_ds = 47, tf_edi = -1, tf_esi = > 671951917, tf_e > bp = -1077943096, tf_isp = -386470540, tf_ebx = 671959136, tf_edx = > 671951944, t > f_ecx = 674495244, tf_eax = 5, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = > 674002619, tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 658, tf_esp = -1077943188, tf_ss = 47}) > at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1009 > #19 0xc065143f in Xint0x80_syscall () at > /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:201 > #20 0x0000002f in ?? () > #21 0x0000002f in ?? () > #22 0x0000002f in ?? () > #23 0xffffffff in ?? () > #24 0x280d2c2d in ?? () > #25 0xbfbfe4c8 in ?? () > #26 0xe8f6ed74 in ?? () > #27 0x280d4860 in ?? () > #28 0x280d2c48 in ?? () > #29 0x2833fb0c in ?? () > #30 0x00000005 in ?? () > #31 0x0000000c in ?? () > #32 0x00000002 in ?? () > #33 0x282c76bb in ?? () > #34 0x0000001f in ?? () > #35 0x00000292 in ?? () > #36 0xbfbfe46c in ?? () > #37 0x0000002f in ?? () > #38 0x00000000 in ?? () > #39 0x00000000 in ?? () > #40 0x00000000 in ?? () > #41 0x00000000 in ?? () > #42 0x6701c000 in ?? () > #43 0xc41fac5c in ?? () > #44 0xc41f5d80 in ?? () > #45 0xe8f6eb34 in ?? () > #46 0xe8f6eb1c in ?? () > #47 0xc347f600 in ?? () > #48 0xc0545d9f in sched_switch (td=0x280d2c2d, newtd=0x280d4860, > flags=Cannot access memory at address 0xbfbfe4d8 > ) > at /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c:881 > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 21:28:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EC516A41C; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:28:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msergeant@snsonline.net) Received: from xyzzy.snsonline.net (office-fw.iexec.net.au [210.18.210.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A0543D1F; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:28:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msergeant@snsonline.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xyzzy.snsonline.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0842B1B5FAF; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:28:41 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20050620151628.0F90043D53@mx1.FreeBSD.org> References: <20050620151628.0F90043D53@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Message-Id: <45872E7B-5F06-41E0-9E6D-2470984AC2A3@snsonline.net> From: Mark Sergeant Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:28:38 +1000 To: Danny Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, 'Doug Barton' , 'Gleb Smirnoff' Subject: Re: named coredumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:28:51 -0000 On 21/06/2005, at 1:16 AM, Danny Cooper wrote: > I am receiving the same problems with FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (amd64) > bind-9.3.1 > > DELL PE2850 > 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz > 4 GB RAM > > named.log.0:19-Jun-2005 11:46:15.945 *** POKED TIMER *** > named.log.0:19-Jun-2005 18:34:17.314 *** POKED TIMER *** > named.log.0:20-Jun-2005 02:40:46.193 *** POKED TIMER *** > > Depending on the load the of the server it can happen every hour. > > In some case's named starts to Max out one CPU and refused to > resolve DNS > until named is killed and restarted. I've seen the exact same thing on my dual AMD64 caching name server, I can only think it is something to do with the Dual CPU's, bind 9.3.1 and FreeBSD 5.4, even an upgrade to stable as of a week ago hasn't fixed it, so for now I have a wrapper script that looks for 99+ % cpu usage and then kill -9 and /etc/rc.d/named start . I'd love to get to the bottom of it, but know one has come across this before it seems. Have a look at my posts on heavy named problems in late may. Cheers, Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 22:28:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD26A16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:28:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@mkbuelow.net) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7AC43D58 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:28:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@mkbuelow.net) Received: from drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (p54AAABBC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.170.171.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BD031428; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:31:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (mkb@localhost.mkbuelow.net [127.0.0.1]) by drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5KMSbJa000641; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:28:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mkb@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net) Message-Id: <200506202228.j5KMSbJa000641@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net> From: Matthias Buelow To: jay@codegurus.org In-Reply-To: Message from Jayton Garnett of "Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:46:20 BST." <42B6D6BC.4000208@codegurus.org> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.84; nmh 1.0.4; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 17) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:28:37 +0200 Sender: mkb@mkbuelow.net Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) (JM) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:28:18 -0000 Jayton Garnett writes: >I had a similar problem and i changed system cases where i was getting a >ICRC error and FreeBSD refused to load or even mount the root fs, it was >also giving errors with something to do with the ATA something or other, >it turned out to be the cable i used after rebuilding the system in the >new case, i used a normal EIDE cable instead of a ATA cable :-/ I've just encountered the same problem on 5.4-STABLE/i386. I rebuilt my kernel with SMP and enabled hyperthreading in loader.conf, because the security weakness doesn't really apply to my desktop machine. So, kernel got the DMA error at boot and couldn't mount the root fs. When I switched off HT in the BIOS, the system came up ok. I've cvsupped 5.4-STABLE just a few hours ago. mkb. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 22:41:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAC816A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:41:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@mkbuelow.net) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010C443D55 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:41:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@mkbuelow.net) Received: from drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (p54AAABBC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.170.171.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8E32E050; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:44:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (mkb@localhost.mkbuelow.net [127.0.0.1]) by drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5KMfTRU000653; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:41:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mkb@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net) Message-Id: <200506202241.j5KMfTRU000653@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net> From: Matthias Buelow To: Matthias Buelow In-Reply-To: Message from Matthias Buelow of "Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:28:37 +0200." <200506202228.j5KMSbJa000641@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.84; nmh 1.0.4; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 17) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:41:29 +0200 Sender: mkb@mkbuelow.net Cc: jay@codegurus.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) (JM) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:41:10 -0000 I wrote: >So, kernel got the DMA error at boot and couldn't mount the root fs. Ah, btw.. it's a SATA disk, on an ICH6 SATA150 controller. mkb. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 23:15:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADAF16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:15:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-5.paradise.net.nz (bm-5a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.58.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D21D43D49 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:15:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (smtp-1a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.32.194]) by linda-5.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IIE00HTVOL6YQ@linda-5.paradise.net.nz> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:15:06 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-14-38.paradise.net.nz [218.101.14.38]) by smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C34D82FF2; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:15:06 +1200 (NZST) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:15:05 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <1dbad315050620044862e8a7f6@mail.gmail.com> To: Michael Schuh Message-id: <42B74DF9.9020706@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050511) References: <1dbad315050620034565892ee@mail.gmail.com> <42B6A528.2000204@paradise.net.nz> <1dbad315050620044862e8a7f6@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:15:08 -0000 Michael Schuh wrote: > Hello, > > yes random IO is more targetted to Databases. > noop, i have the installation always made in the same way, and i have respected > the different diskperformace in different disk-parts..... > this was the reason for > > #cd /; > > at the beginning of my tests. > In the first test i have me shooting self in my foot and i bites me in > my ass :-))) > I was referring to the partitions and slices on the physical disk - each operating system is installed in a different one of these, and so is in a different physical part of the disk - hence you cannot reliably compare IO rates between them (This very issue has been discussed before I recall - try a Google search, as it is quite interesting). > my suggestion going more in the direction...first solve all disk(ata) related > performace issues, then test the mysql-performaces issues again to secure > that you are not lying on an mixing of many problems.... :-) > While noone would complain about faster sequential IO, it is almost certainly not the issue effecting database performance - for instance I find Postgresql consistently faster on RELENG_5 (5.3 onwards) than on RELENG_4 (using the pgbench program). cheers Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 02:16:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0688F16A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:16:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cvkhanh@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A680043D4C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:16:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cvkhanh@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so1181650rna for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:16:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=pc3SjJUkI34ZcIx+ZX4EQfmsIzzK/RMEfq/tBN2FToxiB+p33cJdsfnjJRZ5uS30jGkAYfe/CC12GfeS6OMp+6M1lfo1m7RKkVIkZ928A9cNyAymL9Ws5UQAGBhysiUf/x0gvntJfqQT+kzr4evoGCmqvGSqrhgrP0qFBbpuhU0= Received: by 10.38.76.68 with SMTP id y68mr2214175rna; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.73.24 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5fd642fc050620191670837b21@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:16:30 +0700 From: Khanh Cao Van To: freebsd-stable-list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: howto update freebsd 4.7 release to 4.7 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Khanh Cao Van List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:16:31 -0000 My custom use freeBSD 4.7 release and ask me to install JDK1.4 on it . But when I use ports to compile JDK , the system show me a message : You must have a version of FreeBSD later than 4.7-STABLE February 2003 or 5-CURRENT February 2003 to compile and use JDK 1.4.2. So I have to update my 4.7 release to 4.7 stable . But I do not know how to do make it . I've looking everywhere but could not find any clear document about it . Please help me ! PS : I'm not going to upgrade my kernel 4.7 to 4.8 or anything else , just 4.7 only . Thank for reading ! --=20 ---------------------------------- Cao Van Khanh From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 03:52:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32D616A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 03:52:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mahmoh@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A5F43D1D for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 03:52:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mahmoh@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so938040wri for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:52:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=VLP/P6q4HZ49x5tmto5DZPpBnk2OoQCaukS0USpkn0K730wK75pT+Y6JT1wAi9Fnve9mQ6Acf7JxOMKjmetj7hjO3Hu0c1CcecAMSBJ/4jH78Jjk0deeIUefBzlefs/igj17mnKa7QGHQ4dDXUtdqb0s+dKKYWtqtcfgVaYAMow= Received: by 10.54.35.19 with SMTP id i19mr3099484wri; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:52:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.41.17 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:52:20 +0300 From: Maher Mohamed To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: USB printers How on Freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maher Mohamed List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 03:52:20 -0000 I am trying to install an USB printer=20 i would like to guide me through all the installation if possible.=20 --=20 Mohamed M. Maher From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 05:07:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C82616A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:07:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A446543D1F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:07:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5L57E6a023136; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:37:16 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Maher Mohamed Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:37:10 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4889608.FtCrbH0yvX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506211437.10501.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Subject: Re: USB printers How on Freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:07:28 -0000 --nextPart4889608.FtCrbH0yvX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:22, Maher Mohamed wrote: > I am trying to install an USB printer > i would like to guide me through all the installation if possible. =2D Run kldload ulpt =2D Plug the printer in. =2D Set it up like a parallel printer except the port is /dev/ulpt0 (ie using CUPS or APSfilter etc) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart4889608.FtCrbH0yvX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCt6B+5ZPcIHs/zowRAjI6AJ9K0kVOC+sWQUHE4DV9LJf/Zx0fOQCgpKkC kfTukXmSQCRmF9fgd1cwEBs= =UEx2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4889608.FtCrbH0yvX-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 06:24:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4922B16A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:24:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB5243D49 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:24:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB53864B803 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 03:24:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69055-08 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:24:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-224-176-51.eastlink.ca [24.224.176.51]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBBF64B801 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 03:24:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 04583354E7; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 03:24:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AF0353BB for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 03:24:14 -0300 (ADT) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 03:24:14 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050621032200.N993@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Subject: 4.x binaries on a 5.x machine ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:24:19 -0000 I'm looking at adding my first 5.x server onto our network, but am wondering how 'backward compatible' things are still ... Mainly, could I run a 4.x jail'd environment on a 5.x server, or would I have to upgrade the jail first? Long term goal is to move all boxes over to 5.x, but I can't do it all at once ... I also want to spend some time testing/making sure that 5.x will work in our environment, which means any jail's I move over to the server need to be able to be copied back again to a 4.x server if things don't work ... so leaving the jail environment itself "4.x" is prefer'd ... Thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 06:30:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B2516A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:30:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4965943D1F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:30:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5L6UbkZ025754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:30:38 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050620232733.07d3ecb0@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:28:41 -0700 To: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050621032200.N993@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20050621032200.N993@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: 4.x binaries on a 5.x machine ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:30:39 -0000 At 11:24 PM 6/20/2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >I'm looking at adding my first 5.x server onto our network, but am >wondering how 'backward compatible' things are still ... > >Mainly, could I run a 4.x jail'd environment on a 5.x server, or would I >have to upgrade the jail first? This option from the GENERIC kernel config in 5.4 would seem to suggest that it would work.... though I haven't tried it myself. options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 -Glenn >Long term goal is to move all boxes over to 5.x, but I can't do it all at >once ... I also want to spend some time testing/making sure that 5.x will >work in our environment, which means any jail's I move over to the server >need to be able to be copied back again to a 4.x server if things don't >work ... so leaving the jail environment itself "4.x" is prefer'd ... > >Thanks ... > >---- >Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) >Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 06:44:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A256116A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:44:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-2.paradise.net.nz (bm-2a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.58.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6251943D1F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:44:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-3.paradise.net.nz (smtp-3a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.32.196]) by linda-2.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IIF00MV09DJ6G@linda-2.paradise.net.nz> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:44:07 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-13-145.paradise.net.nz [218.101.13.145]) by smtp-3.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A423DAE3A5; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:44:06 +1200 (NZST) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:44:05 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <6.1.0.6.2.20050620232733.07d3ecb0@cobalt.antimatter.net> To: Glenn Dawson Message-id: <42B7B735.9010000@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050511) References: <20050621032200.N993@ganymede.hub.org> <6.1.0.6.2.20050620232733.07d3ecb0@cobalt.antimatter.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.x binaries on a 5.x machine ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:44:09 -0000 Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 11:24 PM 6/20/2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> I'm looking at adding my first 5.x server onto our network, but am >> wondering how 'backward compatible' things are still ... >> >> Mainly, could I run a 4.x jail'd environment on a 5.x server, or would >> I have to upgrade the jail first? > > > This option from the GENERIC kernel config in 5.4 would seem to suggest > that it would work.... though I haven't tried it myself. > > options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 ....And install the 'compat 4.x' distribution onto your 5,x boxes! Cheers Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 06:44:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1075916A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:44:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chinhngt@sectorb.msk.ru) Received: from hq.sectorb.msk.ru (petaflop.b.gz.ru [217.67.124.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE0943D1F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:44:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chinhngt@sectorb.msk.ru) Received: from unix (unix.local [172.16.20.120]) by hq.sectorb.msk.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB37DD11; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:44:37 +0400 (MSD) From: "Nguyen Tam Chinh" To: "'Khanh Cao Van'" , "'freebsd-stable-list'" Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:43:14 +0400 Message-ID: <000001c5762c$7f992a30$781410ac@unix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 In-Reply-To: <5fd642fc050620191670837b21@mail.gmail.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Cc: Subject: RE: howto update freebsd 4.7 release to 4.7 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:44:41 -0000 If you don't want to upgrade your system to a newer state, just don't use the JDK or use old releases of it (1.3 for example) -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Khanh Cao Van Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 6:17 AM To: freebsd-stable-list Subject: howto update freebsd 4.7 release to 4.7 stable My custom use freeBSD 4.7 release and ask me to install JDK1.4 on it . But when I use ports to compile JDK , the system show me a message : You must have a version of FreeBSD later than 4.7-STABLE February 2003 or 5-CURRENT February 2003 to compile and use JDK 1.4.2. So I have to update my 4.7 release to 4.7 stable . But I do not know how to do make it . I've looking everywhere but could not find any clear document about it . Please help me ! PS : I'm not going to upgrade my kernel 4.7 to 4.8 or anything else , just 4.7 only . Thank for reading ! -- ---------------------------------- Cao Van Khanh _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 06:49:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99DC16A41C; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:49:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4D343D1D; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:49:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5L6n5pj027999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:49:05 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5L6n4cI033551 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:49:04 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5L6n4rb033550; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:49:04 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:49:04 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20050621064904.GB33520@cell.sick.ru> References: <20050620151628.0F90043D53@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <42B68641.3070603@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42B68641.3070603@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff on relay.bestcom.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Danny Cooper Subject: Re: named coredumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:49:14 -0000 On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Doug Barton wrote: D> Thanks for clarifying guys. Are either of you in a position to upgrade to D> -stable and see if the problem persists? Does STABLE have an other version of BIND? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 06:49:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89F816A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:49:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chinhngt@sectorb.msk.ru) Received: from hq.sectorb.msk.ru (petaflop.b.gz.ru [217.67.124.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A9343D48 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:49:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chinhngt@sectorb.msk.ru) Received: from unix (unix.local [172.16.20.120]) by hq.sectorb.msk.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB43DD36; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:49:51 +0400 (MSD) From: "Nguyen Tam Chinh" To: "'Nguyen Tam Chinh'" , "'Khanh Cao Van'" , "'freebsd-stable-list'" Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:48:28 +0400 Message-ID: <000101c5762d$3add6180$781410ac@unix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 In-Reply-To: <000001c5762c$7f992a30$781410ac@unix> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Cc: Subject: RE: howto update freebsd 4.7 release to 4.7 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:49:52 -0000 Oh, I've just forget. To update from 4.7-REL to 4.7-STABLE, please search for the word cvsup in handbook or google for it. PS. Just a question, why 4.7 only? -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Nguyen Tam Chinh Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 10:43 AM To: 'Khanh Cao Van'; 'freebsd-stable-list' Subject: RE: howto update freebsd 4.7 release to 4.7 stable If you don't want to upgrade your system to a newer state, just don't use the JDK or use old releases of it (1.3 for example) -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Khanh Cao Van Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 6:17 AM To: freebsd-stable-list Subject: howto update freebsd 4.7 release to 4.7 stable My custom use freeBSD 4.7 release and ask me to install JDK1.4 on it . But when I use ports to compile JDK , the system show me a message : You must have a version of FreeBSD later than 4.7-STABLE February 2003 or 5-CURRENT February 2003 to compile and use JDK 1.4.2. So I have to update my 4.7 release to 4.7 stable . But I do not know how to do make it . I've looking everywhere but could not find any clear document about it . Please help me ! PS : I'm not going to upgrade my kernel 4.7 to 4.8 or anything else , just 4.7 only . Thank for reading ! -- ---------------------------------- Cao Van Khanh _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 07:04:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D756316A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:04:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr (postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6931A43D4C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:04:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F5D1734B8 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4EBDB405B; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:04:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:04:27 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: jeremie@le-hen.org Subject: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:04:14 -0000 Hi list, I caught a panic this night on my RELENG_5. The kernel was compiled on 2005/05/21. Please, feel free to ask for further informations (and include me explicitely in the recipients list since I'm not subscribed to this list). kgdb stacktrace: %%% #22 0xc0566d1d in panic ( fmt=0xc0728d5d "Duplicate free of item %p from zone %p(%s)\n") at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:550 td = (struct thread *) 0xc205ec00 bootopt = 256 newpanic = 1 ap = 0xd6d3f968 "" buf = "Duplicate free of item 0xc1be8800 from zone 0xc1045ae0(Mbuf)\n", '\0' #23 0xc069e280 in uma_dbg_free (zone=0xc1045ae0, slab=0xc1be8fa8, item=0xc1be8800) at ../../../vm/uma_dbg.c:301 keg = 0xc101f3c0 slabref = 0x0 freei = 8 #24 0xc069cc39 in uma_zfree_arg (zone=0xc1045ae0, item=0xc1be8800, udata=0x0) at ../../../vm/uma_core.c:2273 keg = 0xc101f3c0 cache = 0xc1045b18 bucket = 0xc1be2000 bflags = 0 cpu = 0 skip = SKIP_DTOR #25 0xc05a0a0b in m_freem (mb=0x0) at uma.h:304 No locals. #26 0xc05ee0d5 in arpresolve (ifp=0xc1a5b000, rt0=0xc1d44000, m=0xc1be7200, dst=0xd6d3fa94, desten=0xd6d3fa2c "/Ê]ÀÀµwÀ") at ../../../netinet/if_ether.c:442 la = (struct llinfo_arp *) 0xc1a75a00 sdl = (struct sockaddr_dl *) 0xc2128910 error = -1038972656 rt = (struct rtentry *) 0xc1d44000 #27 0xc05dac65 in ether_output (ifp=0xc1a5b000, m=0xc1be7200, dst=0xd6d3fa94, rt0=0x0) at ../../../net/if_ethersubr.c:165 type = -10541 error = 50 hdrcmplt = 0 esrc = "K\000\000\000\214z" edst = "/Ê]ÀÀµ" eh = (struct ether_header *) 0x32 loop_copy = 0 #28 0xc060150c in ip_output (m=0xc1be7200, opt=0xc1be7240, ro=0xd6d3fa90, flags=0, imo=0x0, inp=0xc40f7a8c) at ../../../netinet/ip_output.c:770 ip = (struct ip *) 0xc1be7240 ifp = (struct ifnet *) 0xc1a5b000 m0 = (struct mbuf *) 0xc1be7240 hlen = 20 len = 1 error = 0 dst = (struct sockaddr_in *) 0xd6d3fa94 ia = (struct in_ifaddr *) 0xc1c2b300 isbroadcast = 0 sw_csum = 1 iproute = {ro_rt = 0xc1d44000, ro_dst = {sa_len = 16 '\020', sa_family = 2 '\002', sa_data = "\000\000Àš\001²\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"}} odst = {s_addr = 1} fwd_tag = (struct m_tag *) 0x0 __func__ = "ip_output" #29 0xc060aba1 in tcp_output (tp=0xc1d75534) at ../../../netinet/tcp_output.c:1119 so = (struct socket *) 0xc2afe000 len = 144 recwin = 66608 sendwin = -1044483500 flags = 24 error = -1044483500 m = (struct mbuf *) 0xc1be7200 ip = (struct ip *) 0xc1be7240 th = (struct tcphdr *) 0xc1be7254 opt = "\001\001\b\n\002À>m\003õJÁ+\001\000\000şà¯ÂÐà¯Â\000à¯Â\204ûÓÖ\203 ~ZÀÐà¯Â" ipoptlen = 0 optlen = 12 hdrlen = 52 idle = 1 sendalot = 0 i = 299 sack_rxmit = 0 sack_bytes_rxmt = 0 p = (struct sackhole *) 0x0 tao = {tao_cc = 767, tao_ccsent = 3228670914, tao_mssopt = 64356} __func__ = "tcp_output" #30 0xc061167c in tcp_usr_send (so=0xc2afe000, flags=0, m=0xc1be7600, nam=0x0, control=0x0, td=0xc205ec00) at ../../../netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:699 error = 0 inp = (struct inpcb *) 0xc40f7a8c tp = (struct tcpcb *) 0xc1d75534 #31 0xc05a41e8 in sosend (so=0xc2afe000, addr=0x0, uio=0xd6d3fc70, top=0xc1be7600, control=0x0, flags=0, td=0xc205ec00) at ../../../kern/uipc_socket.c:835 mp = (struct mbuf **) 0xc1be7600 m = (struct mbuf *) 0xc1be7600 space = 33160 len = 144 resid = 0 clen = -1044482560 error = 0 dontroute = 0 atomic = 0 #32 0xc05928bf in soo_write (fp=0x0, uio=0xd6d3fc70, active_cred=0xc4211e80, flags=0, td=0xc205ec00) at ../../../kern/sys_socket.c:118 so = (struct socket *) 0xc2afe000 error = 144 #33 0xc058bc0b in dofilewrite (td=0xc205ec00, fp=0xc2aff83c, fd=0, buf=0x0, nbyte=3228877920, offset=Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0x93 ) at file.h:245 auio = {uio_iov = 0xd6d3fc68, uio_iovcnt = 1, uio_offset = 143, uio_resid = 0, uio_segflg = UIO_USERSPACE, uio_rw = UIO_WRITE, uio_td = 0xc205ec00} aiov = {iov_base = 0x807d090, iov_len = 0} cnt = 144 error = -1066089376 ktruio = (struct uio *) 0x0 #34 0xc058ba74 in write (td=0xc205ec00, uap=0xd6d3fd04) at ../../../kern/sys_generic.c:300 fp = (struct file *) 0xc2aff83c error = 0 #35 0xc06d2a12 in syscall (frame= {tf_fs = -1078001617, tf_es = 47, tf_ds = -1078001617, tf_edi = 134671528, tf_esi = 144, tf_ebp = -1077943016, tf_isp = -690750108, tf_ebx = 671922152, tf _edx = 134671528, tf_ecx = 4, tf_eax = 4, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 6 73631499, tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 518, tf_esp = -1077943044, tf_ss = 47}) at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:1009 params = 0xbfbfe500
callp = (struct sysent *) 0xc0744960 td = (struct thread *) 0xc205ec00 p = (struct proc *) 0xc2b04a98 orig_tf_eflags = 518 sticks = 113 error = 0 narg = 3 args = {4, 134729728, 144, 0, -1077942928, 0, 113, -1028633960} code = 4 #36 0xc06c46bf in Xint0x80_syscall () at ../../../i386/i386/exception.s:201 %%% Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 08:44:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F9416A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr (postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D5A43D1F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6DAC074 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:44:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1F390405B; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:44:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:44:19 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050621084419.GC738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: jeremie@le-hen.org Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:44:05 -0000 Hi, > I caught a panic this night on my RELENG_5. The kernel was compiled on > 2005/05/21. Please, feel free to ask for further informations (and > include me explicitely in the recipients list since I'm not subscribed > to this list). > > kgdb stacktrace: > %%% > [snip] > %%% I was a little bit sleepy earlier this morning. I forgot to tell that my kernel is compiled with INVARIANTS and PREEMPTION. %%% (kgdb) up 26 #26 0xc05ee0d5 in arpresolve (ifp=0xc1a5b000, rt0=0xc1d44000, m=0xc1be7200, dst=0xd6d3fa94, desten=0xd6d3fa2c "/æ]ÀäµwÀ") at ../../../netinet/if_ether.c:442 442 m_freem(la->la_hold); (kgdb) l 437 * There is an arptab entry, but no ethernet address 438 * response yet. Replace the held mbuf with this 439 * latest one. 440 */ 441 if (la->la_hold) 442 m_freem(la->la_hold); 443 la->la_hold = m; 444 if (rt->rt_expire) { 445 RT_LOCK(rt); 446 rt->rt_flags &= ~RTF_REJECT; (kgdb) print *la $1 = {la_le = {le_next = 0xc1e74400, le_prev = 0xc077aa68}, la_rt = 0xc1d44000, la_hold = 0x0, la_preempt = 5, la_asked = 0} %%% -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 09:07:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D98616A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:07:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FB743D4C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:07:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5L972ES031438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:07:02 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5L97188035124 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:07:01 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5L971d9035123; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:07:01 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:07:01 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Jeremie Le Hen Message-ID: <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff on relay.bestcom.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:07:05 -0000 On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:04:27AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: J> #25 0xc05a0a0b in m_freem (mb=0x0) at uma.h:304 J> No locals. J> #26 0xc05ee0d5 in arpresolve (ifp=0xc1a5b000, rt0=0xc1d44000, m=0xc1be7200, J> dst=0xd6d3fa94, desten=0xd6d3fa2c "/??]??????w??") J> at ../../../netinet/if_ether.c:442 J> la = (struct llinfo_arp *) 0xc1a75a00 J> sdl = (struct sockaddr_dl *) 0xc2128910 J> error = -1038972656 J> rt = (struct rtentry *) 0xc1d44000 IMHO, this looks like a race. The route is not locked, when its llinfo is edited. Probably the mbuf was freed when arp reply arrived and la_hold was send. Look into in_arpinput() near 736: (*ifp->if_output)(ifp, la->la_hold, rt_key(rt), rt); la->la_hold = 0; Yeah, I have just triggered another panic running 15 instances of this script on SMP box: ( while (true); do arp -d 81.19.64.111 >/dev/null 2>&1; ping -c 1 -t 1 81.19.64.111 >/dev/null 2>&1; done ) & But my duplicate free is in fxp_txeof(). This means that output thread has won the race. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 09:28:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBA216A41C; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:28:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr (postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717AD43D48; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:28:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98]) by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884D5317E48; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:28:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 34BAF405B; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:28:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:28:36 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Gleb Smirnoff Message-ID: <20050621092836.GD738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:28:22 -0000 Hi Gleb, > IMHO, this looks like a race. The route is not locked, when > its llinfo is edited. > > Probably the mbuf was freed when arp reply arrived and la_hold was send. > Look into in_arpinput() near 736: > > (*ifp->if_output)(ifp, la->la_hold, rt_key(rt), rt); > la->la_hold = 0; > > Yeah, I have just triggered another panic running 15 instances of this > script on SMP box: > > ( > while (true); do > arp -d 81.19.64.111 >/dev/null 2>&1; > ping -c 1 -t 1 81.19.64.111 >/dev/null 2>&1; > done > ) & > > But my duplicate free is in fxp_txeof(). This means that output thread has > won the race. This explanation sounds good but my box is an UP with PREEMPTION. Is is supposed to be also possible in this case ? Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 09:31:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C7416A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:31:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F373243D1F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:31:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5L9VpbM031988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:31:51 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5L9VoDd035386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:31:51 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5L9VouA035385; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:31:50 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:31:50 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Jeremie Le Hen Message-ID: <20050621093150.GA35316@cell.sick.ru> References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> <20050621092836.GD738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050621092836.GD738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff on relay.bestcom.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:31:53 -0000 On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:28:36AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: J> > IMHO, this looks like a race. The route is not locked, when J> > its llinfo is edited. J> > J> > Probably the mbuf was freed when arp reply arrived and la_hold was send. J> > Look into in_arpinput() near 736: J> > J> > (*ifp->if_output)(ifp, la->la_hold, rt_key(rt), rt); J> > la->la_hold = 0; J> > J> > Yeah, I have just triggered another panic running 15 instances of this J> > script on SMP box: J> > J> > ( J> > while (true); do J> > arp -d 81.19.64.111 >/dev/null 2>&1; J> > ping -c 1 -t 1 81.19.64.111 >/dev/null 2>&1; J> > done J> > ) & J> > J> > But my duplicate free is in fxp_txeof(). This means that output thread has J> > won the race. J> J> This explanation sounds good but my box is an UP with PREEMPTION. J> Is is supposed to be also possible in this case ? I guess yes, because of preemption. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 10:51:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1D016A41C; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:51:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855A143D48; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:51:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5LApuNM033876 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:51:57 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5LApt1M036805 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:51:55 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5LApseA036804; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:51:54 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:51:54 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Jeremie Le Hen Message-ID: <20050621105154.GA36538@cell.sick.ru> References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff on relay.bestcom.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: qingli@FreeBSD.org, sam@FreeBSD.org, andre@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:51:59 -0000 --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit [ cc'ing parties involved in this part of code] On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:07:01PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: T> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:04:27AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: T> J> #25 0xc05a0a0b in m_freem (mb=0x0) at uma.h:304 T> J> No locals. T> J> #26 0xc05ee0d5 in arpresolve (ifp=0xc1a5b000, rt0=0xc1d44000, m=0xc1be7200, T> J> dst=0xd6d3fa94, desten=0xd6d3fa2c "/??]??????w??") T> J> at ../../../netinet/if_ether.c:442 T> J> la = (struct llinfo_arp *) 0xc1a75a00 T> J> sdl = (struct sockaddr_dl *) 0xc2128910 T> J> error = -1038972656 T> J> rt = (struct rtentry *) 0xc1d44000 T> T> IMHO, this looks like a race. The route is not locked, when T> its llinfo is edited. T> T> Probably the mbuf was freed when arp reply arrived and la_hold was send. T> Look into in_arpinput() near 736: T> T> (*ifp->if_output)(ifp, la->la_hold, rt_key(rt), rt); T> la->la_hold = 0; T> T> Yeah, I have just triggered another panic running 15 instances of this script on T> SMP box: T> T> ( T> while (true); do T> arp -d 81.19.64.111 >/dev/null 2>&1; T> ping -c 1 -t 1 81.19.64.111 >/dev/null 2>&1; T> done T> ) & T> T> But my duplicate free is in fxp_txeof(). This means that output thread has T> won the race. I suppose that the attached patch closes your race. However, there is still race between RTM_DELETE and output path. The above script still drops kernel to panic, but the other one. Output path works with already freed llinfo: #28 0xc0507000 in m_freem (mb=0x0) at mbuf.h:410 #29 0xc053fde3 in arpresolve (ifp=0xc2012800, rt0=0xc22fcdec, m=0xc25a8000, dst=0xe720bb28, desten=0xe720bacc "uøbÀ+\001") at /usr/src/sys/netinet/if_ether.c:443 #30 0xc0538078 in ether_output (ifp=0xc2012800, m=0xc25a8000, dst=0xe720bb28, rt0=0xc22fcdec) at /usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c:173 #31 0xc054b5b4 in ip_output (m=0xc25a8000, opt=0xc25a80ac, ro=0xe720bb24, flags=0x20, imo=0x0, inp=0xc25eb5a0) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:772 #32 0xc054d36b in rip_output (m=0xc25a8000, so=0x0, dst=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/raw_ip.c:320 #33 0xc054de7b in rip_send (so=0xc248c914, flags=0x0, m=0xc25a8000, nam=0xc218d410, control=0x0, td=0xc224d7d0) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/raw_ip.c:785 #34 0xc050a30f in sosend (so=0xc248c914, addr=0xc218d410, uio=0xe720bc3c, top=0xc25a8000, control=0x0, flags=0x0, td=0xc224d7d0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:827 (kgdb) frame 29 #29 0xc053fde3 in arpresolve (ifp=0xc2012800, rt0=0xc22fcdec, m=0xc25a8000, dst=0xe720bb28, desten=0xe720bacc "uøbÀ+\001") at /usr/src/sys/netinet/if_ether.c:443 443 m_freem(la->la_hold); (kgdb) p *la $3 = { la_le = { le_next = 0xdeadc0de, le_prev = 0xdeadc0de }, la_rt = 0xdeadc0de, la_hold = 0xdeadc0de, la_preempt = 0xc0de, la_asked = 0xdead } Fixing this one is harder. We take la from unlocked rtentry obtained via rt_check(), or from arplookup(). The latter drops lock on rtentry, too. Then we do some work and use this la. It may have already been freed in arp_rtrequest(), the RTM_DELETE case. I see two approaches here: 1) Protecting llinfo with route lock. In this case we need rt_check() to return locked *rt (just reference won't help). We also need arplookup() to return locked rt. And do not unlock it withing all arpresolve() and a big part of in_arpinput() functions. 2) Add mutex to llinfo_arp. I'm afraid this will hurt performance. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="if_ether.c.diff" Index: if_ether.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netinet/if_ether.c,v retrieving revision 1.137 diff -u -r1.137 if_ether.c --- if_ether.c 5 Jun 2005 03:13:12 -0000 1.137 +++ if_ether.c 21 Jun 2005 10:36:08 -0000 @@ -438,11 +438,11 @@ * response yet. Replace the held mbuf with this * latest one. */ + RT_LOCK(rt); if (la->la_hold) m_freem(la->la_hold); la->la_hold = m; if (rt->rt_expire) { - RT_LOCK(rt); rt->rt_flags &= ~RTF_REJECT; if (la->la_asked == 0 || rt->rt_expire != time_second) { rt->rt_expire = time_second; @@ -459,8 +459,8 @@ } } - RT_UNLOCK(rt); } + RT_UNLOCK(rt); return (EWOULDBLOCK); } @@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ goto reply; la = arplookup(isaddr.s_addr, itaddr.s_addr == myaddr.s_addr, 0); if (la && (rt = la->la_rt) && (sdl = SDL(rt->rt_gateway))) { + struct mbuf *hold; + /* the following is not an error when doing bridging */ if (!bridged && rt->rt_ifp != ifp #ifdef DEV_CARP @@ -729,11 +731,13 @@ if (rt->rt_expire) rt->rt_expire = time_second + arpt_keep; rt->rt_flags &= ~RTF_REJECT; - RT_UNLOCK(rt); la->la_asked = 0; la->la_preempt = arp_maxtries; - if (la->la_hold) { - (*ifp->if_output)(ifp, la->la_hold, rt_key(rt), rt); + hold = la->la_hold; + la->la_hold = 0; + RT_UNLOCK(rt); + if (hold) { + (*ifp->if_output)(ifp, hold, rt_key(rt), rt); la->la_hold = 0; } } --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 11:18:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F282816A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:18:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-stable@theloosingend.net) Received: from royk.itea.ntnu.no (royk.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.190.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD1D43D4C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:18:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-stable@theloosingend.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by royk.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B21766EBC for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:18:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by royk.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:17:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 48156 invoked by uid 1001); 21 Jun 2005 13:17:59 +0200 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jun 2005 13:17:59 +0200 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:17:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen X-X-Sender: sveinhal@maren.thelosingend.net To: Khanh Cao Van In-Reply-To: <5fd642fc050620191670837b21@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20050621131249.Q48087@maren.thelosingend.net> References: <5fd642fc050620191670837b21@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: howto update freebsd 4.7 release to 4.7 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:18:02 -0000 * Khanh Cao Van [2005-06-21 09:16 +0700] > So I have to update my 4.7 release to 4.7 stable . But I do not know > how to do make it . I've looking everywhere but could not find any > clear document about it . Please help me ! > > PS : I'm not going to upgrade my kernel 4.7 to 4.8 or anything else , > just 4.7 only . Thank for reading ! There is no such thing as 4.7-stable, there is a 4.7-release, and there is a 4-stable (among others). The -stable-branch is a moving target, right now, it might be calles 4.11-stable, since 4.11 was the latest release that was spawned from this branch, but it's not exactly 4.11 either. "4.7-stable or later", means that you will have to at least upgrade to 4.8-release if you want to comply to the requirements of your software installation. And while you're at it, I would strongly advice you to upgrade all the way to 4.11, unless you have strong reasons not to. If this does not fit you, then you either need to install an older version of your software, that does not require 4.7-stable or later, or not install the software in question at all. Svein halvor From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 11:31:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4A716A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:31:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD3743D64 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c220-239-8-51.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.8.51]) by mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5LBVKXp010116 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:31:21 +1000 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5LBVJRx067472; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:31:20 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id j5LBVJsw067471; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:31:19 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:31:18 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: Khanh Cao Van Message-ID: <20050621113118.GT50157@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <5fd642fc050620191670837b21@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5fd642fc050620191670837b21@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: freebsd-stable-list Subject: Re: howto update freebsd 4.7 release to 4.7 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:31:24 -0000 On Tue, 2005-Jun-21 09:16:30 +0700, Khanh Cao Van wrote: >My custom use freeBSD 4.7 release and ask me to install JDK1.4 on it . >But when I use ports to compile JDK , the system show me a message : > >You must have a version of FreeBSD later than 4.7-STABLE February 2003 >or 5-CURRENT February 2003 to compile and use JDK 1.4.2. JDK 1.4 requires some threading changes that were (presumably) introduced in February 2003. Looking back at the CVS commit logs, there were a large number of changes to the threading library during January and February 2003 and it's not clear exactly what fixes JDK is relying on. If the only problem with JDK is the threading library, you may be able to get JDK1.4 running by just upgrading libpthread to 4-STABLE: # cd /usr/src/lib/libpthread upgrade just this tree to 4-STABLE using whatever method you prefer # make clean # make all # make install I can't guarantee that this will work but it is probably your only option to get JDK 1.4 working without doing a full upgrade. >So I have to update my 4.7 release to 4.7 stable . But I do not know >how to do make it . I've looking everywhere but could not find any >clear document about it . Please help me ! 4.7-STABLE is not a fixed package. It refers to the RELENG_4 CVS branch between the time that RELENG_4_7 was branched and RELENG_4_8 was branched (ie betweem 4.7-RELEASE and 4.8-RELEASE). It is not really practical to update to 4.7-STABLE once 4.8 has been released. >PS : I'm not going to upgrade my kernel 4.7 to 4.8 or anything else , >just 4.7 only . Thank for reading ! Note that 4.7 is no longer supported by the FreeBSD project and I would strongly recommend that you consider upgrading. In particular, security fixes are unlikely to be applied to 4.7. Upgrading userland without upgrading the kernel is not supported in general. -- Peter Jeremy From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 12:15:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF4D16A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:15:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.schuh@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3A343D5D for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:15:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.schuh@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g2so65619nfe for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:15:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bZzsX/ZpE4wR9WkQNbi6Awgnwpinv4Xo15tJz/1x/+ihjiP3po4FkEzxzcMsOR4w8qmHYy8J8Uynvpbio92djuUXkQT5v+2NjPJNz3JedjBhmmmsCmCay21Etnm68VJ9yVT4FwmoCho5jXSgo66q8jKcqH6esGZlSG2sdyACZck= Received: by 10.48.43.18 with SMTP id q18mr107512nfq; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.244.20 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1dbad315050621051525f4c6fc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:15:42 +0200 From: Michael Schuh To: Mark Kirkwood In-Reply-To: <42B74DF9.9020706@paradise.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1dbad315050620034565892ee@mail.gmail.com> <42B6A528.2000204@paradise.net.nz> <1dbad315050620044862e8a7f6@mail.gmail.com> <42B74DF9.9020706@paradise.net.nz> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Schuh List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:15:44 -0000 hello, first sorry for my bad english, with i mean no operation. i can live with a better performance from postgresql under RELENG_5 :-D i find it great. As i sayed i have the installations always made in the same way, so that i = mean. I mean i have alwas made the swap on the first gig of the disk, and the installation on the rest of the disk. and i have no multiple os'es on these disk. I know that other diskpart's have other performance...... :-D i mean i have really strictly regarded where my os'es are installed for these tests. what i not can ensure, is that the Gentoo uses the same parts for the programs, relying of the implemantation from ext2fs/ext3fs than BSD under UFS. But i think really that are enough reasons to say this test speaking a real language, and gave me not bad results. I be not a noob or an newby, so that i know that the io performance of a di= sk is related to the sectors that i use for regarding this performance. :-D i have made the test always on the hardware, not compatible or equal= , really the same, same disk, same processor, same board, same ram, same ethernet-card, all same........ i would not say look for a faster io-performance, that is not the only factor for database performance, but what is when your disk-access=20 uses the double of time as before? then can you not say "ohhh my problem is not related to disk-io" ;-) i would not say that the io of disk ist the only important factor, but it is in fact an important factor. make a simple test: install a database-intensive application on an PII400 with DDRS-4,3GB SCSI-disk and make 500.000 inserts in an postgresql and an = mysql database. so you can see that it uses many many time, change the disk to an= =20 ATA66 disk with good performance (better then the DDRS or DCAS) and then you see, that the disk-prformance is an important fact. i would you only make sensible for the view that you cannot only digging at= the ipc-performance or the threading. I know that are also important factors, but what is if the base of all of these factors are lame? then you are lying on an mixed error behaviour that are not really representative. you search the error in first time on the wrong place. i think first view the diskperformance in versus of the Os'es and the versions, then digging deeper and search the oil in threading.....:-)) i woul not start a principle discussion, that is not my target, my target is an really performant OS, that go's he's way forward and not backward's. I have seen that the disk-performance (ata-related) is much slower in RELENG_5 than in RELENG_4, and this is a step backwards to me, if its so much slower. about five or ten percent is not really bad an can comes from an other scheduling, as you can see in dragonfly, but halv as good as before ist for me not acceptable for production uses. best regards michael 2005/6/21, Mark Kirkwood : > Michael Schuh wrote: > > Hello, > > > > yes random IO is more targetted to Databases. > > noop, i have the installation always made in the same way, and i have r= espected > > the different diskperformace in different disk-parts..... > > this was the reason for > > > > #cd /; > > > > at the beginning of my tests. > > In the first test i have me shooting self in my foot and i bites me in > > my ass :-))) > > >=20 > I was referring to the partitions and slices on the physical disk - each > operating system is installed in a different one of these, and so is in > a different physical part of the disk - hence you cannot reliably > compare IO rates between them (This very issue has been discussed before > I recall - try a Google search, as it is quite interesting). >=20 > > my suggestion going more in the direction...first solve all disk(ata) r= elated > > performace issues, then test the mysql-performaces issues again to secu= re > > that you are not lying on an mixing of many problems.... :-) > > >=20 > While noone would complain about faster sequential IO, it is almost > certainly not the issue effecting database performance - for instance I > find Postgresql consistently faster on RELENG_5 (5.3 onwards) than on > RELENG_4 (using the pgbench program). >=20 > cheers >=20 > Mark >=20 > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 12:37:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392B416A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:37:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cvkhanh@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAFC43D49 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:37:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cvkhanh@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so1368695rna for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:37:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=g8ix2H6Fy1vJiI9Ujb8tFarMhpX2yAFr6uSfhrtrElOLMgGsDbLvuMXV2pPCP4rQQenoE3MOKwtanOnKJi9JFL/RdmXIgVqvxTf5FoX6EiRm6TjVtgwl3ak5nz1WbWM5ZD2Vq0cg07qA755xGAOBDK1IqWKe4qUYonNza/PLzz8= Received: by 10.38.152.65 with SMTP id z65mr2400257rnd; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.73.24 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5fd642fc0506210537322a0fb9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 19:37:42 +0700 From: Khanh Cao Van To: Peter Jeremy In-Reply-To: <20050621113118.GT50157@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <5fd642fc050620191670837b21@mail.gmail.com> <20050621113118.GT50157@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Cc: freebsd-stable-list Subject: Re: howto update freebsd 4.7 release to 4.7 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Khanh Cao Van List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:37:43 -0000 hi , I could not findout the "# cd /usr/src/lib/libpthread" as your answer bellow ,please help me to fix this problem On 6/21/05, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Tue, 2005-Jun-21 09:16:30 +0700, Khanh Cao Van wrote: > >My custom use freeBSD 4.7 release and ask me to install JDK1.4 on it . > >But when I use ports to compile JDK , the system show me a message : > > > >You must have a version of FreeBSD later than 4.7-STABLE February 2003 > >or 5-CURRENT February 2003 to compile and use JDK 1.4.2. >=20 > JDK 1.4 requires some threading changes that were (presumably) > introduced in February 2003. Looking back at the CVS commit logs, > there were a large number of changes to the threading library during > January and February 2003 and it's not clear exactly what fixes > JDK is relying on. >=20 > If the only problem with JDK is the threading library, you may be able > to get JDK1.4 running by just upgrading libpthread to 4-STABLE: > # cd /usr/src/lib/libpthread > upgrade just this tree to 4-STABLE using whatever method you prefer > # make clean > # make all > # make install >=20 > I can't guarantee that this will work but it is probably your only > option to get JDK 1.4 working without doing a full upgrade. >=20 > >So I have to update my 4.7 release to 4.7 stable . But I do not know > >how to do make it . I've looking everywhere but could not find any > >clear document about it . Please help me ! >=20 > 4.7-STABLE is not a fixed package. It refers to the RELENG_4 CVS > branch between the time that RELENG_4_7 was branched and RELENG_4_8 > was branched (ie betweem 4.7-RELEASE and 4.8-RELEASE). It is not > really practical to update to 4.7-STABLE once 4.8 has been released. >=20 > >PS : I'm not going to upgrade my kernel 4.7 to 4.8 or anything else , > >just 4.7 only . Thank for reading ! >=20 > Note that 4.7 is no longer supported by the FreeBSD project and I would > strongly recommend that you consider upgrading. In particular, security > fixes are unlikely to be applied to 4.7. >=20 > Upgrading userland without upgrading the kernel is not supported in > general. >=20 > -- > Peter Jeremy >=20 --=20 ---------------------------------- Cao Van Khanh From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 12:49:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099A816A41C; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:49:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@r2d2.multiplay.co.uk) Received: from r2d2.multiplay.co.uk (host7.iclon.multiplay.co.uk [212.135.219.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A5F43D1D; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:49:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@r2d2.multiplay.co.uk) Received: from r2d2.multiplay.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r2d2.multiplay.co.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5LDomZ5000650; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:50:48 GMT (envelope-from root@r2d2.multiplay.co.uk) Received: (from root@localhost) by r2d2.multiplay.co.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j5LDomF4000649; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:50:48 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:50:48 GMT Message-Id: <200506211350.j5LDomF4000649@r2d2.multiplay.co.uk> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org From: Steven Hartland X-send-pr-version: 3.113 X-GNATS-Notify: Cc: freebsd-stable-list Subject: hptmv ( Highpoint RocketRaid 1820a ) corrupts fs on shutdown -p X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Steven Hartland List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:49:42 -0000 >Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Steven Hartland >Organization: Multiplay >Confidential: no >Synopsis: hptmv ( Highpoint RocketRaid 1820a ) corrupts fs on shutdown -p >Severity: serious >Priority: high >Category: kern >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p2 i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD r2d2.multiplay.co.uk 5.4-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p2 #5: Tue Jun 21 13:29:02 UTC 2005 root@r2d2.multiplay.co.uk:/.usr/i386/src/sys/i386/compile/MPUK_SMP_200HZ i386 >Description: When shutting down with power off e.g. shutdown -p now a machine with a Highpoint RocketRaid 1820a ( more than likely the 1820 as well ) corrupts the FS bad enough to force recorvery in single user mode. The problem occurs because the disk flush is async and no time is given for this to happen. >How-To-Repeat: Shutdown a box with a hptmv based controller with power off. >Fix: Apply the following patch which adds a 5 second delay after calling flush. Note: the fix is only relavent for i386 as there is no source for amd64, which is also affected. I've informed Highpoint of the issue but as yet no updated driver has been released. --- entry.c.orig Tue Jun 21 13:23:05 2005 +++ entry.c Tue Jun 21 13:27:38 2005 @@ -2157,6 +2157,10 @@ return (EINVAL); - EVENTHANDLER_DEREGISTER(shutdown_final, pAdapter->eh); FlushAdapter(pAdapter); + + /* give the flush some time to happen */ + DELAY( 1000 * 1000 * 5 ); + + EVENTHANDLER_DEREGISTER(shutdown_final, pAdapter->eh); return 0; From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 13:25:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1F716A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:25:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Received: from schubert.byrnehq.com (dsl-33-12.dsl.netsource.ie [213.79.33.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E96843D55 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:25:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Received: from localhost (mauer.directski.com. [212.147.140.194]) by schubert.byrnehq.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5LEPprV001105; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:25:58 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:25:27 +0100 From: Tony Byrne Organization: ByrneHQ X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1505061840.20050621142527@byrnehq.com> To: Martin In-Reply-To: <42B7226B.40503@nurfuerspam.de> References: <8d02aed005062012012e081fb5@mail.gmail.com> <42B7226B.40503@nurfuerspam.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ByrneHQ-SA-Hits: 1.455 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 192.168.10.254 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, twesky Subject: Re[2]: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!) (JM) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tony Byrne List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:25:45 -0000 Hello Martin, Monday, June 20, 2005, 9:09:15 PM, you wrote: M> I just compiled the kernel from May 26th. Works fine. It looks like M> for me it's broken between May 26th and May 30th. M> I tried these kernels: M> 2005-06-16 broken M> 2005-05-31 broken M> 2005-05-30 (00:00:00) broken M> 2005-05-26 (00:00:00) ok M> 2005-05-22 ok M> 2005-05-15 ok M> 2005-05-09 ok M> The problem appears under heavy disk load. There's definitely something up with the driver for the Intel ICH5 controller. I have second machine with the same chipset, this time a desktop, which is exhibiting the same DMA timeout problem with its SATA disk. It has a RELENG_5 kernel which was built from sources updated yesterday. Regards, Tony. -- Tony Byrne From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 13:48:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0259516A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:48:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C2B43D48 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:48:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:48:42 +0100 Message-ID: <42B81A90.9030808@dial.pipex.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:48:00 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khanh Cao Van References: <5fd642fc050620191670837b21@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5fd642fc050620191670837b21@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jun 2005 13:48:42.0435 (UTC) FILETIME=[EFA73930:01C57667] Cc: freebsd-stable-list Subject: Re: howto update freebsd 4.7 release to 4.7 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:48:03 -0000 Khanh Cao Van wrote: >My custom use freeBSD 4.7 release and ask me to install JDK1.4 on it . >But when I use ports to compile JDK , the system show me a message : > >You must have a version of FreeBSD later than 4.7-STABLE February 2003 >or 5-CURRENT February 2003 to compile and use JDK 1.4.2. > >So I have to update my 4.7 release to 4.7 stable . But I do not know >how to do make it . I've looking everywhere but could not find any >clear document about it . Please help me ! > > AFAIK there is no such thing as 4.7-STABLE, just 4-STABLE and the handbook page on tags bears this out. (4-STABLE would be improvements from the *latest* 4 release which is 4.11. If you won't go to 4.8 then 4-STABLE is the stuff of your nightmares. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html says: RELENG_4 The line of development for FreeBSD-4.X, also known as FreeBSD 4-STABLE >PS : I'm not going to upgrade my kernel 4.7 to 4.8 or anything else , >just 4.7 only . Thank for reading ! > No-one here can stop you shooting yourself in the foot. The release engineering page clearly states: > FreeBSD 4.7 security fix branch (not officially supported). so I guess you are own your own. Not upgrading a critical machine to 5.X I could understand, but not upgrading from 4.7 another 4.X release I find incomprehensible. --Alex From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 14:00:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6222E16A420 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:00:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cvkhanh@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B63C43D1D for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:00:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cvkhanh@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so1398098rna for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:00:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=BykyKp3Hu43o083KMRLi7oeBGLmqvAm807VY52IZt41HBw9ZhHLGjBvP8tTyTA83wRT+RD5Thsm6FCkYNzUz4EJ9Ju86G1+3qn5ELGpH6MKToNlTlaiigTdu2vgDhimVuK4XNC3RmyjQwUNa81pxiIVgXU9W4KrudCU31DyAbKk= Received: by 10.38.76.68 with SMTP id y68mr2434928rna; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.73.24 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5fd642fc05062107001efca879@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:00:05 +0700 From: Khanh Cao Van To: freebsd-stable-list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: update libpthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Khanh Cao Van List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:00:06 -0000 Peter Jeremy tell me that I have to update libpthread to be able to install JDK 1.4 on freeBSD 4.7 . But I could not find out what ports contain that lib . Help me if you know . Please do not tell me about why still using freeBSD 4.7 . It not my own , it the customer's and I have to work on it if I do not want my project false . If I was , I'll take the latest 5.4 immediatly --=20 ---------------------------------- Cao Van Khanh From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 14:05:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1229C16A41F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:05:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chinhngt@sectorb.msk.ru) Received: from hq.sectorb.msk.ru (petaflop.b.gz.ru [217.67.124.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56D243D5C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:05:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chinhngt@sectorb.msk.ru) Received: from unix.hackers (unix.hackers [172.16.36.86]) by hq.sectorb.msk.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1685FC1; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:05:35 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:05:37 +0400 (MSD) From: Nguyen Tam Chinh X-X-Sender: chinhngt@unix.hackers To: Khanh Cao Van In-Reply-To: <5fd642fc05062107001efca879@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20050621180417.K2276@unix.hackers> References: <5fd642fc05062107001efca879@mail.gmail.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE Keywords: 216091683 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable-list Subject: Re: update libpthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:05:41 -0000 Hi Khanh, Libpthread is in the base system. You should get it by using cvsup or extract it from the install CD. On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Khanh Cao Van wrote: > Peter Jeremy tell me that I have to update libpthread to be able to > install JDK 1.4 on freeBSD 4.7 . But I could not find out what ports > contain that lib . Help me if you know . > > Please do not tell me about why still using freeBSD 4.7 . It not my > own , it the customer's and I have to work on it if I do not want my > project false . If I was , I'll take the latest 5.4 immediatly > -- > ---------------------------------- > Cao Van Khanh > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ----- With best regards, | The Power to Serve Nguyen Tam Chinh | http://www.FreeBSD.org Loc: sp.cs.msu.su | From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 14:18:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E260116A41C; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:18:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frode@nordahl.net) Received: from smtp1.powertech.no (smtp1.powertech.no [195.159.0.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739D243D1F; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:18:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frode@nordahl.net) Received: from [195.159.148.126] (dhcp7.xu.nordahl.net [195.159.148.126]) by smtp1.powertech.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535E581E9; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:18:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1118146251.755.4.camel@spirit> References: <2D2A5D81-9E95-4D83-B479-D61BBB39C25F@nordahl.net> <1118146251.755.4.camel@spirit> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Frode Nordahl Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:18:36 +0200 To: delphij@delphij.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: propagate_priority panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:18:39 -0000 On 7. jun. 2005, at 14.10, Xin LI wrote: > Hi, Frode, > > =E5=9C=A8 2005-06-07=E4=BA=8C=E7=9A=84 09:32 +0200=EF=BC=8CFrode = Nordahl=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > >> Dear colleagues, >> > [snip] > >> db> trace >> Tracing pid 86 tid 100089 td 0xc54a1e10 >> propagate_priority(c54a1e10,c08f3750,c54c6960,c0901ae0,c54a1e10) at >> propagate_priority+0x7f >> turnstile_wait(c56f6a80,c0901ae0,c54c6960) at turnstile_wait+0x2e1 >> _mtx_lock_sleep(c0901ae0,c54a1e10,0,0,0) at _mtx_lock_sleep+0xf9 >> nfsrv_rcv(c5b32b64,c5b5b580,1) at nfsrv_rcv+0x4e >> sowakeup(c5b32b64,c5b32bb4) at sowakeup+0xad >> udp_append(c5a8c870,c5c96810,c5a99200,1c,ee83dc60) at udp_append=20 >> +0x158 >> udp_input(c5a99200,14,8e009fc3,0,0) at udp_input+0x5fb >> ip_input(c5a99200) at ip_input+0x4f1 >> netisr_processqueue(c08f5718) at netisr_processqueue+0xa3 >> swi_net(0) at swi_net+0xf2 >> ithread_loop(c5455e00,ee83dd48) at ithread_loop+0x159 >> fork_exit(c0605048,c5455e00,ee83dd48) at fork_exit+0x75 >> fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 >> --- trap 0x1, eip =3D 0, esp =3D 0xee83dd7c, ebp =3D 0 --- >> > > This looks like what I have been observed within a recent -CURRENT > kernel, which indicates a bug that was fixed recently. > > Would you please try the patch here: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/kern/=20 > kern_switch.c.diff?r1=3D1.111&r2=3D1.112 > > You can safely ignore failed patch of Hunk #1, but if Hunk #2 and/=20 > or #3 > has been failed, please let us know your ident /sys/kern/kern_switch.c > output. Running with this patch the system livelocks instead, I have the =20 following trace from it: Tracing pid 84 tid 100087 td 0xc54a7a80 kdb_enter(c0854f33) at kdb_enter+0x2b siointr1(c55b8000) at siointr1+0xce siointr(c55b8000) at siointr+0x5e intr_execute_handlers(c53fb490,ee837b0c,4,ee837b5c,c07c3f53) at =20 intr_execute_handlers+0x7d lapic_handle_intr(34) at lapic_handle_intr+0x2e Xapic_isr1() at Xapic_isr1+0x33 --- interrupt, eip =3D 0xc0617871, esp =3D 0xee837b50, ebp =3D = 0xee837b5c --- _mtx_lock_sleep(c090fac0,c54a7a80,0,0,0) at _mtx_lock_sleep+0xb9 nfsrv_rcv(c5ac7a20,c5c41c80,1) at nfsrv_rcv+0x4e sowakeup(c5ac7a20,c5ac7a70) at sowakeup+0xad udp_append(c5ac9870,c5c20810,caaae700,1c,ee837c60) at udp_append+0x158 udp_input(caaae700,14,8e009fc3,0,0) at udp_input+0x5fb ip_input(caaae700) at ip_input+0x4f1 netisr_processqueue(c09036f8) at netisr_processqueue+0xa3 swi_net(0) at swi_net+0xf2 ithread_loop(c5495000,ee837d48) at ithread_loop+0x159 fork_exit(c060bb38,c5495000,ee837d48) at fork_exit+0x75 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 --- trap 0x1, eip =3D 0, esp =3D 0xee837d7c, ebp =3D 0 --- db> Any ideas? Thanks! Frode Nordahl frode@nordahl.net From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 14:18:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BD016A424 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:18:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cvkhanh@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500DD43D1F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:18:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cvkhanh@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so1405140rna for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:18:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rWBf0OBYiBTO12yODEbyp9mgmH5l5Ujm7R35flpZoRUA7LdEB0Nm8TM0/mhAOuKs3BGDp2bG1rDyRUHdPiLyV+Zo7hqzQc2UQEp/DTeHTWd2kd3KnoHoewqFBCNzrIQkOEho13LyIPrqw2Q47rOdsOEAvBas0QzPwJfA06JRAok= Received: by 10.38.207.69 with SMTP id e69mr2456569rng; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.73.24 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5fd642fc050621071821582d2e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:18:42 +0700 From: Khanh Cao Van To: Nguyen Tam Chinh In-Reply-To: <20050621180417.K2276@unix.hackers> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <5fd642fc05062107001efca879@mail.gmail.com> <20050621180417.K2276@unix.hackers> Cc: freebsd-stable-list Subject: Re: update libpthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Khanh Cao Van List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:18:43 -0000 hic , because I just have only 5 hour to conform with the boss that could or could not install JDK 1.4 on freeBSD 4.7 , so please give me some more detail . I could not find out what ports contain the libpthread so looking at the CD or cvs could not give me anything :( On 6/21/05, Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote: > Hi Khanh, >=20 > Libpthread is in the base system. You should get it by using cvsup or > extract it from the install CD. >=20 > On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Khanh Cao Van wrote: >=20 > > Peter Jeremy tell me that I have to update libpthread to be able to > > install JDK 1.4 on freeBSD 4.7 . But I could not find out what ports > > contain that lib . Help me if you know . > > > > Please do not tell me about why still using freeBSD 4.7 . It not my > > own , it the customer's and I have to work on it if I do not want my > > project false . If I was , I'll take the latest 5.4 immediatly > > -- > > ---------------------------------- > > Cao Van Khanh > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > > >=20 > ----- > With best regards, | The Power to Serve > Nguyen Tam Chinh | http://www.FreeBSD.org > Loc: sp.cs.msu.su | >=20 --=20 ---------------------------------- Cao Van Khanh From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 14:25:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAA316A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:25:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.kipp@eurowings.com) Received: from email-2.eurowings.com (email.eurowings.com [193.96.182.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55B143D1D for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:25:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.kipp@eurowings.com) Received: from localhost (email-2 [127.0.0.1]) by email-2.eurowings.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70C16FCB2 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:29:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from email-2.eurowings.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (email-2.eurowings.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15764-06 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:29:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EXCH4.eurowings.com (unknown [10.100.1.36]) by email-2.eurowings.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CC86FCDA for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:29:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EXCH5.eurowings.com ([10.100.1.37]) by EXCH4.eurowings.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:25:33 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:25:33 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: update libpthread Thread-Index: AcV2aadtHpQ7+R7gT/Of8KC4xWdE8QAAPU0J From: "Kipp Holger" To: "Khanh Cao Van" , "freebsd-stable-list" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jun 2005 14:25:33.0925 (UTC) FILETIME=[15CDD150:01C5766D] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at eurowings.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: update libpthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:25:35 -0000 Khanh Cao Van wrote on Tue 21.06.2005 16:00 > Peter Jeremy tell me that I have to update libpthread to be able to > install JDK 1.4 on freeBSD 4.7 . But I could not find out what ports > contain that lib . Help me if you know . Not port. Base system. Considering this, the best solution for you seems to be to upgrade the base system to 4.8-RELEASE or later. > Please do not tell me about why still using freeBSD 4.7 . It not my > own , it the customer's and I have to work on it if I do not want my > project false . If I was , I'll take the latest 5.4 immediatly For cvsup see: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html Regards, Holger Kipp From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 14:40:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3812316A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:40:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F160943D53 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:40:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id j5LEenfr012641; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:40:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:40:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Kipp Holger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: Khanh Cao Van , freebsd-stable-list Subject: RE: update libpthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:40:55 -0000 On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Kipp Holger wrote: > Khanh Cao Van wrote on Tue 21.06.2005 16:00 > > > Peter Jeremy tell me that I have to update libpthread to be able to > > install JDK 1.4 on freeBSD 4.7 . But I could not find out what ports > > contain that lib . Help me if you know . > > Not port. Base system. Considering this, the best solution for you > seems to be to upgrade the base system to 4.8-RELEASE or later. src/libpthread is not in 4.x and can not be made to work in 4.x. In 4.x, your only solution is to use src/libc_r, which is now marked for deprecation in -current (6.x). If you want reliable Java support, I suggest you use -stable (5.x) which has libpthread. Go ask the -java mailing list for more info. -- DE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 14:51:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C60A16A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:51:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EFB43D1F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:51:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (stojuz@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5LEpAWn024351; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:51:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5LEpA2W024350; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:51:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:51:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200506211451.j5LEpA2W024350@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Michael Schuh In-Reply-To: <1dbad315050621051525f4c6fc@mail.gmail.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Michael Schuh List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:51:14 -0000 Michael Schuh wrote: > As i sayed i have the installations always made in the same way, so that i mean. > I mean i have alwas made the swap on the first gig of the disk, and > the installation > on the rest of the disk. and i have no multiple os'es on these disk. The problem is that the file (from "dd of=foo") can still end up at completely different physical places on the disk. It depends on the filesystem (ext2, ext3, UFS, whatever) and on the allocation strategies of the filesystem code. UFS might start filling cylinder groups from the beginning of the disk, while ext3 might start at the end (does ext3 even _have_ cylinder groups?). This was just an example, but you get the idea. Of course, it also depends on how much data there already is on the filesystem, and how it is distributed over the disk. For accurate measurements and comparisons, you have to make sure to use _exactly_ the same physical location on the disk. From userland you don't have a way to control the physical allocation of files. Therefore, the only reliable way is to leave an unused partition on the disk, do _not_ put a filesystem on it, and use the raw device in the »dd« command. If you do this, you will always hit the same physical location on the disk. But then again -- as others have already mentioned, serial write speed is not the most important factor for database performance (although the WAL journal files of advanced transactional databases like PostgreSQL are written in a sequential way), so the usefulness of this "benchmark" is very debatable. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "I started using PostgreSQL around a month ago, and the feeling is similar to the switch from Linux to FreeBSD in '96 -- 'wow!'." -- Oddbjorn Steffensen From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 15:01:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1997216A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:01:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.schuh@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992A143D49 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:01:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.schuh@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g2so72024nfe for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:01:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CWhEiDjVW7nvJiLuxk4l4FwmnKX4oX4z/obAsONiH/01SIDWl3sFUkvH10usPbf4un0MEl9IIaH9bim9kymbrrEc9g/iTqlgDpW4hn7XNTD/O3RiYkjjvbqlDEMRzZv5UsBiqHL5aHYl5iZzH+rlirWSqNCwajC/jCXv4a+aLUg= Received: by 10.48.144.8 with SMTP id r8mr111979nfd; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:01:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.244.20 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1dbad31505062108011b812ba8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:01:49 +0200 From: Michael Schuh To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Michael Schuh In-Reply-To: <200506211451.j5LEpA2W024350@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1dbad315050621051525f4c6fc@mail.gmail.com> <200506211451.j5LEpA2W024350@lurza.secnetix.de> Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Schuh List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:01:52 -0000 Hello Oliver, ahhhhh, that are the hint that i missed. now i have another question, if i use the same Os in 2 versions (RELENG_4, RELENG_5) can i hope that the tests are made on the same part of disk? or in other words can an dd on the two OS' es so much different because they use an totally other part of disk? I think no, the strategie from dd under one OS should not be changed if the OS-Version has changed. the part with serial IO related to database-performance have i understand, but i quests me have the others understand my meanings? best regards Michael Schuh 2005/6/21, Oliver Fromme : > Michael Schuh wrote: > > As i sayed i have the installations always made in the same way, so th= at i mean. > > I mean i have alwas made the swap on the first gig of the disk, and > > the installation > > on the rest of the disk. and i have no multiple os'es on these disk. >=20 > The problem is that the file (from "dd of=3Dfoo") can still > end up at completely different physical places on the disk. >=20 > It depends on the filesystem (ext2, ext3, UFS, whatever) > and on the allocation strategies of the filesystem code. > UFS might start filling cylinder groups from the beginning > of the disk, while ext3 might start at the end (does ext3 > even _have_ cylinder groups?). This was just an example, > but you get the idea. >=20 > Of course, it also depends on how much data there already > is on the filesystem, and how it is distributed over the > disk. >=20 > For accurate measurements and comparisons, you have to make > sure to use _exactly_ the same physical location on the > disk. From userland you don't have a way to control the > physical allocation of files. Therefore, the only reliable > way is to leave an unused partition on the disk, do _not_ > put a filesystem on it, and use the raw device in the =BBdd=AB > command. If you do this, you will always hit the same > physical location on the disk. >=20 > But then again -- as others have already mentioned, serial > write speed is not the most important factor for database > performance (although the WAL journal files of advanced > transactional databases like PostgreSQL are written in a > sequential way), so the usefulness of this "benchmark" is > very debatable. >=20 > Best regards > Oliver >=20 > -- > Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 M=FCnchen > Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author > and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. >=20 > "I started using PostgreSQL around a month ago, and the feeling is > similar to the switch from Linux to FreeBSD in '96 -- 'wow!'." > -- Oddbjorn Steffensen > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 15:14:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185F716A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:14:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF0743D49 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:14:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so1496847wri for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:14:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rkHjXdbpGsacx6+Dh8NZrUbPqDlMSf45K2UfpRDyX4KTbkrY9LQx2aOwdYnHto13rD8UI7697bZS+mv9Gr/czeeGakz1QwLFRQr95Ym0iXlBsbEOfHTyObf1Fmtz0nlghg0zTuvIZ4KW1eecLkY9fG2u3S8S9/jOtNCICscJkQg= Received: by 10.54.3.11 with SMTP id 11mr3236713wrc; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.29.77 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff050621081450fc8f0b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:14:46 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel To: Mark Kirkwood In-Reply-To: <42B7B735.9010000@paradise.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050621032200.N993@ganymede.hub.org> <6.1.0.6.2.20050620232733.07d3ecb0@cobalt.antimatter.net> <42B7B735.9010000@paradise.net.nz> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Glenn Dawson Subject: Re: 4.x binaries on a 5.x machine ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scot Hetzel List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:14:48 -0000 On 6/21/05, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > > This option from the GENERIC kernel config in 5.4 would seem to suggest > > that it would work.... though I haven't tried it myself. > > > > options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 >=20 > ....And install the 'compat 4.x' distribution onto your 5,x boxes! >=20 I don't believe it would be neccessary to install the 'compat 4.x' libraries on the 5.x host box, as those libraries are already in the jailed 4.x environment. If you were to upgrade the jailed 4.x environment to 5.x, then you would need to add the 'compat 4.x' libraries until you update all the ports in the jailed environment. Scot From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 15:30:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C3216A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:30:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cvkhanh@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B878943D1F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:30:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cvkhanh@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so1432857rna for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:30:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=m/qVcgF9WTran7pt6MOYZ5T4GX2YD4Sla6QQ/W4d1zJeIh6hPx3aHVhiHgSysDjeIN9yCsG1z1wKjUtz/QZOIXuzgHYeswbnZ8U21VndkXbh0lw0JBaCPUhbA9oRv06JWLnSxb92yrYjUPsiBea8110uxi+keIW2CagDn09Nq+E= Received: by 10.38.9.9 with SMTP id 9mr2471543rni; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.73.24 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5fd642fc05062108301c776777@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:30:20 +0700 From: Khanh Cao Van To: Daniel Eischen In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: Kipp Holger , freebsd-stable-list Subject: Re: update libpthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Khanh Cao Van List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:30:21 -0000 I find the libpthread in the src/lib/libpthread on the cvs server , but I could not get only that source code to my PC . In the cvs file I edited : *default host=3Dcvsup.freebsd.org *default base=3D/usr *default prefix=3D/usr/local *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_4 *default delete use-rel-suffix # If your network link is a T1 or faster, comment out the following line. *default compress ## Ports Collection. # # The easiest way to get the ports tree is to use the "ports-all" # mega-collection. It includes all of the individual "ports-*" # collections, ports-all src-all and the src-all will get all the sourcecode down . I did not want this happend , just the sourcecode of my expecial packet only . How could I get only the libpthread down ? On 6/21/05, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Kipp Holger wrote: >=20 > > Khanh Cao Van wrote on Tue 21.06.2005 16:00 > > > > > Peter Jeremy tell me that I have to update libpthread to be able to > > > install JDK 1.4 on freeBSD 4.7 . But I could not find out what ports > > > contain that lib . Help me if you know . > > > > Not port. Base system. Considering this, the best solution for you > > seems to be to upgrade the base system to 4.8-RELEASE or later. >=20 > src/libpthread is not in 4.x and can not be made to work in 4.x. > In 4.x, your only solution is to use src/libc_r, which is now > marked for deprecation in -current (6.x). If you want reliable > Java support, I suggest you use -stable (5.x) which has libpthread. > Go ask the -java mailing list for more info. >=20 > -- > DE >=20 >=20 --=20 ---------------------------------- Cao Van Khanh From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 15:37:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA22516A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:37:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D20343D49 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:37:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E125F1F0A5; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:37:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id C31316130; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:37:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:37:05 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Khanh Cao Van Message-ID: <20050621153705.GA68261@stack.nl> References: <5fd642fc05062107001efca879@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5fd642fc05062107001efca879@mail.gmail.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-stable-list Subject: Re: update libpthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:37:07 -0000 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:00:05PM +0700, Khanh Cao Van wrote: > Peter Jeremy tell me that I have to update libpthread to be able to > install JDK 1.4 on freeBSD 4.7 . But I could not find out what ports > contain that lib . Help me if you know . There is no /usr/src/lib/libpthread for FreeBSD-4.x He probably meant /usr/src/lib/libc_r > Please do not tell me about why still using freeBSD 4.7 . It not my > own , it the customer's and I have to work on it if I do not want my > project false . If I was , I'll take the latest 5.4 immediatly Why doesn't it work on 4.7 then ? The oldest one I still have running is: drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jan 23 2004 /var/db/pkg/jdk-1.4.2p5 on: FreeBSD world.ilse.net 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Mon Jul 21 17:26:16 CEST 2003 Zlo --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCuDQhezjnobFOgrERAiVIAKCdtSgPUGyf8W7uVwLwxevdf4yqCgCfTTVM KSJknNQdCi9dVyFxgd1Ylwo= =nk4j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 16:01:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA5516A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:01:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E2943D1F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:01:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-07-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-07-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.19]) by mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B946435312; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:00:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.44]) by mail-in-07-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4DA128662; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:00:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dsl-082-083-043-176.arcor-ip.net [82.83.43.176]) by mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0761FEA8; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:00:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5LG0tvU077418 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:00:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:00:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <5fd642fc05062108301c776777@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5fd642fc05062108301c776777@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: Khanh Cao Van Subject: Re: update libpthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:01:02 -0000 --nextPart1408082.qv6WdHFSGm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 21. June 2005 17:30, Khanh Cao Van wrote: > I find the libpthread in the src/lib/libpthread on the cvs server , > but I could not get only that source code to my PC . > In the cvs file I edited : > > *default host=3Dcvsup.freebsd.org > *default base=3D/usr > *default prefix=3D/usr/local > *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_4 > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > # If your network link is a T1 or faster, comment out the following line. > *default compress > > ## Ports Collection. > # > # The easiest way to get the ports tree is to use the "ports-all" > # mega-collection. It includes all of the individual "ports-*" > # collections, > ports-all > src-all > > and the src-all will get all the sourcecode down . I did not want this > happend , just the sourcecode of my expecial packet only . How could I > get only the libpthread down ? You don't need libpthread, you need libc_r. I suggest you follow the advice= =20 from the jdk port Makefile and upgrade the complete FreeBSD 4.7 sources to = a=20 4-STABLE after February 2003: *default host=3Dcvsup.freebsd.org *default base=3D/usr *default prefix=3D/usr/local *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_4 *default date=3D2003.03.01.00.00.00 *default delete use-rel-suffix Then cd /usr/src and make buildworld and make installworld. I'd personally= =20 recommend to make and install a new kernel as well to be on the safe side,= =20 but that's your call. The jdk port should build after that. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart1408082.qv6WdHFSGm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCuDm1Xhc68WspdLARAhkiAJsFoeykyiBzDEKCly/foMBT40hRCACeJjje DxqsjSIDMEL9KZ/CxYrRvmA= =qSD9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1408082.qv6WdHFSGm-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 17:17:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7455716A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:17:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.fluidhosting.com (mail1.fluidhosting.com [66.150.201.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F009D43D4C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:17:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 7452 invoked by uid 399); 21 Jun 2005 17:17:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.0.35.182?) (dougb@dougbarton.net@192.0.35.182) by mail1.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 21 Jun 2005 17:17:13 -0000 Message-ID: <42B84B90.60004@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:17:04 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <20050620151628.0F90043D53@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <42B68641.3070603@FreeBSD.org> <20050621064904.GB33520@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050621064904.GB33520@cell.sick.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Danny Cooper Subject: Re: named coredumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:17:24 -0000 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Doug Barton wrote: > D> Thanks for clarifying guys. Are either of you in a position to upgrade to > D> -stable and see if the problem persists? > > Does STABLE have an other version of BIND? > Not newer than 5.4, no, but it does have other things fixed. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 21:24:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9533416A41C; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:24:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: from green.homeunix.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5LLOl6H004964; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:24:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: (from green@localhost) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j5LLOkE6004963; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:24:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:24:46 -0400 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman To: Khanh Cao Van Message-ID: <20050621212446.GE13582@green.homeunix.org> References: <5fd642fc050620191670837b21@mail.gmail.com> <20050621113118.GT50157@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <5fd642fc0506210537322a0fb9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5fd642fc0506210537322a0fb9@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: Peter Jeremy , freebsd-stable-list Subject: Re: howto update freebsd 4.7 release to 4.7 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:24:47 -0000 On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:37:42PM +0700, Khanh Cao Van wrote: > hi , I could not findout the "# cd /usr/src/lib/libpthread" as your > answer bellow ,please help me to fix this problem Yeah, 4.x actually uses libc_r. You should be able to get away with just updating that by itself without even updating libc or the kernel. No guarantees, but it's something I've always found to work alright. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 00:20:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C255F16A41C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:20:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-2.paradise.net.nz (bm-2a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.58.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C0E43D4C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:20:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-3.paradise.net.nz (smtp-3a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.32.196]) by linda-2.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IIG00AM2MACTJ@linda-2.paradise.net.nz> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:20:37 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-45-235.paradise.net.nz [218.101.45.235]) by smtp-3.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FD5AEA41; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:18:10 +1200 (NZST) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:18:09 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <790a9fff050621081450fc8f0b@mail.gmail.com> To: Scot Hetzel Message-id: <42B8AE41.5080508@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050511) References: <20050621032200.N993@ganymede.hub.org> <6.1.0.6.2.20050620232733.07d3ecb0@cobalt.antimatter.net> <42B7B735.9010000@paradise.net.nz> <790a9fff050621081450fc8f0b@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Glenn Dawson Subject: Re: 4.x binaries on a 5.x machine ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:20:38 -0000 Scot Hetzel wrote: > > > I don't believe it would be neccessary to install the 'compat 4.x' > libraries on the 5.x host box, as those libraries are already in the > jailed 4.x environment. > > If you were to upgrade the jailed 4.x environment to 5.x, then you > would need to add the 'compat 4.x' libraries until you update all the > ports in the jailed environment. > > Good point - I had forgotten that the 4.x jails will have their libraries with 'em! Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 07:37:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9497516A41F; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:37:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB80743D53; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:37:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5M7bImd057698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:37:19 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5M7bIwa047553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:37:18 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5M7bHDv047552; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:37:18 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:37:17 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20050622073717.GA47513@cell.sick.ru> References: <20050620151628.0F90043D53@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <42B68641.3070603@FreeBSD.org> <20050621064904.GB33520@cell.sick.ru> <42B84B90.60004@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42B84B90.60004@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff on relay.bestcom.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Danny Cooper Subject: Re: named coredumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:37:28 -0000 On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 10:17:04AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: D> > D> Thanks for clarifying guys. Are either of you in a position to upgrade to D> > D> -stable and see if the problem persists? D> > D> > Does STABLE have an other version of BIND? D> D> Not newer than 5.4, no, but it does have other things fixed. Which ones? I can patch my system and test. I probably won't upgrade whole system. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 08:32:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8734D16A41C; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1166243D58; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:32:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c220-239-8-51.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.8.51]) by mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5M8Wp3F006192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:32:52 +1000 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5M8WpRx068785; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:32:51 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id j5M8Wo8i068784; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:32:50 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:32:50 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: Khanh Cao Van Message-ID: <20050622083250.GU50157@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <5fd642fc050620191670837b21@mail.gmail.com> <20050621113118.GT50157@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <5fd642fc0506210537322a0fb9@mail.gmail.com> <20050621212446.GE13582@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050621212446.GE13582@green.homeunix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: Brian Fundakowski Feldman , freebsd-stable-list Subject: Re: howto update freebsd 4.7 release to 4.7 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:32:55 -0000 On Tue, 2005-Jun-21 17:24:46 -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: >On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:37:42PM +0700, Khanh Cao Van wrote: >> hi , I could not findout the "# cd /usr/src/lib/libpthread" as your >> answer bellow ,please help me to fix this problem > >Yeah, 4.x actually uses libc_r. Sorry about that. I was looking in the wrong source tree. -- Peter Jeremy From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 09:36:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24F516A41C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:36:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C0C43D1D for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:36:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (sbapqb@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5M9aSqQ059386; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:36:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5M9aR2a059385; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:36:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:36:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200506220936.j5M9aR2a059385@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Michael Schuh In-Reply-To: <1dbad31505062108011b812ba8@mail.gmail.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Michael Schuh List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:36:31 -0000 Michael Schuh wrote: > now i have another question, if i use the same Os in 2 versions > (RELENG_4, RELENG_5) can i hope that the tests are made on the same > part of disk? Hope you always can. But rely on it you should not. ;-) > or in other words can an dd on the two OS' es so much different > because they use an > totally other part of disk? I think no, the strategie from dd under > one OS should not be changed if the OS-Version has changed. It's not the dd which decides where to put the file, it's the filesystem code. And yes, there can be differences between RELENG_4 and RELENG_5. In particular, in RELENG_5 you have UFS2, not the old UFS. There have always been changes to the FS code, for example I remember that the allocation of directories has changed some time ago to improve metadata performance for large trees (known as "dirpref"). As I said: The only way to make sure you hit the same physical place on the disk is to use a raw partition, not a file on some filesystem. Note that even small differences in the placement of the file can have a noticeable effect on the speed. Apart from the speed differences of the disk cylinders, it can also happen that the file is allocated in a non-contiguous way, especially if it is large and the filesystem already contains a lot of files, and/or had a lot of write+delete operations previously (i.e. causing fragmentation). > the part with serial IO related to database-performance have i > understand, but i quests me have the others understand > my meanings? That I don't know. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "anyone new to programming should be kept as far from C++ as possible; actually showing the stuff should be considered a criminal offence" -- Jacek Generowicz From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 11:02:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24EE16A41C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.schuh@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361AE43D55 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.schuh@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g2so16401nfe for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:01:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dd8wwGH2IU46sKXUvZXWLqu0roa8uSurHCJYLSFecTSz5PN9rikrSKAiQe35IVAlhs179K6YOI/eq/XSvqvLzlA9WcNlAdmYLW0JelWo5tejgDxClOkU8RUI0mBRR+ZS+9U58gb7NTgIUbkmQxkVKWAt7c/tqWPRFB8XR9zqKvU= Received: by 10.48.240.16 with SMTP id n16mr13797nfh; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.244.20 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1dbad31505062204012e0d42a3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:01:58 +0200 From: Michael Schuh To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Oliver Fromme In-Reply-To: <200506220936.j5M9aR2a059385@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1dbad31505062108011b812ba8@mail.gmail.com> <200506220936.j5M9aR2a059385@lurza.secnetix.de> Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Schuh List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:02:00 -0000 Hi Oliver, 2005/6/22, Oliver Fromme : > Michael Schuh wrote: > > now i have another question, if i use the same Os in 2 versions > > (RELENG_4, RELENG_5) can i hope that the tests are made on the same > > part of disk? >=20 > > Hope you always can. But rely on it you should not. > > ;-) >=20 That's right. :-D > > or in other words can an dd on the two OS' es so much different > > because they use an > > totally other part of disk? I think no, the strategie from dd under > > one OS should not be changed if the OS-Version has changed. >=20 > It's not the dd which decides where to put the file, it's > the filesystem code. And yes, there can be differences > between RELENG_4 and RELENG_5. In particular, in RELENG_5 > you have UFS2, not the old UFS. There have always been > changes to the FS code, for example I remember that the > allocation of directories has changed some time ago to > improve metadata performance for large trees (known as > "dirpref"). >=20 > As I said: The only way to make sure you hit the same > physical place on the disk is to use a raw partition, not > a file on some filesystem. >=20 Yes i have that understand. And that was the reason why i make in future these tests new with an raw-partition on the same part of disk. so that i never must hope, so i become knowledge and i know the facts :-D > Note that even small differences in the placement of the > file can have a noticeable effect on the speed. Apart > from the speed differences of the disk cylinders, it can > also happen that the file is allocated in a non-contiguous > way, especially if it is large and the filesystem already > contains a lot of files, and/or had a lot of write+delete > operations previously (i.e. causing fragmentation). >=20 yes this is also clear for me, but in my case, it was only a small disk (8GB) and it has only the OS, nothing more, nothing less. And as i made these tests, i have all the performance for me and my OS. *grrrrr* i be the master of disaster.......... *lol* We should have all more humor.......the life it's more funny...... > > the part with serial IO related to database-performance have i > > understand, but i quests me have the others understand > > my meanings? >=20 i must hope so :-D, i can not sure > That I don't know. >=20 > Best regards > Oliver >=20 > -- > Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 M=FCnchen > Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author > and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. >=20 > "anyone new to programming should be kept as far from C++ as > possible; actually showing the stuff should be considered a > criminal offence" -- Jacek Generowicz >=20 thank you for your suggestions best regards Michael Schuh From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 11:54:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506D316A41C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:54:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ath@niksun.com) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1312343D49 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:54:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ath@niksun.com) Received: from stiegl.mj.niksun.com (stiegl.mj.niksun.com [10.70.0.231]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5MBtO0g020656; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:55:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ath@niksun.com) Received: from stiegl.mj.niksun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stiegl.mj.niksun.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32ED454F1; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:54:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:54:00 -0400 From: Andrew Heybey To: Tomas Randa Message-ID: <20050622075400.2b4ae178@stiegl.mj.niksun.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.11 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.85.1/949/Tue Jun 21 09:33:26 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI troubles X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:54:07 -0000 > I Am running 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sun May 8 18:23:40 > CEST 2005 with Adaptec 29320 or 2930U2 controller and with heavy load > on SCSI I have the following problems ending with system freeze. Have > anybody some opinion where could be problem? > > Thanks a lot Tomas Randa > > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled Seagate had bugs in early U320 firmware versions. I do not remember the precise symptoms, so I cannot say for sure that this is your problem. But you should start by upgrading your firmware. For 15k drives, you want at least firmware version 0006. See http://www.seagate.com/support/disc/u320_firmware.html andrew From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 13:03:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FE716A41F for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:03:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5C843D5D for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:03:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 53700 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2005 12:54:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.53]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Jun 2005 12:54:26 -0000 Message-ID: <42B961B9.7A5856B3@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:03:53 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> <20050621105154.GA36538@cell.sick.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: qingli@FreeBSD.org, sam@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:03:53 -0000 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > [ cc'ing parties involved in this part of code] > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:07:01PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > T> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:04:27AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > T> J> #25 0xc05a0a0b in m_freem (mb=0x0) at uma.h:304 > T> J> No locals. > T> J> #26 0xc05ee0d5 in arpresolve (ifp=0xc1a5b000, rt0=0xc1d44000, m=0xc1be7200, > T> J> dst=0xd6d3fa94, desten=0xd6d3fa2c "/??]??????w??") > T> J> at ../../../netinet/if_ether.c:442 > T> J> la = (struct llinfo_arp *) 0xc1a75a00 > T> J> sdl = (struct sockaddr_dl *) 0xc2128910 > T> J> error = -1038972656 > T> J> rt = (struct rtentry *) 0xc1d44000 > T> > T> IMHO, this looks like a race. The route is not locked, when > T> its llinfo is edited. > T> > T> Probably the mbuf was freed when arp reply arrived and la_hold was send. > T> Look into in_arpinput() near 736: > T> > T> (*ifp->if_output)(ifp, la->la_hold, rt_key(rt), rt); > T> la->la_hold = 0; > T> > T> Yeah, I have just triggered another panic running 15 instances of this script on > T> SMP box: > T> > T> ( > T> while (true); do > T> arp -d 81.19.64.111 >/dev/null 2>&1; > T> ping -c 1 -t 1 81.19.64.111 >/dev/null 2>&1; > T> done > T> ) & > T> > T> But my duplicate free is in fxp_txeof(). This means that output thread has > T> won the race. > > I suppose that the attached patch closes your race. However, there is still > race between RTM_DELETE and output path. The above script still drops kernel > to panic, but the other one. Output path works with already freed llinfo: > > #28 0xc0507000 in m_freem (mb=0x0) at mbuf.h:410 > #29 0xc053fde3 in arpresolve (ifp=0xc2012800, rt0=0xc22fcdec, m=0xc25a8000, dst=0xe720bb28, > desten=0xe720bacc "uøbÀ+\001") at /usr/src/sys/netinet/if_ether.c:443 > #30 0xc0538078 in ether_output (ifp=0xc2012800, m=0xc25a8000, dst=0xe720bb28, rt0=0xc22fcdec) > at /usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c:173 > #31 0xc054b5b4 in ip_output (m=0xc25a8000, opt=0xc25a80ac, ro=0xe720bb24, flags=0x20, imo=0x0, inp=0xc25eb5a0) > at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:772 > #32 0xc054d36b in rip_output (m=0xc25a8000, so=0x0, dst=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/raw_ip.c:320 > #33 0xc054de7b in rip_send (so=0xc248c914, flags=0x0, m=0xc25a8000, nam=0xc218d410, control=0x0, td=0xc224d7d0) > at /usr/src/sys/netinet/raw_ip.c:785 > #34 0xc050a30f in sosend (so=0xc248c914, addr=0xc218d410, uio=0xe720bc3c, top=0xc25a8000, control=0x0, flags=0x0, > td=0xc224d7d0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:827 > > (kgdb) frame 29 > #29 0xc053fde3 in arpresolve (ifp=0xc2012800, rt0=0xc22fcdec, m=0xc25a8000, dst=0xe720bb28, > desten=0xe720bacc "uøbÀ+\001") at /usr/src/sys/netinet/if_ether.c:443 > 443 m_freem(la->la_hold); > (kgdb) p *la > $3 = { > la_le = { > le_next = 0xdeadc0de, > le_prev = 0xdeadc0de > }, > la_rt = 0xdeadc0de, > la_hold = 0xdeadc0de, > la_preempt = 0xc0de, > la_asked = 0xdead > } > > Fixing this one is harder. We take la from unlocked rtentry obtained via > rt_check(), or from arplookup(). The latter drops lock on rtentry, too. > Then we do some work and use this la. It may have already been freed in > arp_rtrequest(), the RTM_DELETE case. > > I see two approaches here: > > 1) Protecting llinfo with route lock. In this case we need rt_check() > to return locked *rt (just reference won't help). We also need > arplookup() to return locked rt. And do not unlock it withing all > arpresolve() and a big part of in_arpinput() functions. I think for 5-stable this is the way to go. > 2) Add mutex to llinfo_arp. I'm afraid this will hurt performance. The new ARP stuff should fix these issues, however it is not ready yet. At the moment it looks like it wont make it right away into 6.0 but go into 7-current and then MFC'd back for 6.1R. -- Andre From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 13:19:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00D516A41C; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:19:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C72D43D1D; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:19:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5MDJjr4065327 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:19:46 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5MDJjMO051386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:19:45 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5MDJjri051385; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:19:45 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:19:44 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Andre Oppermann Message-ID: <20050622131944.GA51271@cell.sick.ru> References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> <20050621105154.GA36538@cell.sick.ru> <42B961B9.7A5856B3@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42B961B9.7A5856B3@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff on relay.bestcom.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: qingli@FreeBSD.org, sam@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:19:49 -0000 On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:03:53PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: A> > Fixing this one is harder. We take la from unlocked rtentry obtained via A> > rt_check(), or from arplookup(). The latter drops lock on rtentry, too. A> > Then we do some work and use this la. It may have already been freed in A> > arp_rtrequest(), the RTM_DELETE case. A> > A> > I see two approaches here: A> > A> > 1) Protecting llinfo with route lock. In this case we need rt_check() A> > to return locked *rt (just reference won't help). We also need A> > arplookup() to return locked rt. And do not unlock it withing all A> > arpresolve() and a big part of in_arpinput() functions. A> A> I think for 5-stable this is the way to go. I have started working on this. Making arplookup() to return locked rt looks possible. There are two more questions: - is it possible to make rt_check() to return locked *rt? This requires editing nd6.c, and if_*subr.c. We can't MFC this to RELENG_5. Probably, at first step I'll try to avoid changing rt_check and see whether changing arplookup() is enough to avoid panics. - Is the following statement always true? la->la_rt->rt_llinfo == la A> > 2) Add mutex to llinfo_arp. I'm afraid this will hurt performance. A> A> The new ARP stuff should fix these issues, however it is not ready yet. A> At the moment it looks like it wont make it right away into 6.0 but go A> into 7-current and then MFC'd back for 6.1R. Yeah. I've already compiled a kernel with it. It is bootable and working, but I haven't yet run hard tests. I'll work on locking now and perform testing. In general it looks much better than what we have now. The locking is going to be simple and straightforward. Thanks for nice code! Do you mind if I pull it into a perforce branch to work on it together? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 13:28:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B6316A41C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:28:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEC743D53 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:28:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 54007 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2005 13:19:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.53]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Jun 2005 13:19:01 -0000 Message-ID: <42B9677C.41ADE411@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:28:28 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> <20050621105154.GA36538@cell.sick.ru> <42B961B9.7A5856B3@freebsd.org> <20050622131944.GA51271@cell.sick.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qingli@FreeBSD.org, sam@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:28:30 -0000 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:03:53PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > A> > Fixing this one is harder. We take la from unlocked rtentry obtained via > A> > rt_check(), or from arplookup(). The latter drops lock on rtentry, too. > A> > Then we do some work and use this la. It may have already been freed in > A> > arp_rtrequest(), the RTM_DELETE case. > A> > > A> > I see two approaches here: > A> > > A> > 1) Protecting llinfo with route lock. In this case we need rt_check() > A> > to return locked *rt (just reference won't help). We also need > A> > arplookup() to return locked rt. And do not unlock it withing all > A> > arpresolve() and a big part of in_arpinput() functions. > A> > A> I think for 5-stable this is the way to go. > > I have started working on this. Making arplookup() to return locked rt > looks possible. There are two more questions: > > - is it possible to make rt_check() to return locked *rt? This requires > editing nd6.c, and if_*subr.c. We can't MFC this to RELENG_5. > Probably, at first step I'll try to avoid changing rt_check and see > whether changing arplookup() is enough to avoid panics. Actually I don't know if rt_check() can return a locket *rt. > - Is the following statement always true? > la->la_rt->rt_llinfo == la Good question. I'll look into Design and Implementation of 4.4BSD and FreeBSD 5 when I get home. > A> > 2) Add mutex to llinfo_arp. I'm afraid this will hurt performance. > A> > A> The new ARP stuff should fix these issues, however it is not ready yet. > A> At the moment it looks like it wont make it right away into 6.0 but go > A> into 7-current and then MFC'd back for 6.1R. > > Yeah. I've already compiled a kernel with it. It is bootable and working, > but I haven't yet run hard tests. I'll work on locking now and perform > testing. In general it looks much better than what we have now. The locking > is going to be simple and straightforward. Thanks for nice code! Do you > mind if I pull it into a perforce branch to work on it together? Better wait a bit before you pull it into perforce. First we have to move Qing along and second I'd like to do one more iteration with him over the code. There are a couple of rough edges and style issues I'd like to carve out first. And then there is the tab-space problem which makes it a pain importing. We need to fix Qing's editor as the very first thing. ;-) -- Andre From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 14:15:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6876416A41C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:15:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from checking_my_mail@yahoo.com) Received: from web51403.mail.yahoo.com (web51403.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0268543D53 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:15:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from checking_my_mail@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 46518 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Jun 2005 14:15:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=fjLRBoy45BKHJRiIujphG4trisjkH1k3dUyyIlTKwHICF/TXw/agVuUgXaT5FqjSpTy9D5mkAkTGklhlR8zQk0b44Jj8Jn+elTE34JtIQebDTq+DLFUF9hdcz+gBn5h3CWteMdjbBYmR5NVN3B7xxgkdsw+fXGNfgppxG9u0VRI= ; Message-ID: <20050622141503.46514.qmail@web51403.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [136.141.2.76] by web51403.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:15:03 PDT Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:15:03 -0700 (PDT) From: ya hoo To: stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 5.4 stable & Intel 865 PE & Intel 925XE support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:15:09 -0000 Hi ALL, Just wanted to know if there are any known issues with these chipsets. Heck, better yet, Is there a website that has a list of all supporting intel chipsets for 5.4 stable? Thanks, --------------------------------- Yahoo! Sports Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 14:26:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE5816A41C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB01C43D49 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:26:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from pumice6.sentex.ca (pumice6.sentex.ca [64.7.153.21]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5MEPXaP023128 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:25:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by pumice6.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5MEQ2jP039980; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:26:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5MEPt5B005044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:25:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20050622102202.04adb318@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:26:31 -0400 To: ya hoo , stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20050622141503.46514.qmail@web51403.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050622141503.46514.qmail@web51403.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.18 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.21 Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4 stable & Intel 865 PE & Intel 925XE support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:26:04 -0000 At 10:15 AM 22/06/2005, ya hoo wrote: >Hi ALL, >Just wanted to know if there are any known issues with these chipsets. >Heck, better yet, Is there a website that has a list of all supporting >intel chipsets for 5.4 stable? Best thing to do is search through the lists. If there is a problem, people generally speak up. I have a number of 865 (mostly G) boards out there that work really well with RELENG_5. I have one 915, but no 925. Seems to function just fine however. [verify1]% dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 20 22:55:18 EDT 2005 mdtancsa@verify1.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/verify Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (2999.67-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf34 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbff real memory = 1072627712 (1022 MB) avail memory = 1040101376 (991 MB) npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 2.0 (no driver attached) uhci0: port 0xe000-0xe01f at device 29.0 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xe100-0xe11f at device 29.1 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xe200-0xe21f at device 29.2 on pci0 usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xe300-0xe31f at device 29.3 on pci0 usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xd01c4000-0xd01c43ff at device 29.7 on pci0 usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered pcib1: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 fxp0: port 0xd000-0xd03f mem 0xd0000000-0xd0000fff irq 10 at device 8.0 on pci1 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:01:80:57:29:a9 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.2 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) acpi_tz0: on acpi0 fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A, console sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xca7ff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2999669400 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec Fast IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. ipfw2 initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to accept, logging limited to 31000 packets/entry by default ad0: 114473MB [232581/16/63] at ata0-master SATA150 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a [verify1]% ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 16:53:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB67C16A41F for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:53:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from debiandude@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B431743D55 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:53:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from debiandude@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 12so306579nzp for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:53:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pbFTVJ8YqKOgbQVvs5dJddJHsF2BCCgT6xDTF8s+mF+kL2Z/4SJqPdBGvw0madeKGYsmHRXtaiF16/saO38ruN1e+A9P3GTYzsr1KqqxvaR7qAuNtTtQyDpZFEKYHAizKNN6dL6JNBxPxipHzqz1ct/zaVUEPgPXnn0IlU6kyU4= Received: by 10.36.146.1 with SMTP id t1mr710780nzd; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.3.2 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:53:03 +0200 From: Hannes Mayer To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <8e5ef5f705061707365cf265a3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <8e5ef5f705061707365cf265a3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Kernel module/IPC with userland: create and write to FIFO X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hannes Mayer List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:53:04 -0000 Daniel, Alexander, thanks a lot for your suggestions. So far I've made good progress. For the time being I'll buffer in kernel space - I'll look into the pipe stuff later. I just implemented tsleep and wakeup for the read blocking. After major problems when starting, this is going to be fun :-) Thanks again, Hannes. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 09:57:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C315216A41F; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:57:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kappa@rambler-co.ru) Received: from yam.park.rambler.ru (yam.park.rambler.ru [81.19.64.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2391C43D4C; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:57:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kappa@rambler-co.ru) Received: from capella.park.rambler.ru (capella.park.rambler.ru [81.19.65.30]) by yam.park.rambler.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5N9vUZF066287; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:57:30 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from kappa@rambler-co.ru) Received: by capella.park.rambler.ru (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1DADF4105; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:57:33 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:57:32 +0400 From: Alex Kapranoff To: ports@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050623095732.GA23071@capella.park.rambler.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE i386 Organization: Inner Mongolia User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: RSS feeds for UPDATINGs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:57:34 -0000 I once searched (in vain) for a way not to miss important thnigs in UPDATING files. If anyone is interested, he(she) can now use my home-grown rss 2.0 feeds. They are synced to CVS once a day. This one for the Ports: http://kapranoff.ru/~kappa/files/ports.UPDATING.rss20.xml And this for RELENG_5 branch: http://kapranoff.ru/~kappa/files/src.UPDATING.rss20.xml I can quickly hack another one for -CURRENT if there's interest. -- Alex Kapranoff, $n=["1another7Perl213Just3hacker49"=~/\d|\D*/g]; $$n[0]={grep/\d/,@$n};print"@$n{1..4}\n" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 10:03:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C1016A41C; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:03:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from mail3out.barnet.com.au (mail3out.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9474343D1F; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:03:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by mail3out.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 27) id C203B877C9A; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:03:42 +1000 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <42BA88FE000131866A58E7@BarNet> Received: from mail3-auth.barnet.com.au (mail3.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.barnet.com.au", Issuer "BarNet Root Certificate Authority" (verified OK)) by mail3.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC73877C94; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:03:42 +1000 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (edwin-3.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "edwin.adsl.barnet.com.au", Issuer "BarNet Root Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mail3-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E254877C56; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:03:42 +1000 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 21210611B; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:03:41 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:03:41 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Alex Kapranoff Message-ID: <20050623100340.GB79443@k7.mavetju> References: <20050623095732.GA23071@capella.park.rambler.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050623095732.GA23071@capella.park.rambler.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RSS feeds for UPDATINGs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:03:45 -0000 On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:57:32PM +0400, Alex Kapranoff wrote: > I once searched (in vain) for a way not to miss important thnigs in > UPDATING files. If anyone is interested, he(she) can now use my > home-grown rss 2.0 feeds. They are synced to CVS once a day. > > This one for the Ports: > http://kapranoff.ru/~kappa/files/ports.UPDATING.rss20.xml > > And this for RELENG_5 branch: > http://kapranoff.ru/~kappa/files/src.UPDATING.rss20.xml Talk to dvl@ about getting this on FreshPorts. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 10:23:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA20516A41C; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:23:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (xbsd.org [82.233.2.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630F243D48; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:23:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF98111C93; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:30:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06706-07; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:30:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.20.108] (unknown [217.15.95.90]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B851C11BC8; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:30:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42BA8DAE.1060203@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:23:42 +0200 From: Florent Thoumie User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edwin Groothuis References: <20050623095732.GA23071@capella.park.rambler.ru> <20050623100340.GB79443@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <20050623100340.GB79443@k7.mavetju> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Alex Kapranoff Subject: Re: RSS feeds for UPDATINGs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:23:55 -0000 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:57:32PM +0400, Alex Kapranoff wrote: > >>I once searched (in vain) for a way not to miss important thnigs in >>UPDATING files. If anyone is interested, he(she) can now use my >>home-grown rss 2.0 feeds. They are synced to CVS once a day. >> >>This one for the Ports: >>http://kapranoff.ru/~kappa/files/ports.UPDATING.rss20.xml >> >>And this for RELENG_5 branch: >>http://kapranoff.ru/~kappa/files/src.UPDATING.rss20.xml > > > Talk to dvl@ about getting this on FreshPorts. That's a very good idea. Thanks a lot. -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 10:42:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDED416A41C; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:42:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F44343D58; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:42:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5NAgVDw087741 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:42:31 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5NAgUeF061461 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:42:31 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5NAgU7Q061460; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:42:30 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:42:30 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Andre Oppermann Message-ID: <20050623104230.GB61389@cell.sick.ru> References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> <20050621105154.GA36538@cell.sick.ru> <42B961B9.7A5856B3@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42B961B9.7A5856B3@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff on relay.bestcom.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: qingli@FreeBSD.org, sam@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:42:35 -0000 On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:03:53PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: A> > Fixing this one is harder. We take la from unlocked rtentry obtained via A> > rt_check(), or from arplookup(). The latter drops lock on rtentry, too. A> > Then we do some work and use this la. It may have already been freed in A> > arp_rtrequest(), the RTM_DELETE case. A> > A> > I see two approaches here: A> > A> > 1) Protecting llinfo with route lock. In this case we need rt_check() A> > to return locked *rt (just reference won't help). We also need A> > arplookup() to return locked rt. And do not unlock it withing all A> > arpresolve() and a big part of in_arpinput() functions. A> A> I think for 5-stable this is the way to go. What about fixing it step by step? The patch attached to my previous message fixes the panic report by Jeremie, I suppose. It is race between output path and input path, that can occur anytime in runtime. The race that is not fixed by my patch (discussed above) is between output path and RTM_DELETE message, is less critical - it can occur only when administrator runs arp -d. Can you please review my patch? I think we should commit it first, and then work on the second race. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 14:15:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B7C16A41C; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:15:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr (postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E7243D58; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:15:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30056C087; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:15:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBC53405C; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:15:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:15:14 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Gleb Smirnoff Message-ID: <20050623141514.GD738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> <20050621105154.GA36538@cell.sick.ru> <42B961B9.7A5856B3@freebsd.org> <20050623104230.GB61389@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050623104230.GB61389@cell.sick.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Jeremie Le Hen , sam@FreeBSD.org, Andre Oppermann , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, qingli@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:15:07 -0000 Gleb, > What about fixing it step by step? The patch attached to my previous message > fixes the panic report by Jeremie, I suppose. It is race between output > path and input path, that can occur anytime in runtime. FYI, I compiled my kernel with your patch and I have had no panic since then. Note that my previous uptime was multiple tens of days and I haven't done stress tests. But anyway I think your massively parallel arp -d/ping tests are far more significative than my box which only communicates with a couple of settled machines. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 15:13:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8849C16A41C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:13:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phil.brennan@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF1743D4C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:13:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phil.brennan@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 16so16595nzp for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:12:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=laD/DJ8cD2+xSqR1GwxfE5MccCNM3+IOfNMI29PSxpbd03flZU45oQGRbqu7GQRaEom0jbxb5FDhLlSdSbC7lPXKJr8vW5jWwCbEToqn7PdKxmk3s2N1lYQmSUIFZVddzL6RjGvZ5e2fwnmIkxhLB0UaN7ZW0VYRerInYEnEf+4= Received: by 10.36.120.13 with SMTP id s13mr1360642nzc; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.100.20 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:12:59 +0000 From: Phil Brennan To: Dick Davies In-Reply-To: <20050527144730.GA79587@eris.tenfour> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050527130550.GA43864@dragon.stack.nl> <200505270937.53448.kirk@strauser.com> <20050527144730.GA79587@eris.tenfour> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Users Subject: Re: cron stops silently X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Phil Brennan List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:13:00 -0000 On 5/27/05, Dick Davies wrote: > * Kirk Strauser [0538 15:38]: > > On Friday 27 May 2005 08:05, Dean Strik wrote: > > > > > I just filed PR 81555 about this. For me, it appears that cron(8) exi= ts > > > after a SIGPIPE when an LDAP-user does a crontab -e. Are you also usi= ng > > > LDAP here? See also the PR (hasn't appeared on the website when I typ= e > > > this btw). > > > > > > Me too > > >=20 > Me three - 5.4 and nss_ldap. >=20 >=20 > -- > 'You may need to metaphorically make a deal with the devil. > By 'devil' I mean robot devil and by 'metaphorically' I mean get your coa= t.' > -- Bender > Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns >=20 >=20 >=20 Just in case anyone missed it,Dean Strik has a patch for this at the pr page: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D81555 applied cleanly for me. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 16:02:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E3E16A41C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:02:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F282A43D1F for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:02:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9E7221202 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:02:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82681-09 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:02:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0172B21C807 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:02:09 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:02:03 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050623095732.GA23071@capella.park.rambler.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050623095732.GA23071@capella.park.rambler.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7679734.3fqRKbKBLU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506231102.07393.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: RSS feeds for UPDATINGs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:02:15 -0000 --nextPart7679734.3fqRKbKBLU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 23 June 2005 04:57, Alex Kapranoff wrote: > If anyone is interested, he(she) can now use my home-grown rss 2.0 feeds. > They are synced to CVS once a day.=20 Thank you, thank you, thank you! That's an excellent idea, and pretty=20 obvious in retrospect. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart7679734.3fqRKbKBLU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBCutz/5sRg+Y0CpvERAgurAJ40lgRfpX/T7iWnl3h7KIn5AeKlkACcC+h8 IWTfSEH23ZryyiEzfNGve0g= =5Ahx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7679734.3fqRKbKBLU-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 18:42:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27C016A41C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:42:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBD543D49 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:42:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coe.ufrj.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5688917005 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:42:27 -0300 (BRT) Received: from coe.ufrj.br ([146.164.53.65]) by localhost (roma.coe.ufrj.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51234-08 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:42:26 -0300 (BRT) Received: from [10.0.0.15] (telco [201.8.56.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by coe.ufrj.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5AC17003 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:42:26 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <42BB02AF.3080702@jonny.eng.br> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:42:55 -0300 From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.3 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at coe.ufrj.br Cc: Subject: ATA problems with FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:42:31 -0000 Hi, I have already installed FreeBSD 5.4 in lots of hardware, but now I came to one that is troublig me. It an ASUS motherboard, model P4VP-MX, with VIA8235 Chipset. Neither the FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE CD, nor a preinstalled hard disk can identify the ATA disks in this computer. During the hard disk probe the kernel sends some messages, "ata0-master: failure - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out", "ata0-master: failure - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out", and them no hard disk is identified, so I cannot install the system. If I boot from a pre-installed hard disk, its even worse, after these message, I get a "kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled", but I must confess that this hard disk does not have a GENERIC kernel anymore. The CPU is a P4 2.0GHz, with 512M DDR, if this matters. I cannot provide a memory dump, because there is no device to dump at. Also, note that Fedora 3 and Windows XP Home run on this hardware without any trouble. Thanks for any help, Jonny PS: Please CC: me in the answers as I do not currently subscribe to -stable. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 19:54:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115CA16A41C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:54:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@mkbuelow.net) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12F643D1D for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:54:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@mkbuelow.net) Received: from drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (p54AA96C8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.170.150.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFA3317C3; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:57:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (mkb@localhost.mkbuelow.net [127.0.0.1]) by drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5NJsFTU002207; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:54:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mkb@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net) Message-Id: <200506231954.j5NJsFTU002207@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net> From: Matthias Buelow To: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis In-Reply-To: Message from Joao Carlos Mendes Luis of "Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:42:55 -0300." <42BB02AF.3080702@jonny.eng.br> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.84; nmh 1.0.4; GNU Emacs 21.3.1 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:54:15 +0200 Sender: mkb@mkbuelow.net Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems with FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:54:21 -0000 Joao Carlos Mendes Luis writes: >kernel sends some messages, "ata0-master: failure - ATA_IDENTIFY timed >out", "ata0-master: failure - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out", and them no hard >disk is identified, so I cannot install the system. If I boot from a >pre-installed hard disk, its even worse, after these message, I get a I've started experiencing the same here, occasionally on reboot, but only after I have upgraded to 5.4-STABLE on June 21. Before, I haven't seen that issue. In a similar situation to yours, Windows XP here has no problems so I don't assume it's hardware related. (And, when it actually boot, the problem doesn't seem occur anymore then while the system is up.) I'm now hesitating to update other machines because of that, hope it gets identified (and fixed) soon. mkb. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 20:26:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE9716A41C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:26:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jim-c@charter.net) Received: from mxsf27.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf27.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06EF43D55 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:26:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jim-c@charter.net) Received: from mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.139]) by mxsf27.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5NKQULG002647 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:26:30 -0400 Received: from 68-119-202-215.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (68.119.202.215) by mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 23 Jun 2005 16:26:30 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.93,224,1115006400"; d="scan'208"; a="1026261619:sNHT118039432" Message-ID: <42BB1AF3.9050307@charter.net> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:26:27 -0400 From: Jim Campbell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis References: <42BB02AF.3080702@jonny.eng.br> In-Reply-To: <42BB02AF.3080702@jonny.eng.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems with FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:26:33 -0000 Jonny, When I started using FreeBSD a month or so ago I experienced the same problem. The only workable solution for me was to use 4.11. I corresponded with Søren Schmidt about this, but he could find no reason for this occurrence. If anyone can suggest a test for me to run to gather data for this I would be more than happy to do so. Jim Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote: > Hi, > > I have already installed FreeBSD 5.4 in lots of hardware, but now > I came to one that is troublig me. > > It an ASUS motherboard, model P4VP-MX, with VIA8235 Chipset. > Neither the FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE CD, nor a preinstalled hard disk can > identify the ATA disks in this computer. During the hard disk probe > the kernel sends some messages, "ata0-master: failure - ATA_IDENTIFY > timed out", "ata0-master: failure - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out", and them > no hard disk is identified, so I cannot install the system. If I boot > from a pre-installed hard disk, its even worse, after these message, I > get a "kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled", but I must confess > that this hard disk does not have a GENERIC kernel anymore. > > The CPU is a P4 2.0GHz, with 512M DDR, if this matters. I cannot > provide a memory dump, because there is no device to dump at. > > Also, note that Fedora 3 and Windows XP Home run on this hardware > without any trouble. > > Thanks for any help, > > Jonny > > PS: Please CC: me in the answers as I do not currently subscribe to > -stable. Thanks. > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 20:39:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDDB16A41C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:39:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA4843D48 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:39:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coe.ufrj.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id E978C1700B; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:39:55 -0300 (BRT) Received: from coe.ufrj.br ([146.164.53.65]) by localhost (roma.coe.ufrj.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63058-05; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:39:55 -0300 (BRT) Received: from [10.0.0.15] (telco [201.8.56.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by coe.ufrj.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4370317007; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:39:55 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <42BB1E38.70708@jonny.eng.br> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:40:24 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Luis?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Buelow References: <200506231954.j5NJsFTU002207@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net> In-Reply-To: <200506231954.j5NJsFTU002207@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAADBQ TFRFAAAAgAAAAIAAgIAAAACAgACAAICAgICAwMDA/wAAAP8A//8AAAD//wD/AP//////ex+xxAAA Ac9JREFUOMtdk8FupDAMhr1qRbjR2x77GD3uq7BS1TkuhyrmFnppcvOrUlUquXltJ2EAIw1Dvvz+ bRPgrQbU6NpzuY0AF1LABIc4AH9crxLwb/4VztEU42W9SOBezwX4ClzeLuC9PBFRq+2xpJJHN8KQ Oa9Hd/ACnldgUVADvgHKA2usVwW12BVSkrThJH+5lqqQXIAAvRkQM6WqkADpO5gBx5m5VOxRgBZV HRLRcgc4dv3ukbOBm3de8uHIe1n0BBUBIi4hi0U2ownGkkwrwN425ygVPjntsvOmkFyyXYfreHXq f1tugFLCFDhZcsffYIqxKNAB/FkNbBDslUTz0MMQfuRnkN6D5nLVQ0G2H3bWC6KByTZPZWhJ/jgs ChX3e/P5y0VReCUCYm0/pUQd1lQ4/aIty/YtW6y3WMHc8yazpcU8UuqqB+LfMql/wVx4kXNTwGQO PxTuL7+AhbSkWS4z0TdZFbo1BR6qQkA08DnogNNHey/SGc5GejqFttxhjBHd3rjd62nR08gnxeFr Ic2e52we+QC0rIg6KYn1AKQsbF3wcgAP00MZrZ6X0yc5v5TRXgTi/jtVwef5I6Y+J7kyb+d1eB6K 4LoOLphBW/8PdNW9dapKWXwAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at coe.ufrj.br Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems with FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:39:58 -0000 Matthias Buelow wrote: > Joao Carlos Mendes Luis writes: > > >>kernel sends some messages, "ata0-master: failure - ATA_IDENTIFY timed >>out", "ata0-master: failure - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out", and them no hard >>disk is identified, so I cannot install the system. If I boot from a >>pre-installed hard disk, its even worse, after these message, I get a > > > I've started experiencing the same here, occasionally on reboot, but > only after I have upgraded to 5.4-STABLE on June 21. Before, I haven't I'm not totally sure, But IIRC, it also happened with the 5.3-RELEASE install CD. It was the first CD I have tried, and when it failed, I got the more recent one. Only after this one failed I started deeper tests to be sure about the flaw. > seen that issue. In a similar situation to yours, Windows XP here has no > problems so I don't assume it's hardware related. (And, when it actually > boot, the problem doesn't seem occur anymore then while the system is > up.) I'm now hesitating to update other machines because of that, hope > it gets identified (and fixed) soon. > > mkb. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 22:56:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADCC16A41C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:56:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob89@eng.ufl.edu) Received: from scorpion.eng.ufl.edu (scorpion.eng.ufl.edu [128.227.116.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2007B43D48 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:56:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob89@eng.ufl.edu) Received: (qmail 19373 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2005 22:56:42 -0000 Received: from scanner.engnet.ufl.edu (HELO ?128.227.152.221?) (128.227.152.221) by scorpion.eng.ufl.edu with SMTP; 23 Jun 2005 22:56:42 -0000 Message-ID: <42BB3E2A.9040105@eng.ufl.edu> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:56:42 -0400 From: Bob Johnson Organization: University of Florida User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050406) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matthias Buelow , Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Subject: Re: ATA problems with FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:56:44 -0000 On 6/23/05, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Joao Carlos Mendes Luis writes: > > >kernel sends some messages, "ata0-master: failure - ATA_IDENTIFY timed > >out", "ata0-master: failure - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out", and them no hard > >disk is identified, so I cannot install the system. If I boot from a > >pre-installed hard disk, its even worse, after these message, I get a > > I've started experiencing the same here, occasionally on reboot, but > only after I have upgraded to 5.4-STABLE on June 21. Before, I haven't > seen that issue. In a similar situation to yours, Windows XP here has no > problems so I don't assume it's hardware related. (And, when it actually > boot, the problem doesn't seem occur anymore then while the system is > up.) I'm now hesitating to update other machines because of that, hope > it gets identified (and fixed) soon. > Hmmm. I encountered this one time on the laptop I upgraded to 5.4-RELEASE (not -STABLE) a few weeks ago, although I had booted the system several times prior to that with no problems. It got part way throught the boot then started throwing that error message. I powered down the system and tried again and it worked ok. Because I had installed a new hard drive as part of the upgrade, and the error actually happened the first time I rebooted the system from Windows to FreeBSD (dual boot system), and it was also the first time I booted it with my wireless card using the NDIS wrapper, I came to no conclusion about the proximate cause other than to hope that my new hard drive was not defective. I have booted the system (warm and cold, and reboot from Windows) at least a dozen times since, and it has not repeated. Given your experience, I am beginning to suspect that this is a race condition that is more likely to hit some systems than others. I've had other problems with the NDIS driver wrapper, but since you aren't using it, I guess it likely isn't the cause of this issue. - Bob From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 02:13:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283BB16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 02:13:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from balgaa@micom.mn) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A5743D1F for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 02:13:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from balgaa@micom.mn) Received: from [202.179.0.80] (helo=localhost) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1DldyC-0006kC-8t for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:31:04 +0900 From: (Balgansuren.B) balgaa@micom.mn To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ZBTA tsanba p1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20050624021338.60A5743D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 02:13:38 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Buffalo WLI-PCI-G54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 02:13:41 -0000 Hello, I have driver disk for the Windows 98/Me/2000/XP of the Buffalo WLI-PCI-G54 wireless NIC. If possible I want to know "ndiscvt" command convert Windows driver to FreeBSD driver module. I don't know which version of Windows driver files need to convert to FreeBSD driver module and how to convert it. I have following files in .ZIP file: ------------------------------------ ABCfg.exe ABCfg.ini bcm43xx.cat bcmwl5.sys bwcdrv.cat bwcdrv.sys BWCDRV.VXD BWCINST.DLL bwcsrv.exe DriverUpdate.htm net2pg54.inf netbwc2k.inf netbwc98.inf netcbg54.inf There another directory named MDRIVER contains following: bcm43xx.cat bcmwl5.sys bwcdrv.cat bwcdrv.sys BWCDRV.VXD BWCINST.DLL bwcsrv.exe net2pg54minf netbwc2minf netbwc9minf netcbg5minf Above files located in latest version of driver files. Previous version of .ZIP driver file contains following: =================================== MDRIVER ------------ netcbg5m.inf bwcdrv.cat bwcdrv.sys BWCDRV.VXD BWCINST.DLL bcmwl5.sys netbwc2m.inf netbwc9m.inf bw43xx.cat Win2000 ---------- bwcdrv.cat bwcdrv.sys BWCDRV.VXD BWCINST.DLL bcmwl5.sys netbwc2k.inf bw43xx.cat netcbg54.inf WinXP ------- bwcdrv.cat bwcdrv.sys BWCDRV.VXD BWCINST.DLL bcmwl5.sys netbwc2k.inf bw43xx.cat netcbg54.inf WinME ------- bwcdrv.cat bwcdrv.sys BWCDRV.VXD BWCINST.DLL bcmwl5.sys netbwc98.inf bw43xx.cat netcbg54.inf Win98 ------- bwcdrv.cat bwcdrv.sys BWCDRV.VXD BWCINST.DLL bcmwl5.sys netbwc98.inf bw43xx.cat netcbg54.inf Which driver files need to convert FreeBSD module? ndiscvt command line format? Thanks, Balgaa From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 03:40:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB4016A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 03:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ksb@platypusgroup.com) Received: from tsunami.platypusgroup.com (tsunami.platypusgroup.com [64.71.174.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED1A43D4C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 03:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ksb@platypusgroup.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.platypusgroup.com [127.0.0.1]) by tsunami.platypusgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7284A9D for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:40:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tsunami.platypusgroup.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tsunami.platypusgroup.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85070-01 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:40:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by tsunami.platypusgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 698B34A9C; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:40:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tsunami.platypusgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BFA4A9B for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:40:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:40:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Kevin S. Brackett" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050623233947.F81650@tsunami.platypusgroup.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: libc.so.4 & libc_r.so.4 in ices0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 03:40:44 -0000 libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x28755000) libc_r.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 (0x287ee000) any ideas why it's doing this, and what the fix is? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 04:05:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A39816A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 04:05:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71B443D48 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 04:05:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j5O457Nk056075; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:05:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:05:07 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: "Kevin S. Brackett" Message-ID: <20050624040506.GA5014@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050623233947.F81650@tsunami.platypusgroup.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050623233947.F81650@tsunami.platypusgroup.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libc.so.4 & libc_r.so.4 in ices0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 04:05:08 -0000 In the last episode (Jun 23), Kevin S. Brackett said: > libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x28755000) > libc_r.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 (0x287ee000) > > any ideas why it's doing this, and what the fix is? Looks fine to me: libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x2875c000) libpthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 (0x28836000) Is this a machine recently upgraded from 4.*? Does "ldd -a ices" indicate that those libs are being pulled in as dependencies of another library? If so, rebuild that port, then rebuild ices. Here is a script to find all the binaries linked to superceded port libs and libs directly linked to threads libs: #! /bin/sh ( find -s /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib -name "lib*.so" find -s /usr/local/bin /usr/X11R6/bin/ ) | xargs ldd -a 2>/dev/null | awk ' /^[^\t]/ { cmd=$1 } /^\t.*\/compat\// { printf "%s\t%s\n",cmd,$3 } /^\t(libc_r|libpthread|libthr).so/ { printf "%s\t%s\n",cmd,$3 } ' -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 04:42:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C0316A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 04:42:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ksb@platypusgroup.com) Received: from tsunami.platypusgroup.com (tsunami.platypusgroup.com [64.71.174.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD4143D49 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 04:42:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ksb@platypusgroup.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.platypusgroup.com [127.0.0.1]) by tsunami.platypusgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188434A9D; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:42:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tsunami.platypusgroup.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tsunami.platypusgroup.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85070-08; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:42:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by tsunami.platypusgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B1E2C4A9C; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:42:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tsunami.platypusgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFC54A86; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:42:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:42:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Kevin S. Brackett" To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: <20050624040506.GA5014@dan.emsphone.com> Message-ID: <20050624004056.D81650@tsunami.platypusgroup.com> References: <20050623233947.F81650@tsunami.platypusgroup.com> <20050624040506.GA5014@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libc.so.4 & libc_r.so.4 in ices0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 04:42:40 -0000 On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jun 23), Kevin S. Brackett said: >> libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x28755000) >> libc_r.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 (0x287ee000) >> >> any ideas why it's doing this, and what the fix is? > > Looks fine to me: > > libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x2875c000) > libpthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 (0x28836000) > > Is this a machine recently upgraded from 4.*? Does "ldd -a ices" > indicate that those libs are being pulled in as dependencies of another > library? If so, rebuild that port, then rebuild ices. > > Here is a script to find all the binaries linked to superceded port > libs and libs directly linked to threads libs: > > #! /bin/sh > ( find -s /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib -name "lib*.so" > find -s /usr/local/bin /usr/X11R6/bin/ > ) | > xargs ldd -a 2>/dev/null | > awk ' > /^[^\t]/ { cmd=$1 } > /^\t.*\/compat\// { printf "%s\t%s\n",cmd,$3 } > /^\t(libc_r|libpthread|libthr).so/ { printf "%s\t%s\n",cmd,$3 } > ' Well, the problem is when libc and libc_r are linked together, I recompiled without -lc and it's now fine, but not really what i'd consider a great fix... From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 05:34:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF1716A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 05:34:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1626343D48 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 05:34:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id j5O5YF8C000684; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:34:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:34:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: "Kevin S. Brackett" In-Reply-To: <20050624004056.D81650@tsunami.platypusgroup.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson Subject: Re: libc.so.4 & libc_r.so.4 in ices0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 05:34:18 -0000 On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Kevin S. Brackett wrote: > > Well, the problem is when libc and libc_r are linked together, I > recompiled without -lc and it's now fine, but not really what i'd consider > a great fix... I suggest you go do some research -- look in our archives and man pages. libc is linked automatically; you don't want to specify it yourself. Link order is important; your application must be linked to libc_r (or libpthread/libthr) before libc. Using -lc_r -lc will work, -lc -lc_r will not. Just let the compiler link to libc for you. -- DE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 06:09:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6615116A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:09:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smckay@internode.on.net) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEEC43D4C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:09:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smckay@internode.on.net) Received: from dungeon.home (ppp116-218.lns1.bne3.internode.on.net [59.167.116.218]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5O694s2029758; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:39:04 +0930 (CST) Received: from dungeon.home (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dungeon.home (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5O683ul026404; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:08:04 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from mckay) Message-Id: <200506240608.j5O683ul026404@dungeon.home> To: stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:08:03 +1000 From: Stephen McKay Cc: Stephen McKay Subject: VFS_BIO_DEBUG and 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:09:07 -0000 Hi-diddly-ho! Is VFS_BIO_DEBUG still supposed to work in 4.11? I'm trying to debug a data corruption problem that could be a bug in the cd9660 file system and thought that enabling VFS_BIO_DEBUG might help. Instead it complains a lot about directories and character devices being VMIO'd nowadays, then panics with "biodone: zero vnode ref count" before it even finishes booting. I have reason to believe this was a useful flag back in 4.4 (because I saw a kernel config from Matt Dillon that included it), but have not found any evidence of use more recent than that. So, is it obsolete now? Or is it just only a little bit broken? I don't (yet) understand the invariants it is trying to enforce, so perhaps none of them apply any more. Stephen. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 06:39:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE46C16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:39:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21F1B43D49 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:39:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2005 06:39:40 -0000 Received: from p5090C3B7.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO klotz.local) [80.144.195.183] by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 24 Jun 2005 08:39:40 +0200 X-Authenticated: #989277 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klotz.local (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5O6daEK001436 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:39:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Message-ID: <42BBAAA8.3050503@nurfuerspam.de> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:39:36 +0200 From: Martin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050403) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Stable References: <1117573047.3095.24.camel@klotz.local> In-Reply-To: <1117573047.3095.24.camel@klotz.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: ATA DMA timeouts [FIXED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:39:43 -0000 Hi, thank you, whoever fixed it and whatever it was, but -STABLE is stable again for me. The ATA DMA timeouts have disappeared with yesterdays kernel. Looking at the CVS tree, I notice that there weren't many changes to the ATA code before the problems appeared and also when it has been fixed. More info: I didn't update world to build this latest kernel and there were no changes in my kernel configuration. There is still one and only difference. I updated the nvidia-driver this time. I wonder if an "old" nvidia-driver can lead to ATA DMA errors. I don't think so, but I just want to tell you to make my report complete here. (Btw, nvidia-driver triggers a "panic: spinlock rm.mutex_mtx not in order list, when using "option WITNESS" without "option WITNESS_SKIPSPIN".) Thanks, Martin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 09:58:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102DF16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:58:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputnik@hellooperator.net) Received: from mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FAB43D4C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:58:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputnik@hellooperator.net) Received: from aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050624095839.HNRB481.mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:58:39 +0100 Received: from 9.hellooperator.net ([82.31.78.41]) by aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050624095839.SWAH14072.aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@9.hellooperator.net> for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:58:39 +0100 Received: from [10.4.0.5] (helo=eris.tenfour) by 9.hellooperator.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DlkxI-0006sh-Ot for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:58:36 +0100 Received: from rasputnik by eris.tenfour with local (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DlkxI-0003Ar-M0 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:58:36 +0100 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:58:36 +0100 From: Dick Davies To: FreeBSD Stable Users Message-ID: <20050624095836.GB1311@eris.tenfour> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: marking ports as 'cleaned' in portaudit.conf ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dick Davies List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:58:41 -0000 I just manually patched up my ruby18 install and tried to tell portaudit that the local port is now clean, but it doesn't want to know: root@eris rasputnik # portaudit Affected package: ruby-1.8.2_3 Type of problem: ruby -- arbitrary command execution on XMLRPC server. Reference: ^C root@eris rasputnik # cat /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf portaudit_fixed="594eb447-e398-11d9-a8bd-000cf18bbe54" root@eris rasputnik # what did I miss? -- 'Save the cost of installing cable TV by taping current editions of Top Of The Pops and then watching them in fifteen years' time.' -- Top Tips Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 10:48:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AA016A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:48:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612BC43D53 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:48:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Dllbv-0005ne-DD for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:40:35 +0200 Received: from 81-188-7-152.sdsl.easynet.be ([81.188.7.152]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:40:35 +0200 Received: from tfa by 81-188-7-152.sdsl.easynet.be with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:40:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Thomas Fazekas Followup-To: gmane.network.samba.general Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:14:09 +0200 Lines: 106 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 81-188-7-152.sdsl.easynet.be User-Agent: KNode/0.9.0 Sender: news Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-config@freebsd.org Subject: Winbind NT domain authentication X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:48:01 -0000 Hi list, Sorry for the cros-post, I'm not sure which list is better for me as I got a question related to samba, configuration, FreeBSD. I'm trying to configure NT authentication on FreeBSD 5.4 with Samba 3.0.12 (installed form the ports collection). I've folowed the Samba 3 howto I've managed the following : wbinfo -g returns correctly the domain groups wbinfo -u returns all the users (including those ones from the domain) ntlm auth does authenticate the user correctly ntlm_auth --username=usr1 password: NT_STATUS_OK: Success (0x0) and in the winbind log I get :         rpc: trusted_domains         [ 3141]: request interface version         [ 3141]: request location of privileged pipe         [ 3141]: request domain name         [ 3141]: request misc info         [ 3141]: pam auth MYDOMAIN\usr1         rpc_dc_name: Returning DC PASSV_SERV (_the_ip_) for domain MYDOMAIN         IPC$ connections done anonymously         Connecting to host=PASSV_SERV         Connecting to _the_ip_ at port 445 I suspect this means that my samba/winbind configuration is correct. The trouble is that I still can't login (login or ssh) with usernames from the domain. If I try with MYDOMAIN\usr1 I just get an Access Denied. The worse is that I'm not sure that I'm looking for the logs in the right place, the auth.log of messages doesn't show any trace of winbind beeing called. My smb.conf : workgroup = MYDOMAIN netbios name = MY_BSD password server = passwd_serv_ip security = domain encrypt passwords = yes #passdb backend = tdbsam guest server string = MY_BSD Samba Server # separate domain and username with '\', like DOMAIN\username winbind separator = \\ # use uids from 10000 to 20000 for domain users idmap uid = 10000-20000 # use gids from 10000 to 20000 for domain groups idmap gid = 10000-20000 # allow enumeration of winbind users and groups winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes # give winbind users a real shell (only needed if they have telnet access) template homedir = /home/winnt/%D%U template shell = /usr/local/bin/bash My nsswitch.conf group: compat winbind group_compat: nis hosts: files dns winbind networks: files passwd: compat winbind passwd_compat: nis shells: files and finally my /etc/pam.d/sshd # auth auth required pam_nologin.so no_warn #auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_warn no_fake_prompts #auth requisite pam_opieaccess.so no_warn allow_local #auth sufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn try_first_pass #auth sufficient pam_ssh.so no_warn try_first_pass #auth required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass #tfa auth sufficient pam_winbind.so debug try_first_pass auth sufficient pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass # account #account required pam_krb5.so account required pam_login_access.so account sufficient pam_winbind.so debug account sufficient pam_unix.so # session #session optional pam_ssh.so session required pam_permit.so # password #password sufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn try_first_pass password sufficient pam_winbind.so debug try_first_pass password sufficient pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass I hope this question is not silly but only for NT authentication smbd/nmbd is not necessary to run, isn't it ? Winbind should do de job. This is the 2'nd week I keep trying setting this thing up, and one of the most frustrating experience ever... Can anybody give me some hints (other then going to a psychiatrist) Thomas From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 11:06:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1D716A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:06:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-02.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FA0F43D5C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:06:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: (qmail 2506 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2005 11:06:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warren.shinji.nq.nu) (202.161.9.197) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 24 Jun 2005 11:06:41 -0000 From: Warren To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:05:57 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506242105.57896.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:06:47 -0000 ln -s /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c rm -f xf86drmSL.c ln -s /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/xf86drmSL.c xf86drmSL.c make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/lib/GL. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri. -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 11:07:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB3916A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:07:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60CE43D5C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:07:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01611F038 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:07:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id D0D1A6345; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:07:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:07:50 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050624110750.GA96233@stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Lock Order Reversal #66 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:07:55 -0000 --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This time I didn't get a LOR, but: kdb_backtrace(0,1,c07328e8,c0732780,c0700d3c) at 0xc053f7e1 =3D kdb_backtra= ce+0x29 witness_checkorder(c6c33900,9,c06ce108,3d3) at 0xc0549180 =3D witness_check= order+0x544 _mtx_lock_flags(c6c33900,0,c06ce108,3d3,0) at 0xc052184b =3D _mtx_lock_flag= s+0x5b in_pcblookup_local(c0757820,0,7eca,1) at 0xc059c17b =3D in_pcblookup_local+= 0xbf in_pcbbind_setup(cc78b708,0,cc78b740,cc78b722,c634e800) at 0xc059b5ea =3D i= n_pcbbind_setup+0x52a in_pcbbind(cc78b708,0,c634e800,c8345534,1) at 0xc059b07a =3D in_pcbbind+0xce tcp_usr_listen(c68f4dec,c5c96c00) at 0xc05b4f59 =3D tcp_usr_listen+0xad solisten(c68f4dec,1,c5c96c00,cadb6dd0,0) at 0xc055efd8 =3D solisten+0x18 listen(c5c96c00,ebae4d04,2,4,213) at 0xc05641d0 =3D listen+0x5c syscall(2f,2f,2f,3,0) at 0xc0682d0b =3D syscall+0x227 Xint0x80_syscall() at 0xc067260f =3D Xint0x80_syscall+0x1f --- syscall (106, FreeBSD ELF32, listen), eip =3D 0x280e8f7b, esp =3D 0xbfb= feb0c, ebp =3D 0xbfbfeb68 --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid =3D 0; apic id =3D 00 fault virtual address =3D 0xee440140 fault code =3D supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer =3D 0x8:0xc055a986 stack pointer =3D 0x10:0xec45f9e8 frame pointer =3D 0x10:0xec45f9f0 code segment =3D base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b =3D DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags =3D interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL =3D 0 current process =3D 29055 (screen) [thread pid 29055 tid 100828 ] Stopped at 0xc055a986 =3D ptcopen+0x56: movl 0xc07067c0 =3D li= nesw(,%eax,4),%eax db>=20 :-( kern.ostype: FreeBSD kern.osrelease: 5.4-STABLE kern.osrevision: 199506 kern.version: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #12: Mon May 30 11:39:53 CEST 2005 root@rave.ilse.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SE3DEBUG hw.machine: i386 hw.model: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz hw.ncpu: 4 hw.byteorder: 1234 hw.physmem: 4151205888 hw.usermem: 4003508224 hw.pagesize: 4096 hw.floatingpoint: 1 hw.machine_arch: i386 hw.realmem: 4160225280 hw.aac.iosize_max: 65536 hw.ata.ata_dma: 1 hw.ata.wc: 1 hw.ata.atapi_dma: 0 hw.pci.enable_io_modes: 1 hw.pci.do_powerstate: 0 hw.pci.host_mem_start: 2147483648 hw.pci.irq_override_mask: 57080 hw.intr_storm_threshold: 500 hw.availpages: 1013478 hw.bus.devctl_disable: 0 hw.kbd.keymap_restrict_change: 0 hw.syscons.saver.keybonly: 1 hw.syscons.bell: 1 hw.syscons.sc_no_suspend_vtswitch: 0 hw.busdma.total_bpages: 33 hw.busdma.zone0.total_bpages: 1 hw.busdma.zone0.free_bpages: 1 hw.busdma.zone0.reserved_bpages: 0 hw.busdma.zone0.active_bpages: 0 hw.busdma.zone0.total_bounced: 0 hw.busdma.zone0.total_deferred: 0 hw.busdma.zone0.lowaddr: 0xffffffff hw.busdma.zone0.alignment: 4096 hw.busdma.zone0.boundary: 0 hw.busdma.zone1.total_bpages: 32 hw.busdma.zone1.free_bpages: 32 hw.busdma.zone1.reserved_bpages: 0 hw.busdma.zone1.active_bpages: 0 hw.busdma.zone1.total_bounced: 0 hw.busdma.zone1.total_deferred: 0 hw.busdma.zone1.lowaddr: 0xffffffff hw.busdma.zone1.alignment: 2 hw.busdma.zone1.boundary: 65536 hw.clockrate: 3065 hw.instruction_sse: 1 hw.acpi.supported_sleep_state: S1 S4 S5 hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5 hw.acpi.sleep_button_state: S1 hw.acpi.lid_switch_state: NONE hw.acpi.standby_state: S1 hw.acpi.suspend_state: S3 hw.acpi.sleep_delay: 1 hw.acpi.s4bios: 0 hw.acpi.verbose: 0 hw.acpi.reset_video: 1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_usage: 100.00% hw.em0.debug_info: -1 hw.em0.stats: -1 hw.em0.rx_int_delay: 0 hw.em0.tx_int_delay: 66 hw.em0.rx_abs_int_delay: 66 hw.em0.tx_abs_int_delay: 66 hw.em1.debug_info: -1 hw.em1.stats: -1 hw.em1.rx_int_delay: 0 hw.em1.tx_int_delay: 66 hw.em1.rx_abs_int_delay: 66 hw.em1.tx_abs_int_delay: 66 Marc --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCu+mGezjnobFOgrERAlj3AKC0svqSjDCeEFsznaUyNbkCyMmcfwCglnd/ cR8odLhwn6urM+r/hC4Vk88= =3baR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 11:12:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C569416A41C; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:12:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2866143D1D; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:12:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5OBC6aK012826; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:42:07 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:41:50 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200506242105.57896.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> In-Reply-To: <200506242105.57896.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1623648.5dqn8qzDWV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506242042.02597.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Warren , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:12:12 -0000 --nextPart1623648.5dqn8qzDWV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote: > ln > -s > /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-su= pp >ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c > rm -f xf86drmSL.c > ln > -s > /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-su= pp >ort/linux/drm/xf86drmSL.c xf86drmSL.c > make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/lib/GL. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri. What commanad did you run? What version of FreeBSD are you running? When did you last cvsup your ports tree? Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING? =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1623648.5dqn8qzDWV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCu+qC5ZPcIHs/zowRAijwAJ4s+pdCWeIhLUhQ5rYxAESWcSEzvQCePGRn WiyaEjH9fc70gHhDU2jt9kA= =NXVf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1623648.5dqn8qzDWV-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 11:18:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC31816A41F for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:18:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-06.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1620243D49 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:18:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: (qmail 27174 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2005 11:18:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warren.shinji.nq.nu) (202.161.9.197) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 24 Jun 2005 11:18:06 -0000 From: Warren To: "Daniel O'Connor" Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:17:28 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200506242105.57896.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <200506242042.02597.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200506242042.02597.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506242117.29688.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:18:10 -0000 On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 9:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote: > > ln > > -s > > /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-su > >pp ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c > > rm -f xf86drmSL.c > > ln > > -s > > /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-su > >pp ort/linux/drm/xf86drmSL.c xf86drmSL.c > > make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop > > *** Error code 2 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/lib/GL. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri. > > What commanad did you run? portupgrade -aDk -m BATCH=yes > What version of FreeBSD are you running? 5.4-STABLE > When did you last cvsup your ports tree? Just before doing PortUpgrade before sending the 1st email > Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING? cant say as i did. -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 12:17:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465DF16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nohuman@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D396743D48 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:17:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nohuman@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so96886nfc for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 05:17:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=SkqmDgTqqSAjE/cgEWrSKDsgkyIBnEIVlf/qU8x2D9C/opzEEhpDNxtOwWwC2mf6DeKqQOm5rWJl9nJTsYtJzVwCX4/Y4RiyreR5jWUXDX7PSTpcsSNMmriq7qtzUGv5JHD3PE5GOa+/ffvrwYNS2rVcxlmxBOG9V4lDtMyrt7M= Received: by 10.48.237.12 with SMTP id k12mr64615nfh; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 05:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.49.15 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 05:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5e51d2fd05062405175d78aa4f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:17:29 +0200 From: Thomas Beer To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Simultaneously two versions of one port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Thomas Beer List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:17:31 -0000 Dear All, I'm trying to install gdesklets which depends on py24-orbit. However, py23-orbit is already installed. I googled and tryed various ways with portupgrade et al. What to do? Thanks Tom [root@lap gdesklets]# make install =3D=3D=3D> gdesklets-0.34.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python - foun= d <---snip---> =3D=3D=3D> Installing for py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 =3D=3D=3D> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.4 -= found =3D=3D=3D> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on executable: pkg-config - found =3D=3D=3D> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on shared library: glib-2.0.600 - f= ound =3D=3D=3D> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on shared library: IDL-2.0 - found =3D=3D=3D> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on shared library: ORBit-2.0 - foun= d =3D=3D=3D> Generating temporary packing list =3D=3D=3D> Checking if devel/py-orbit2 already installed =3D=3D=3D> An older version of devel/py-orbit2 is already installed (py23-orbit-2.0.1_1) You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/py-orbit2 without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/py-orbit2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-gnome2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/deskutils/gdesklets. --=20 -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 12:26:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD46F16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:26:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pascal@blackwillow.giznet.com) Received: from hermes.uci.kun.nl (hermes.uci.kun.nl [131.174.93.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8304D43D1F for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:26:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pascal@blackwillow.giznet.com) Received: from blackwillow.giznet.com (vhe-520082.sshn.net [195.169.225.20]) by hermes.uci.kun.nl (PMDF V6.2-X17 #30689) with ESMTP id <0IIL002F0976EJ@hermes.uci.kun.nl> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:25:54 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blackwillow.giznet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46228A938 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:25:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blackwillow.giznet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pg76.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55534-08 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:25:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blackwillow.giznet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blackwillow.giznet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15934A927 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:25:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:25:49 +0100 From: Pascal Groenen In-reply-to: <5e51d2fd05062405175d78aa4f@mail.gmail.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20050624122250.M77287@blackwillow.giznet.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.51 20050228 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-OriginatingIP: 81.58.62.242 (pascal) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new References: <5e51d2fd05062405175d78aa4f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Simultaneously two versions of one port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:26:07 -0000 Dear Thom, What I do when something like this happens is: either, 'cd' to the port that is causing the problem, devel/py-orbit2, in this case and type 'make deinstall', than go back to your original port and issue a make again or, 'cd' to the port that is causing the problem, devel/py-orbit2, in this case and type 'make -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER install clean'. This forces an upgrade of the troublesome port, but may result in a double registered port. This can be checked by issuing 'pkgdb -F' Good luck, Pascal On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:17:29 +0200, Thomas Beer wrote > Dear All, > > I'm trying to install gdesklets which depends on > py24-orbit. However, py23-orbit is already > installed. I googled and tryed various ways > with portupgrade et al. What to do? > > Thanks Tom > > [root@lap gdesklets]# make install > ===> gdesklets-0.34.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python - found > > <---snip---> > > ===> Installing for py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 > ===> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.4 - found > ===> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on executable: pkg-config - found > ===> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on shared library: glib-2.0.600 - found > ===> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on shared library: IDL-2.0 - found > ===> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on shared library: ORBit-2.0 - found > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ===> Checking if devel/py-orbit2 already installed > ===> An older version of devel/py-orbit2 is already installed > (py23-orbit-2.0.1_1) > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/py-orbit2 > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" > in your environment or the "make install" command line. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/py-orbit2. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-gnome2. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/deskutils/gdesklets. > > -- > -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? > -- Don't know. Don't care. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 12:32:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446C316A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:32:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smckay@internode.on.net) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB16743D4C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:32:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smckay@internode.on.net) Received: from dungeon.home (ppp116-218.lns1.bne3.internode.on.net [59.167.116.218]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5OCW597040999; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:02:05 +0930 (CST) Received: from dungeon.home (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dungeon.home (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5OCV6jp047730; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:31:06 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from mckay) Message-Id: <200506241231.j5OCV6jp047730@dungeon.home> To: stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:31:06 +1000 From: Stephen McKay Cc: Stephen McKay Subject: Data corruption in cd9660 on FreeBSD 4.11? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:32:08 -0000 Hi! I'm experiencing data corruption when reading CDs and DVDs on FreeBSD 4.11. My best theory so far is that cd9660 or perhaps the VFS layer is mishandling 2048 byte buffers (since they are smaller than one virtual memory page), occasionally writing them to the wrong location in RAM. Read on for why I think so. First up, I don't think this is the usual hardware problem since the machine has done huge numbers of buildworlds (in 4.x and -current) without any of the telltale signs (eg bus errors and segmentation violations). There are no error messages in /var/log/messages. Also, it moonlights as a games machine and plays Doom 3, Battlefield 1942, Neverwinter Nights and so forth like a champ. Memory, cpu, video, disk, networking are all just fine 100% of the time. The hardware is an ASUS P4P800 mobo (including onboard Marvell Yukon gigabit ethernet) with a P4 2.8GHz cpu, 1GB RAM, Maxtor 120GB disk, Pioneer 103S DVD-ROM, LiteOn SOHW-1673S DVD burner in an Antec Sonata case. Now that I have a DVD burner, I make backups of my main machines (over NFS) but have found that they often don't verify as 100% correct. The symptom is that, for some files, an entire 2048 DVD sector is replaced with different (non-zero) data. This occurs both when reading with the Pioneer DVD-ROM and when reading with the LiteOn burner (though I don't test with the Pioneer much as it is slower). I emphasise that all burns have been 100% correct (ie the burning process worked and this can be verified by reading on, say, my iBook), so all of the hardware seems to be operating correctly (and swiftly, I might add). The problem is that reading the iso9660 file system is not safe. After some experimenting, I've found that the problem also occurs when reading CDs, and I built a test CD (of photos of a recent wedding) and in testing I read this CD over and over. I compare the CD with the original files (via NFS) using diff. When diff finds a difference, I save copies of the differing files before they can be flushed from the cache. I have calculated checksums for all 2048 blocks on the CD, so I can know if any given block of 2048 bytes came from the CD and if so which file it came from. In all cases so far, the 2048 byte error has been a block from another file, not a random corruption. I am starting to believe that, under high load, the cd9660 file system code tells the ata driver to put a 2K block in the wrong spot in memory, leaving some old junk in the gap in the file being read, and blasting some other 2K block of memory. It may not be cd9660 code per se that is wrong, but a bug in the complex buffer handling code (getblk, getnewbuf, allocbuf, etc). Why do I believe it is writing to the wrong memory, rather than any number of other flaws? In two runs (out of many), unusual things occurred that are consistent with memory being overwritten, rather than, say, a 2K block just not being read at all: In one, an innocent sshd core-dumped (which is something that has never happened except when running my cd9660 tests), and in another, a previously OK cached NFS file became corrupted. Explaining that last case further: I had been running a test script that would mount the CD, compare files, unmount the CD, and repeat. This meant that the NFS copy of the files was read over and over and hence became memory resident (there being enough space in 1GB of RAM for one copy of the files, plus my normal programs). Several tests passed without fault (hence all the NFS files were cached and correct), when suddenly there were multiple corruptions; call them file A and file B. File A was the usual corruption where a 2K block of another file was unexpectedly present in the copy read from the CD, but in file B it was the NFS file that was wrong. In fact it contained the missing block from file A! In short, the fully memory resident NFS file B had been corrupted by reading file A from the CD. It's been pretty interesting hunting this problem, but now I'm sort of stuck. I believe that some 2K reads from DVDs and CDs end up in the wrong place in RAM, but I can't find where this happens in the code (it's pretty hard to work out just by reading it), and I can't rule out the possibility that there's a hardware error here that I've just never run across before. So, can anyone suggest any more tests I could try? Or is there a kind of hardware fault that could cause this substitution of whole blocks read from CDs without causing any other problems? And does anyone know of any commits made anywhere in the 5 years since 4.x split off from 5.x that may be relevant? Yep. 5 years. I have started looking, but there's a fair bit of stuff in there... Stephen. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 12:34:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941B416A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:34:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nohuman@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2394843D49 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:34:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nohuman@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so97722nfc for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 05:34:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jM0qviOo/jKn5jhCJSFHV2ATIALzJ71HjM8ohTkK95ZoWv2ESxczHz8A07QtwUCIdjSZKpGCXsvsZnU/qDlTnbYxfjQN4a3D3J/oexoAboIlHw1zbuQ1RWHriGtZR9L0Tg5XTISTqaz+8c1RMnIdC/4pn6dR936zfcdoXNgt8iQ= Received: by 10.48.237.12 with SMTP id k12mr65101nfh; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 05:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.49.15 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 05:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5e51d2fd05062405347d51a753@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:34:23 +0200 From: Thomas Beer To: Pascal Groenen In-Reply-To: <20050624122250.M77287@blackwillow.giznet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <5e51d2fd05062405175d78aa4f@mail.gmail.com> <20050624122250.M77287@blackwillow.giznet.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Simultaneously two versions of one port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Thomas Beer List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:34:25 -0000 > either, 'cd' to the port that is causing the problem, devel/py-orbit2, i= n > this case and type 'make deinstall', than go back to your original port a= nd > issue a make again What's with existing dependencies? >=20 > or, 'cd' to the port that is causing the problem, devel/py-orbit2, in thi= s > case and type 'make -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER install clean'. This forces an > upgrade of the troublesome port, but may result in a double registered po= rt. > This can be checked by issuing 'pkgdb -F' >=20 > Good luck, >=20 > Pascal >=20 > On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:17:29 +0200, Thomas Beer wrote > > Dear All, > > > > I'm trying to install gdesklets which depends on > > py24-orbit. However, py23-orbit is already > > installed. I googled and tryed various ways > > with portupgrade et al. What to do? > > > > Thanks Tom > > > > [root@lap gdesklets]# make install > > =3D=3D=3D> gdesklets-0.34.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python - = found > > > > <---snip---> > > > > =3D=3D=3D> Installing for py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 > > =3D=3D=3D> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2= .4 - found > > =3D=3D=3D> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on executable: pkg-config - fou= nd > > =3D=3D=3D> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on shared library: glib-2.0.600= - found > > =3D=3D=3D> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on shared library: IDL-2.0 - fo= und > > =3D=3D=3D> py24-orbit-2.0.1_1 depends on shared library: ORBit-2.0 - = found > > =3D=3D=3D> Generating temporary packing list > > =3D=3D=3D> Checking if devel/py-orbit2 already installed > > =3D=3D=3D> An older version of devel/py-orbit2 is already installed > > (py23-orbit-2.0.1_1) > > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/py-orbit2 > > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" > > in your environment or the "make install" command line. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/py-orbit2. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-gnome2. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/deskutils/gdesklets. > > > > -- > > -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? > > -- Don't know. Don't care. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 --=20 -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 12:50:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D449B16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:50:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from mail.onlinefix.de (mail2-out.titan-networks.de [217.140.72.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A04A43D53 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:50:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void ([217.140.77.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.onlinefix.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j5OColdk029151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:50:48 +0200 Received: by kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 9B73139B1; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:50:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:50:46 +0200 From: Stefan Walter To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050624125046.GA915@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT" Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Infinity Approximation Task Force X-PGP-key: http://www.gegenunendlich.de/swalter-rsa.asc X-PGP-fingerprint: 85D8 6A49 22C7 6CD9 B011 5D6A 5691 111B 12B9 E0B3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: EHCI: mtools stuck in state 'physrd' or panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:50:51 -0000 --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I just updated to this morning's RELENG_5 and thought I'd give USB 2.0 a try to speed up data exchange with my USB sticks. The controller is correctly identified, it seems: ehci0: mem 0xdbfdf700-0xdbfdf7ff irq 3 at d= evice 16.3 on pci0 When plugging in a USB stick, it is correctly identified, too: umass0: USB Flash Disk, rev 2.00/2.00, addr 2 da2 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da2: < USB BAR 2.00> Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device=20 da2: 40.000MB/s transfers da2: 124MB (255744 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 124C) I can also list the content of the FAT filesystem with mtools' mdir command. When trying to copy a file from the stick to a local filesystem, however, mcopy is almost immediately stuck in state "physrd" (according to top(1)) after copying a varying number of bytes (between 100 and 2200 KB is what I've seen so far). I cannot kill the mtools process, but pulling out the USB stick helps - it panics after a few times of doing that, though. I thought it might have to do with IRQ sharing first, but according to "vmstat -i" and dmesg, ehci0 doesn't share its IRQ with anything else. I know that the ehci(4) man page says the driver is not finished and quite buggy, but that doesn't mean I shouldn't report a problem, right? ;) Any ideas? Stefan --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iQGVAwUBQrwBplaRERsSueCzAQKbWgv/SHWcV+HF2WudzQ6ZJiP+91QriPPsjW2t abwAXhg/QMg/qKsL42sVrrI7qyKJIgIxrLYf3mheROTWnXWiD3TBFANSAi0BFbkl IEOWuxer+OxUstZzKZUBAY0prhSSHV7gCgcIT5UKdbNjQtkOX5Jm2NJI4yOwZc4B ffrh4th/u1KxdUUMtcABYIW+vH+MF+ezzX9F9O9VfASeBd3Djw2in/NCpXbeuXwd XSAg02coLyGCN5FUTZ3TQIMi1Cmu7qSuwV1VZCKidUHoJH5mNbFfijzO0gSB64gI eMqEHVqpaqaJHP1RZu37A01CX8JmR4VgkLhIUCu/NYMk0ZADLKySS76rNHv57YVH Z9+lGT/qB2vZKTeojWtUor3mtZX+Ytwr+PoSe/OQQSkY1rrdchgXwP4FMdpq9lqI KzKHXSOjgdZ3UhTzedM/Z9jAFLfr5HOBcWynBBcYhnM7lNiOAhVdclBTJQDG6I6U sCIgCkmCJXk0sMCd0WFBQEnsRCFMRixh =FfAs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 12:59:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDFC16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:59:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from mail.onlinefix.de (mail2-out.titan-networks.de [217.140.72.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86B643D1F for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:59:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void ([217.140.77.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.onlinefix.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j5OCxJdk030253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:59:19 +0200 Received: by kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 04D8539B1; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:59:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:59:18 +0200 From: Stefan Walter To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050624125918.GA1051@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> References: <5e51d2fd05062405175d78aa4f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5e51d2fd05062405175d78aa4f@mail.gmail.com> X-PGP-key: http://www.gegenunendlich.de/swalter-rsa.asc X-PGP-fp: 85D8 6A49 22C7 6CD9 B011 5D6A 5691 111B 12B9 E0B3 Organization: Infinity Approximation Task Force X-PGP-key: http://www.gegenunendlich.de/swalter-rsa.asc X-PGP-fingerprint: 85D8 6A49 22C7 6CD9 B011 5D6A 5691 111B 12B9 E0B3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: Simultaneously two versions of one port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:59:21 -0000 --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thomas Beer in gmane.os.freebsd.stable: > I'm trying to install gdesklets which depends on > py24-orbit. However, py23-orbit is already > installed. I googled and tryed various ways > with portupgrade et al. What to do? Do you still need the Python 2.3 stuff? If not, you could just upgrade all packages installed for 2.3 with 'portupgrade "py23*"', for instance. Stefan --=20 No reading beyond this point --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iQGVAwUBQrwDplaRERsSueCzAQLFzAv/UEXpgFd9RHXxqoK3Ew6dfw/sNxl6lfjn zeU5Hip/UmCd4NtEkOS2bkYVNl2IGrx+7kz3IcGeKRIVaCx/Lx/1QtB6g0Q8qY6I 3FuD1lbRgwa5DoY3wDVlwsLQHsP1z4nBvF8iMBzYC9hrOehTVgmQO3MQsrdX7QxH VGmepoSVKlv+auapI831jEXpQyeFWkZTb7UDU9/B82y4C7PJEgRCcaC2Qo+Gum8b YL0g98SbRSAP7M0JvZxwkbcwTFKh+CWonjI/EAThZ97v/rOdqswiSHwaQNEvFsEX apKjEUz3pJweYLVENSQr1x5m1MAPkLl5QDtEn9+fejdSHznXCU6ySOI5FKkKA4Yl 7AaeC5qzy10phFKGShGidmIy4M7oL7aTlHqUVQxPT5ggVH8RZMVP4BCB8uk/DH0g IGUoql5JErbJ3SAsgxztnsI9WSyv3DnYb9iZkWbXSWMjmDv4acXuuV2NyWVCreiq ybrYvtab591cgioU4+2g+3LZoDbhDR9E =nEG9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 13:32:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D84516A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB5E43D1F for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from pumice6.sentex.ca (pumice6.sentex.ca [64.7.153.21]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5ODWMAW005469 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:32:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by pumice6.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5ODWrZQ018156; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:32:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5ODWqQT013569 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:32:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20050624093240.037cb048@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:34:14 -0400 To: Stefan Walter , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20050624125046.GA915@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> References: <20050624125046.GA915@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.18 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.21 Cc: Subject: Re: EHCI: mtools stuck in state 'physrd' or panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:32:55 -0000 At 08:50 AM 24/06/2005, Stefan Walter wrote: >I can also list the content of the FAT filesystem with mtools' mdir >command. When trying to copy a file from the stick to a local filesystem, >however, mcopy is almost immediately stuck in state "physrd" (according to >top(1)) after copying a varying number of bytes (between 100 and 2200 KB >is what I've seen so far). I cannot kill the mtools process, but pulling >out the USB stick helps - it panics after a few times of doing that, >though. If you reformat the USB stick with UFS2, does IO still hang the box ? ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 13:33:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07E416A41C; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:33:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D38B43D1D; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:33:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5ODXhJH013601; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:03:43 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Warren Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:02:57 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200506242105.57896.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <200506242042.02597.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200506242117.29688.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> In-Reply-To: <200506242117.29688.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1379865.RmspeCIFRN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506242303.08320.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:33:46 -0000 --nextPart1379865.RmspeCIFRN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:47, Warren wrote: > Just before doing PortUpgrade before sending the 1st email > > > Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING? > > cant say as i did. Well that was silly.. Not that I think there is a specific entry in this case but it is a good ha= bit=20 to get in to.. Do you have the kernel source installed? I think you may need that to build= =20 the xfree86-dri port (I don't know why it doesn't check) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1379865.RmspeCIFRN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCvAuU5ZPcIHs/zowRAjyyAJ9hT8uEEzvwdzqeeciiKOvbtiEfygCghZEf /t19Xp3VTz/j6K31jO+iMuA= =XUQr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1379865.RmspeCIFRN-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 14:16:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705AE16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:16:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from mail.onlinefix.de (mail2-out.titan-networks.de [217.140.72.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F9F43D1F for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:16:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void ([217.140.77.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.onlinefix.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j5OEGWdk020424 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:16:35 +0200 Received: by kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 1CF7E3F19; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:16:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:16:30 +0200 From: Stefan Walter To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050624141630.GA1313@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> References: <20050624125046.GA915@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> <6.2.1.2.0.20050624093240.037cb048@64.7.153.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050624093240.037cb048@64.7.153.2> X-PGP-key: http://www.gegenunendlich.de/swalter-rsa.asc X-PGP-fp: 85D8 6A49 22C7 6CD9 B011 5D6A 5691 111B 12B9 E0B3 Organization: Infinity Approximation Task Force X-PGP-key: http://www.gegenunendlich.de/swalter-rsa.asc X-PGP-fingerprint: 85D8 6A49 22C7 6CD9 B011 5D6A 5691 111B 12B9 E0B3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: Re: EHCI: mtools stuck in state 'physrd' or panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:16:37 -0000 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Tancsa in gmane.os.freebsd.stable: > If you reformat the USB stick with UFS2, does IO still hang the box ? I haven't tried that, but instead tried to just dump the whole USB stick to a file with "dd if=3D/dev/da2 of=3Dstickimage bs=3D1024". The dd process= also hung in state "physrd" eventually, and about a minute after pulling out the USB stick the system panic'd. Furthermore, I tried the same (both mcopy and dd) on my notebook (Centrino -> Intel ICH4 chipset), which didn't have ehci in its kernel until then, either. It worked flawlessly, multiple times. Stefan --=20 No reading beyond this point --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iQGVAwUBQrwVvlaRERsSueCzAQIo7wv9HjvrYBCxbBkJnM802Lv9rQrErQS4G2xK 0FATQvcdn7hmxULL+kHX72XFW5U4gZsGbpdj1D+3aKsAsKtNIPh6biuNbbDyHCkJ GYVxBAEBJuiwV9C4CgJ6fQ2J2HeN44/WA7eqKR8+h3sstVdtNR636FmRz+hSibPi eiddZHher2PwvBUJj7v4LgpcqYhDtvEE1tE3OqtsZ+Oc6WlM28aYr0cTj5ITTjGp +wAiY4ZLnz5IbCeRVoXzhEu9FVNdchV8yG/1fLMtIP72dYK+BbnKZJqTGTlHdGit WGwbd4llpGjGc3/qJCAU3/rIO1aRGY3hoEneEz8a6i+hQtHui5ACJnUS2/zv1w+G 0TVlxNK1//fqaRyKa8Ubt4aEGoQof5dxjP4DVfqqDjRgtN98R847ecSAzLZ7ei5H 8aqRmfQ5VNnT+vxz6Vhl7PF41a1VGLC4yP0umuzkYfAr11/7XXDQ8ULl+5e1edpM PRrhlXUaEFjNZF7XDLN66gJgl/euRNXs =bSaJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 14:53:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE30616A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:53:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C63843D48 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:53:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2005 14:53:01 -0000 Received: from p5090F138.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO klotz.local) [80.144.241.56] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 24 Jun 2005 16:53:01 +0200 X-Authenticated: #989277 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klotz.local (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5OEquos001572 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:52:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Message-ID: <42BC1E48.3010808@nurfuerspam.de> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:52:56 +0200 From: Martin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050403) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: ATA DMA timeouts [NOT FIXED] (forget my last mail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:53:03 -0000 Hi (again), believe it or not. After sending the last mail and closing firefox, the system has been hanging for a few seconds and spit this out: ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=226025086 I'm back on kernel of May 26th again. This time I did not have a corrupted file system or at least not as badly corrupted that it panics the kernel, like the first time. Usually my system has DMA timeouts very early while booting up and creates mess on the file systems. Sorry for causing noise. :( I'm going to test a kernel every week and report, when the problems are gone. Martin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 16:09:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57DC16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SysAdmin@Rainbow-IT.net) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626B543D1F for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SysAdmin@Rainbow-IT.net) Received: from venus.rainbow-it.net (venus.furrie.net [62.3.212.122]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D6A25203C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:09:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost.rainbow-it.net [127.0.0.1]) by venus.rainbow-it.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D636228BF for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:09:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from venus.rainbow-it.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (venus.rainbow-it.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00579-08 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:09:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from [10.0.1.45] (valhalla.hq.inty.net [10.0.1.45]) by venus.rainbow-it.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823AF22822 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:09:23 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <42BC3038.30705@Rainbow-IT.net> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:09:28 +0100 From: Chris Phillips Organization: Rainbow IT Consultancy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050516) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rainbow-it.net Subject: dmesg queries X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:09:30 -0000 Hi All, I'm trying to figure out a couple of things & would like some advice please. My server was on FreeBSD 5.3 STABLE #1 this morning (I only took it to STABLE, because at the time, my GigNIC was not supported fully @RELEASE). I upgraded today & it's now looking like this: - % uname -a FreeBSD venus.rainbow-it.net 5.4-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p2 #2: Fri Jun 24 13:43:08 BST 2005 furrie@venus.rainbow-it.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VENUS i386 It's a lowly Dell PowerEdge 800 Here's what has me writing... looking in /var/run/dmesg I see: - kernel: ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 kernel: ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 3 kernel: ioapic1: WARNING: intbase 32 != expected base 24 kernel: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kernel: ioapic1 irqs 32-55 on motherboard Should I be worried by that WARNING? Also in /var/run/dmesg I see: - kernel: Interrupt storm detected on "irq19: uhci0 uhci2"; throttling interrupt source kernel: Interrupt storm detected on "irq18: bge0 uhci1+"; throttling interrupt source I think the top device is a Logitech QuickCam Express & the bottom one (using irq18), is my onboard Gigabit NIC. Would these lines in dmesg suggest that there is a problem and if so, is there anything that I can do to combat it? Is it likely that this 'throttling', is slowing my NIC at all? I have seen this kind of notification (throttling), when printing. This is the dmesg output for that device: - kernel: ppc0: port 0x778-0x77f,0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 1 on acpi0 kernel: ppc0: Generic chipset (ECP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode kernel: ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold kernel: ppbus0: on ppc0 kernel: ppbus0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE/ECP kernel: Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0: kernel: ppbus0: PRINTER MLC,PCL,PML kernel: lpt0: on ppbus0 kernel: lpt0: Interrupt-driven port kernel: ppi0: on ppbus0 Now, the upgrade may well have stopped the behavior mentioned below, but if not, does anyone know what I might have done wrong, to be getting (a lot of) messages like: - sio0: 1848 more interrupt-level buffer overflows (total 11269) ? This is the device: - kernel: sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 kernel: sio0: type 16550A Finally, is it considered "bad form", to ask multiple questions like I have, or should I have separated them & sent them in multiple emails? Kind Regards, Chris Phillips From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 17:03:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE4D16A41C; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:03:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from B.Candler@pobox.com) Received: from orb.pobox.com (orb.pobox.com [207.8.226.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAC343D48; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:03:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from B.Candler@pobox.com) Received: from orb (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orb.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244A8276A; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:03:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bloodhound.noc.clara.net (bloodhound.noc.clara.net [195.8.70.207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by orb.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C7A8E; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:03:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Candler To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia32@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:03:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506241803.28436.B.Candler@pobox.com> Cc: alfred@freebsd.org Subject: pxeboot, NFS and root-path: bug or documentation error? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:03:21 -0000 I have been setting up a pxeboot "jumpstart" environment for FreeBSD 4.11, following the instructions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pxe/ Rather than build pxeboot like this: # rm -rf /usr/obj/* # cd /usr/src/sys/boot # make # cp /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/pxeldr/pxeboot /usr/tftpboot I just copied /boot/pxeboot from the FreeBSD-4.11 CD-ROM. Otherwise I followed the instructions very closely. The pxeboot client machine is a Compaq ProLiant DL380. On first attempt, it got as far as pxeboot starting, and then: pxe_open: server addr: 192.168.0.1 pxe_open: server path: /pxeroot pxe_open: gateway ip: 0.0.0.0 Booting [kernel]... can't load 'kernel' can't load 'kernel.old' And my NFS server logs a failed attempt to mount /pxeroot: Jun 24 16:32:40 sr-mon-00 mountd[642]: mount request from 192.168.0.240 for non existent path /pxeroot Jun 24 16:32:49 sr-mon-00 last message repeated 59 times This is strange; I thought that at this stage pxeboot would be pulling across the kernel and ramdisk via TFTP from /usr/tftpboot, although the documentation is far from clear. pxeboot(8) says: pxeboot recognizes next-server and option root-path directives as the server and path to NFS mount for file requests, respectively, or the server to make TFTP requests to. (Erm, so exactly how do I choose whether to use NFS or to use TFTP for the next stage?) Anyway, assuming that I'm forced to use NFS at this point, I added another DHCP option: option root-path "192.168.0.1:/usr/tftpboot"; This option is not shown in the example dhcpd.conf in pxeboot(8), nor in the article referred to above. However, if I also put an entry in the NFS server's /etc/hosts file for the client DHCP address, it then works properly. So the question is: when pxeboot runs on the client, is it able to fetch loader.rc, the kernel and ramdisk via TFTP, or only via NFS? If it's only NFS, then I think the pxeboot(8) manpage, and the pxeboot article, ought to be updated. If it *can* use TFTP, does anyone have any suggestions for what I was doing wrong? Regards, Brian Candler. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 17:32:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A47B16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:32:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54ECE43D53 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A57CB85A for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:32:55 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) In-Reply-To: <42BC3038.30705@Rainbow-IT.net> References: <42BC3038.30705@Rainbow-IT.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-4--406745818; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: <2DBC5B54-DE92-41BA-9EB6-35BCF7719FD3@khera.org> From: Vivek Khera Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:32:54 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: dmesg queries X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:32:56 -0000 --Apple-Mail-4--406745818 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Jun 24, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Chris Phillips wrote: > Here's what has me writing... looking in /var/run/dmesg I see: - > > kernel: ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 > kernel: ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 3 > kernel: ioapic1: WARNING: intbase 32 != expected base 24 > kernel: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > kernel: ioapic1 irqs 32-55 on motherboard > > Should I be worried by that WARNING? I see this as well on my PE800. > Also in /var/run/dmesg I see: - > > kernel: Interrupt storm detected on "irq19: uhci0 uhci2"; > throttling interrupt source > kernel: Interrupt storm detected on "irq18: bge0 uhci1+"; > throttling interrupt source > I get this as well. I don't use USB so I turned that off at the BIOS and removed it from my kernel, but I still get "interrupt storm" on my bge0 device. No idea why. Performance is not all that great on this box disk-wise, but CPU wise it is acceptably fast. I run FreeBSD/amd64 on it rather than FreeBSD/ i386. Vivek Khera, Ph.D. +1-301-869-4449 x806 --Apple-Mail-4--406745818-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 17:54:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C233316A41C; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:54:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mv.twc.weather.com (mv.twc.weather.com [65.212.71.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5918543D55; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:54:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.50.41.231] (Not Verified[65.202.103.25]) by mv.twc.weather.com with NetIQ MailMarshal (v6, 0, 3, 8) id ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:07:45 -0400 From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-ia32@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:50:37 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200506241803.28436.B.Candler@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <200506241803.28436.B.Candler@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506241350.38689.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: alfred@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Brian Candler Subject: Re: pxeboot, NFS and root-path: bug or documentation error? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:54:09 -0000 On Friday 24 June 2005 01:03 pm, Brian Candler wrote: > I have been setting up a pxeboot "jumpstart" environment for FreeBSD 4.11, > following the instructions at > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pxe/ > > Rather than build pxeboot like this: > # rm -rf /usr/obj/* > # cd /usr/src/sys/boot > # make > # cp /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/pxeldr/pxeboot /usr/tftpboot > I just copied /boot/pxeboot from the FreeBSD-4.11 CD-ROM. Otherwise I > followed the instructions very closely. > > The pxeboot client machine is a Compaq ProLiant DL380. > > On first attempt, it got as far as pxeboot starting, and then: > > pxe_open: server addr: 192.168.0.1 > pxe_open: server path: /pxeroot > pxe_open: gateway ip: 0.0.0.0 > Booting [kernel]... > can't load 'kernel' > can't load 'kernel.old' > > And my NFS server logs a failed attempt to mount /pxeroot: > > Jun 24 16:32:40 sr-mon-00 mountd[642]: mount request from 192.168.0.240 > for non existent path /pxeroot > Jun 24 16:32:49 sr-mon-00 last message repeated 59 times > > This is strange; I thought that at this stage pxeboot would be pulling > across the kernel and ramdisk via TFTP from /usr/tftpboot, although the > documentation is far from clear. pxeboot(8) says: > > pxeboot recognizes next-server and option root-path directives as the > server and path to NFS mount for file requests, respectively, or the > server to make TFTP requests to. > > (Erm, so exactly how do I choose whether to use NFS or to use TFTP for the > next stage?) > > Anyway, assuming that I'm forced to use NFS at this point, I added another > DHCP option: > > option root-path "192.168.0.1:/usr/tftpboot"; > > This option is not shown in the example dhcpd.conf in pxeboot(8), nor in > the article referred to above. However, if I also put an entry in the NFS > server's /etc/hosts file for the client DHCP address, it then works > properly. > > So the question is: when pxeboot runs on the client, is it able to fetch > loader.rc, the kernel and ramdisk via TFTP, or only via NFS? > > If it's only NFS, then I think the pxeboot(8) manpage, and the pxeboot > article, ought to be updated. If it *can* use TFTP, does anyone have any > suggestions for what I was doing wrong? It uses TFTP to fetch the pxeboot binary itself. After that, it uses either NFS or TFTP. By default it uses NFS to access /boot/loader and friends. If you want it to just use TFTP and not use NFS at all, you need to recompile pxeboot with LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT=yes defined in make. That is: % cd /sys/boot % make clean % make LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT=yes % cp /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/pxeldr/pxeboot /usr/tftpboot -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 18:31:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B0C16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:31:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF22743D49 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:31:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from ranger.anduin.net ([81.0.162.52] helo=[192.168.1.110]) by anduin.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dlsy2-000Nds-B0 for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:31:54 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <0C2E62BF-3F7C-48A1-9FBF-FD9CBDC00169@anduin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: stable@freebsd.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:31:19 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Cc: Subject: Network/fxp related panic in 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:31:56 -0000 Hi all, I recently re-enabled SMP on one of my 5.4 servers (dual intel p3), and after a relatively short while (couple of days) it starts acting up. Today it was frozen and had jumped into kernel debugger on serial console. Problem is that my serial console was controlled by a terminal at work, and when I got home it seemed that the work terminal had disconnected. All I could do was a 'trace' - I don't have the panic screen (if any) nor do I have any other output because the watchdog triggered the powerswitch cycle just after I got the trace: Tracing pid 29 tid 100000 td 0xc22a0000 fxp_intr_body(c2404000,c2404000,40,ffffffff,8) at fxp_intr_body+0xd0 fxp_intr(c2404000,0,0,0,0) at fxp_intr+0x14e ithread_loop(c22f6500,e3384d38,0,0,0) at ithread_loop+0x1b8 fork_exit(c06a9150,c22f6500,e3384d38) at fork_exit+0x80 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 --- trap 0x1, eip = 0, esp = 0xe3384d6c, ebp = 0 --- db> What makes me wonder is ... When I connected the serial console, the db> prompt was already there. Does that mean that the work terminal disconnect somehow sent a telnet break, and triggered the kernel debugger? I.e. - this was no panic, but a stupid serial console hiccup? Is there any way to prevent this in the future - like changing the control character that would trigger the kernel debugger? (I have BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER in my kernel config..) Thanks, /Eirik From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 18:39:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AA616A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:39:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonewolf-freebsd@earthmagic.org) Received: from ppp162-248.static.internode.on.net (ppp162-248.static.internode.on.net [150.101.162.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5191943D49 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:39:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonewolf-freebsd@earthmagic.org) Received: from earthmagic.org (unknown [192.168.2.3]) by ppp162-248.static.internode.on.net (Postfix-MSA) with ESMTP id EC0459214; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 04:36:54 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <42BC5353.1090807@earthmagic.org> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 04:39:15 +1000 From: Johny Mattsson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030524 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: twesky References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:39:19 -0000 twesky wrote: > I am having ATA_DMA errors on 5.4R and 5 STABLE up to June 16 (haven't > done a cvsup again). It doesn't happen on 5.3R or lower. I've just upgraded my fileserver from 5.1-R to 5.4-R, and I'm seeing this problem too now on 3 out of 4 drives. > The exact error message is below: > > It happens within a few hours of use. The laptop will then reboot, > and fsck must be ran. After fsck the timeouts happen within a few > seconds of booting. My system uses a "SiI 0680 UDMA133 controller" in addition to the old built-in "Intel PIIX4 UDMA33 controller". My system drive hangs off the PIIX4 controller and I see no issues with it, only drives off the SiI; ad0: 8207MB [16676/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 ad4: 57241MB [116301/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA100 ad6: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata3-master UDMA100 ad7: 152627MB [310101/16/63] at ata3-slave UDMA100 Right after the upgrade things worked well for a couple of hours, and then I got a reboot all of a sudden. Upon inspection I found tons of both "READ_DMA timed out" as well as "WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error" messages in log prior to the reboot. After the reboot it went to do the fsck and made it perhaps halfway through it before it started churning out READ_DMA timed out messages again, followed by the "ad7: warning - removed from configuration" message. Things did not get better from there, but with each sucessive reboot more and more started going wrong. In order to be able to get the system to even boot in the end I had to physically disconnect the ad7 drive, but even so I'm getting READ_DMA timed out messages for ad4 and ad6. Since I'm getting WRITE_DMA errors on both ad6 and ad7 now (I haven't written anything to ad4 yet, so I don't know if I'll get errors on that one too), and I wasn't a few hours ago when I was running 5.1-R, I refuse to believe that two disks have gone bad in that timespan! I'm not sure what I should do at this point - theoretically I could proceed to roll back to 5.1 to prevent further data loss, but I'm guessing it'd be good if I kept it for a little while so that I could run tests for patches :-/ Seeing the comments about possible failing controller hardware, I might see if I can find a replacement controller tomorrow... any ideas in the meantime will be appreciated though! Still feels very iffy that this started happening right after the upgrade... I was expecting to get rid of some of the quirks from the early preview, not get far worse ones! :-( Oh, btw, using smartmontools' smartctl, I've gotten the information that ad4 has had 32 write errors in total, ad6 have had 0 (despite seeing the WRITE_DMA errors in the system log), and ad7 refuses to even talk SMART. ### Here's the contents of the dmesg from before I pulled ad7 out: Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Sun May 8 10:21:06 UTC 2005 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (467.73-MHz 686-class CPU) Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x665 Stepping = 5 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: Features=0x183f9ff Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: real memory = 805240832 (767 MB) Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: avail memory = 778231808 (742 MB) Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: npx0: on motherboard Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: npx0: INT 16 interface Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: acpi0: on motherboard Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: cpu0: on acpi0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: acpi_button0: on acpi0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: pcib0: port 0x5000-0x500f,0x4000-0x4041,0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: pci0: on pcib0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xe3ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: pci1: on pcib1 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: isa0: on isab0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 7.1 on pci0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: uhci0: port 0x9000-0x901f irq 11 at device 7.2 on pci0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: usb0: on uhci0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: usb0: USB revision 1.0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: atapci1: port 0xa400-0xa40f,0xa000-0xa003,0x9c00-0x9c07,0x9800-0x9803,0x9400-0x9407 mem 0xe9001000-0xe900 10ff irq 9 at device 10.0 on pci0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ata2: channel #0 on atapci1 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ata3: channel #1 on atapci1 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: pci0: at device 11.0 (no driver attached) Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ahc0: port 0xa800-0xa8ff mem 0xe9000000-0xe9000fff irq 10 at device 12.0 on pci0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: aic7880: Ultra Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/253 SCBs Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: rl0: port 0xac00-0xacff mem 0xe9002000-0xe90020ff irq 11 at device 13.0 on pci0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: miibus0: on rl0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: rlphy0: on miibus0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: rl0: Ethernet address: 00:40:f4:28:9d:20 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: sio0: type 16550A Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: sio1: type 16550A Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ppc0: port 0x778-0x77b,0x378-0x37b irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ppc0: SMC-like chipset ((ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/16 bytes threshold Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ppbus0: on ppc0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: plip0: on ppbus0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: lpt0: on ppbus0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: lpt0: Interrupt-driven port Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ppi0: on ppbus0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: kbd0 at atkbd0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: psm0: model IntelliMouse Explorer, device ID 4 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: orm0: at iomem 0xcd000-0xcd7ff,0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: pmtimer0 on isa0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: fdc0: cannot allocate I/O port (6 ports) Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: Timecounter "TSC" frequency 467729279 Hz quality 800 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ad0: 8207MB [16676/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ad4: 57241MB [116301/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA100 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ad6: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata3-master UDMA100 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: ad7: 152627MB [310101/16/63] at ata3-slave UDMA100 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: sa0: 5.000MB/s transfers (5.000MHz, offset 8) Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: sa1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: sa1: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: sa1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15) Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2device Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: cd0: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15) Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Jun 24 18:22:19 kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a Cheers, /Johny -- Johny Mattsson - Making IT work ,-. ,-. ,-. When all else fails, http://www.earthmagic.org _.' `-' `-' Murphy's Law still works! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 19:00:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057D016A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:00:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from twesky@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDCF43D49 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:00:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from twesky@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so517945wri for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:00:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LDrsW6wfvtX36dwdy8ESs3MKjc72QN2drDhXg7oCFAhlyJMTo2C9nqyi2fNVh7BI/+nfXLrHAduN+/Dc2g5tmqdozflB/U3aXsG3j+qwA5xFnTRHDfrR0cSsZkAPxjJ6gjrxZcaYwV7AGf+levzt7DWF7uF6awnPTc3/e2R5F5M= Received: by 10.54.42.17 with SMTP id p17mr1966853wrp; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.45.71 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8d02aed005062412001c7903b3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:00:08 -0500 From: twesky To: Johny Mattsson In-Reply-To: <42BC5353.1090807@earthmagic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> <42BC5353.1090807@earthmagic.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: twesky List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:00:09 -0000 I don't think it is a hardware problem. Unless you replace it with the exact same hardware, it'll be difficult to determine if it was the hardware. I haven't had any issues with 5.3R or any stable version before April 15. I am going to do some checking this weekend and see if it is hardware or software what is causing my timeouts. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 19:05:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D1516A41C; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:05:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from orb.pobox.com (orb.pobox.com [207.8.226.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F0643D4C; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:05:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from orb (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orb.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D598F3108; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:05:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from billdog.local.linnet.org (dsl-212-74-113-66.access.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.113.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by orb.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6891F95; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:05:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from brian by billdog.local.linnet.org with local (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DltUw-0000Il-8S; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:05:54 +0100 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:05:54 +0100 From: Brian Candler To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20050624190554.GA1063@uk.tiscali.com> References: <200506241803.28436.B.Candler@pobox.com> <200506241350.38689.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506241350.38689.jhb@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-ia32@freebsd.org, alfred@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pxeboot, NFS and root-path: bug or documentation error? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:05:48 -0000 On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 01:50:37PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > It uses TFTP to fetch the pxeboot binary itself. After that, it uses either > NFS or TFTP. By default it uses NFS to access /boot/loader and friends. If > you want it to just use TFTP and not use NFS at all, you need to recompile > pxeboot with LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT=yes defined in make. That is: > > % cd /sys/boot > % make clean > % make LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT=yes > % cp /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/pxeldr/pxeboot /usr/tftpboot Thank you, that's very clear. Re-reading the manpage I do now see the phrase "selectable through compile-time options"; perhaps it would be worth also showing those options. Is there any fundamental reason why both couldn't be compiled in at once, e.g. limitations on the pxeboot binary size? Or is it just awkward to implement? I would have no objection to options root-path = "tftp://192.168.0.1/usr/tftpboot" I would also have no objection to "pxeboot.nfs" and "pxeboot.tftp" being built :-) I'll try building the tftp version when back in the office next week. Thanks again, Brian. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 19:27:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4975516A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:27:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gmulder@infotechfl.com) Received: from pigeon.infotechfl.com (mailrelay.infotechfl.com [209.251.147.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1B443D53 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:27:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gmulder@infotechfl.com) Received: from [172.20.0.75] (gmulder.infotechfl.com [172.20.0.75]) by pigeon.infotechfl.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5OJRl002000 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:27:47 -0400 Message-ID: <42BC5EE2.2020003@infotechfl.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:28:34 -0400 From: Gary Mu1der User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> <20050621105154.GA36538@cell.sick.ru> <42B961B9.7A5856B3@freebsd.org> <20050623104230.GB61389@cell.sick.ru> <20050623141514.GD738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <20050623141514.GD738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:27:49 -0000 All, Can someone confirm that the following stack trace is showing the same problem, or not? I can reproduce the problem with the custom kernel config included below (which is basically GENERIC stripped of devices I don't have or need and IPFILTER added), but not with a stock GENERIC kernel. To cause the crash I'm running 20-30 instances of the following script: d5# cat arping.sh #!/bin/sh while : do arp -d 192.168.4.$1 >/dev/null 2>&1; ping -c 1 -t 1 192.168.4.$1 >/dev/null 2>&1; done d5# uname -a FreeBSD d5.bidx.com 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #6: Thu Jun 23 13:45:20 EDT 2005 root@d5.bidx.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DB-DUAL-AMD64-RAID5 amd64 d5# kgdb /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DB-DUAL-AMD64-RAID5/kernel.debug ./vmcore.5 [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"] GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd". #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:167 167 pcpu.h: No such file or directory. in pcpu.h (kgdb) bt #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:167 #1 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #2 0xffffffff802557b7 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:410 #3 0xffffffff80255fef in panic (fmt=0xffffff00b5907500 " ë6µ") at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:566 #4 0xffffffff8029ad2a in sbdrop_locked (sb=0xffffffffb6274860, len=1146) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket2.c:1149 #5 0xffffffff8029afe2 in sbflush_locked (sb=0xffffffffb6274860) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket2.c:1116 #6 0xffffffff8029b049 in sbrelease_locked (sb=0xffffffffb6274860, so=0xffffff00a0a2a8a0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket2.c:564 #7 0xffffffff8029b0d5 in sbrelease (sb=0xffffffffb6274860, so=0xffffff00a0a2a8a0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket2.c:577 #8 0xffffffff80297b03 in sorflush (so=0xffffff00a0a2a8a0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1483 #9 0xffffffff80297e42 in sofree (so=0xffffff00a0a2a8a0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:407 #10 0xffffffff80298467 in soclose (so=0xffffff00a0a2a8a0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:485 #11 0xffffffff802847b5 in soo_close (fp=0xffffff009ca95b60, td=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_socket.c:299 #12 0xffffffff8022c2c0 in fdrop_locked (fp=0xffffff009ca95b60, td=0xffffff00b5907500) at file.h:288 #13 0xffffffff8022c40a in closef (fp=0xffffff009ca95b60, td=0xffffff00b5907500) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:1920 #14 0xffffffff8022e5be in fdfree (td=0xffffff00b5907500) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:1624 #15 0xffffffff80238bd0 in exit1 (td=0xffffff00b5907500, rv=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exit.c:236 #16 0xffffffff8023a04e in sys_exit (td=0x0, uap=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exit.c:93 #17 0xffffffff8035cd8c in syscall (frame= {tf_rdi = 0, tf_rsi = 5263360, tf_rdx = 0, tf_rcx = 34366596768, tf_r8 = 0, tf_r9 = 140737488350136, tf_rax = 1, tf_rbx = 0, tf_rbp = 3, tf_r10 = -1099499764224, tf_r11 = 515, tf_r12 = 140---Type to continue, or q to quit--- 737488350376, tf_r13 = 0, tf_r14 = 0, tf_r15 = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_addr = 34368259080, tf_flags = 0, tf_err = 2, tf_rip = 34366590280, tf_cs = 43, tf_rflags = 514, tf_rsp = 140737488350296, tf_ss = 35}) at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:771 #18 0xffffffff80349f88 in Xfast_syscall () at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:248 #19 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #20 0x0000000000505000 in ?? () #21 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #22 0x000000080068a6a0 in ?? () #23 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #24 0x00007fffffffebb8 in ?? () #25 0x0000000000000001 in ?? () #26 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #27 0x0000000000000003 in ?? () #28 0xffffff0000b50600 in ?? () #29 0x0000000000000203 in ?? () #30 0x00007fffffffeca8 in ?? () #31 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #32 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #33 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #34 0x000000000000000c in ?? () #35 0x0000000800820408 in ?? () #36 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #37 0x0000000000000002 in ?? () #38 0x0000000800688d48 in ?? () #39 0x000000000000002b in ?? () #40 0x0000000000000202 in ?? () #41 0x00007fffffffec58 in ?? () #42 0x0000000000000023 in ?? () #43 0x00007fffffffe968 in ?? () #44 0x0000000000000023 in ?? () #45 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #46 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #47 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #48 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #49 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #50 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #51 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #52 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #53 0x00000000a14b4000 in ?? () #54 0xffffffffb6274c40 in ?? () #55 0x0000000001010000 in ?? () #56 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #57 0xffffff00b536eba0 in ?? () #58 0xffffff00ec19a780 in ?? () #59 0xffffffffb6274b58 in ?? () #60 0xffffff00b5907500 in ?? () #61 0xffffffff8026a26c in sched_switch (td=0x0, newtd=0x3, flags=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c:881 #62 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #63 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #64 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #65 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #66 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #67 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #68 0x000000000000037f in ?? () #69 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #70 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #71 0x0000ffff00001f80 in ?? () #72 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #73 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #74 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #75 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #76 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #77 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #78 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #79 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #80 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #81 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #82 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #83 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #84 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #85 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #86 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #87 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #88 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #89 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #90 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #91 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #92 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #93 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #94 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #95 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #96 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #97 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #98 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #99 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #100 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #101 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #102 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #103 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #104 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #105 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #106 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #107 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #108 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #109 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #110 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #111 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #112 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #113 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #114 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #115 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #116 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #117 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #118 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #119 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #120 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #121 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #122 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #123 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #124 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #125 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #126 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #127 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #128 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #129 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #130 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #131 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #132 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #133 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffb6275000 (kgdb) d5# cat DB-DUAL-AMD64-RAID5 # # GENERIC -- Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64 # # For more information on this file, please read the handbook section on # Kernel Configuration Files: # # http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html # # The handbook is also available locally in /usr/share/doc/handbook # if you've installed the doc distribution, otherwise always see the # FreeBSD World Wide Web server (http://www.FreeBSD.org/) for the # latest information. # # An exhaustive list of options and more detailed explanations of the # device lines is also present in the ../../conf/NOTES and NOTES files. # If you are in doubt as to the purpose or necessity of a line, check first # in NOTES. # # $FreeBSD: src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC,v 1.421.2.8 2005/03/30 01:05:53 murray Exp $ machine amd64 cpu HAMMER ident DB-DUAL-AMD64-RAID5 # Debug Options makeoptions DEBUG=-g options DDB options KDB options BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER options INVARIANT_SUPPORT options INVARIANTS options WITNESS options WITNESS_KDB options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN # To statically compile in device wiring instead of /boot/device.hints #hints "GENERIC.hints" # Default places to look for devices. options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler #options SCHED_ULE # 4BSD experimental scheduler options INET # InterNETworking #options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support #options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories #options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device #options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client #options NFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server #options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT #options NTFS # NT File System #options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options COMPAT_43 # Needed by COMPAT_LINUX32 options COMPAT_IA32 # Compatible with i386 binaries options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 options COMPAT_LINUX32 # Compatible with i386 linux binaries options SCSI_DELAY=5000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~128k to driver. options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~215k to driver. options ADAPTIVE_GIANT # Giant mutex is adaptive. # Workarounds for some known-to-be-broken chipsets (nVidia nForce3-Pro150) device atpic # 8259A compatability options NO_MIXED_MODE # Don't penalize working chipsets # Linux 32-bit ABI support options LINPROCFS # Cannot be a module yet. # Bus support. Do not remove isa, even if you have no isa slots device acpi device isa device pci # Floppy drives device fdc # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata #device atadisk # ATA disk drives #device ataraid # ATA RAID drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives #device atapist # ATAPI tape drives options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering # SCSI Controllers #device ahc # AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices device ahd # AHA39320/29320 and onboard AIC79xx devices #device amd # AMD 53C974 (Tekram DC-390(T)) #device isp # Qlogic family #device ispfw # Firmware for QLogic HBAs- normally a module #device mpt # LSI-Logic MPT-Fusion #device ncr # NCR/Symbios Logic #device sym # NCR/Symbios Logic (newer chipsets + those of `ncr') #device trm # Tekram DC395U/UW/F DC315U adapters #device adv # Advansys SCSI adapters #device adw # Advansys wide SCSI adapters #device aic # Adaptec 15[012]x SCSI adapters, AIC-6[23]60. #device bt # Buslogic/Mylex MultiMaster SCSI adapters # SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) #device ch # SCSI media changers device da # Direct Access (disks) device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) # RAID controllers interfaced to the SCSI subsystem #device amr # AMI MegaRAID #device ciss # Compaq Smart RAID 5* #device dpt # DPT Smartcache III, IV - See NOTES for options #device iir # Intel Integrated RAID #device ips # IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID #device mly # Mylex AcceleRAID/eXtremeRAID #device twa # 3ware 9000 series PATA/SATA RAID # RAID controllers device aac # Adaptec FSA RAID #device aacp # SCSI passthrough for aac (requires CAM) #device ida # Compaq Smart RAID #device mlx # Mylex DAC960 family #XXX pointer/int warnings #device pst # Promise Supertrak SX6000 #device twe # 3ware ATA RAID # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse device vga # VGA video card driver device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc # PCCARD (PCMCIA) support # PCMCIA and cardbus bridge support #device cbb # cardbus (yenta) bridge #device pccard # PC Card (16-bit) bus #device cardbus # CardBus (32-bit) bus # Serial (COM) ports #device sio # 8250, 16[45]50 based serial ports # Parallel port #device ppc #device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) #device lpt # Printer #device plip # TCP/IP over parallel #device ppi # Parallel port interface device #device vpo # Requires scbus and da # If you've got a "dumb" serial or parallel PCI card that is # supported by the puc(4) glue driver, uncomment the following # line to enable it (connects to the sio and/or ppc drivers): #device puc # PCI Ethernet NICs. #device de # DEC/Intel DC21x4x (``Tulip'') #device em # Intel PRO/1000 adapter Gigabit Ethernet Card #device ixgb # Intel PRO/10GbE Ethernet Card #device txp # 3Com 3cR990 (``Typhoon'') #device vx # 3Com 3c590, 3c595 (``Vortex'') # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these NICs! device miibus # MII bus support #device bfe # Broadcom BCM440x 10/100 Ethernet device bge # Broadcom BCM570xx Gigabit Ethernet #device dc # DEC/Intel 21143 and various workalikes device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558) #device lge # Level 1 LXT1001 gigabit Ethernet #device nge # NatSemi DP83820 gigabit Ethernet #device pcn # AMD Am79C97x PCI 10/100 (precedence over 'lnc') #device re # RealTek 8139C+/8169/8169S/8110S #device rl # RealTek 8129/8139 #device sf # Adaptec AIC-6915 (``Starfire'') #device sis # Silicon Integrated Systems SiS 900/SiS 7016 #device sk # SysKonnect SK-984x & SK-982x gigabit Ethernet #device ste # Sundance ST201 (D-Link DFE-550TX) #device ti # Alteon Networks Tigon I/II gigabit Ethernet #device tl # Texas Instruments ThunderLAN #device tx # SMC EtherPower II (83c170 ``EPIC'') #device vge # VIA VT612x gigabit Ethernet #device vr # VIA Rhine, Rhine II #device wb # Winbond W89C840F #device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'') # ISA Ethernet NICs. pccard NICs included. #device cs # Crystal Semiconductor CS89x0 NIC # 'device ed' requires 'device miibus' # XXX kvtop brokenness, pointer/int warnings #device ed # NE[12]000, SMC Ultra, 3c503, DS8390 cards #device ex # Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 and Pro/10+ #device ep # Etherlink III based cards #device fe # Fujitsu MB8696x based cards # XXX kvtop brokenness, pointer/int warnings #device lnc # NE2100, NE32-VL Lance Ethernet cards #device sn # SMC's 9000 series of Ethernet chips #device xe # Xircom pccard Ethernet # Wireless NIC cards #device wlan # 802.11 support #device an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs. #device awi # BayStack 660 and others #device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs. # Pseudo devices. device loop # Network loopback device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices device io # I/O device device random # Entropy device device ether # Ethernet support #device sl # Kernel SLIP #device ppp # Kernel PPP #device tun # Packet tunnel. device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) device md # Memory "disks" #device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling #device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) # The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! # Note that 'bpf' is required for DHCP. #device bpf # Berkeley packet filter # USB support #device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface #device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface #device usb # USB Bus (required) #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices #device ugen # Generic #device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" #device ukbd # Keyboard #device ulpt # Printer #device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da #device ums # Mouse #device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player #device uscanner # Scanners # USB Ethernet, requires mii #device aue # ADMtek USB Ethernet #device axe # ASIX Electronics USB Ethernet #device cue # CATC USB Ethernet #device kue # Kawasaki LSI USB Ethernet #device rue # RealTek RTL8150 USB Ethernet # FireWire support #device firewire # FireWire bus code #device sbp # SCSI over FireWire (Requires scbus and da) #device fwe # Ethernet over FireWire (non-standard!) # SMP #device apic # I/O APIC options SMP # SMP support # IPFilter options IPFILTER options IPFILTER_LOG options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 19:45:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EDD16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:45:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gmulder@infotechfl.com) Received: from pigeon.infotechfl.com (mailrelay.infotechfl.com [209.251.147.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE0543D49 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:45:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gmulder@infotechfl.com) Received: from [172.20.0.75] (gmulder.infotechfl.com [172.20.0.75]) by pigeon.infotechfl.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5OJjR003816 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:45:27 -0400 Message-ID: <42BC6305.7000802@infotechfl.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:46:13 -0400 From: Gary Mu1der User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> <20050621105154.GA36538@cell.sick.ru> <42B961B9.7A5856B3@freebsd.org> <20050623104230.GB61389@cell.sick.ru> <20050623141514.GD738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <42BC5EE2.2020003@infotechfl.com> In-Reply-To: <42BC5EE2.2020003@infotechfl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:45:28 -0000 Sorry, I forgot to add that this is a Tyan Thunder K8SPRO w/dual AMD Opteron Processors, model no. 246, 4GB of RAM and an Adaptec 2200S RAID controller. The NIC being used is the onboard Broadcom Gigabit Ethernet (bge). Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 21:34:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE66B16A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:34:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from mail09.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail09.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6230543D1D for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:34:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c220-239-8-51.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.8.51]) by mail09.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5OLYYgr022163 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 25 Jun 2005 07:34:34 +1000 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5OLYXRx075342; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 07:34:33 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id j5OLYXT4075341; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 07:34:33 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 07:34:33 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: Stephen McKay Message-ID: <20050624213433.GA50157@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <200506241231.j5OCV6jp047730@dungeon.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506241231.j5OCV6jp047730@dungeon.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Data corruption in cd9660 on FreeBSD 4.11? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:34:36 -0000 On Fri, 2005-Jun-24 22:31:06 +1000, Stephen McKay wrote: >I'm experiencing data corruption when reading CDs and DVDs on FreeBSD 4.11. ... >So, can anyone suggest any more tests I could try? Or is there a kind of >hardware fault that could cause this substitution of whole blocks read from >CDs without causing any other problems? You might like to post the relevant sections of a verbose boot - the ATA and CD probes. Are you running the CD/DVD drives in PIO or UDMA modes? In the former, the CPU is reading the data from the CD and writing it to memory. In the latter, the CPU tells the disk controller where to write. It could be instructive to change modes and see what happens. Have you tried anything other than ISO9660 filesystems on a physical CD? What happens if you just dd the CD-ROM? What happens if you use a vnode mount (see vnconfig(8)) of an ISO filesystem sitting in a UFS filesystem? Anything unusual in your kernel config file? Have you tried building a kernel with WITNESS and/or DIAGNOSTIC? Any chance of you repeating the tests with a 5.x system? Maybe on a spare small partition or using a 5.4-RELEASE disk1 as a live filesystem. -- Peter Jeremy From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 22:58:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2332716A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:58:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Received: from schubert.byrnehq.com (dsl-33-12.dsl.netsource.ie [213.79.33.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E00643D49 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:58:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Received: from localhost ([192.168.10.102]) by schubert.byrnehq.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5ONwp4e011808; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:58:52 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-current@byrnehq.com) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:58:56 +0100 From: Tony Byrne Organization: ByrneHQ X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <941771390.20050624235856@byrnehq.com> To: Martin In-Reply-To: <42BC1E48.3010808@nurfuerspam.de> References: <42BC1E48.3010808@nurfuerspam.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ByrneHQ-SA-Hits: -0.945 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 192.168.10.254 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re[2]: ATA DMA timeouts [NOT FIXED] (forget my last mail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tony Byrne List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:58:52 -0000 Hello Martin, M> believe it or not. After sending the last mail and closing M> firefox, the system has been hanging for a few seconds and M> spit this out: M> ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=226025086 Yeah, I updated and rebuilt on seeing your email, but found it did little. I has TIMEOUTs again within 10 minutes of rebooting. M> Sorry for causing noise. :( M> I'm going to test a kernel every week and report, when the M> problems are gone. I'd certainly be interested in hearing about your results, but from the general lack of discussion of the problem on this list, I'm guessing we may be on our own. I'm not sure anyone is actually working on a "fix", because I'm not sure the problem is recognized. I have two separate Intel IHC5 based boxes affected by DMA TIMEOUTS, both with SATA drives and I'd like to get to the bottom of this. Regards, Tony. -- Tony Byrne From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 04:33:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1277516A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 04:33:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E710943D48 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 04:33:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D60E972DDF; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D053972DDD; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:33:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Philippe PEGON In-Reply-To: <42B70E62.3080801@crc.u-strasbg.fr> Message-ID: <20050624213257.T47411@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20050617150950.F1236@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> <20050619161113.V83634@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20050619180740.H750@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> <42B7071F.30704@crc.u-strasbg.fr> <42B70E62.3080801@crc.u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Mitch Parks , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4-p1 crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 04:33:48 -0000 On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Philippe PEGON wrote: > Philippe PEGON wrote: > > Mitch Parks wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Doug White wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Mitch Parks wrote: > >>> > >>>> Below are details regarding another crash on a Dell 2600 SMP (HTT > >>>> and USB > >>>> disabled). It has been 9 days since the last crash. I didn't have > >>>> the serial > >>>> console in place for this last crash, but it is now. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> As noted, the ttwakeup() panic is a known bug. The best thing we have > >>> for > >>> a fix is this patch: > >>> > >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tty.t_pgrp.diff > >>> > >>> Please give it a try and report back if you have any more panics (or > >>> don't :-) ). > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks! This patch appears to be for 5.3, but I manually applied the > >> chunk of the patch that didn't apply cleanly and the countdown is on. > >> > >> I'll report back in 10 days unless something bad happens before then. > >> > >> Below is the patch chunk #10 that I actually applied rather than the > >> one given. If I've done something bad here by removing the PGRP_LOCK > >> please let me know. > > > > > > I'm not a kernel developper, but if you remove > > > > PGRP_LOCK(tp->t_pgrp); > > > > and the PGRP_UNLOCK(tp->t_pgrp) in the if condition (removed by the > > orginal patch) > > > > there is maybe another "PGRP_UNLOCK(tp->t_pgrp);" to remove if the if > > condition doesn't match, line 2528 in the original 5.4-p1 tty.c ? > > after having applied the patch (with your modification), there is no > "sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock)" in the ttyinfo function if the three > conditions failed. Maybe we have just to replace > "PGRP_UNLOCK(tp->t_pgrp);" line 2528 by "sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock)" ? > I think that we need the helps of a kernel developper. No, that would be a leaked lock, which would cause hangs. More likely its some other case that got missed that needs locks extended to it, or the aliased pgrp isn't the underlying problem. I've run out of time to debug this, unfortunately... > > > > >> > >> .... > >> Hunk #6 succeeded at 1154 (offset -51 lines). > >> Hunk #7 succeeded at 1215 (offset -6 lines). > >> Hunk #8 succeeded at 1203 (offset -51 lines). > >> Hunk #9 succeeded at 1946 (offset -5 lines). > >> Hunk #10 failed at 2562. > >> Hunk #11 succeeded at 2847 (offset -212 lines). > >> 1 out of 11 hunks failed--saving rejects to tty.c.rej > >> > >> > >> @@ -2495,19 +2511,21 @@ > >> * On return following a ttyprintf(), we set tp->t_rocount to > >> 0 so > >> * that pending input will be retyped on BS. > >> */ > >> + sx_slock(&proctree_lock); > >> if (tp->t_session == NULL) { > >> + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); > >> ttyprintf(tp, "not a controlling terminal\n"); > >> tp->t_rocount = 0; > >> return; > >> } > >> if (tp->t_pgrp == NULL) { > >> + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); > >> ttyprintf(tp, "no foreground process group\n"); > >> tp->t_rocount = 0; > >> return; > >> } > >> - PGRP_LOCK(tp->t_pgrp); > >> - if ((p = LIST_FIRST(&tp->t_pgrp->pg_members)) == 0) { > >> - PGRP_UNLOCK(tp->t_pgrp); > >> + if ((p = LIST_FIRST(&tp->t_pgrp->pg_members)) == NULL) { > >> + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); > >> ttyprintf(tp, "empty foreground process group\n"); > >> tp->t_rocount = 0; > >> return; > >> > >> Or the complete patch: > >> http://kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu/~mitch/crash/tty_5.4.patch > >> > >> Mitch Parks > >> mitch@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 06:10:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EBB16A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:10:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B429B43D55 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:10:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5P6AsWA041816; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:40:55 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:40:44 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2363580.fX6dWphaP4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506251540.50639.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 203.31.81.10 Subject: 5.4 Installer + Promise FT100TX2 = Loader crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:10:58 -0000 --nextPart2363580.fX6dWphaP4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I am updating an old 4.x system to 5.4 here and it has a Promise FT100TX2 R= AID=20 controller (in mirror). The problem is that when I boot the CD the loader crashes (does a reg dump)= =20 but only if the card is present and an array is defined. I can't record wha= t=20 the dump is because it continually sprays the dump down the screen which=20 makes it unreadable :( I have seen this on an AMD64 system (I used the same RAID card in it) and g= ot=20 the same problem. To work around it on that system I installed via the=20 motherboard IDE controller and then moved the disk over to the RAID=20 controller. It only seems to affect booting the installer - once the system is installe= d=20 it boots from the RAID card just fine (!) I just tried booting from floppy and that works (?!) although that method=20 doesn't probe my PS/2 keyboard for some reason :-/ Does anyone have any suggestions for fixing the RAID + CD boot problem? Thanks. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart2363580.fX6dWphaP4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCvPVq5ZPcIHs/zowRAvFQAJ9iXr1a8Ln8jY8LRcAWiBuwx2MZXACfQ3Nq MuIEsvd/u2Fom7vBDZN3tuc= =waX9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2363580.fX6dWphaP4-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 06:22:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB0216A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:22:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm@idiom.com) Received: from delight.idiom.com (delight.idiom.com [216.240.32.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B668443D1D for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:22:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm@idiom.com) Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by delight.idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6487A1F9AD1 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:22:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from idiom.com (mwm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5P6MPNX032983; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:22:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mwm@idiom.com) Received: (from mwm@localhost) by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j5P6MOGf032978; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:22:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mwm) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:22:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Meyer Message-Id: <200506250622.j5P6MOGf032978@idiom.com> To: stable@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: 5.4 fails to find boot drive, then panics. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:22:25 -0000 I'm trying to install 5.4-RELEASE off of CDROM on an ASUS P5S800 motherboard with a SATA drive in it. The SATA drive shows up as ad4 during the install process, and the install goes just fine. But the resulting system fails to boot. It goes through the boot sequence, draws the cute 5.x booto menu, then issues the messages: Can't work out which disk we are booting from. Guessed BIOS device 0xffffffff not found by probes, defaulting to disk0: panic: free: guard1 fail @0x5195c from /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader/../../common/module.c:957 --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- Booting with debug messages doesn't change this at all. There don't appear to be any bug reports related to this problem. Checking google turns up a lot of peole who had this problem, but the only solution was a guy who had a bad disk. I checked the md5 sum on the downloaded image, and the software that I used to burn the image (Disk Utility on Mac OS X) claimed to verify the burned disk - which I believe means it did a checksum on the image and the disk. There is an AGA DVD drive in the system on the secondary master. I thought that it was getting confused by the drive numbers, and checked the bios to see if I could turn off the ATA controllers. There's apparently no way to do that. I suspect the panic is due to a bug in code that is only exercised if the boot "can't work out which disk we are booting from." So if I can solve that, the system should boot ok, and I can file a bug report for the panic. I'm hoping that I can tweak a boot config file to solve the boot problem, and that someone here knows what needs to be tweaked. Maybe a diffferent boot loader would solve the problem? Thanks, X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FFF16A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:28:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-2.paradise.net.nz (bm-2a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.58.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2674C43D48 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:28:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (smtp-2b.paradise.net.nz [202.0.32.211]) by linda-2.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IIM005ZJNAVIK@linda-2.paradise.net.nz> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:28:07 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-14-110.paradise.net.nz [218.101.14.110]) by smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651669E699; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:28:07 +1200 (NZST) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:28:06 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <200506251540.50639.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Daniel O'Connor Message-id: <42BCF976.4060902@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050511) References: <200506251540.50639.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4 Installer + Promise FT100TX2 = Loader crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:28:09 -0000 I have experienced this (since about 5.3) on a dual PIII Tyan S1834. In my case perseverance seems to pay off - one in (approx) 10 boots will work... Mark Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Hi, > I am updating an old 4.x system to 5.4 here and it has a Promise FT100TX2 RAID > controller (in mirror). > > The problem is that when I boot the CD the loader crashes (does a reg dump) > but only if the card is present and an array is defined. I can't record what > the dump is because it continually sprays the dump down the screen which > makes it unreadable :( > > I have seen this on an AMD64 system (I used the same RAID card in it) and got > the same problem. To work around it on that system I installed via the > motherboard IDE controller and then moved the disk over to the RAID > controller. > > It only seems to affect booting the installer - once the system is installed > it boots from the RAID card just fine (!) > > I just tried booting from floppy and that works (?!) although that method > doesn't probe my PS/2 keyboard for some reason :-/ > > Does anyone have any suggestions for fixing the RAID + CD boot problem? > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 06:47:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC64B16A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:47:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lsp3@gte.net) Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net (vms042pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946AD43D4C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:47:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lsp3@gte.net) Received: from Pentium166 ([71.103.102.121]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IIM00BO3O7A32L7@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:47:35 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:43:31 -0700 From: "Leland" To: "freebsd-stable" Message-id: <013701c57951$34bf6ec0$0c01a8c0@Pentium166> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Subject: cvsup from 4.11-RELEASE to 4.11-RELEASE-p1 28,000 errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:47:36 -0000 I have got to be doing someting wrong, it is right in front of me and I just don't seel it. Hope someone can help, thanks. >From a clean install of 4.11-RELEASE with All Distributions, cvsup-without-gui was then installed from ports. cvsup -g -L 2 cvs-supfile will produce src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_4_11 with 8310752 bytes and more than 28,000 lines starting with "C src/...." Here is my cvs-supfile: *default host=cvsup9.us.FreeBSD.org *default tag=RELENG_4_11 *default date=2005.03.28.15.57.00 *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup *default prefix=/usr/local/etc/cvsup *default release=cvs *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all ports-all doc-all cvsroot-all Here is the first 19 lines of checkouts.cvs:RELENG_4_11 "C " errors C src/COPYRIGHT,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550885#173563#444 1.4.2.1.2.1 2005.01.01.23.24.04 2#871#110#11046218444#61173#644 C src/Makefile,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11189457726#2859233#444 1.234.2.19 2003.04.16.09.59.40 2#871#110#10504871804#84803#644 C src/Makefile.inc1,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11189457726#4008533#444 1.141.2.70.2.1 2004.12.17.13.41.58 2#871#110#11032909185#243063#644 C src/Makefile.upgrade,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11063134785#295583#444 1.17 99.08.28.01.35.58 2#871#19#9358041584#97613#644 C src/README,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550885#267873#444 1.15.2.4 2002.04.26.16.01.35 2#871#110#10198368954#26993#644 C src/UPDATING,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11184490206#4967663#444 1.73.2.91.2.10 2005.05.13.00.02.11 2#871#110#11159425315#451853#644 C src/bin/Makefile,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550885#129343#444 1.15.2.2 2000.10.31.09.43.57 2#871#19#9729854373#4723#644 C src/bin/Makefile.inc,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550885#103563#444 1.11.2.1 2001.12.13.09.58.12 2#871#110#10082374923#1693#644 C src/bin/cat/Makefile,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550884#41063#444 1.5 99.08.27.23.13.32 2#871#19#9357956123#1443#644 C src/bin/cat/cat.1,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550885#228223#444 1.10.2.9 2001.12.14.14.22.08 2#871#110#10083397284#52633#644 C src/bin/cat/cat.c,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550885#277923#444 1.14.2.8 2002.06.29.05.09.26 2#871#110#10253273664#72173#644 C src/bin/chio/Makefile,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550884#66293#444 1.6.2.1 2001.07.28.19.22.01 2#871#19#9963481213#2043#644 C src/bin/chio/chio.1,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550885#300653#444 1.10.2.8 2003.05.16.22.43.15 2#871#110#10531249954#84603#644 C src/bin/chio/chio.c,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550885#680433#444 1.15.2.3 2001.07.28.19.22.01 2#871#19#9963481215#273603#644 C src/bin/chio/defs.h,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550884#69333#444 1.2.2.1 2001.07.28.19.22.01 2#871#19#9963481214#24423#644 C src/bin/chio/pathnames.h,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550884#45253#444 1.2 99.08.27.23.13.35 2#871#19#9357956154#18383#644 C src/bin/chmod/Makefile,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550884#56673#444 1.5.2.1 2001.08.01.00.34.15 2#871#19#9966260553#1643#644 C src/bin/chmod/chmod.1,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550885#384663#444 1.17.2.16 2003.02.24.03.01.00 2#871#110#10460556604#91573#644 C src/bin/chmod/chmod.c,v RELENG_4_11 2005.06.08.21.29.53 2#871#110#11153550885#247663#444 1.16.2.7 2003.11.14.15.27.08 2#871#110#10688236284#57433#644 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 07:35:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D71A16A41C; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 07:35:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonewolf-freebsd@earthmagic.org) Received: from ppp162-248.static.internode.on.net (ppp162-248.static.internode.on.net [150.101.162.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84CA43D1D; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 07:35:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonewolf-freebsd@earthmagic.org) Received: from earthmagic.org (unknown [192.168.2.3]) by ppp162-248.static.internode.on.net (Postfix-MSA) with ESMTP id BC26291F4; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:32:43 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <42BD0926.8000804@earthmagic.org> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:35:02 +1000 From: Johny Mattsson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030524 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> <42BC5353.1090807@earthmagic.org> <8d02aed005062412001c7903b3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8d02aed005062412001c7903b3@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: twesky@gmail.com, sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors - [ workaround for me ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 07:35:08 -0000 Hi all, Today I've taken a fresh stab at the problem (I'm never at my best at 5am in the morning having worked through the night), and I have managed to come up with what appears to amount to a successful workaround. It would be good if my observations could be confirmed by someone else. Basically, the problem seems to be related to using more than one channel on the IDE controller. Data points for this are: [ SiI 0680 ] Channel 1: 40 GB Seagate Channel 2: 60 GB Seagate + 160 GB Western Digital Result: 200k worth of "DMA_READ timed out" and "DMA_WRITE UDMA ICRC error" messages, inability to obtain SMART info from the WD drive, WD drive info garbled, and WD drive being removed/detached from the config. The errors only appeared after a few hours operation, but once they were there, no amount of reboots would get rid of them/improve the situation. To attempt to save the data on the WD disk before the FS got completely hammered, I pulled it out, and observed the following: [ SiI 0680 ] Channel 1: 40 GB Seagate Channel 2: 60 GB Seagate Result: DMA_READ timed out errors for both drives, and "DMA_WRITE UDMA ICRC error" messages for the 60 GB Seagate. Since I had an older ATA-100 controller available, I tried with it (it can't handle >120GB drives though, so I couldn't as many combinations as I would have liked): [ CMD 649 ] Channel 1: 40 GB Seagate Channel 2: 60 GB Seagate Result: DMA_READ timed out errors, but only when both drives are in use at the same time. Running fsck on a slice on either drive in parallell reliably reproduced the DMA_READ errors. Whenever an error was reported for one drive, another error for the other drive always followed right after. [ CMD 649 ] Channel 1: Channel 2: 40 GB Seagate + 60 GB Seagate Result: No error messages. [ CMD 649 ] Channel 1: 40 GB Seagate + 60 GB Seagate Channel 2: Result: No error messages. Encouraged by these findings, I swapped back to the SiI controller to test the 160 GB drive: [ SiI 0680 ] Channel 1: Channel 2: 160 GB WD Result: No error messages [ SiI 0680 ] Channel 1: 160 GB WD Channel 2: Result: No error messages Finally, I tried everything together: [ SiI 0680 ] Channel 1: 160 GB WD Channel 2: [ CMD 649 ] Channel 1: 40 GB Seagate + 60 GB Seagate Channel 2: Result: No errors messages. What I haven't mentioned in the above is that I also tried some combinations with different cables, and also at reduced speed (UDM66 vs UDMA100). Neither changes had any effect on the behaviour. With the WD drive alone on the SiI 0680, I was also able to retrieve SMART information from it, and it's showing no errors for the drive at all. Likewise so for the 60 GB Seagate drive. All drives pass their self-tests without any errors. As mentioned in my previous email, my system drive is hanging off the built-in PIIX4 controller, as a single drive and only one channel on the controller used. I never saw any errors for that drive throughout my testing. My conclusion is thusly that there is something that's crept in that's affecting stability when multiple channels are used on the same controller. I'm not versed enough in driver internals to know if it's IRQ, DMA, ISR or anything-else related though. Below are my latest dmesg and pciconf listings - hopefully this will help someone locate the culprit. (Soren?) So, now I'm stuck with a system with three IDE controllers and one SCSI controller, and a motherboard that is utterly confused when I ask it boot off an external controller... (i.e. I can only boot off the built-in controller now). Please let me know if there's some other info I can get for you; I'll have limited ability to move drives around since this is the file server and people get annoyed when it's unavailable, but do ask if you think it will help you! :) Cheers, /Johny ======= dmesg ======== Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Sun May 8 10:21:06 UTC 2005 root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (467.73-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x665 Stepping = 5 Features=0x183f9ff real memory = 805240832 (767 MB) avail memory = 778231808 (742 MB) npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0x5000-0x500f,0x4000-0x4041,0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xe3ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x 3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0x9000-0x901f irq 11 at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) atapci1: port 0xa400-0xa40f,0xa000-0xa003,0x9c00-0 x9c07,0x9800-0x9803,0x9400-0x9407 mem 0xea001000-0xea0010ff irq 11 at device 9.0 on pci0 ata2: channel #0 on atapci1 ata3: channel #1 on atapci1 atapci2: port 0xb800-0xb80f,0xb400-0xb403,0xb000-0xb007,0xac00-0xac03,0xa800-0xa807 irq 9 at device 10.0 on pci0 ata4: channel #0 on atapci2 ata5: channel #1 on atapci2 pci0: at device 11.0 (no driver attached) ahc0: port 0xbc00-0xbcff mem 0xea000000-0xea000fff irq 10 at device 12.0 on pci0 aic7880: Ultra Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/253 SCBs rl0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem 0xea002000-0xea0020ff irq 11 at device 13.0 on pci0 miibus0: on rl0 rlphy0: on miibus0 rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto rl0: Ethernet address: 00:40:f4:28:9d:20 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x778-0x77b,0x378-0x37b irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/16 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model IntelliMouse Explorer, device ID 4 orm0: at iomem 0xd0000-0xd07ff,0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 fdc0: cannot allocate I/O port (6 ports) sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 467728754 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec ad0: 8207MB [16676/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 ad4: 152627MB [310101/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA100 ad8: 57241MB [116301/16/63] at ata4-master UDMA100 ad9: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata4-slave UDMA100 Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device sa0: 5.000MB/s transfers (5.000MHz, offset 8) sa1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 sa1: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device sa1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15) cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ----------------------- ======= pciconf -lv ========== # pciconf -lv agp0@pci0:0:0: class=0x060000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x71908086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82443BX/ZX 440BX/ZX CPU to PCI Bridge (AGP Implemented)' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI pcib1@pci0:1:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x71918086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82443BX/ZX 440BX/ZX AGPset PCI-to-PCI bridge' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI isab0@pci0:7:0: class=0x060100 card=0x00000000 chip=0x71108086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4/4E/4M ISA Bridge' class = bridge subclass = PCI-ISA atapci0@pci0:7:1: class=0x010180 card=0x00000000 chip=0x71118086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4/4E/4M IDE Controller' class = mass storage subclass = ATA uhci0@pci0:7:2: class=0x0c0300 card=0x00000000 chip=0x71128086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4/4E/4M USB Interface' class = serial bus subclass = USB none0@pci0:7:3: class=0x068000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x71138086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4/4E/4M Power Management Controller' class = bridge atapci1@pci0:9:0: class=0x010400 card=0x36801095 chip=0x06801095 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Silicon Image Inc (Was: CMD Technology Inc)' device = 'SiI 0680 (Was: PCI-0680) Ultra ATA133 EIDE Controller' class = mass storage subclass = RAID atapci2@pci0:10:0: class=0x010400 card=0xf5ffffff chip=0x06491095 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Silicon Image Inc (Was: CMD Technology Inc)' device = 'PCI-649 Ultra ATA/100 PCI to IDE/ATA Controller' class = mass storage subclass = RAID none1@pci0:11:0: class=0x030000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x0519102b rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Matrox Electronic Systems Ltd.' device = 'MGA-2064W Storm (Millennium board)' class = display subclass = VGA ahc0@pci0:12:0: class=0x010000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x81789004 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Adaptec Inc' device = 'AHA-2940U/UW/2940D Ultra/Ultra Wide/Dual SCSI Host Adapter' class = mass storage subclass = SCSI rl0@pci0:13:0: class=0x020000 card=0x813910ec chip=0x813910ec rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device = 'RT8139 (A/B/C/810x/813x/C+) Fast Ethernet Adapter' class = network subclass = ethernet -------------------------- -- Johny Mattsson - Making IT work ,-. ,-. ,-. When all else fails, http://www.earthmagic.org _.' `-' `-' Murphy's Law still works! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 08:03:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1EB16A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 08:03:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4F543D1F for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 08:03:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5P83S64042296; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:33:29 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Mark Kirkwood Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:33:24 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200506251540.50639.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <42BCF976.4060902@paradise.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <42BCF976.4060902@paradise.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1773043.6ghgElnZ4c"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506251733.24574.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4 Installer + Promise FT100TX2 = Loader crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 08:03:32 -0000 --nextPart1773043.6ghgElnZ4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:58, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > I have experienced this (since about 5.3) on a dual PIII Tyan S1834. In > my case perseverance seems to pay off - one in (approx) 10 boots will > work... Hmm strange.. I tried it a few times on an ABit AV8, once on an Epox 8KRDA+ and a few tim= es=20 on an Epox nForce2 board (I can't remember exactly which model) and it has= =20 never worked. They all have AWARD BIOSen (if it matters) I wonder if it's a problem where a memory area is overwritten because there= is=20 more info from the BIOS than expected (ie floppy, CDROM, RAID). =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1773043.6ghgElnZ4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCvQ/M5ZPcIHs/zowRAlVCAJ9BA+CGHL1asm6pZeEnpoPF29IidgCfY3uC Hfs3CQoTh6o2R0cywtpr3rU= =cG+r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1773043.6ghgElnZ4c-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 09:02:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C640316A41F for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:02:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mitch@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu) Received: from kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu (kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu [129.101.191.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C17643D1F for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:02:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mitch@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu) Received: (qmail 95765 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Jun 2005 09:02:58 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Jun 2005 09:02:58 -0000 Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 02:02:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Mitch Parks To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: <20050619184650.T6413@fledge.watson.org> Message-ID: <20050625012751.U98651@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> References: <20050617150950.F1236@kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> <20050617235352.GA80058@xor.obsecurity.org> <42B40173.6070600@crc.u-strasbg.fr> <20050619184650.T6413@fledge.watson.org> X-Radio: KUOI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 5.4-p1 crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:02:59 -0000 On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Robert Watson wrote: >> there is a PR for it : kern/74319 > > This sounds very similar to a serial console related tty bug I was > experiencing on -STABLE a few months ago, and that is believed may have been > worked around in 5.4 tweaks before release. In particular, that there are > reference counting related bugs in the 5.x tty code that are fixed by a > partial rewrite of the tty code in 6.x, but that are too large and disruptive > to merge to RELENG_5. If the problem is persisting, it may be worth trying > to merge anyway, but it is a pretty big change and would break device driver > binary compatibility, etc. What we might want to do here is wait until 6.x > has settled out a bit more, then consider merging it to 5.x once 6.x has > gotten burned in with similar workloads and continued to not illustrate the > 5.x tty reference bugs. On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Doug White wrote: > I've run out of time to debug this, unfortunately... I went back to reports I made in January about 5.3: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-January/010898.html which appears to be the same issue. I _thought_ this was resolved when I disabled HT, but maybe I was just lucky between the last reboot and the 5.4 upgrade. It sounds like there's a reasonable chance this has been squashed in code for 6.0? Since this box is already unstable, I'd be tempted to be an early 6 adopter to see if it is actually resolved. Especially so if that would be helpful to the cause. Otherwise, I guess I need to look at going back to 4.X or 5.2.1, which were completely stable on this box. I have time to deal with this over the next 6 weeks, but much less so after that. Any suggestions? Mitch Parks mitch@uidaho.edu From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 09:22:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E9F16A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:22:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF4FB43D55 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:22:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2005 09:22:17 -0000 Received: from pD952C061.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO p4-3200.local) [217.82.192.97] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 25 Jun 2005 11:22:17 +0200 X-Authenticated: #4870692 From: Andreas Rudisch To: Leland In-Reply-To: <013701c57951$34bf6ec0$0c01a8c0@Pentium166> References: <013701c57951$34bf6ec0$0c01a8c0@Pentium166> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3aX4vV5iud+osaMtDAhq" Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:22:15 +0200 Message-Id: <1119691335.526.19.camel@p4-3200.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: cvsup from 4.11-RELEASE to 4.11-RELEASE-p1 28,000 errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:22:19 -0000 --=-3aX4vV5iud+osaMtDAhq Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 23:43 -0700, Leland wrote: > I have got to be doing someting wrong, it is right in front of me and I j= ust > don't seel it. > Hope someone can help, thanks. >=20 > >From a clean install of 4.11-RELEASE with All Distributions, > cvsup-without-gui was then installed from ports. >=20 > cvsup -g -L 2 cvs-supfile will produce src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_4_11 > with 8310752 bytes > and more than 28,000 lines starting with "C src/...." >=20 > Here is my cvs-supfile: > *default host=3Dcvsup9.us.FreeBSD.org > *default tag=3DRELENG_4_11 > *default date=3D2005.03.28.15.57.00 > *default base=3D/usr/local/etc/cvsup > *default prefix=3D/usr/local/etc/cvsup > *default release=3Dcvs > *default delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > src-all > ports-all > doc-all > cvsroot-all >=20 Do not mix ports and source, it is always better to use two seperated supfiles for each. Take a look in here: /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ I am not sure why you want to use a date. If you only want to update to the security branch of FreeBSD 4.11 you do not need it. Here as an example my supfiles for 5.4 to give you an idea. ports-supfile: *default host=3Dcvsup.no.FreeBSD.org *default base=3D/var/db *default prefix=3D/usr *default release=3Dcvs tag=3D. *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress ports-all security-supfile: #cvsupfile for 5.4-security *default host=3Dcvsup.no.FreeBSD.org *default base=3D/var/db *default prefix=3D/usr *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_4 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all The tag is important, for ports it is always '.', which means you will always get the latest version. If you use this tag for the source tree too, then you will end up getting the latest -CURRENT version, the development branch. The -STABLE branch only uses the release number, e.g. RELENG_4 would be FreeBSD 4-STABLE. The -SECURITY branch, you want to get, has an additional number added, RELENG_4_11. For further information you should read this: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cutting-edge.html Andreas --=20 GnuPG key : 0xD25FCC81 | http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc Fingerprint: D182 6F22 7EEC DD4C 0F6E 564C 691B 0372 D25F CC81 --=-3aX4vV5iud+osaMtDAhq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCvSJHaRsDctJfzIERAnj/AJ0ZyaarkzkxY7GpOnanBk2GK21bJwCfcFgV ABF//JGmA4l9WPPD4gkZ3zQ= =EnvJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3aX4vV5iud+osaMtDAhq-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 09:26:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF5716A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:26:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8416943D1F for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:26:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2005 09:26:45 -0000 Received: from p5090E9EF.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO klotz.local) [80.144.233.239] by mail.gmx.net (mp015) with SMTP; 25 Jun 2005 11:26:45 +0200 X-Authenticated: #989277 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klotz.local (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5P9Qf2w001670; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:26:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nakal@nurfuerspam.de) Message-ID: <42BD2351.2060508@nurfuerspam.de> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:26:41 +0200 From: Martin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050403) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johny Mattsson References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> <42BC5353.1090807@earthmagic.org> <8d02aed005062412001c7903b3@mail.gmail.com> <42BD0926.8000804@earthmagic.org> In-Reply-To: <42BD0926.8000804@earthmagic.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: twesky@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:26:48 -0000 Johny Mattsson wrote: > Basically, the problem seems to be related to using more than one > channel on the IDE controller. This isn't a solution to my problem. I only have one hard drive. It's 120GB Seagate. We seem to have different problems, btw. I also don't think, my problem is ATA-related. It shows effect on ATA, but I don't see any modifications that have been done to ATA on -STABLE between May 26 and May 30. It is something else going on there. Today at night the system was up and the security scan showed "bad descriptors" and "bad block"-errors. This was the effect of my last experiment with latest -STABLE. (I previously thought that the file system was intact, but it's not true.) I don't know why this is called "bad block". It confuses users (at least me) making them think they have physically destroyed hard disk areas, but this is not the case, as a simple dd shows. And bad blocks will not appear after using a new kernel and disappear when I reinstall an older one and use fsck. Martin Here my dmesg (kernel date: May 26th 00:00:00): -------------------------------------------- Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 20 21:44:05 CEST 2005 nakal@klotz.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KLOTZ ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Sempron(tm) 2200+ (1499.52-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x681 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383fbff real memory = 536805376 (511 MB) avail memory = 511455232 (487 MB) ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard netsmb_dev: loaded npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xe3ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 nvidia0: mem 0xddc80000-0xddcfffff,0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff,0xde000000-0xdeffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 xl0: <3Com 3c905-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xec00-0xec3f irq 17 at device 9.0 on pci0 miibus0: on xl0 nsphy0: on miibus0 nsphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:60:08:4e:42:3b ath0: mem 0xdffd0000-0xdffdffff irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci0 ath0: mac 5.9 phy 4.3 5ghz radio 4.6 ath0: Ethernet address: 00:0f:b5:28:de:4b ath0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps ath0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps bktr0: mem 0xdddfe000-0xdddfefff irq 19 at device 11.0 on pci0 bktr0: Hauppauge Model 44804 C108 bktr0: Detected a MSP34255?-?31 at 0x80 bktr0: Hauppauge WinCast/TV, Philips PAL I tuner, msp3400c stereo. pci0: at device 11.1 (no driver attached) sym0: <875> port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xdfffe000-0xdfffefff,0xdfffff00-0xdfffffff irq 17 at device 13.0 on pci0 sym0: Tekram NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking uhci0: port 0xdc00-0xdc1f irq 21 at device 16.0 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xe000-0xe01f irq 21 at device 16.1 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xe400-0xe41f irq 21 at device 16.2 on pci0 usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 16.3 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 17.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xfc00-0xfc0f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 17.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 pcm0: port 0xd800-0xd8ff irq 22 at device 17.5 on pci0 pcm0: vr0: port 0xd400-0xd4ff mem 0xdffffd00-0xdffffdff irq 23 at device 18.0 on pci0 miibus1: on vr0 ukphy0: on miibus1 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto vr0: Ethernet address: 00:0b:6a:a7:2a:a4 acpi_button1: on acpi0 fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f4-0x3f5,0x3f2-0x3f3 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x778-0x77b,0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 0 on acpi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 joy0: port 0x200-0x207 on acpi0 speaker0: port 0x61 on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcefff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled ums0: Logitech USB Receiver, rev 1.10/9.10, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 5 buttons and Z dir. Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1499520245 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ipfw2 initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, logging unlimited ad0: 114473MB [232581/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 cd2 at sym0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 cd2: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd2: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 8) cd2: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present cd1 at sym0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 cd1: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15) cd1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present cd0 at sym0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - tray closed Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 09:49:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A47816A42F for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:49:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00E2643D1D for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2005 09:49:39 -0000 Received: from pD952C061.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO p4-3200.local) [217.82.192.97] by mail.gmx.net (mp015) with SMTP; 25 Jun 2005 11:49:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #4870692 From: Andreas Rudisch To: Leland In-Reply-To: <1119691335.526.19.camel@p4-3200.local> References: <013701c57951$34bf6ec0$0c01a8c0@Pentium166> <1119691335.526.19.camel@p4-3200.local> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3+ciAXy75L6KctxZFs+3" Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:49:37 +0200 Message-Id: <1119692977.711.3.camel@p4-3200.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: cvsup from 4.11-RELEASE to 4.11-RELEASE-p1 28,000 errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:49:41 -0000 --=-3+ciAXy75L6KctxZFs+3 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 11:22 +0200, Andreas Rudisch wrote: > On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 23:43 -0700, Leland wrote: > > I have got to be doing someting wrong, it is right in front of me and I= just > > don't seel it. > > Hope someone can help, thanks. > >=20 > > >From a clean install of 4.11-RELEASE with All Distributions, > > cvsup-without-gui was then installed from ports. > >=20 > > cvsup -g -L 2 cvs-supfile will produce src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_4_= 11 > > with 8310752 bytes > > and more than 28,000 lines starting with "C src/...." > >=20 > > Here is my cvs-supfile: > > *default host=3Dcvsup9.us.FreeBSD.org > > *default tag=3DRELENG_4_11 > > *default date=3D2005.03.28.15.57.00 > > *default base=3D/usr/local/etc/cvsup > > *default prefix=3D/usr/local/etc/cvsup > > *default release=3Dcvs > > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > *default compress > > src-all > > ports-all > > doc-all > > cvsroot-all > >=20 >=20 > Do not mix ports and source, it is always better to use two seperated > supfiles for each. Take a look in here: >=20 > /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ >=20 > I am not sure why you want to use a date. If you only want to update to > the security branch of FreeBSD 4.11 you do not need it. >=20 > Here as an example my supfiles for 5.4 to give you an idea. >=20 > ports-supfile: >=20 > *default host=3Dcvsup.no.FreeBSD.org > *default base=3D/var/db > *default prefix=3D/usr > *default release=3Dcvs tag=3D. > *default delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > ports-all > > > security-supfile: >=20 > #cvsupfile for 5.4-security > *default host=3Dcvsup.no.FreeBSD.org > *default base=3D/var/db > *default prefix=3D/usr > *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_4 > *default delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > src-all If you really want to get FreeBSD 4.11-p1, then adding the date was correct= . *default date=3D2005.03.28.15.57.00 (with RELENG_4_11 of course). > The tag is important, for ports it is always '.', which means you will > always get the latest version. If you use this tag for the source tree > too, then you will end up getting the latest -CURRENT version, the > development branch. >=20 > The -STABLE branch only uses the release number, e.g. RELENG_4 would be > FreeBSD 4-STABLE. The -SECURITY branch, you want to get, has an > additional number added, RELENG_4_11. >=20 > For further information you should read this: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cutting-edge.ht= ml Andreas --=20 GnuPG key : 0xD25FCC81 | http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc Fingerprint: D182 6F22 7EEC DD4C 0F6E 564C 691B 0372 D25F CC81 --=-3+ciAXy75L6KctxZFs+3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCvSixaRsDctJfzIERAkZIAJ9nKVXowpTumiuKJz+8XwWS/m9LpACgnjfv uVpjHdgdB6jzi3Wko1KWddU= =cQLs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3+ciAXy75L6KctxZFs+3-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 10:02:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCFF16A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:02:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fandino@ng.fadesa.es) Received: from tierra2.ng.fadesa.es (tierra2.ng.fadesa.es [195.55.55.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D029F43D4C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:02:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fandino@ng.fadesa.es) Received: from [10.20.30.2] (252.Red-81-44-76.pooles.rima-tde.net [81.44.76.252]) (authenticated bits=0) by tierra2.ng.fadesa.es (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5PA2jNM013674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:02:53 +0200 Message-ID: <42BD2BC7.6090000@ng.fadesa.es> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:02:47 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Jos=E9_M=2E_Fandi=F1o=22?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050603 X-Accept-Language: gl, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: user fandino from 81.44.76.252 Subject: kern.geom.raid3.syncs_per_sec=0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:02:57 -0000 Accidentally I set this variable to 0 and it causes a hard lock (FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p2) could someone check if this reproducible in their test machines so I can open a pr? /-------/ Geom name: datos State: COMPLETE Components: 3 Flags: ROUND-ROBIN GenID: 0 SyncID: 3 ID: 3217021940 Providers: 1. Name: raid3/datos Mediasize: 311491352576 (290G) Sectorsize: 1024 Mode: r1w1e0 Consumers: 1. Name: ad4s2 Mediasize: 155745676800 (145G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 State: ACTIVE Flags: DIRTY GenID: 0 SyncID: 3 Number: 2 Type: PARITY 2. Name: ad5s2 Mediasize: 155745676800 (145G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 State: ACTIVE Flags: DIRTY GenID: 0 SyncID: 3 Number: 0 Type: DATA 3. Name: ad6s2 Mediasize: 155745676800 (145G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 State: ACTIVE Flags: DIRTY GenID: 0 SyncID: 3 Number: 1 Type: DATA From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 10:24:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E83916A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:24:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-2.paradise.net.nz (bm-2a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.58.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5350843D49 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:24:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (smtp-1a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.32.194]) by linda-2.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IIM00738Y8MH8@linda-2.paradise.net.nz> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:24:22 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-14-110.paradise.net.nz [218.101.14.110]) by smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4864828BE; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:24:21 +1200 (NZST) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:24:19 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <200506251733.24574.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Daniel O'Connor Message-id: <42BD30D3.4000203@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050511) References: <200506251540.50639.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <42BCF976.4060902@paradise.net.nz> <200506251733.24574.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4 Installer + Promise FT100TX2 = Loader crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:24:24 -0000 Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Hmm strange.. > I tried it a few times on an ABit AV8, once on an Epox 8KRDA+ and a few times > on an Epox nForce2 board (I can't remember exactly which model) and it has > never worked. They all have AWARD BIOSen (if it matters) > > I wonder if it's a problem where a memory area is overwritten because there is > more info from the BIOS than expected (ie floppy, CDROM, RAID). > Sounds like a promising possibility (good pun too) - as removing the RAID card (in my case a Promise TX2000) certainly makes it go away. Some other observations: 5.0 and 5.1 install CDs boot fine for me (have not tried 5.2), it is only 5.3 and 5.4 (also today 6.0 CURRENT) that crash (reg dump ) or reboot immediately. That fact that it *sometimes* works is interesting - I am curious to see if you can reproduce this (say try 10 - 15 times). Cheers Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 11:57:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AD816A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:57:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858C843D1F for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:57:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5PBvH7E043348; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:27:17 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Mark Kirkwood Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:26:59 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200506251540.50639.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200506251733.24574.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <42BD30D3.4000203@paradise.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <42BD30D3.4000203@paradise.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1390593.HQt8KTtFJ4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506252127.07387.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4 Installer + Promise FT100TX2 = Loader crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:57:26 -0000 --nextPart1390593.HQt8KTtFJ4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:54, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > > I wonder if it's a problem where a memory area is overwritten because > > there is more info from the BIOS than expected (ie floppy, CDROM, RAID). > > Sounds like a promising possibility (good pun too) - as removing the :) > RAID card (in my case a Promise TX2000) certainly makes it go away. I find even disconnecting the drives so no RAID is detected works - ie it's= =20 not the presence of the card per se that is a problem. > Some other observations: > > 5.0 and 5.1 install CDs boot fine for me (have not tried 5.2), it is > only 5.3 and 5.4 (also today 6.0 CURRENT) that crash (reg dump ) or > reboot immediately. Hmm I see.. I know it works OK with 4. as I have installed plenty o= f=20 systems like that. I will try some earlier 5.x releases (say, boot only ISO= s)=20 and see how it goes. > That fact that it *sometimes* works is interesting - I am curious to see > if you can reproduce this (say try 10 - 15 times). OK, well I'll try it a few times and see :) Thanks for your input. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1390593.HQt8KTtFJ4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCvUaT5ZPcIHs/zowRAo1UAJ4myFtfSATlEQyptO8lD55lnAzPwACfWvLQ sOfU+7OP22ddYBvr8uE/pCQ= =1cLC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1390593.HQt8KTtFJ4-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 16:14:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEE316A41C; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:14:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AA943D48; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:14:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id j5PGFXb44088; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:15:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Warren" , "Daniel O'Connor" Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:14:26 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 In-Reply-To: <200506242117.29688.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:14:46 -0000 Warren, Why are you building xfree86? FreeBSD 5.4 uses Xorg. It's just about the same code just different licensing. I don't think the FreeBSD core is bothering to keep the xfree86 port working on FreeBSD 5.X just FreeBSD 4.11 Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Warren >Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 4:17 AM >To: Daniel O'Connor >Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed > > >On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 9:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote: >> > ln >> > -s >> > >/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfre >e86/os-su >> >pp ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c >> > rm -f xf86drmSL.c >> > ln >> > -s >> > >/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfre >e86/os-su >> >pp ort/linux/drm/xf86drmSL.c xf86drmSL.c >> > make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop >> > *** Error code 2 >> > >> > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/lib/GL. >> > *** Error code 1 >> > >> > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri. >> >> What commanad did you run? > >portupgrade -aDk -m BATCH=yes >> What version of FreeBSD are you running? >5.4-STABLE >> When did you last cvsup your ports tree? >Just before doing PortUpgrade before sending the 1st email >> Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING? >cant say as i did. > >-- >Yours Sincerely >Shinjii >http://www.shinji.nq.nu >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 18:10:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1C816A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:10:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDB043D48 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:10:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: from dialup84116-176.ip.peterstar.net ([84.204.116.176] helo=doom.homeunix.org) by voodoo.oberon.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DmF5u-000KzZ-TN for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:10:11 +0200 Received: from doom.homeunix.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doom.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5PI5tmv001642; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:06:15 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: (from igor@localhost) by doom.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j5PI4xos001641; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:04:59 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igor) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:04:59 +0400 From: Igor Pokrovsky To: "Balgansuren.B" Message-ID: <20050625180459.GA1609@doom.homeunix.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Balgansuren.B" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20050624021338.60A5743D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050624021338.60A5743D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Buffalo WLI-PCI-G54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:10:27 -0000 On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 02:13:38AM +0000, Balgansuren.B wrote: > Hello, > > I have driver disk for the Windows 98/Me/2000/XP of the Buffalo > WLI-PCI-G54 wireless NIC. > > If possible I want to know "ndiscvt" command convert Windows driver > to FreeBSD driver module. Cool, hey anybody write vxd2ko.exe. I'd surely get use of such thing ;-) -ip -- Any time you wish to demonstrate something, the number of faults is proportional to the number of viewers. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 18:25:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A7D16A41C; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:25:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736D943D1F; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:25:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id DAF89A19; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:25:14 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:25:14 -0500 To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: <20050625182514.GA635@soaustin.net> References: <200506242117.29688.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Warren , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:25:16 -0000 On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:14:26AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Why are you building xfree86? FreeBSD 5.4 uses Xorg. It's > just about the same code just different licensing. I don't think the > FreeBSD core is bothering to keep the xfree86 port working on FreeBSD 5.X > just FreeBSD 4.11 I'm sorry, but this is wrong on almost all counts. The default X server that is installed by the base for 5.4 is indeed xorg, but both XFree and xorg are being actively maintained. A great deal of work goes into keeping both X servers working on the active source branches. As for the licensing meta-fiasco, see the FAQ or use Google to find out more; this has been hashed and re-hashed and re-re-hashed here, and in other venues, many times. mcl From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 18:32:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6B516A41C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:32:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richw@richw.org) Received: from smtp3.Stanford.EDU (smtp3.Stanford.EDU [171.67.16.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721D743D48 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:32:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richw@richw.org) Received: from whodunit.richw.org (SW-90-716-276-1.Stanford.EDU [171.66.155.243]) by smtp3.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5PIWZ2N027766 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:32:35 -0700 Received: from whodunit.richw.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whodunit.richw.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5PIWXFF081339; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:32:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from richw@whodunit.richw.org) Received: (from richw@localhost) by whodunit.richw.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5PIWXF7081338; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:32:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from richw) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:32:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Rich Wales To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <42BD0926.8000804@earthmagic.org> Message-ID: <20050625182203.R79928.richw@whodunit.richw.org> References: <8d02aed00506181404642100b9@mail.gmail.com> <42BC5353.1090807@earthmagic.org> <8d02aed005062412001c7903b3@mail.gmail.com> <42BD0926.8000804@earthmagic.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: ATA_DMA errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:32:36 -0000 I had a READ_DMA timeout situation which I'm pretty sure was related to a drive problem. I'm running 5.3-RELEASE-p5 on an older machine (333 MHz AMD K6). The 20 GB hard drive in this system periodically, but only occasionally, gave READ_DMA timeout errors. These errors sometimes cited identical block (LBA) numbers from one time to the next. I tried running the system with the case open, in case it was an overheating problem, but this had no effect. I considered replacing the power supply, but I never got around to doing this. Finally, about a week ago, I copied the entire system to a new hard drive. So far, I haven't had even one READ_DMA error since going to the new hard drive. At least in this one case, it seems fairly certain that the problem has something to do with a particular hard drive. Curiously, I did =not= get any READ_DMA errors while I was making a full backup of the old drive in preparation for copying the data onto the new drive. Rich Wales richw@richw.org http://www.richw.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 21:46:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC59816A41C; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:46:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B71A43D4C; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:46:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id j5PLkqb45126; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:46:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Mark Linimon" Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:45:45 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 In-Reply-To: <20050625182514.GA635@soaustin.net> Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Warren , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:46:07 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Mark Linimon >Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:25 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: Daniel O'Connor; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Warren; >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed > > >On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:14:26AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> Why are you building xfree86? FreeBSD 5.4 uses Xorg. It's >> just about the same code just different licensing. I don't think the >> FreeBSD core is bothering to keep the xfree86 port working on >FreeBSD 5.X >> just FreeBSD 4.11 > >I'm sorry, but this is wrong on almost all counts. The default X >server that is installed by the base for 5.4 is indeed xorg, but >both XFree and xorg are being actively maintained. I'm sorry to step on the toes of the port maintainer but instead of complaining about it you need to respond to the realitites. And the reality is this: ln -s /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-su pport/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c rm -f xf86drmSL.c ln -s /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-su pport/linux/drm/xf86drmSL.c xf86drmSL.c make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/lib/GL. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri. If you really believe that XFree86 is being actively maintained, then answer the original poster, quit bitching about what I'm saying. What do you think maintainence is? >A great deal of >work goes into keeping both X servers working on the active source >branches. > The 4.X source branch isn't really active anymore. >As for the licensing meta-fiasco, see the FAQ or use Google to find >out more; this has been hashed and re-hashed and re-re-hashed here, >and in other venues, many times. > If the licensng was a non-issue then xorg wouldn't exist. Personally I deplore the move to xorg based on the simple requirement of xfree86 for recognition in their new license - this was the same bunch of bullcrap that the GPL bigots were using to throw rocks at the BSD license years ago. But the plain fact of the matter is that the Open Source community isn't going to tolerate what xfree86 tried doing, and the users of open source, which is you and I, are not served by splitting development between 2 forks of X Windows. The amount of new video hardware that is coming out and needs drivers is increasing, drivers are getting more and more complex to write, and manufacturers are just as bad as they always have been about assisting in video driver development. The sooner that xfree86 goes away and dies the better for the community in the long run. We just had a big thread on making FreeBSD easier to use for the average person - and now your claiming that it's a -good- thing to have two completely different X Windows distributions?!?! How exactly does this HELP with the complexity issue - unless the goal is to make FreeBSD even more complicated? Ted From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 22:39:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4197E16A41F for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:39:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-06.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DB6A43D1F for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:39:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: (qmail 16376 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2005 22:39:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warren.shinji.nq.nu) (202.161.9.197) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 25 Jun 2005 22:39:34 -0000 From: Warren To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 08:37:07 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506260837.08911.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:39:37 -0000 On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 7:45 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > But the plain fact of the matter is that the Open Source community > isn't going to tolerate what xfree86 tried doing, and the users of > open source, which is you and I, are not served by splitting development > between 2 forks of X Windows. The amount of new video hardware that is > coming out and needs drivers is increasing, drivers are getting more and > more complex to write, and manufacturers are just as bad as they always > have been about assisting in video driver development. The sooner that > xfree86 goes away and dies the better for the community in the long > run. I dont want to get in the middle of a pissing contest yous seem to have going as to who is right or wrong or which X should be kept. The fact is i simply wished to know why the pkg was failing and how to correct it, nothing more nothing less. -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 22:51:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4DAB16A420; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:51:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD4B43D1F; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:51:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 8BE302619; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:51:04 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:51:04 -0500 To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: <20050625225104.GA7022@soaustin.net> References: <20050625182514.GA635@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Warren Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:51:06 -0000 On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:45:45PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > I'm sorry to step on the toes of the port maintainer but instead > of complaining about it you need to respond to the realitites. In general I would rather do that than argue, yes. > make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop > *** Error code 2 > > If you really believe that XFree86 is being actively maintained, then > answer the original poster, quit bitching about what I'm saying. Actively maintained means having updates tested on the build cluster and committed when the majority of ports upgrade successfully. It does not mean every port necessarily is going to work in every single configuration, since there are a large number of interdependent parts. Have you filed a PR about this? query-pr shows no match for 'drm'. fwiw, the most recent update to x11/XFree86-4/Makefile was on 2005/06/15 02:39:58 to update to 4.5.0 and shows that 8 different PRs were closed by the commit. > The 4.X source branch isn't really active anymore. This is news to me. AFAIK we are still requesting all our port maintainers to keep things working on 4.X whenever possible. > Personally I deplore the move to xorg based on the simple requirement > of xfree86 for recognition in their new license Sigh. I'm really not going to go over this for the Nth time on the mailing lists. The licensing issue was the final straw in a long-running situation that had more to do with who was able to commit what to the XFree repository. Please go do the research on the web, this has a years-long history behind it. > the users of open source, which is you and I, are not served by > splitting development between 2 forks of X Windows. You are entitled to your opinion. Others disagree, and quite strongly so. There are multiple versions of many other things in the ports tree, as well. > We just had a big thread on making FreeBSD easier to use for the > average person - and now your claiming that it's a -good- thing > to have two completely different X Windows distributions?!?! As long as we have people who are demanding that both servers work: yes. If people want something that's the easiest to use, then they should go with the current default. We already have a group of users who have no wish to change to xorg (for their own reasons), and as long as that is the case and there are maintainer cycles to do it, then we'll do both. Finally, the initial question would have probably gotten a better answer if posted to the freebsd-x11 mailing list, where the maintainers of the X servers tend to hang out, and any further discussion of these issues ought to migrate there as well. mcl From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 23:19:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A367016A41C; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:19:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4081E43D48; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:19:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id j5PNJub45505; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:19:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Mark Linimon" Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:18:49 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 In-Reply-To: <20050625225104.GA7022@soaustin.net> Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Warren , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:19:16 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Linimon [mailto:linimon@lonesome.com] >Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 3:51 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: Mark Linimon; Daniel O'Connor; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Warren; >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed > > >On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:45:45PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> I'm sorry to step on the toes of the port maintainer but instead >> of complaining about it you need to respond to the realitites. > >In general I would rather do that than argue, yes. > >> make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop >> *** Error code 2 >> >> If you really believe that XFree86 is being actively maintained, then >> answer the original poster, quit bitching about what I'm saying. > >Actively maintained means having updates tested on the build cluster >and committed when the majority of ports upgrade successfully. It does >not mean every port necessarily is going to work in every single >configuration, since there are a large number of interdependent parts. > >Have you filed a PR about this? query-pr shows no match for 'drm'. > It's not a problem I have since I use xorg on 5.X As a matter of fact I just installed xfree86 a week ago, from scratch, on a new 4.11 system, from a ports tree that I cvsupped, with no problems. So I don't have an answer for the OP as to why his xfree86 setup doesen't build. But I have no problems in building xorg on FreeBSD 5, the OP indicated he was using FreeBSD 5, and FreeBSD 5 comes with a prebuilt binary of xorg. So a very logical question is to ask the OP why he is going at cross-currents and using xfree86 on 5. If his answer had been something that indicated that xfree86 was not a dependency for what he was doing, then once again, the quickest fix would be to simply tell him to stop using xfree86 and build xorg. I don't have any particular bias against xfree86. I do not agree with fracturing the X development effort between 2 virtually identical projects - but as I didn't have any vote in that happening, I am forced to deal with the aftermath. And so I'm going to do that from a self-interest point of view. And the best solution for me and for just about everyone in Open Source is to choose between xfree86 or xorg, and for just about everyone to choose the same choice, and let the other project die off from neglect. The FreeBSD Project chose xorg, so I will chose xorg. Maybe they chose wrong and xorg will die and xfree86 will continue - if that happens I'll deal with it then. If there was significant "product differentiation" between xfree86 and xorg, then there would be a reason to keep both. Right now there is not and with the difficulty in X development, there won't soon be. >fwiw, the most recent update to x11/XFree86-4/Makefile was on >2005/06/15 02:39:58 to update to 4.5.0 and shows that 8 different >PRs were closed by the commit. > >> The 4.X source branch isn't really active anymore. > >This is news to me. AFAIK we are still requesting all our port >maintainers to keep things working on 4.X whenever possible. > OK, then schedule another RELEASE. If you knew anything about the history of FreeBSD you would know that 4.X should have ended years ago. I know Rod Grimes personally and he was one of the founders, and he said that what happened with 4 was never the way it was intended. Here's the litmus test - would you pull a popular port if it breaks on 4 but not on 5? 'nuff said. > >> the users of open source, which is you and I, are not served by >> splitting development between 2 forks of X Windows. > >You are entitled to your opinion. Others disagree, and quite strongly >so. The FreeBSD project agrees with me, if they did not then they would have rewritten the installer to make it optional which one to pick. > >Finally, the initial question would have probably gotten a better >answer if posted to the freebsd-x11 mailing list, where the maintainers >of the X servers tend to hang out, and any further discussion of these >issues ought to migrate there as well. > I agree with that. Ted