From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 10 19:27:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEF6C55 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.t@mail.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [74.208.4.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9A534A for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-us.mail.com ([172.19.198.49]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmxus001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LvVYt-1UYz1J18S3-010aFd for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:27:18 +0200 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2013 19:27:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO blazon-pc.rw.local) [78.84.232.174] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us009) with SMTP; 10 Apr 2013 15:27:17 -0400 X-Authenticated: #76218138 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18Pfs4yuEMPvsCnZ9I3ZSieBgnHBqrlQEYbYVncub 3b3iUpgC8kjr38 Message-ID: <5165BD13.7090308@mail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:27:15 +0300 From: Jeff Tipton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When will binary packages be back? References: <201304101739.LAA29126@lariat.net> <201304101519390199.00EB2234@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <201304101519390199.00EB2234@sentry.24cl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:27:21 -0000 On 04/10/2013 22:19, Mike. wrote: > On 4/10/2013 at 11:39 AM Brett Glass wrote: > > |For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long > |waits and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating > |small systems. But even though the development server security > |breach is now long past, there are no published binary packages for > |FreeBSD 9.1. When will they be back? > ============= > > > Additionally, for me, building from ports for me has tended to pull in > many, many X-windows support files when they are not needed. > > Specifically, I run a non-windowing system using command line tools. > When I tried to compile Samba from ports, I finally killed the 'make' > stage after three hours of compiling X-windows stuff. > > Nowhere had I ever spcified that the system was running X or any other > windowing system. Yet, there it was, three hours of wasted time. > > I never had such issues when installing from packages. > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" @Mike Then you must have selected some non-default options that have pulled in those as dependencies. You can remove them by: make rmconfig or, including all dependent ports: make rmconfig-recursive -Jeff