From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 22 13:40:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73F57AB6 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (ip-2-1-0-2.r03.asbnva02.us.ce.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:0:5000::16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 275C1DE6 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonderland.m5p.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2MDeIpR035895 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:40:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Message-ID: <532D92C2.1030809@m5p.com> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:40:18 -0400 From: George Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hello fdclose References: <201403181404.52197.jhb@freebsd.org> <201403191523.33275.jhb@freebsd.org> <86zjkkr5ma.fsf@nine.des.no> <86fvmbzlbn.fsf@nine.des.no> <86mwgj7aru.fsf@nine.des.no> <1395422417.81853.14.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <98DE2314-1233-4C12-8346-5D1240B9BAAF@bsdimp.com> <86a9cj6oo5.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86a9cj6oo5.fsf@nine.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 10.100.0.3 X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:::1]); Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:40:23 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:40:25 -0000 On 03/21/14 20:51, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Warner Losh writes: >> It does serve a useful purpose, though, which is why it has endured. >> If you were to have a man page that said ‘Putc(3) returns …’ then the >> automated tools (and web links) that find Putc.3 wouldn’t be able to since >> it doesn’t exist. > > Moreover - if FreeBSD were written in Pascal, it might not matter, but > in C, _exit(2) and _Exit(3) are two different functions. > > (I'm sure there are other examples without a leading underscore) > > (eww, starting a sentence with a non-alphabetic character would be even > worse...) > > DES > Etc., etc., etc. Wouldn't it be more productive to spend this effort on recasting the sentence in question so that it doesn't start with a word that starts with a small letter? -- George