From owner-freebsd-standards Tue Mar 11 19:11: 1 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE6037B401 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:11:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from espresso.bsdmike.org (espresso.bsdmike.org [65.39.129.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F3843F3F for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:11:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@espresso.bsdmike.org) Received: by espresso.bsdmike.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 0A3949C58; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:57:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:57:53 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CFR: add widely accepted _ISOC99_SOURCE Message-ID: <20030311215753.G88290@espresso.bsdmike.org> References: <20030310061548.GA85361@nagual.pp.ru> <20030310104434.P70629@espresso.bsdmike.org> <20030311144501.GA364@nagual.pp.ru> <20030311104943.A88290@espresso.bsdmike.org> <20030311164240.GA2305@nagual.pp.ru> <20030311113754.C88290@espresso.bsdmike.org> <20030311175402.GA3885@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030311175402.GA3885@nagual.pp.ru>; from ache@nagual.pp.ru on Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 08:54:02PM +0300 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andrey A. Chernov writes: > 3) The question is: should we even support _ISOC99_SOURCE in its current > Linux form, i.e. as "turn C99 extensions on"? I don't think it's particularly useful, so I would say no. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message