From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 17 12:07:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77761065673 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959128FC2E for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:07:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: by yxe11 with SMTP id 11so1331428yxe.3 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:07:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:received :message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :importance; bh=4ZQwU56Zijuu4WSj+wc2Kav32teDd0RMITyyW/rlcDo=; b=qN6kkbK+SFygLMkA3FZpamiYmQc3COWnHL2aFEk8v8b9E3gP77FbjZz6lDiNgk4g86 8k0b8lygZ5+XeMGN5vcnPevGLr87P3wiLm8t8b0Ny7hZWax1jPp0Pe8t2NivfKnx+Tja sK1gTKaTjQxASYjtn4PzT2IJc6wyU6n8B4aPo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-priority:importance; b=uCANF5AXwFc0PvUSZ46ZWNOPKee4tKg66Ys6NHwtAxX0AiSHJcIBKwkMH4TmA23xyL H0rKYbV78PQvAXOfX1LbE1VXeqh4zjQRVzKIpvDsyIsjx4/gBLYXUHkvbDDyigKvdPi1 VbJz8+GFGG7VFK3ZIOPnXRtFDOljlj4QEQBQA= Received: by 10.90.101.17 with SMTP id y17mr805174agb.80.1247832474344; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:07:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cygnus.homeunix.com ([189.71.108.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 36sm28391agc.20.2009.07.17.05.07.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Nenhum_de_Nos Received: by cygnus.homeunix.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id 03E69B8722; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:07:48 -0300 (BRT) Received: from 189.92.202.0 (SquirrelMail authenticated user matheus) by cygnus.homeunix.com with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:07:48 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <0a394f735684111014877d2b39783693.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20090717010813.03477b27.matheus@eternamente.info> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:07:48 -0300 (BRT) From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: gstripe problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:07:56 -0000 On Fri, July 17, 2009 07:20, Ivan Voras wrote: > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >> hail, >> >> I have a problem with gstripe on today stable. I created this stripe >> using a bit more old stable (two weeks tops) and it can't be read on old >> stable (from 30/12/2008). So I recreated in 8-BETA1 and I could mount >> and see files. When I tried again on 30/12/2008 stable and todays, on >> PII machine (i386): > > So your problem is that: > > a) you created a gstripe array on a recent STABLE (two weeks ago) and it > was fine > b) you tried to use it with an old STABLE (30.12.2008.) and it didn't work > c) you tried to use it with today's STABLE and it didn't work > d) it works with 8-BETA1 > ? its quite this. the stripe just vanishes when I try to see it in any stable. and if I create in stable, a reboot makes it go way :( > The only thing that comes to my mind is that during your tests you have > changed the stripe size, making the file system data unusable (and > unmountable). > >> [root@xxx ~]# gstripe status >> Name Status Components >> stripe/stripe0 UP ad4s2 >> ad6s2 > >> mount: /dev/stripe/stripe0 : Invalid argument >> >> on 8-BETA1 it works, but can't create stripe on it and use on this >> stable box though. the stripe already has files ! so anything weird >> could make me loose my data ... > > Are you saying you won't use 8-BETA1 because you fear there may be > problems with it? If so, you shouldn't worry so much - 8-CURRENT is very > stable. I know it is. 8-CURRENT is great really (I use it in other places). my main concern is that this is a server with mail/dns/dhcp/apache/some other services I forgot and changing to 8-BETA may need to recompile all things, and need time I don't have right now ... can I just update and use all software compiled for 7.1-PRERELEASE ? thanks, matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style