Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 22:22:29 -0800 (PST) From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: jimd@dutton4.it.siu.edu Cc: taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSd.ORG, burgess@cynjut.neonramp.com Subject: Re: Tcl7.6 Scripts? Message-ID: <199704030622.WAA17166@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970402184214.205B-100000@dutton4.it.siu.edu> (message from Jim Dutton on Wed, 2 Apr 1997 18:52:15 -0600 (CST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* I consider "my" FreeBSD-2.2 system to be "adequate" for ANY port that is * distributed, where the port files do not indicate a requirement for * something that I don't already have. If a port requires a specific version * of BSD-PORT-MK, then there should be a note in the port files, to that * affect. Your system (at least bsd.port.mk) is not the release version of FreeBSD-2.2 (or 2.2.1, which is identical as far as ports go). tcl-7.6 is buildable on 2.2R. Believe me, or how did I build the package that's now sitting on ftp.freebsd.org's packages-2.2 directory? ;) Moreover, as long as you take ports from 2.2-RELEASE/ports (or ports-2.2, the extracted tree) on ftp.freebsd.org, they should all build for 2.2R. If you want to build ports from ports-current, you may need the -current bsd.port.mk (which may or may not be enough to build a particular port, of course, if the rest of your system is not -current). Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704030622.WAA17166>