From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 21:39:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4081065678 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A208FC08 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadj38 with SMTP id j38so9855109iad.13 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:39:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PaNRnvTcBWM+hBGwD7sdJLoLJps5mUAHiGiFiKHbLRY=; b=Vv8QxCHcqehUAS0lxZa5EevEpTI9t5XfcohQwj1ZTYvhAx3FNV5wsVVJkXzTmiNxT/ bNGCLFUw8U+5DbMtwLAQdK53Y/JWg+KMlMcx8nb43BKSGBRpizjJtis7HazhPFUPX35O 6wEoqCUKP3+PoVgOdkZWad9k5ODWTqJBm9plo= Received: by 10.42.73.138 with SMTP id s10mr19676040icj.38.1326145172283; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:39:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.207.7 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:39:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20120109143726.GA3185@lonesome.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:39:01 +0000 Message-ID: To: Arnaud Lacombe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Mark Linimon , FreeBSD current mailing list Subject: Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:39:33 -0000 On 9 January 2012 21:06, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon wro= te: >>>>> On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >>>>> So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on >>>>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being "9.0 RELEASE" (with >>>>> checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually >>>>> release images per-se ? >>>> >>>> Excellent! =A0You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative= , >>>> sentences that have no qualifying phrases. >>>> >>> FWIW, this was more a sarcastic sentence pointing out that FreeBSD is >>> currently officially distributing non-released build in a directory >>> which might leads users to consider this is the official release, thus >>> misleading them. >> >> So, a pointless email. >> > as is linimon@'s. > >>>> 9.0 will be *released* when and only when the official, signed, email >>>> goes out. =A0Everything up until that point is preparation. >>>> >>> ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I >>> see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory. Do you expect me to consult >>> freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the announce, the hash of >>> the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has been released ? No, I see 9.0 >>> ISOs in a `releases' directory, I assume it has been released, >>> whatever your spreading process is. >>> >>> Btw, none of the CHECKSUMS files are signed on the FTP. >> >> Have you checked the website? The latest supported release is clearly >> specified, right in the middle of the home page. >> >> Please don't tell me you'd look in ftp before checking the website. =A0I >> think you're just looking to nitpick. >> > I did look the ftp before the website. It is an irrelevant source of > information as I assume none of that stuff to be up-to-date. re@ has > an unimpressive track record about information update. Ridiculous assumption. I don't know who in re@ upset you so much, but you seriously need to get over it and stop trying to prove they're idiots. Constructive feedback is welcome, deliberately finding fault with strange things is not. Chris