From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 18:22:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51E916A4CE for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:22:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web90205.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web90205.mail.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.94.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B551943D49 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:22:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hardcodeharry@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 61772 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Mar 2005 18:22:49 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=EdNauvAAU2fmB5YNwzZOMFOpF523YAJnqR8ncXg6nGR6etX5l8H5sJYu0nurKJ5Gcw+uCF4kO7Z6jjd2Kat+7yKNnMyWrvm5Z4GP/L1FTQTTw2hG/LS3N2/xKJhbWw3zc/fs4LD2QKBjYP2SGs7l8+bdrP3WEjIoo4aJOiuiOaU= ; Message-ID: <20050318182249.61770.qmail@web90205.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.47.116.25] by web90205.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:22:49 PST Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:22:49 -0800 (PST) From: Boris Spirialitious To: Chuck Robey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: 6667 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:22:50 -0000 --- Chuck Robey wrote: > Boris Spirialitious wrote: > > --- Boris Spirialitious > > wrote: > > > >>--- Matthew Seaman > > >>wrote: > >> > >>>On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:50:22AM -0800, Boris > >>>Spirialitious wrote: > >>> > >>>>When opteron support start for Freebsd? I have > >>> > >>>4.9. > >>> > >>>>is supported? Or 4.11 better? I can't use 5.x. > >>> > >>>Well, AMD64 support as a tier-1 platform only > came > >>>in with 5.x, so > >>>you're S.O.L. if you have to use a 4.x release > >>>version. > >>> > >>> > >>>>Will a i386 disk boot on opteron system? Can I > >>>>use same disk image for intel and amd MBs? Any > >>>>big problems? > >>> > >>>You can generally run AMD64 machines in IA32 mode > >> > >>-- > >> > >>>but what would be > >>>the point? All you get then is a machine that > >> > >>costs > >> > >>>more than an > >>>equivalent IA32 box and that probably performs > >>>worse. > >> > >>That is very curious to say. Isn't the advantage > >>of Opteron the superior IO architecture? There is > >>not much advantage with 64 bit computing. What is > >>faster about it? Pointers are bigger, so it use > >>more cache for less. NOt much 64bit math in > >>OS. Why do you say it will perform worse? > > Boris, I am sure you realize that a great deal of > the 64 bit IO > architecture is leveraged from the 64 bit > instructions set, that allows > things like 64 bit fetches. Will there be a gain > without using the 64 > bit instruction set? Yes. Will it be as large? > No. I do not see that. Most adapter card registers only 32bits, and PCIX dma is 64bits anyway, so what 64bit fetches are there? Larger pointers take up more cache space. Benchmark show that 64bit pointers slow memory operation. So the difference overall may be small. I not argue about 64bit maybe faster. But the hypertransport architecture may be enough to make the cost worthwhile. Boris __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/