From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 27 08:35:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040E27E6 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@aboutsupport.com) Received: from mail-ea0-f175.google.com (mail-ea0-f175.google.com [209.85.215.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9936DE for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f175.google.com with SMTP id d1so722672eab.20 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:35:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=Z8PH03tqIUc+tG/czkZf/UNaWKH7tdq7Cbkr196qAxI=; b=kevqZH4luxU6PhZex218YP32iEZ1A1rcU2qmsKLvqihFImWnVKz6C5en6PSBkSPN91 59FoVbspOgQY1dGjmz0LO5HIWLwSd+hcUVcvqkujwEO56wyT17UqPm1B/JBjwJastSBS vgFKwfWC41mKfCmBkxp5tiW4YurbtfB+sskg5OTJPWOaKgqqAIQ2YJRz4PhcInvyR3lb fxaqV8/w5g0fC3eBTvCD7JiM6CA8WqSYxoOpMdibYtXTI20ZgH2+TUHnwz59I0OTV1EI TRrGZwiFUMNb1HT6VX+ITGk6zCAEpDMXBgxDaScUNgJgCtZtKyb0p7x0IAOPNYM2QwMO jFyA== X-Received: by 10.14.193.131 with SMTP id k3mr38506955een.45.1359275708724; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:35:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.30.151] ([95.87.236.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e2sm10221589eeo.8.2013.01.27.00.35.07 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:35:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5104E6B7.9070302@aboutsupport.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 10:35:03 +0200 From: "Zyumbilev, Peter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Cronjob Cvsup -> What? References: <20130127001805.97F0119B@hub.freebsd.org> <44d2wrw8fs.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44d2wrw8fs.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl1hBhsO8sR3IZBPOLAe81XL/7cocH/hdbv7gj1+Qw5fx6aLwZ4c5D3+DxEghhXhcka5kfr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:35:17 -0000 On 27/01/2013 06:34, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > If you needed version control features on your ports tree (especially if > you were regularly contributing changes to ports), getting and updating > your tree through subversion would have some extra features you might > want, but it doesn't sound as if that is the case for you. > > Unless you have a specific reason why portsnap doesn't fit your use > case, it's definitely the way to go for just keeping a ports tree > updated regularly. Last 10 years I am using cvsup. Any good guide for the transition to subversion ? For ports is easy(portsnap), but I for system update I still have problems saying good bye to old habits and I still use cvsup...:-) Peter