From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Apr 21 06:15:42 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA07290
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 06:15:42 -0700
Received: from dtr.com (dtr.rain.com [204.119.8.19])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA07283
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 06:15:40 -0700
From: bmk@dtr.com
Received: (from bmk@localhost) by dtr.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id GAA29467; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 06:07:06 -0700
Message-Id: <199504211307.GAA29467@dtr.com>
Subject: Re: Strange named error?
To: nc@ain.charm.net (Network Coordinator)
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 06:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950421003651.14225A-100000@ain.charm.net> from "Network Coordinator" at Apr 21, 95 00:42:29 am
Reply-To: bmk@dtr.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 607       
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> I have been getting this odd error message from named

> Lame delegation to '131.67.198.in-addr.arpa' from [199.2.252.10] (server 
> for '131.67.198.in-addr.arpa'?) on query on name '36.131.67.198.in-addr.arpa'

> I'm not sure it really causes a problem, but its kind of strange that 
> named thinks its significant enough to mention. 199.2.252.10 is 
> ns2.sprintlink.net.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong - but I believe that this is telling you
that 199.2.252.10 thinks that you should be the authoritative server for
zone 131.67.198.in-addr.arpa - and your BIND information doesn't agree
with this.