From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr 20 18: 1:31 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from cygnus.rush.net (cygnus.rush.net [209.45.245.133])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 518F615065; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 18:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bright@rush.net)
Received: from localhost (bright@localhost)
	by cygnus.rush.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA12380;
	Tue, 20 Apr 1999 20:14:29 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 20:14:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>
To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Cc: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>,
	Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>, Wilko Bulte <wilko@yedi.iaf.nl>,
	current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) 
In-Reply-To: <199904202342.QAA02679@rah.star-gate.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990420201027.11384d-100000@cygnus.rush.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote:

> What does this patch fix?

NFS clients getting blocks of 0x00 in the cache.

try to link a large object over NFS without the patches, you'll see
what i mean.

Matt, i'm going to test your patches now, I really appreciate the work
and explanations you've given as to the problem and the solution you've
devised.  If anyone's gonna find a NFS bug.... :)

I'm impressed with the changes you're proposing for the VM system
and was wondering if these patches include the work for directory
caching you've been working on.

Thanks, 
-Alfred 

> 
> 	Tnks!
> 	Amancio
> 
> -- 
> 
>  Amancio Hasty
>  hasty@star-gate.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message